大眾運輸導向車站周邊步行友善環境規劃之研究－以板橋車站為例

Walking-Friendly Environmental Planning Around the Transit-Oriented Development Station - Using Banqiao Station as an Example

10.6128/CP.202303_50(1).0002

謝翊楷(Yi-Kai Hsieh)；李家儂(Chia-Nung Li)

大眾運輸導向發展 ； 步行友善環境 ； 差異性 ； 空間型構法則 ； Transit-Oriented-Development ； Walking-friendly Environment ； Differentiation ； Space Syntax

都市與計劃

50卷1期（2023 / 03 / 31）

27 - 56

繁體中文;英文

本研究以TOD理念結合Space Syntax之理論基礎，強調以「步行」為主的環境規劃做為發展框架。從台灣都市環境與TOD發展現況觀察，發現對於TOD規劃僅能以距離場站的遠近作為主要衡量基準之原因，乃在於缺乏考量各個TOD區的環境差異性與條件適地性，其各區在地條件與環境現況有所不同，尤其區內步行路網結構的連結關係更存在差異，進而將TOD區分為兩種型態，即TOD-W與TOD-P兩種不同次模式，據以提出TOD之6D元素，即新增考量「大眾運輸範圍內之差異性（Differentiation）與適地性」，並建構其可評估之代表意涵，以此形塑TOD規劃理念之嶄新的風貌。本研究主要運用Space Syntax進行案例地區步行路網量化分析，藉由突破對於步行研究的限制，使軸線與拓撲轉換可妥善考量步行空間，亦使地區便捷值（R^3）之結果更為真實反映步行路網狀況，並進一步改良出TOD區步行友善環境值（R^w），加以檢視車站周邊步行環境發展現況及進行綜合討論。

This research combines the TOD (Transit-Oriented Development) concept with Space Syntax network analysis method to construct the elements (6D) that should be considered in walking-friendly environmental planning around the TOD station and as a guide for urban development. Our observation of current TOD development in Taiwan suggests that walking environment planning in surrounding areas of MRT stations is solely based on distance centered from a station. Because of the lack of consideration of different local applicability among the TOD areas, the road conditions are quite different in each locality and environment. Especially, the connectivity of the pedestrian walking networks among the localities varies. Therefore, the TOD areas are divided into two categories, namely TOD -W (walking) and TOD-P (private vehicle). Additionally, the 6D elements of TOD are brought up by adding a new consideration of "differentiation and local applicability within the reach of mass transit", formulating an evaluation system to study its significance. To find a novel concept of TOD development, this study applies Space Syntax to quantitatively analyze the pedestrian walking networks. The pedestrian space can be properly considered by breaking the limits of 'walking' analysis, under the circumstance of axis and topology conversion. The locality convenience value (R^3) can illustrate the reality of the pedestrian network. Furthermore, the TOD walking environment friendliness value (R^w) can be concluded to improve the study. Evaluating the walking environment current condition around the station with these methods, a comprehensive discussion can be conducted.

1. 白仁德,劉人華(2014)。大眾運輸導向建成環境特性對捷運運量影響之研究－以臺北捷運為實證對象。建築與規劃學報，15(2/3)，111-128。
   連結：
2. 李家儂,賴宗裕(2009)。交通運輸與土地使用連結下的都市模式演變－全球 36 個主要城市比較分析。都市與計劃，36(1)，25-49。
   連結：
3. 李家儂,謝翊楷(2015)。以空間型構法則及步行導向理念檢視 TOD 區內土地使用配置的合理性。運輸計劃季刊，44(1)，1-24。
   連結：
4. Al-Azzawi, M.,Raeside, R.(2007).Modeling Pedestrian Walking Speeds on Sidewalks.Journal of Urban Planning and Development,133(3),211-219.
5. Bhatta, S. D.,Drennan, M. P.(2003).The Economic Benefits of Public Investment in Transportation: A Review of Recent Literature.Journal of Planning Education and Research,22(3),288-296.
6. Calthorpe, P.(1993).The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream.New York:Princeton Architectural Press.
7. Carlton, I.(2007).Histories of Transit-Oriented Development: Perspectives on the Development of the TOD.Concept, CA:Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley.
8. Cervero, R.,Kockelman, K.(1997).Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design.Transportation Research, D,,2(3),199-219.
9. Cervero, R.,Landis, J.(1992).Suburbanization of jobs and the Jobs and the Journey to Work: A Submarket Analysis of Commuting in the San Francisco Bay Area.Journal of Advanced Transportation,26(3),275-297.
10. Cervero, R.,Sarmiento, O. L.,Jacoby, E.,Gomez, L.F.,Neiman, A.(2009).Influences of Built Environments on Walking and Cycling: Lessons from Bogotá.International Journal of Sustainable Transportation,3(4),203-226.
11. Cho, S.,Chen, Z.,Yen, S. T.,Eastwood, D. B.(2006).The effects of urban sprawl on body mass index: where people live does matter.Consumer Interests Annual,52(1),159-169.
12. Doyle, S.,Kelly-Schwartz, A.,Schlossberg, M.,Stockard, J.(2006).Active community environments and health: the relationship of walkable and safe communities to individual health.Journal of American Planning Association,72,19-31.
13. Ewing, R.,Bartholomew, K.,Winkelman, S.,Walters, J.,Chen, D.,McCann, B.,Goldberg, D.(2007).Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change.Chicago, IL:Urban Land Institute.
14. Ewing, R.,Cervero, R.(2010).Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Planning Association,76(3),265-294.
15. Gehl, J.(2011).Life between buildings: Using public space.Washington, USA:Island Press.
16. Giles-Corti, B.,Vernez-Moudon, A.,Reis, R.,Turrell, G.,Dannenberg, A. L.,Badland, H.,Foster, S.,Lowe, M.,Sallis, J. F.,Stevenson, M.,Owen, N.(2016).City planning and population health: a global challenge.The Lancet,388(10062),2912-2924.
17. Gloria, S. C.,Charlotte, C.,Sergio, C.,Helena, C.(2018).Graphical approach to assess urban quality: Mapping walkability based on the TOD-standard.Cities,76,58-71.
18. Gregory, B. (2015). Member Spotlight with Bert Gregory: A Focus on Health is Transforming the Design Industry, http://uli.org/centers-initiatives/member-spotlight-bert-gregory-focus-health-transforming-industry/, Mar. 26, 2020.
19. Handy, S.(2005).Smart Growth and the Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us?.International Regional Science Review,28(2),146-167.
20. Hillier, B.(1996).Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture.Space Syn.
21. Johnson, M. P.(2001).Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda.Environment and Planning A,33(4),717-735.
22. Jun, H. J.,Hur, M.(2015).The relationship between walkability and neighborhood social environment: The importance of physical and perceived walkability.Applied Geography,62,115-124.
23. Kaufmann, V.(2011).The individual motilities that make the city. Rethinking the City: Urban Dynamics and Mobility.Switzerland:EPFL Press.
24. Kelly-Schwartz, A. C.,Stockard, J.,Doyle, S.,Schlossberg, M.(2004).Is sprawl unhealthy? A multilevel analysis of the relationship of metropolitan sprawl to the health of individuals.Journal of Planning Education and Research,24(2),84-196.
25. Kumara, P.P.,Ravi Sekhar, Ch,Paridaa, M.(2018).Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods.Journal of Transport Geography,72,166-177.
26. Kushner, J. A.(2004).The Post-Automobile City: Legal Mechanisms to Establish the Pedestrian-Friendly City.North Carolina:Carolina Academic Press.
27. Litman, T.(2019).,Todd Litman Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
28. Lo, A.(2010).China's response to climate change.Environmental Science and Technology,44(15),5689-5690.
29. Lopez, R.(2004).Urban sprawl and risk for being overweight or obese.American Journal of Public Health,94,1574-1579.
30. Montgomery, C.(2013).Happy city: Transforming our lives through urban design.New York, USA:Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
31. Newman, P.,Kenworthy, J. R.(2000).Sustainable of urban form: The big picture.Achieving Sustainable Urban Form,New York:
32. Rahul, T. M.,Verma, A.(2013).Economic impact of non-motorized transportation in Indian cities.Research in Transportation Economics,38(1),22-34.
33. Saaty, T.L.(2005).Making and validatung comple decisions with the AHP/ANP.Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering,14(1),1-36.
34. Sallis, J. F.,Bull, F.,Burdett, R.,Frank, L. D.,Griffiths, P.,Giles-Corti, B.,Stevenson, M.(2016).Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities.The Lancet,388(10062),2936-2947.
35. Song, Y.,Knaap, G.(2004).Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl?.Journal of the American Planning Association,70(2),210-225.
36. Tsiompras, A. B.,Photis, Y. N.(2017).What matters when it comes to “Walk and the city.Defining a weighted GIS-based walkability index Transportation Research Procedia,24,523-530.
37. United Nations(2018).World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision.
38. Ventura, F. X.(2016).Espacio y movilidad: la arquitectura de los desplazamientos.Madrid, Spain:Los Libros de la Catarata.
39. Wey, W. M.,Chiu, Y. H.(2012).Assessing the walkability of pedestrian environment under the transit-oriented development.Habitat International,38
40. Zuniga-Teran, A. A.,Orr, B. J.,Gimblett, R. H.,Chalfoun, H. V.,Marsh, S. E.,Guertin, D. P.,Going, S. B.(2017).Designing healthy communities: Testing the walkability model.Frontiers of Architectural Research,6(1),63-73.
41. 吳綱立,林更岳,張智勝(2010)。生態大眾運輸導向發展理念的車站地區土地使用評估架構與規劃策略之研究。中華民國住宅學會第 19 屆年會暨學術研討會
42. 李家儂(2009)。臺北，國立政治大學地政研究所。
43. 林楨家,李家儂,馮正民,羅健文,蔡耀慶,陳志豪,李欣庭,黃運貴,黃新薰,朱珮芸(2011).都市計畫案綠色運輸衡量指標之研訂.臺北:交通部運輸研究所.
44. 徐村和(1998)。模糊德爾菲層級分析法。模糊系統學刊，4，59-72。
45. 張學孔(2001)。永續發展與綠色交通。經濟前瞻，117，116-121。
46. 鄭滄濱(2001)。臺北，國立台灣科技大學資訊管理系。
47. 謝翊楷(2019)。臺北，中國文化大學建築及都市設計學系。