题名

應用PPGIS於里山地景變遷分析：以吉哈拉艾為例

并列篇名

Applying PPGIS in Satoyama Landscape Change Analysis: A Case of Ciharaay

DOI

10.6128/CP.202112_48(4).0001

作者

陳品何(Pin-Ho Chen)；趙芝良(Chih-Liang Chao)；藍姆路．卡造(Kacaw Lameru)；鍾明光(Ming-Kuang Chung)；徐霈馨(Pei-Hsin Hsu)；董景生(Gene-Sheng Tung)；盧道杰(Dau-Jye Lu)

关键词

土地利用與地表變遷 ； 參與式研究 ； 水稻田梯田 ； 友善環境農法 ； 生物多樣性 ； 生態旅遊 ； Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) ； Participatory research ； Terraced paddy rice fields ； Environmental friendly farming ； Biodiversity ； Ecotourism

期刊名称

都市與計劃

卷期/出版年月

48卷4期（2021 / 12 / 31）

页次

347 - 375

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

近年來隨著里山倡議在臺灣的推動與蓬勃發展，里山地景變遷機制的了解也越受到重視，然卻少有可搭配的土地利用資料，以貼切詮釋地景變遷的里山分析方法。本文以花蓮縣豐南村的吉哈拉艾文化地景為個案，透過文獻回顧、參與式工作坊等質化方法，將公眾參與式地理資訊系統（Public Participation Geographic Information System; PPGIS）應用於里山地景變遷分析。此方法引進參與式研究的取徑，考量社會界線，以文化景觀區為範疇，引進鑲嵌體的土地利用空間資訊，配合繪圖與文獻回顧，收集以地主與農民為主的報導人意見，描繪與討論地景變遷及其驅動力。結果發現吉哈拉艾的里山地景，基本上可分為水稻梯田、果園及森林等三大類型，從1999年到2019年的20年間的土地利用轉變，以水稻田為主，共縮減54.5%。主要是因為人口外流與老年化引起的勞動力不足而產生的水稻田休／廢耕（合計6.37公頃），及為求增加收益而改旱作（0.48公頃）。近廿年，吉哈拉艾使用有機與友善環境農法，恢復了部分的動物多樣性，而田間植物則少有恢復。2000年起，社區開創直銷自有稻米品牌與引進生態產業，則有鼓勵維持水稻田的效果。吉哈拉艾個案顯示，利用PPGIS具備空間資訊處理能力及促進在地居民參與和培力（empower）的特點，可透過權益關係人的記憶與討論，跨越時間軸線，描繪地景變遷，更能應對鑲嵌區塊的土地利用，細緻分析地景的形成與變遷及其驅動力。未來應用於臺灣的里山地景保育與地景分析，有其便利性。此方法適用於小尺度與人互動密切的里山地景，挑戰為耗時費工，需與部落社區權益關係人，尤其地主與土地使用者緊密互動。
英文摘要

The promotion and vigorous development of the Satoyama Initiative in Taiwan in recent years has been attracted increasing interest in understanding the Satoyama landscapes change mechanism. Since Satoyama analysis has rarely been adopted to analyze detailed land use and its driving forces to interpret landscape change, this study takes the Ciharaay cultural landscapes in Fengnan Village, Hualien County as a case study, and applies the Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) in Satoyama landscape analysis using qualitative methods such as literature review and participatory workshops. It introduces mainly a participatory research approach to implement PPGIS in this study, with social boundaries demarcating the cultural landscapes as the scope of Satoyama, with mapping and literature review to collect detailed information on land use of mosaics, which is used to map and discuss landscape change and the driving forces behind this landscapes. Analytical results reveal that it has been reduced for the coverage of paddy rice fields consisting of paddy rice terraced fields, orchards and forests, in the Cilaraay Satoyama Landscapes by 54.5% in the 20 years from 1999 to 2019. This reduction is caused mainly by the shortage of human resources induced by outflow of population and labor overload (6.37ha), while the rest resulted from changes to dryland farming for higher income (0.48ha). Additionally, some wildlife reappeared in the fields, but few for the wild flora in the fields, as local farmers adopted organic and/or environmentally friendly farming in recent two decades. Since 2000, local farmers began to sell local rice using a local brand and introduced ecotourism for the community itself, this encouraging the maintenance of paddy rice fields. The Cilaraay case results show that the ability to deal with geospatial information, promote local participation and empower local people, PPGIS could help map landscape change cross time and analyze delicately its land use and driving forces beyond by working with community members. This finding demonstrates the feasibility of applying PPGIS in landscape analysis and Satoyama conservation in Taiwan. This operating model is particularly appropriate for Satoyama landscapes of small scale and close interactions with human activities; however, it consumes much time and human resources, and requires close interaction with local stakeholders, particularly landowners and users.
主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 林裕彬,詹士樑,陸曉筠,江莉琦,徐家雯,林昭遠,劉小蘭,吳振發,林峰田,李慧琳,陳佳正,莊振義,羅敏輝,簡旭伸,連宛渝,余佳珍,吳岱蓉,林士淵(2018)。土地資源核心議題—土地系統動態變遷之因果與機制研究。臺灣土地研究，21(2)，111-136。
    連結：
  2. 莊永忠,廖學誠(2011)。PPGIS 與傳統民眾參與方式在社區議題討論與居民參與程度上之比較研究：以宜蘭縣龜山島社區為例。地理研究，55，89-120。
    連結：
  3. Alessa, L.,Kliskey, A.,Brown, G.(2008).Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space.Landscape and Urban Planning,85(1),27-39.
  4. Anderson, O.,Crow, T. R.,Lietz, S. M.,Stearns, F.(1996).Transformation of a landscape in the upper mid-west, USA: The history of the lower St. Croix river valley, 1830 to present.Landscape and Urban Planning,35(4),247-267.
  5. Antrop, M.(2006).Sustainable landscapes: Contradiction, fiction or utopia.Landscape and Urban Planning,75(3-4),187-197.
  6. Antrop, M.(2005).Why landscapes of the past are important for the future.Landscape and Urban Planning,70(1-2),21-34.
  7. Berkes, F.,Colding, J.,Folke, C.(2000).Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management.Ecological Applications,10(5),1251-1262.
  8. Black, A. E.,Strand, E.,Wright, R. G.,Scott, J. M.,Morgan, P.,Watson, C.(1998).Land use history at multiple scales: Implications for conservation planning.Landscape and Urban Planning,43(1-3),49-63.
  9. Bouma, J.,Varallyay, G.,Batjes, N. H.(1998).Principal land use changes anticipated in Europe.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,67(2-3),103-119.
  10. Brown, G.(2012).An empirical evaluation of the spatial accuracy of public participation GIS (PPGIS) data.Applied Geography,34,289-294.
  11. Brown, G.,Brabyn, L.(2012).An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification.Landscape and Urban Planning,107(3),317-331.
  12. Brown, G.,Fagerholm, N.(2015).Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation.Ecosystem Services,13,119-133.
  13. Brown, G.,Weber, D.,de Bie, K.(2015).Is PPGIS good enough? An empirical evaluation of the quality of PPGIS crowd-sourced spatial data for conservation planning.Land Use Policy,43,228-238.
  14. Corbin, J.,Strauss, A.(1990).Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.Qualitative Sociology,13(1),3-21.
  15. Cosgrove, D.,Daniels, S.(1988).The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  16. Cosgrove, D.,Jackson, P.(1987).New directions in cultural geography.Area,19,95-101.
  17. Dunn, C. E.(2007).Participatory GIS - A people’s GIS?.Progress in Human Geography,31(5),616-637.
  18. Duraiappah, A. K.,Nakamura, K.,Takeuchi, K.,Watanabe, M.,Nishi, M.(2012).SatoyamaSatoumi Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Socio-Ecological Production Landscapes of Japan.New York:United Nations University Press.
  19. Elwood, S. A.(2002).GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment.Environment and Planning A,34(5),905-922.
  20. Fischer, J.,Hartel, T.,Kuemmerle, T.(2012).Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes.Conservation Letters,5(3),167-175.
  21. Frazier, T. G.,Wood, N.,Yarnal, B.(2010).Stakeholder perspectives on land-use strategies for adapting to climate-change-enhanced coastal hazards: Sarasota, Florida.Applied Geography,30(4),506-517.
  22. Fukamachi, K.,Oku, H.,Nakashizuka, T.(2001).The change of a satoyama landscape and its causality in Kamiseya, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan, between 1970 and 1995.Landscape Ecology,16,703-717.
  23. Global Land Project=GLP(2005).Science Plan and Implementation Strategy.Stockholm:IGBP Secretariat.
  24. Ichikawa, K.,Okubo, N.,Okubo, S.,Takeuchi, K.(2006).Transition of the satoyama landscape in the urban fringe of the Tokyo metropolitan area from 1880 to 2001.Landscape and Urban Planning,78(4),398-410.
  25. International HIV/AIDS Alliance=IHAA(2001).A Facilitators’ Guide to Participatory Workshops with NGOs/CBOs Responding to HIV/AIDS.Brighton:International HIV/AIDS Alliance.
  26. Jewkes, R.,Murcott, A.(1996).Meanings of community.Social Science & Medicine,43(4),555-563.
  27. Krausmann, F.,Haberl, H.,Schulz, N. B.,Erb, K. H.,Darge, E.,Gaube, V.(2003).Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria-Part I: Driving forces of land-use change: 1950-1995.Land Use Policy,20(1),1-20.
  28. Kyem, P. A. K.(2000).Embedding GIS applications into resource management and planning activities of local and indigenous communities: A desirable innovation or a destabilizing enterprise?.Journal of Planning Education and Research,20(2),176-186.
  29. Lambin, E. F.,Baulies, X.,Bockstael, N.,Fischer, G.,Krug, T.,Leemans, R.,Moran, E. F.,Rindfuss, R. R.,Sato, Y.,Skole, D.,Turner, B. L., II,Vogel, C.(1999).Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC), Implementation Strategy.Stockholm, Bonn:IGBP.
  30. Laverty, S. M.(2003).Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,2(3),21-35.
  31. Lawas, T. P.,Tirol, M. S. C.,Cardenas, V. R.,Jamias, S. B.(2009).Communication resource mapping for coastal resources management of Barangay Malabrigo, Lobo, Batangas, Philippines.Journal of Environmental Science and Management,12,38-56.
  32. Loikkanen, T.,Simojoki, T.,Wallenius, P.(1999).Participatory Approach to Natural Resource Management. A Guide Book.Vantaa:Finnish Forest and Park Service.
  33. Long, H.,Tang, G.,Li, X.,Heilig, G. K.(2007).Socio-economic driving forces of land-use change in Kunshan, the Yangtze River Delta economic area of China.Journal of Environmental Management,83(3),351-364.
  34. McNeill, J. (rapporteur)(1994).Toward a typology and regionalization of land-cover and land-use change: Report of Working Group B.Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective,Cambridge:
  35. Meinig, D. W.(ed.)(1979).The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays.New York:Oxford University Press.
  36. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment=MA(2005).Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis.Washington DC:Island Press.
  37. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment=MA(2003).Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment.Washington DC:Island Press.
  38. Mishler, E. G.(1986).Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  39. Morgan, D. l.(1988).Focus Groups as Qualitative Research.Newbury Park:Sage.
  40. Morimoto, J.,Yoshida, H.(2005).Dynamic changes of native Rhododendron colonies in the urban fringe of Kyoto city in Japan: Detecting the long-term dynamism for conservation of secondary nature.Landscape and Urban Planning,70(3-4),195-204.
  41. O’ Rourke, E.(2005).Socio-natural interaction and landscape dynamics in the Burren, Ireland.Landscape and Urban Planning,70(1-2),69-83.
  42. Parcerisas, L.,Marull. J.,Pino, J.,Tello, E.,Coll, F.,Basnou, C.(2012).Land use changes, landscape ecology and their socioeconomic driving forces in the Spanish Mediterranean coast (El Maresme County, 1850-2005).Environmental Science & Policy,23,120-132.
  43. Patton, M. Q.(1990).Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications.
  44. Rall, E.,Hansen, R.,Pauleit, S.(2019).The added value of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for urban green infrastructure planning.Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,40,264-274.
  45. Ramirez-Gomez, S. O. I.,Brown, G.,Verweij, P. A.,Boot, R.(2016).Participatory mapping to identify indigenous community use zones: Implications for conservation planning in southern Suriname.Journal for Nature Conservation,29,69-78.
  46. Santos, G. S.,de Arantes Gomes, R.,dos Santos, E. A.(2018).PPGIS as an urban planning tool around airports.Journal of Air Transport Management,69,269-278.
  47. Sarjakoski, T.(1998).Networked GIS for public participation- Emphasis on utilizing image data.Computers, Environment and Urban Systems,22(4),381-392.
  48. Serra, P.,Pons, X.,Saurí, D.(2008).Land-cover and land-use change in a Mediterranean landscape: A spatial analysis of driving forces integrating biophysical and human factors.Applied Geography,28(3),189-209.
  49. Seto, K. C.,Kaufmann, R. K.(2003).Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the Pearl River Delta, China: Integrating remote sensing with socioeconomic data.Land Economics,79(1),106-121.
  50. Sieber, R. E.(2003).Public participation geographic information systems across borders.The Canadian Geographer,47(1),50-61.
  51. Sieber, R. E.(2006).Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework.Annals of the Association of the American Geographers,96(3),491-507.
  52. Strickland-Munro, J.,Kobryn, H.,Brown, G.,Moore, S. A.(2016).Marine spatial planning for the future: Using Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) to inform the human dimension for large marine parks.Marine Policy,73,15-26.
  53. Takeuchi, K.(2010).Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: The Satoyama Initiative.Ecological Research,25(5),891-897.
  54. Takeuchi, K.(2002).The nature of Satoyama landscape.Satoyama: The Traditional Rural Landscape of Japan,Tokyo:
  55. Takeuchi, K.,Ichikawa, K.,Elmqvist, T.(2016).Satoyama landscape as social–ecological system: Historical changes and future perspective.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,19,30-39.
  56. Tsai, B. W.,Lu, D. J.,Chung, M. K.,Lien, M. C.(2013).Evaluation of PPGIS empowerment-A case study of Meinong Yellow Butterfly Valley in Taiwan.Journal of environmental management,116,204-212.
  57. Turner, B. L.,Janetos, A. C.,Verburg, P. H.,Murray, A. T.(2013).Land system architecture: Using land systems to adapt and mitigate global environmental change.Global Environmental Change,23(2),395-397.
  58. Turner, B. L.,Lambin, E. F.,Reenberg, A.(2007).The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,104,20666-20671.
  59. Turner, B. L.,Skole, D.,Sanderson, S.,Fischer, G.,Fresco, L.,Leemans, R.(1995).Land-Use and Land-Cover Change Science/Research Plan.Stockholm:IGBP.
  60. Verburg, P. H.,Schot, P. P.,Dijst, M. J.,Veldkamp, A.(2004).Land use change modelling: Current practice and research priorities.GeoJournal,61(4),309-324.
  61. Verburg, P. H.,Tabeau, A.,Hatna, E. E.(2013).Assessing spatial uncertainties of land allocation using a scenario approach and sensitivity analysis: A study for land use in Europe.Journal of Environmental Management,127,132-144.
  62. Verburg, P. H.,van de Steeg, J.,Veldkamp, A.,Willemen, L.(2009).From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization.Journal of Environmental Management,90(3),1327-1335.
  63. Weiner, D.(ed.),Harris, T. M.(ed.),Craig, W. J.(ed.)(2002).Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems.London:Taylor and Francis.
  64. Xie, Y.,Mei, Y.,Guangjin, T.,Xuerong, X.(2005).Socio-economic driving forces of arable land conversion: A case study of Wuxian City, China.Global Environmental Change,15(3),238-252.
  65. 丁志堅(2002)。臺北，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源研究所。
  66. 四手井綱英(2000)。里山のこと。関西自然保護機構会報，22(1)，71-77。
  67. 田村俊和、山本博、吉岡慎一(1983)。大規模地形改変の全国的把握。地理学評論，56(4)，223-242。
  68. 何立德(2009)。地景多樣性與地景保育。科學發展，439，22-29。
  69. 何宗宜,劉政榮(2006)。公眾參與地理信息系統在我國的發展初探。測繪通報，8，33-37。
  70. 李光中(2014)。農業濕地保育與里山倡議。科學發展，497，28-35。
  71. 李光中(2013)。花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告,花蓮:花蓮縣文化局。
  72. 李光中(2012)。花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告,花蓮:花蓮縣文化局。
  73. 李光中(2016)。花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告,花蓮:花蓮縣文化局。
  74. 林俊強,張長義,蔡博文,李建堂,丁志堅,李玉亭(2005)。運用公眾參與地理資訊系統於原住民族傳統領域之研究。地理學報，41，65-82。
  75. 林務局（2017），社區林業中心今日揭牌邁入社區林業2.0時代完整建構里山根經濟，「林務局全球資訊網」，https://www.forest.gov.tw/forest-news/0061623，2019 年 5 月 10 日。
  76. 花蓮縣文化局（2016），花蓮縣富里鄉豐南村吉哈拉艾文化景觀，「花蓮縣文化局」，https://www.hccc.gov.tw/zh-tw/CulturalHeritage/Detail/133，2019 年 5 月 10 日。
  77. 施添福(1979)。臺灣人口長成及其空間集中過程。地理研究報告，5，159-181。
  78. 洪志成（譯）,廖梅花（譯）,Krueger, R. A.(1988).焦點體訪談.嘉義:濤石.
  79. 胡幼慧(1996).質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例.臺北:巨流.
  80. 財團法人農業工程研究中心(2017)。花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告花蓮縣文化局委託研究報告,花蓮:花蓮縣文化局。
  81. 畢恆達(1995)。生活經驗研究的反省：詮釋學的觀點。本土心理學研究，4，224-259。
  82. 陳怡靜,陳思宏,吳振發(2018)。彰化縣土地利用變遷之民眾識覺分析。興大園藝，43(4)，109-123。
  83. 陳美惠,林穎楨(2017)。整合協同經營與里山倡議的森林治理－以阿禮與大武部落生態旅遊及資源保育為例。臺灣林業科學，32(4)，299-316。
  84. 彭立沛(2015)。科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北:國立臺灣大學生物產業傳播暨發展學系暨研究所。
  85. 趙榮台(2011)。里山倡議。大自然季刊，110，64-67。
  86. 歐素汝（譯）,Stewart, D.W.,Shamdasani, P. N.(1990).焦點團體：理論與實務.臺北:弘智文化.
  87. 鍾明光,盧道杰(2018)。失落的里山：臺灣淺山客家聚落的發展歷程與環境資源保育。國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院實驗林研究報告，32(4)，249-258。
  88. 邊瑞芬(1991)。臺灣地區縣市社經發展與人口遷移的關係。人口學刊，14，83-108。
print cancel