题名

利己或者利他?整合品牌利益動機與利環境動機探討電動機車使用行為意圖

并列篇名

Egoistic or Altruistic? Integrating Brand Benefit Motivations and Pro-environmental Motivations to Investigate Behavioral Intention of Electric Scooter Use

DOI

10.6128/CP.202212_49(4).0003

作者

謝旭昇(Hsu-Sheng Hsieh);陳葦丰(Wei-Feng Chen)

关键词

計畫行為理論 ; 行為意圖 ; 利環境行為 ; 品牌利益 ; 電動機車 ; Gogoro ; Theory of planned behavior ; Behavioral intention ; Pro-environmental behavior ; Brand benefits ; Electric scooter ; Gogoro

期刊名称

都市與計劃

卷期/出版年月

49卷4期(2022 / 12 / 31)

页次

421 - 452

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

隨著氣候異常加劇,人們對環境的保護意識日漸抬頭,運輸服務亦逐漸訴諸利環境功效以促進大眾的使用。然而,個體使用一項帶有利環境結果的運輸產品或服務之動機,除了利環境因素之外,亦可能是為了追求其本身的品牌利益,從而產生利環境行為。為深入探討此現象的心理過程,本研究以「計畫行為理論」作為理論之架構,進一步整合「利環境動機」與「品牌利益動機」的行為意圖決定因素;並以可能同時源自於利環境和品牌利益動機的電動機車Gogoro使用行為意圖作為實例,發展心理構面的量測並進行問卷調查;繼而透過結構方程模式分析使用行為意圖的產生過程與原因,以檢驗納入品牌利益動機的利環境行為之心理過程。研究結果發現,利環境動機中的「環境知識」雖然顯著地正向影響「環境態度」,但後者並不對「行為意圖」產生影響;再者,品牌利益動機中的「品牌知識」顯著地正向影響「品牌態度」,且後者會繼而增強「行為意圖」;而利環境和品牌利益動機中的兩種「主觀規範」皆不影響「行為意圖」。因此,就電動機車使用行為的促進上,相較於向旅運者訴諸利環境動機,誘發品牌利益動機的策略將更具效果。

英文摘要

The intensification of climate anomalies has led to rising public awareness of environmental protection. Accordingly, transportation service providers are increasingly promoting the positive environmental effects of their services. However, an individual using a transport product or service with pro-environmental results may be motivated not only by its pro-environmental benefits, but also by brand benefits which lead to pro-environmental behaviors. To explore in depth the psychological process of this phenomenon, this study adopts the "theory of planned behavior" as the theoretical framework to further integrate the determinants of behavioral intention in "pro-environmental motivations" and "brand benefit motivations". The electric scooter Gogoro, whose use behavior may be driven by both pro-environmental and brand benefit motivations, is utilized as the case to develop psychological construct measurement and conduct a questionnaire survey. The generation process of and motivations for behavioral intention of use are analyzed by structural equation modeling. Analytical results indicate that, in the pro-environmental motivations, although "environmental knowledge" significantly positively influenced "environmental attitude", the latter did not impact "behavioral intention"; in the brand benefit motivations, "brand knowledge" significantly positively influenced "brand attitude" which in turn enhanced "behavioral intention"; and in the pro-environmental and brand benefit motivations, two types of "subjective norms" did not affect "behavioral intention". Therefore, for promoting electric scooter use, the strategy of inducing brand benefit motivations of travelers would be more effective than resorting to pro-environmental motivations.

主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. Hsieh, H. S.(2018).Soft Measures, Behavioral Theories and Applications for Pro-environmental Travel Behavior Change.Journal of Architecture and Planning,19(1),43-64.
    連結:
  2. 李婕漪,葉智丞(2020)。大學生購買電動機車行為之研究-以 Gogoro 為例。危機管理學刊,17(2),101-110。
    連結:
  3. 夏晧清,葉光毅,傅裕豪,謝旭昇(2011)。將社會行為理論導入於公共工程計畫的應用-從「態度追隨型計畫」到「態度轉變型計畫」。建築與規劃學報,12(2),161-188。
    連結:
  4. 莊寶鵰,陳冠宇,羅文君(2018)。顧客體驗價值對於智慧電動機車購買意願之影響。管理資訊計算,7,149-158。
    連結:
  5. 傅裕豪,夏晧清,葉光毅(2013)。應用說服性溝通解決社會困境問題之研究:以機慢車違規停放問題為例。都市與計劃,40(2),103-134。
    連結:
  6. 黃識銘,方世榮,楊舒蜜(2010)。品牌利益對品牌忠誠度之影響-品牌關係品質與顧客關係品質的中介效果。管理與系統,17(3),373-402。
    連結:
  7. 楊重信,林映辰(2010)。民眾價值與認知對於抗溫室效應行為之影響-台北都會區之實證。都市與計劃,37(1),13-45。
    連結:
  8. 劉易,盧宗成(2018).Exploring consumer reasoning in usage intention for electric scooter sharing.運輸計劃季刊,47(4),271-295.
    連結:
  9. 謝旭昇(2019)。停車政策接受度的心理認知結構及社會困境自覺的調節作用。建築學報,109,53-76。
    連結:
  10. Aaker, D. A.,Joachimsthaler, E.(2000).The Brand Relationship Spectrum: The Key to the Brand Architecture Challenge.California Management Review,42(4),8-23.
  11. Abraham, C.(2015).Mapping modifiable mechanisms in health promotion research: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares.Health Psychology Review,9(2),160-164.
  12. Achrol, R. S.,Kotler, P.(1999).Marketing in the Network Economy.Journal of Marketing,63,146-163.
  13. Ajzen, I.(1991).The Theory of Planned Behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50(2),179-211.
  14. Ajzen, I.,Fishbein, M.(1975).Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.MA:Addison-Wesley.
  15. Ajzen, I.,Joyce, N.,Sheikh, S.,Cote, N. G.(2011).Knowledge and the Prediction of Behavior: The Role of Information Accuracy in the Theory of Planned Behavior.Basic and Applied Social Psychology,33(2),101-117.
  16. Armitage, C. J.(2015).Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour? A commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau and Araújo-Soares.Health Psychology Review,9(2),151-155.
  17. Ayadi, N.,Lapeyre, A.(2014).Consumer purchase intentions for green products: Mediating role of WTP and moderating effects of framing.Journal of Marketing Communications,22(4),367-384.
  18. Bai, Y.,Liu, Y.(2013).An exploration of residents’ low-carbon awareness and behavior in Tianjin, China.Energy Policy,61,1261-1270.
  19. Bamberg, S.(2013).Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change.Journal of Environmental Psychology,34,151-159.
  20. Bamberg, S.,Fujii, S.,Friman, M.,Gärling, T.(2011).Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures.Transport Policy,18(1),228-235.
  21. Bamberg, S.,Möser, G.(2007).Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour.Journal of Environmental Psychology,27(1),14-25.
  22. Belén Del Río, A.,Vázquez, R.,Iglesias, V.(2001).The effects of brand associations on consumer response.Journal of Consumer Marketing,18(5),410-425.
  23. Belgiawan, P. F.,Schmöcker, J. D.,Abou-Zeid, M.,Walker, J.,Fujii, S.(2017).Modelling social norms: Case study of students’ car purchase intentions.Travel Behaviour and Society,7,12-25.
  24. Ben-Akiva, M. E.,Lerman, S. R.(1985).Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand.MIT press.
  25. Burgess, J.,Harrison, C. M.,Filius, P.(1998).Environmental Communication and the Cultural Politics of Environmental Citizenship.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,30(8),1445-1460.
  26. Chaudhuri, A.,Holbrook, M. B.(2001).The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty.Journal of Marketing,65(2),81-93.
  27. Chen, H. S.,Tsai, B. K.,Hsieh, C. M.(2017).Determinants of Consumers’ Purchasing Intentions for the Hydrogen-Electric Motorcycle.Sustainability,9(8),1447.
  28. Chen, H. S.,Tsai, B. K.,Hsieh, C. M.(2018).The Effects of Perceived Barriers on Innovation Resistance of Hydrogen-Electric Motorcycles.Sustainability,10(6),1933.
  29. Conner, M.(2015).Extending not retiring the theory of planned behaviour: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau and Araújo-Soares.Health Psychology Review,9(2),141-145.
  30. Eccarius, T.,Lu, C. C.(2020).Adoption intentions for micro-mobility–Insights from electric scooter sharing in Taiwan.Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,84,102327.
  31. Fournier, S.(1998).Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research.Journal of Consumer Research,24(4),343-373.
  32. Friman, M.,Larhult, L.,Gärling, T.(2013).An analysis of soft transport policy measures implemented in Sweden to reduce private car use.Transportation,40(1),109-129.
  33. Fujii, S.(2005).Reducing inappropriate bicycle parking through persuasive communication.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,35(6),1171-1196.
  34. Gogoro (2021b),Gogoro 介紹,「關於 Gogoro」,https://www.gogoro.com/tw/about,2021 年 4 月 1 日。
  35. Gogoro (2021c),Gogoro Fact Sheet,「Gogoro Fact Sheet」,https://cdn.gogoro.com/resources/attachment/press/2017-09-20-Gogoro-Fact-Sheet-ZH-TW.pdf,2021 年 4 月 1 日。
  36. Gogoro (2021a),Gogoro 2 plus 介紹,「Gogoro 2 Premium 移動精心定義」,https://www.gogoro.com/tw/smartscooter/2-series/plus,2021 年 4 月 1 日。
  37. Gogoro (2021d),Gogoro 3 plus介紹,「Gogoro3 跨時代新標配」,https://web.archive.org/web/20190921092145/https://www.gogoro.com/tw/smartscooter/3-series/plus/,2021年4月1日。
  38. Gollwitzer, P. M.(1999).Implementation intentions - Strong effects of simple plans.American Psychologist,54(7),493-503.
  39. Gollwitzer, P. M.,Oettingen, G.(2015).From studying the determinants of action to analysing its regulation: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau and Araújo-Soares.Health Psychology Review,9(2),146-150.
  40. Hagger, M. S.(2015).Retired or not, the theory of planned behaviour will always be with us.Health Psychology Review,9,125-130.
  41. Han, H.,Hsu, L. T. J.,Sheu, C.(2010).Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities.Tourism Management,31(3),325-334.
  42. Hertzke, P., Müller, N., Schenk, S., and Wu, T. (2018). The global electric-vehicle market is amped up and on the rise. McKinsey Cent. Futur. Mobil, 1-8.
  43. Hsieh, H. S.(2020).Transport policy evaluation based on elasticity analysis with social interactions.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,139,273-296.
  44. Hsieh, H. S.,Kanda, Y.,Fujii, S.(2019).Incorporation of coping planning into the behavior change model that accounts for implementation intention.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,60,228-244.
  45. Hsieh, H. S.,Kanda, Y.,Fujii, S.(2017).Reducing car use by volitional strategy of action and coping planning enhancement.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,47,163-175.
  46. Hungerford, H. R.,Volk, T. L.(1990).Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education.The Journal of Environmental Education,21(3),8-21.
  47. IEA.(2020). Global EV Outlook 2020: Entering the Decade of Electric Drive? https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2020, Oct 1, 2020.
  48. IPCC(2014).Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Geneva, Switzerland:IPCC.
  49. Kaiser, F. G.,Fuhrer, U.(2003).Ecological Behavior’s Dependency on Different Forms of Knowledge.Applied Psychology,52(4),598-613.
  50. Keller, K. L.(1993).Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity.Journal of Marketing,57(1),1-22.
  51. Keller, K. L.(2003).Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge.Journal of Consumer Research,29(4),595-600.
  52. Kim, J.,Fujii, S.,Lee, B.(2013).Strategies to Promote Sustainable Mobility Management Incorporating Heterogeneity.International Journal of Sustainable Transportation,7(2),107-124.
  53. Kollmuss, A.,Agyeman, J.(2002).Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?.Environmental Education Research,8(3),239-260.
  54. Maruyama, G. M.(1997).Basics of Structural Equation Modeling.Thousand Oaks:sage publications.
  55. Orth, U. R.,Mcdaniel, M.,Shellhammer, T.,Lopetcharat, K.(2004).Promoting brand benefits: the role of consumer psychographics and lifestyle.Journal of Consumer Marketing,21(2),97-108.
  56. Ramsey, C. E.,Rickson, R. E.(1976).Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes.The Journal of Environmental Education,8(1),10-18.
  57. Ramsey, J. M.,Hungerford, H. R.,Volk, T.(1989).A technique for analyzing environmental issues.The Journal of Environmental Education,21(1),26-30.
  58. Saghapour, T.,Moridpour, S.,Thompson, R.(2019).Sustainable transport in neighbourhoods: effect of accessibility on walking and bicycling.Transportmetrica A: Transport Science,15(2),849-871.
  59. Schlüter, J.,Weyer, J.(2019).Car sharing as a means to raise acceptance of electric vehicles: An empirical study on regime change in automobility.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,60,185-201.
  60. Schwartz, S. H.(1977).Normative Influences on Altruism.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,10,221-279.
  61. Shaheen, S.,Wong, S.(2020).Shaheen, S. and Wong, S. (2020). Public Transit and Shared Mobility COVID-19 Recovery: Policy Recommendations and Research Needs. UC Office of the President: University of California Institute of Transportation Studies..
  62. Sheth, J. N.,Newman, B. I.,Gross, B. L.(1991).Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values.Journal of Business Research,22(2),159-170.
  63. Shiau, T. A.(2013).Evaluating sustainable transport strategies for the counties of Taiwan based on their degree of urbanization.Transport Policy,30,101-108.
  64. Simsekoglu, Ö.(2018).Socio-demographic characteristics, psychological factors and knowledge related to electric car use: A comparison between electric and conventional car drivers.Transport Policy,72,180-186.
  65. Sniehotta, F. F.,Presseau, J.,Araujo-Soares, V.(2014).Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour.Health Psychology Review,8(1),1-7.
  66. Soyez, K.(2012).How national cultural values affect pro-environmental consumer behavior.International Marketing Review,29(6),623-646.
  67. Thorbjørnsen, H.,Supphellen, M.,Nysveen, H.,Pedersen, P. E.(2002).Building brand relationships online: A comparison of two interactive applications.Journal of Interactive Marketing,16(3),17-34.
  68. White, L. V.,Sintov, N. D.(2017).You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,99,94-113.
  69. 工業技術研究院(2021),各縣市申請輔助統計,「電動機車產業網」,https://www.lev.org.tw/subsidy/result.aspx,2021 年 4 月 1 日。
  70. 王志瑋(2019)。屏東,國立屏東大學國際貿易學系。
  71. 交通部公路總局(2021),機動車輛新增掛牌車輛數按使用燃料別分,「交通部統計查詢網」,https://stat.motc.gov.tw/mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100,2021 年 4 月 1 日。
  72. 林孜倫(2019)。新北,淡江大學國際企業學系。
  73. 徐嘉駿,張文智(2017)。消費者的產品涉入度與價值主張認同度之關係探討-以台灣電動機車市場為例。工業設計,135,51-56。
  74. 劉姿珊(2011)。臺中,國立中興大學科技管理研究所。
被引用次数
  1. (2023)。探討環保意識對綠色餐飲消費認知與行為意向之研究-運用計畫行為理論。島嶼觀光研究,14(4),22-43。