臺北市沿山都市緩衝帶的再自然化及其效益分析

Renaturing peri-urban areas in Taipei: Ecological parks for slope land transformation and their benefits

10.6128/CP.202306_50(2).0007

周素卿(Sue-Ching Jou)；盧鏡臣(Jing-Chein Lu)；鄭詠晨(Yung-Chen Cheng)；林培安(Pei-An Lin)

都市緩衝帶 ； 以自然為本的解決方案 ； 政策回饋循環 ； 效益分析 ； 永春陂生態濕地公園 ； 文山森林公園 ； Peri-urban Areas ； Nature-based Solutions ； Policy Cycle ； Measurement of Effectiveness ； Yongchunpi Wetland Park ； Wenshan Forest Park

都市與計劃

50卷2期（2023 / 06 / 30）

297 - 320

繁體中文;英文

「以自然為本的解決方案」是近年國際上倡議城市再自然化的新興典範，目的在回應氣候變遷之下都市所面臨的挑戰和問題，以更具成本效益之方式促進氣候變遷的減緩與調適，同時創造環境、社會、和經濟多元面向的共效益，塑造都市韌性並加速都市永續轉型。在臺灣，「以自然為本的解決方案」尚未成為主流政策宣示，其發展脈絡和空間經驗也與歐美城市有所差異，因此有必要進行實證科學研究，指出都市空間轉型和實務推動過程的意義。本文透過「政策回饋循環」架構，檢視臺北市海綿城市政策下，沿山緩衝地帶建置生態公園的政策創建、規劃設計、營運維護等過程，並進行效益分析。本研究選擇永春陂生態濕地公園和文山森林公園二處案例，探討其政策及設計過程，以及位於沿山都市緩衝帶公園之多面向效益。研究發現，軍事設施及公墓遷建，及其後續土地取得是臺北沿山都市緩衝帶再自然化的基礎。在市府高層領導、跨局處協助規劃設計、施作廠商的合作、及居民參與下，使得本研究二處案例的再自然化得以從概念成為現實。此二處案例均呈現整合的環境成果、健康與福祉、公民參與、轉型與監測管控等共效益。

Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are an emerging urban planning agenda and a new paradigm for renaturing cities internationally. Policymakers promote NbS to cost-effectively deal with climate change mitigation and adaptation while addressing environmental, social and economic challenges simultaneously, thereby building urban resilience and accelerating sustainable urban transitions. Taiwan has yet to adopt NbS in mainstream policy discourses, and has different socio-economic and cultural contexts of undertaking NbS. Therefore, an empirical investigation of the planning and implementation of urban transformation is scientifically relevant and required. This study investigates the Taipei Sponge City Program from the perspective of 'policy feedback cycle', by analyzing the construction of peri-urban ecological parks located in suburban hills in Taipei. Two case studies-Yongchunpi Wetland Park and Wenshan Forest Park-are investigated to analyze the process of policy creation and landscape design of the parks and to discuss their multiple co-benefits. This study argues that the relocations of military bases and public cemeteries and the acquisition of state-owned lands are key factors in renaturing peri-urban areas in Taipei. Leadership, cross-sectoral collaboration, partnerships with private consulting firms and construction companies, and public participation of local communities have helped renature cities in the two cases. Those two cases also demonstrate co-benefits of integrated environmental performance, human health and well-being, citizen participation and transformation monitoring.

1. 周素卿,盧鏡臣,岑崇恩(2021)。都市公園生態化及其發展脈絡：台北市生態公園的自然鑲嵌與社會特徵分析。都市與計劃，48(1)，49-81。
   連結：
2. 洪立三,許嘉恩(2010)。交界帶的政治生態學居民對於關渡自然公園作為 [ 資源 ] 與 [ 地方 ] 的看法。地理學報，60，1-22。
   連結：
3. Albert, C.,Brillinger, M.,Guerrero, P.,Gottwald, S.,Henze, J.,Schmidt, S.,Ott, E.,Schröter, B.(2021).Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights.Ambio,50(8),1446-1461.
4. Allen, A.(2003).Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field.Environment and Urbanization,15(1),135-148.
5. Cariñanos, P.,Casares-Porcel, M.,de la Guardia, C. D.,Aira, M. J.,Belmonte, J.,Boi, M.,Elvira-Rendueles, B.,De Linares, C.,Fernández-Rodriguez, S.,Maya-Manzano, J. M.,Pérez-Badía, R.,Cruz, D.R.,Rodríguez-Rajo, F. J.,Rojo-Úbeda, J.,Romero-Zarco, C.,Sánchez-Reyes, E.,Sánchez-Sánchez, J.,Tormo-Molina, R.,Maya-Manzano, J. M.(2017).Assessing allergenicity in urban parks: A nature-based solution to reduce the impact on public health.Environmental Research,155,219-227.
6. Carrus, G.,Scopelliti, M.,Lafortezza, R.,Colangelo, G.,Ferrini, F.,Salbitano, F.,Agrimi, M.,Portoghesi, L.,Semenzato, P.,Sanesi, G.(2015).Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas.Landscape and Urban Planning,134,221-228.
7. Chiesura, A.(2004).The role of urban parks for the sustainable city.Landscape and Urban Planning,68(1),129-138.
8. Chini, C. M.,Canning, J. F.,Schreiber, K. L.,Peschel, J. M.,Stillwell, A. S.(2017).The green experiment: Cities, green stormwater infrastructure, and sustainability.Sustainability,9(1),105.
9. Cohen-Shacham, E.,Walters, G.,Janzen, C.,Maginnis, S.(2016).Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges.Gland, Switzerland:IUCN.
10. Davies, H. J.,Doick, K. J.,Hudson, M. D.,Schreckenberg, K.(2017).Challenges for tree officers to enhance the provision of regulating ecosystem services from urban forests.Environmental Research,156,97-107.
11. Dorst, H.,van der Jagt, A.,Raven, R.,Runhaar, H.(2019).Urban greening through nature-based solutions-Key characteristics of an emerging concept.Sustainable Cities and Society,49,101620.
12. Dumitru, A.,Frantzeskaki, N.,Collier, M.(2020).Identifying principles for the design of robust impact evaluation frameworks for nature-based solutions in cities.Environmental Science and Policy,112,107-116.
13. Dumitru, A.,Wendling, L.(2021).Evaluating the impact of nature-based solutions: A handbook for practitioners.Brussels:European Commission.
14. Dushkova, D.,Haase, D.(2020).Not simply green: Nature-based solutions as a concept and practical approach for sustainability studies and planning agendas in cities.Land,9(1),19.
15. EC-European Commission(2015).Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities, Final Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities.Brussels:European Union.
16. Faivre, N.,Fritz, M.,Freitas, T.,de Boissezon, B.,Vandewoestijne, S.(2017).Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges.Environmental Research,159,509-518.
17. Gullino, P.,Battisti, L.,Larcher, F.(2018).Linking multifunctionality and sustainability for valuing peri-urban farming: A case study in the Turin Metropolitan Area (Italy).Sustainability,10(5),1625.
18. Gulsrud, N. M.,Hertzog, K.,Shears, I.(2018).Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne?: Investigating “green placemaking” as a nature-based solution.Environmental Research,161,158-167.
19. Ibes, D. C.(2014).Sustainable urban park systems.Cities and the Environment,7(2),8.
20. Kabisch, N.,Frantzeskaki, N.,Hansen, R.(2022).Principles for urban nature-based solutions.Ambio,51(6),1388-1401.
21. Kabisch, N.,Frantzeskaki, N.,Pauleit, S.,Naumann, S.,Davis, M.,Artmann, M.,Haase, D.,Knapp, S.,Korn, H.,Stadler, J.,Zaunberger, K.,Bonn, A.(2016).Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action.Ecology and Society,21(2)
22. Kabisch, N.,Korn, H.,Stadler, J.,Bonn, A.(2017).Nature-based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas: Linkages Between Science, Policy and Practice.Springer Nature.
23. Kumar, P.,Debele, S. E.,Sahani, J.,Rawat, N.,Marti-Cardona, B.,Alfieri, S. M.,Basu, B.,Basu, A. S.,Bowyer, P.,Charizopoulos, N.,Gallotti, G.,Jaakko, J.,Leo, L. S.,Loupis, M.,Menenti, M.,Mickovski, S. B.,Mun, S. J.,Gonzalez-Ollauri, A.,Pfeiffer, J.,Pilla, F.,Pröll, J.,Rutzinger, M.,Santo, M. A.,Sannigrahi, S.,Spyrou, C.,Tuomenvirta, H.,Zieher, T.(2021).Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: Modelling methods, advantages and limitations.Science of the Total Environment,784,147058.
24. Lafortezza, R.,Chen, J.,Van Den Bosch, C. K.,Randrup, T. B.(2018).Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities.Environmental Research,165,431-441.
25. Loures, L.,Santos, R.,Panagopoulos, T.(2007).Urban parks and sustainable city planning: The case of Portimão.Portugal,3(10),171-180.
26. Marshall, F.,Dolley, J.(2019).Transformative innovation in peri-urban Asia.Research Policy,48(4),983-992.
27. Mexia, T.,Vieira, J.,Príncipe, A.,Anjos, A.,Silva, P.,Lopes, N.,Freitas, C.,Santos-Reis, M.,Correia, O.,Branquinho, C.,Pinho, P.(2018).Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass.Environmental Research,160,469-478.
28. Nesshöver, C.,Assmuth, T.,Irvine, K. N.,Rusch, G. M.,Waylen, K. A.,Delbaere, B.,Haase, D.,Jones-Walters, L.,Keune, H.,Kovacs, E.,Krauze, K.,Külvik, M.,Rey, F.,van Dijk, J.,Vistad, O. I.,Wilkinson, M. E.,Wittmer, H.(2017).The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective.Science of the Total Environment,579,1215-1227.
29. Panno, A.,Carrus, G.,Lafortezza, R.,Mariani, L.,Sanesi, G.(2017).Nature-based solutions to promote human resilience and wellbeing in cities during increasingly hot summers.Environmental Research,159,249-256.
30. Pörtner, H. O.(ed.),Roberts, D. C.(ed.),Poloczanska, E. S.(ed.),Mintenbeck, K.(ed.),Tignor, M.(ed.),Alegría, A.(ed.),Craig, M.(ed.),Langsdorf, S.(ed.),Löschke, S.(ed.),Möller, V.(ed.),Okem, A.(ed.)(2022).Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
31. Raymond, C. M.,Frantzeskaki, N.,Kabisch, N.,Berry, P.,Breil, M.,Nita, M. R.,Geneletti, D.,Calfapietra, C.(2017).A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas.Environmental Science and Policy,77,15-24.
32. Raymond, C.M.,Berry, P.,Breil, M.,Nita, M.R.,Kabisch, N.,de Bel, M.,Enzi, V.,Frantzeskaki, N.,Geneletti, D.,Cardinaletti, M.,Lovinger, L.,Basnou, C.,Monteiro, A.,Robrecht, H.,Sgrigna, G.,Munari, L.,Calfapietra, C.(2017).An impact evaluation framework to support planning and evaluation of nature-based solutions projects.Wallingford, UK:Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.
33. Ruangpan, L.,Vojinovic, Z.,Di Sabatino, S.,Leo, L. S.,Capobianco, V.,Oen, A. M. P.,McClain, M. E.,Lopez-Gunn, E.(2020).Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: A state-of-the-art review of the research area.Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,20(1),243-270.
34. Sarabi, S. E.,Han, Q., L.,Romme, A. G.,de Vries, B.,Wendling, L.(2019).Key enablers of and barriers to the uptake and implementation of nature-based solutions in urban settings: a review.Resources,8(3),121.
35. Scott, M.,Lennon, M.,Haase, D.,Kazmierczak, A.,Clabby, G.,Beatley, T.(2016).Nature-based solutions for the contemporary city/Re-naturing the city/Reflections on urban landscapes, ecosystems services and nature-based solutions in cities/Multifunctional green infrastructure and climate change adaptation: Brownfield greening as an adaptation strategy for vulnerable communities?/Delivering green infrastructure through planning: Insights from practice in Fingal, Ireland/Planning for biophilic cities: From theory to practice.Planning Theory and Practice,17(2),267-300.
36. Simon, D.(2008).Urban environments: issues on the peri-urban fringe.Annual Review of Environment and Resources,33,167-185.
37. Song, Y.,Kirkwood, N.,Maksimović, Č.,Zheng, X.,O'Connor, D.,Jin, Y.,Hou, D.(2019).Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities: A review.Science of The Total Environment,663,568-579.
38. Sowińska-Świerkosz, B.,García, J.(2021).A new evaluation framework for nature-based solutions (NBS) projects based on the application of performance questions and indicators approach.Science of the Total Environment,787,147615.
39. Spyra, M.,La Rosa, D.,Zasada, I.,Sylla, M.,Shkaruba, A.(2020).Governance of ecosystem services trade-offs in peri-urban landscapes.Land Use Policy,95,104617.
40. Vieira, J.,Matos, P.,Mexia, T.,Silva, P.,Lopes, N.,Freitas, C.,Correia, O.,Santos-Reis, M.,Branquinho, C.,Pinho, P.(2018).Green spaces are not all the same for the provision of air purification and climate regulation services: The case of urban parks.Environmental Research,160,306-313.
41. Wandl, A.,Magoni, M.(2017).Sustainable planning of peri-urban areas: introduction to the special issue.Planning Practice and Research,32,1-3.
42. Watkin, L. J.,Ruangpan, L.,Vojinovic, Z.,Weesakul, S.,Torres, A. S.(2019).A framework for assessing benefits of implemented nature-based solutions.Sustainability,11(23),6788.
43. Wickenberg, B.,McCormick, K.,Olsson, J. A.(2021).Advancing the implementation of nature-based solutions in cities: A review of frameworks.Environmental Science and Policy,125,44-53.
44. Xie, L.,Bulkeley, H.,Tozer, L.(2022).Mainstreaming sustainable innovation: unlocking the potential of nature-based solutions for climate change and biodiversity.Environmental Science and Policy,132,119-130.
45. 臺北市政府工務局（2020），「臺北市地理資訊 e 點通」，https://addr.gov.taipei/M2019/indexPwd.aspx，2020 年 12 月 14 日。
46. 臺北市政府都市發展局（2020a），「土地使用分區申請及查詢系統」，https://www.zone.gov.taipei/new_nav1_01.aspx，2020 年 12 月 14 日。
47. 臺北市政府都市發展局（2020b），「臺北市都市計畫整合查詢系統」，https://webgis.udd.gov.taipei/upis_v2，2020 年 12 月 14 日。