题名

不確定性考量下舊市區活化發展之多準則策略規劃評選

并列篇名

Multiple-Criteria Strategy Planning and Evaluation for Old Downtown Revitalization under Uncertainty Considerations

DOI

10.6128/CP.202203_49(1).0001

作者

王維民(Wei-Ming Wang)

关键词

舊市區活化發展 ; 正反雙向同時影響 ; 環境不確定性 ; 利益—機會—成本—風險(BOCR) ; 模糊決策實驗室分析法(FDEMATEL) ; 模糊分析網路程序法(FANP) ; Old downtown revitalization development ; Positive-negative simultaneous impact ; Environmental uncertainty ; Benefits-opportunities-costs-risks (BOCR) ; Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (FDEMATEL) ; Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (FANP)

期刊名称

都市與計劃

卷期/出版年月

49卷1期(2022 / 03 / 31)

页次

1 - 34

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

受都市化威脅與城市轉變影響,舊有城市地區的活化發展已成為全球性急迫課題;為能有效落實,須對相應的策略進行適當規劃與評價。舊市區活化概念與發展策略評選涉及層面廣泛,相關組成元素間常存有正、反雙向同時影響,與複雜相依關係等不確定性;因此,本研究提出一整合式的過程評選模型以資對應。先透過文獻回顧與需求掌握,以利益—機會—成本—風險(BOCR)為分類基礎,彙整34項可能影響因素,並藉由模糊德爾菲法(FDM)篩選得15項評價準則;再利用模糊決策實驗室分析法(FDEMATEL)釐清存在於準則間的相互影響,並援引BOCR概念整合分析網路程序(ANP)的結構,將欲探討地區的可行活化發展策略方案整併其間建立整體評選架構模型。爾後,將該模型應用於新竹市舊市區之經由優勢—劣勢—機會—威脅(SWOT)分析所研擬的五項可行策略方案進行實證;透過模糊ANP with BOCR(FANP with BOCR)數學運算與評比,評選出最佳活化發展策略。研究結果可為舊市區的活化發展提供行動的基礎與具體的導引。

英文摘要

The revitalization development of old-downtown has been revealed to be globally urgent due to the rapid urbanization and resulting transformation of cities. Effective revitalization practices require appropriate planning and assessment of corresponding strategy. Old-downtown revitalization and the development strategy assessment have a wide range of levels, with simultaneous interrelationships of positive-negative impacts among related components, as well as uncertainties. Hence, this study proposes a hybrid process model for solving the problem. The model initially generalizes and assigns 34 relevant possible influence factors through literature review and a focus on present development condition based on four benefits-opportunities-costs-risks (BOCR) merits. The Fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) is then adopted to extract 15 definite evaluation criteria. The interdependence among the evaluation criteria is then evaluated using fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (FDEMATEL). Based on the structure of analytic network process (ANP) with BOCR, the feasible development strategies of an exploratory area can be integrated to construct a complete planning and evaluation model. Finally, Hsinchu-Old-Downtown is employed as an empirical case study. Five proposed strategy alternatives obtained from the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis are integrated with the constructed model. The proposed fuzzy ANP with BOCR is applied to calculate the priorities and to evaluate and select the best option. The analytical results can not only provide an activation basis and concrete guidance for old downtown revitalization development, but can also extend to operative reference for research in relevant fields.

主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 郭幸萍,吳綱立(2013)。公私合夥觀點之古蹟再利用委外經營決策影響因素之研究:多群體分析。建築學報,84,141-161。
    連結:
  2. 郭瑞坤,郭彰仁,鄭心儀(2007)。以鄉村旅遊活化地區發展之策略研究。觀光研究學報,13(1),23-45。
    連結:
  3. 曾建元,陳祥睿(2018)。歷史城區的文化治理-論新竹市舊城區再生運動。國際文化研究,14(1),37-62。
    連結:
  4. 黃國敏,陳宏杰(2007)。新竹市城市觀光行銷策略之研究。中華行政學報,4,23-46。
    連結:
  5. 顏亮一(2006)。市民認同、地區發展與都市保存:迪化街個案分析。都市與計劃,33(2),93-109。
    連結:
  6. Agyekum, E. B.,Ansah, M. N. S.,Afornu, K. B.(2020).Nuclear energy for sustainable development: SWOT analysis on Ghana’s nuclear agenda.Energy Reports,6,107-115.
  7. Akyuz, E.,Celik, E.(2015).A fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate critical operational hazards during gas freeing process in crude oil tankers.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,38,243-253.
  8. Amado, M. P.,Ramalhete, I.,Amado, A. R.,Freitas, J. C.(2016).Regeneration of informal areas: An integrated approach.Cities,58,59-69.
  9. Baykasoğlu., A.,Kaplanoğlu, V.,Durmuşoğlu, Z. D. U.,Şahin, C.(2013).Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection.Expert Systems with Applications,40(3),899-907.
  10. Castanheira, G.,Bragança, L.(2014).The evolution of the sustainability assessment tool SBToolPT: From buildings to the built environment.The Scientific World Journal,2014,1-10.
  11. Chen, M. F.,Tzeng, G. H.,Ding, C. G.(2008).Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives.Applied Soft Computing,8(1),110-117.
  12. De Gregorio Hurtado, S.(2017).Is EU urban policy transforming urban regeneration in Spain? Answers from an analysis of the Iniciativa Urbana (2007-2013).Cities,60,402-414.
  13. De Schepper, S.,Dooms, M.,Haezendonck, E.(2014).Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in public-private partnerships: A mixed experience.International Journal of Project Management,32(7),1210-1222.
  14. Doratli, N.,Hoskara, S. O.,Fasli, M.(2004).An analytical methodology for revitalization strategies in historic urban quarters: A case study of the Walled City of Nicosia, North Cyprus.Cities,21(4),329-348.
  15. Dzeng, R. J.,Wen, K. S.(2005).Evaluating project teaming strategies for construction of Taipei 101 using resource-based theory.International Journal of Project Management,23(6),483-491.
  16. Ertan, T.,Eğercioğlu, Y.(2016).Historic city center urban regeneration: Case of Malaga and Kemeraltı, Izmir.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,223,601-607.
  17. Guarini, M. R.,Battisti, F.(2016).Application of a multi-criteria and participated evaluation procedure to select typology of intervention to redevelop degraded urban area.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,223,960-967.
  18. Horlings, L. G.,Kanemasu, Y.(2015).Sustainable development and policies in rural regions; insights from the Shetland Islands.Land Use Policy,49,310-321.
  19. Hu, C.,Gong, C.(2016).Creating an ecological historic district: Rethinking a Chinese challenge through the case of Oakland district, Pittsburgh.Procedia Engineering,145,1572-1579.
  20. Jung, T. H.,Lee, J.,Yap, M. H. T.,Ineson, E. M.(2015).The role of stakeholder collaboration in culture-led urban regeneration: A case study of the Gwangju project, Korea.Cities,44,29-39.
  21. Kuo, Y. F.,Chen, P. C.(2008).Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using Fuzzy Delphi Method.Expert Systems with Applications,35(4),1930-1939.
  22. Kures, M. E.,Ryan, W. F.(2012).Challenges of an organizational approach to applied downtown market analysis.Applied Geography,32(1),80-87.
  23. Laprise, M.,Lufkin, S.,Rey, E.(2015).An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas.Building and Environment,86,29-38.
  24. Lee, A. H. I.(2009).A fuzzy AHP evaluation model for buyer–supplier relationships with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks.International Journal of Production Research,47(15),4255-4280.
  25. Lee, A. H. I.,Chen, H. H.,Kang, H. Y.(2011).A model to analyze strategic products for photovoltaic silicon thin-film solar cell power industry.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,15(2),1271-1283.
  26. Lee, A. H. I.,Wang, W. M.,Lin, T. Y.(2010).An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,77(1),135-150.
  27. Liou, J. J. H.,Yen, L.,Tzeng, G. H.(2008).Building an effective safety management system for airlines.Journal of Air Transport Management,14(1),20-26.
  28. López-Gamero, M. D.,Molina-Azorín, J. F.,Claver-Cortés, E.(2011).Environmental uncertainty and environmental management perception: A multiple case study.Journal of Business Research,64(4),427-435.
  29. Mateo, C.,Cuñat, A.(2016).Guide of strategies for urban regeneration: A design-support tool for the Spanish context.Ecological Indicators,64,194-202.
  30. Murray, T. J.,Pipino, L. L.,van Gigch, J. P.(1985).A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi.Human Systems Management,5(1),76-80.
  31. Raco, M.(2003).Assessing the discourses and practices of urban regeneration in a growing region.Geoforum,34(1),37-55.
  32. Ramlee, M.,Omar, D.,Yunus, R. M.,Samadi, Z.(2015).Revitalization of urban public spaces: An overview.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science,201,360-367.
  33. Rauch, P.(2007).SWOT analyses and SWOT strategy formulation for forest owner cooperations in Austria.European Journal Forest Research,126(3),413-420.
  34. Ryberg-Webster, S.(2016).Heritage amid an urban crisis: Historic preservation in Cleveland, Ohio's Slavic Village neighborhood.Cities,58,10-25.
  35. Saaty, T. L.(1990).How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.European Journal of Operational Research,48(1),9-26.
  36. Saaty, T. L.(2005).Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Cost, and Risk.Pittsburgh:RWS Publications.
  37. Saaty, T. L.,Ozdemir, M.(2003).Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process.Mathematical and Computer Modelling,37(9-10),1063-1075.
  38. Shen, Y. C.,Lin, G. T. R.,Tzeng, G. H.(2011).Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection.Expert Systems with Applications,38(3),1468-1481.
  39. Shieh, J. I.,Wu, H. H.,Huang, K. K.(2010).A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality.Knowledge-Based Systems,23(3),277-282.
  40. Singh, P. K.,Sarkar, P.(2020).A framework based on fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL for sustainable product development: A case of Indian automotive industry.Journal of Cleaner Production,246,118991.
  41. Verdini, G.(2015).Is the incipient Chinese civil society playing a role in regenerating historic urban areas? Evidence from Nanjing, Suzhou and Shanghai.Habitat International,50,366-372.
  42. Wang, H.,Shen, Q.,Tang, B. S.,Lu, C.,Peng, Y.,Tang, L. Y.(2014).A framework of decision-making factors and supporting information for facilitating sustainable site planning in urban renewable projects.Cities,40,44-55.
  43. Wang, W. M.,Lee, A. H. I.,Chang, D. T.(2010).An integrated FDM-ANP evaluation model for sustainable development of housing community.Optimization Letters,4(2),239-257.
  44. Wang, W. M.,Lee, A. H. I.,Peng, L. P.,Wu, Z. L.(2013).An integrated decision making model for district revitalization and regeneration project selection.Decision Support Systems,54(2),1092-1103.
  45. Weihrich, H.(1999).Analyzing the competitive advantage and disadvantage of Germany with the TOWS Matrix-an alternative to Porter’s Model.European Business Review,99(1),9-22.
  46. Zhai, B.,Ng, M. K.(2013).Urban regeneration and social capital in China: A case study of the Drum Tower Muslim District in Xi’an.Cities,35,14-25.
  47. 中華大學(2011)。中華大學(2011),「漫遊竹塹南門舊城文化路徑串連景觀規劃案」,新竹:新竹市政府文化局。
  48. 王松儀,宣建華(2005)。居住性歷史街區再利用初探。華中建築,23(4),108-109。
  49. 王品方(2009)。臺北,國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所。
  50. 王維民,李欣怡,吳子鈴(2009)。多屬性決策分析應用於地區活化再生評價模式建構之初探。2009 年中華民國都市計劃學會.區域科學學會.地區發展學會聯合年會暨學術論文研討會論文集,臺北:
  51. 白宗弘(2016)。古城裡的自在地景。建築師,42(10),92-97。
  52. 吳仲桓(2013)。新北,輔仁大學景觀設計學系碩士班。
  53. 吳松林(2006)。全球化下的城市競爭策略。研考雙月刊,30(5),3-12。
  54. 林英彥(譯),目瀨守男(1995)。用地域資源使地域活化性之計劃方法。臺灣土地金融季刊,32(3),1-16。
  55. 林盛豐(2017)。林盛豐(2017),「新竹市步行城市計畫」,臺北:內政部營建署。
  56. 洪于翔(2016)。新竹的文化基礎設施。建築師,42(10),98-99。
  57. 徐村和,楊宗欽(2000)。應用模糊層級分析法評選廣告媒體。管理與系統,7(1),19-39。
  58. 張有恆,徐村和,陳曉玲(1997)。航空站區位選擇評估程序之研究。運輸計劃季刊,26(1),37-67。
  59. 許晉誌(2018)。許晉誌(2018),「新竹市 2050 願景計畫」,新竹:新竹市政府都市發展處。
  60. 曾菀婷(2017)。新北,淡江大學歐洲研究所。
  61. 黃俊銘(2016)。新竹城市發展歷程與歷史文化資產願景。建築師,42(10),88-91。
  62. 新竹市政府交通處(2015)。新竹市政府交通處(2015),「城區人本交通步行悠遊網規劃與初步設計」,新竹:新竹市政府。
  63. 新竹市政府都市發展處(2012)。新竹市政府都市發展處(2012),「新竹市八大旗艦計畫」,新竹:新竹市政府。
  64. 楊敏芝(2002)。新北,國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所。
  65. 溫博煌(2003)。臺中,逢甲大學土地管理研究所。
  66. 解鴻年,張馨文,劉晉宏(2004)。城市文藝復興:新竹舊城的城市競爭策略。城市發展研究,11(6),11-16。
  67. 趙慶昇(2003)。臺中,東海大學建築學系。
  68. 盧采玲(2014)。新竹,中華大學建築與都市計畫學系。
  69. 謝秀宜(2014)。新竹市智慧城市發展歷程與策略研擬之探討。竹塹文獻 9,58,62-71。
  70. 龔書章(2016)。新竹的未來是什麼樣的面貌?。建築師,42(10),83-87。