题名

以知識導向發展構築都市研發與創新能量

并列篇名

Configuring the Capacity of Development and Innovation in Urban Via Knowledge-Based Development Strategies

DOI

10.6128/CP.202312_50(4).0001

作者

潘思錡(Ssu-Chi Pan)；胡太山(Tai-Shan Hu)；鄭皓騰(Hao-Teng Cheng)；林海萍(Hai-Ping Lin)

关键词

知識都市 ； 指標評估建構 ； 案例比較分析 ； 研發與創新 ； 知識導向發展 ； Knowledge City ； Indicator Assessment ； Case Study Analysis ； Research Development and Innovation ； Knowledge-Based Urban Development

期刊名称

都市與計劃

卷期/出版年月

50卷4期（2023 / 12 / 15）

页次

469 - 497

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

以知識為導向的都市發展（Knowledge-Based Urban Development，後簡稱KBUD）被視為是推動都市永續發展的最佳範型，惟目前我國的相關研究成果相對缺乏，阻礙了我國推動KBUD的機會與潛能。在釐清KBUD的概念與意義演化，以及推動的成功要素以後，本研究首先將KBUD的分析架構，區分為知識資本、人力資本、環境資本，以及關係資本四大面向，並對四大面向分別建構評估細項。其次，本研究挑選推動KBUD有成的都市，即位於芬蘭的赫爾辛基、澳洲的墨爾本，與臺灣的新竹縣市進行比對，並據以得知我國新竹縣市於推動KBUD時之利與不利。經過對三個案例都市的比較分析，本研究發現，三個案例都市表現較為相似的項目，包含「跨國競爭力」、「教育學習」、「文化保存／包容」，以及「外部關係」。相對而言，我國的新竹地區在「內部關係」與「社會環境」有著較好的表現，而在「學研組織」與「創新能量」上，則仍有加強的空間。
英文摘要

Knowledge-Based Urban Development (KBUD) is regarded as the best model to promote sustainable urban development. Due to the lack of relevant research results, the opportunity and potential of promoting KBUD in our country are hindered. After clarifying the evolution of concept and meaning of KBUD and the success factors in promoting it, this study divides the analysis framework of KBUD into four aspects: knowledge capital, human capital, environmental capital, and relations capital, and constructs evaluation details for each of the four aspects respectively. We select cities that have successfully promoted KBUD, namely Helsinki in Finland and Melbourne in Australia, and compare them with Hsinchu County and City in Taiwan, and learn the advantages and disadvantages of Hsinchu County and City in promoting KBUD. After comparative analysis of the three case cities, this study found that the three case cities performed relatively similar in "transnational competitiveness", "education and learning", "cultural preservation/inclusiveness", and "external relations". Relatively speaking, Hsinchu has a better performance in "internal relations" and "social environment", while there is still room for improvement in "academic research organization" and "innovative energy".
主题分类 工程學 > 土木與建築工程
工程學 > 市政與環境工程
参考文献
  1. 伍家德,杜啟躍(2006)。創新氛圍、知識外溢與產業群聚對科學園區廠商競爭優勢影響性之研究。科技管理學刊，11(3)，53-87。
    連結：
  2. 李德軒(2017)。跨區域合作創新網路的結構特徵。都市與計劃，44(1)，27-58。
    連結：
  3. 林可凡,胡太山,解鴻年,賈秉靜(2012)。地方產業群聚之演化─以新竹地區為例。建築與規劃學報，13(1)，45-74。
    連結：
  4. 徐進鈺(1999)。動的鑲嵌：新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展。臺灣社會研究季刊，35，75-118。
    連結：
  5. 黃家齊,蔡達人(2003)。團隊多元化與知識分享、知識創造及創新績效。臺大管理論叢，13(2)，233-280。
    連結：
  6. 潘思錡,胡太山,賈秉靜(2019)。以創新投入與人才演化之觀點解析臺灣工具機產業創新氛圍的形。建築與規劃學報，20(2)，115-137。
    連結：
  7. 簡禎富,陳勁甫,林國義(2013)。在新竹科學工業園區及週邊規劃研究園區之研究。管理與系統，20(2)，227-255。
    連結：
  8. 邊泰明,林淑雯,陳泓汝(2014)。鄰近性、吸收能力與廠商創新績效：以臺灣生物技術產業廠商為例。都市與計劃，41(4)，357-394。
    連結：
  9. .id Community. (2015). Australia-community profile, .id Community, http://profile.id.com.au/australia/travel-to-work, Aug. 18, 2016.
  10. Abetti, P. A.(2004).Government-supported incubators in the Helsinki region, Finland: Infra structure, results, and best practices.The Journal of Technology Transfer,29(1),19-40.
  11. Aldieri, L.,Carlucci, F.,Vinci, C. P.,Yigitcanlar, T.(2019).Environmental innovation, knowledge spillovers and policy implications: A systematic review of the economic effects literature.Journal of Cleaner Production,239,118051.
  12. Aldieri, L.,Makkonen, T.,Vinci, C. P.(2020).Environmental knowledge spillovers and productivity: A patent analysis for large international firms in the energy, water and land resources fields.Resources Policy,69,101877.
  13. Anttiroiko, A.V.,Laine, M.,Lönnqvist, H.(2016).Metropolitan strategies for global innovation networking: The case of Helsinki.International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development,7(1),20-35.
  14. Asheim, B. T.,Boschma, R.,Cooke, P.(2011).Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases.Regional Studies,45(7),893-904.
  15. Australian Bureau Statistics. (2015a). National accounts: State accounts, key economic indicators: Overview of key economic statistics, Australian Bureau of Statistics, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/key-indicators#national-accounts, Nov. 5, 2016.
  16. Australian Bureau Statistics. (2015e). National accounts: State accounts, technology and innovation, Australian Bureau of Statistics, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/technol-ogy-and-innovation, Nov. 5, 2016.
  17. Australian Bureau Statistics. (2015c). National accounts: State accounts, employment and unemployment-Labour force, Australian Bureau of Statistics, https://www.abs.gov.au/statis-tics/labour/employment-and-unemployment/labour-force-australia/, Nov. 5, 2016.
  18. Australian Bureau Statistics. (2015b). National accounts: State accounts, employment and unemployment, Australian Bureau of Statistics, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/employment-and-unemployment, Nov. 5, 2016.
  19. Australian Bureau Statistics. (2015d). National accounts: State accounts, international trade, Australian Bureau of Statistics, https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/internationaltrade, Nov. 5, 2016.
  20. Australian Government. (2015). Labor Market Information Portal, Australian Government website, https://lmip.gov.au/, Dec, 18, 2016.
  21. Australian Government-Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade(2017).,未出版
  22. Balland, P. A.,Boschma, R.,Frenken, K.(2015).Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics.Regional Studies,49(6),907-920.
  23. Baum, S.,Yigitcanlar, T.,Mahizhnan, A.,Andiappan, N.(2007).Singapore government online: A consideration of e-government outcomes.Journal of E-Government,3(4),65-84.
  24. Benneworth, P.,Ratinho, T.(2014).Reframing the role of knowledge parks and science cities in knowledge-based urban development.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy,32(5),784-808.
  25. Black, D.,Henderson, V.(1998).,Providence:Brown University, Department of Economics.
  26. Bodirsky, K.(2012).Culture for competitiveness: Valuing diversity in EU-Europe and the ‘creative city’of Berlin.International Journal of Cultural Policy,18(4),455-473.
  27. Bulu, M.,Önder, M. A.,Aksakalli, V.(2014).Algorithm-embedded IT applications for an emerging knowledge city: Istanbul, Turkey.Expert Systems with Applications,41(12),5625-5635.
  28. Capone, F.,Lazzeretti, L.,Innocenti, N.(2021).Innovation and diversity: the role of knowledge networks in the inventive capacity of cities.Small Business Economics,56(2),773-788.
  29. Carrillo, F. J.,Yigitcanlar, T.,García, B.,Lönnqvist, A.(2014).Knowledge and the City: Concepts, Applications and Trends of Knowledge-Based Urban Development.New York:Routledge.
  30. Cheng, J.,Cline, M.,Martin, J.,Finkelstein, D.,Awad, T.,Kulp, D.,Siani-Rose, M. A.(2004).A knowledge-based clustering algorithm driven by gene ontology.Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics,14(3),687-700.
  31. Christopherson, S.,Michie, J.,Tyler, P.(2010).Regional resilience: Theoretical and empirical perspectives.Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,3(1),3-10.
  32. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N.,Yigitcanlar, T.,Guaralda, M.(2018).Place quality in innovation clusters: An empirical analysis of global best practices from Singapore, Helsinki.New York, and Sydney Cities,74,156-168.
  33. Faria, H. J.,Montesinos-Yufa, H. M.,Morales, D. R.,Navarro, C. E.(2016).Unbundling the roles of human capital and institutions in economic development.European Journal of Political Economy,45(Suppl.),108-128.
  34. Florida, R.(2004).Cities and the Creative Class.New York:Routledge.
  35. Glaeser, E. L.(2000).The new economics of urban and regional growth.The Oxford Handbook of Economic,New York:
  36. Graham, S.(1999).Global grids of glass: On global cities, telecommunications and planetary urban networks.Urban Studies,36(5-6),929-949.
  37. Hackler, D.(2003).High-tech location in five metropolitan areas.Journal of Urban Affairs,25(5),625-640.
  38. Helsinki Region Infoshare. (2015a). Open data service, Helsinki Region Infoshare Service, https://hri.fi/en_gb/, Dec. 7, 2016.
  39. Helsinki Region Infoshare. (2015b). Open data service, jobs and industries, Helsinki Region Infoshare Service, https://hri.fi/data/en_GB/group/c216c15e-56c7-4d19-89caee80c5484387?groups=tyo-ja-elinkeinot, Dec. 7, 2016.
  40. Hu, T. S.,Pan, S. C.,Lin, H. P.(2021).Development, innovation, and circular stimulation for a knowledge-based city: Key thoughts.Energies,14(23),7999.
  41. Index mundi. (2015). Finland demographics profile, https://www.indexmundi.com/finland/demographics_profile.html, Nov. 5, 2016.
  42. Knight, J.(2008).Higher Education in Turmoil: The Changing World of Internationalization.Rotterdam:Sense Publishers.
  43. Knight, R. V.(1995).Knowledge-based development: Policy and planning implications for cities.Urban Studies,32(2),225-260.
  44. Kunzmann, K. R.(2009).The strategic dimensions of knowledge industries in urban development.disP-The Planning Review,45(177),40-47.
  45. Lee, N.,Nathan, M.(2010).Knowledge workers, cultural diversity and innovation: Evidence from London.International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development,1(1-2),53-78.
  46. Lin, H. P.,Hu, T. S.(2017).Knowledge interaction and spatial dynamics in industrial districts.Sustainability,9(8),1421.
  47. Manninen, A.(2011).Helsinki: City of Helsinki Urban Facts.Helsinki quarterly,,3
  48. Mathie, A.,Cunningham, G.(2003).From clients to citizens: Asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development.Development in Practice,13(5),474-486.
  49. OECD(2015).International migration outlook.OECD.
  50. OECD. (2015a). Data-health spending, OECD, https://data.oecd.org/healthres/health-spending.htm, Oct. 20, 2017.
  51. OECD. (2015d). Gross domestic product (GDP), OECD, https://data.oecd.org/gdp/grossdomestic-product-gdp.htm, Oct. 20, 2017.
  52. OECD. (2015c). Foreign-born employment, OECD, https://data.oecd.org/migration/foreignborn-employment.htm#indicator-chart, Oct. 20, 2017.
  53. OECD. (2015e). Trade in goods and services, OECD, https://data.oecd.org/trade/trade-ingoods-and-services.htm, Oct. 20, 2017.
  54. Open Knowledge. (2015). Global open data index: Survey, Open Knowledge, http://global. survey.okfn.org/, Dec, 16, 2016.
  55. Paddison, R.(ed.)(2001).Handbook of Urban Studies.Glasgow:University of Glasgow.
  56. Pareja-Eastaway, M.,Piqué, J. M.(2011).Urban regeneration and the creative knowledge economy: The case of 22@ in Barcelona.Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal,4(4),319-327.
  57. Rabelo, R. J.,Bernus, P.(2015).A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems.IFAC-PapersOnLine,48(3),2250-2257.
  58. Sarimin, M.,Yigitcanlar, T.(2012).Towards a comprehensive and integrated knowledgebased urban development model: status quo and directions.International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development,3(2),175-192.
  59. Shaw, K.(2003).Discretion vs. regulation and the sorry case of Melbourne city plan 2010.Urban Policy and Research,21(4),441-447.
  60. Simmie, J.,Martin, R.(2010).The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach.Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,3(1),27-43.
  61. Stachowiak, K.,Pinheiro, R.,Sedini, C.,Vaattovaara, M.(2013).Policies aimed at strengthening ties between universities and cities.Place-Making and Policies for Competitive Cities,Chichester:
  62. Sunley, P.,Martin, R.,Gardiner, B.,Pike, A.(2020).In search of the skilled city: Skills and the occupational evolution of British cities.Urban Studies,57(1),109-133.
  63. Tilastokeskus. (2015). Statistics Finland’s free-of-charge statistical databases, Statistics Finland’s Web Service, https://www.stat.fi/tup/tilastotietokannat/index_en.html, Oct. 20, 2016.
  64. UNESCO. (2015). States Parties, Australia, World Heritage Convention, https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/au, Dec. 7, 2016.
  65. Vaattovaara, M.(2009).The emergence of the Helsinki Metropolitan area as an international hub of the knowledge industries.Built Environment,35(2),204-211.
  66. van den Berg, L.,Pol, P. M. J.,van Winden, W.,Woets, P.(2004).Helsinki in the knowledge economy.Quarterly,4(3),22-26.
  67. van Wezemael, J.(2012).Afterword: concluding: Directions for building prosperous knowledge cities.Building Prosperous Knowledge Cities,Yigitcanla Cheltenham:
  68. van Winden, W.,van den Berg, L.,Pol, P. M. J.(2007).European cities in the knowledge economy: Towards a typology.Urban Studies,44(3),525-549.
  69. World Economic Forum(2015).The global competitiveness report 2015-2016-Report highlights.World Economic Forum.
  70. World Economic Forum. (2015c). The global competitiveness report 2015-2016-Economy profiles, World Economic Forum, http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-re- port-2015-2016/economies/#economy=ALB, Nov. 15, 2016.
  71. World Economic Forum. (2015d). The global competitiveness report 2015-2016-Competi-tiveness rankings, World Economic Forum, https://reports.weforum.org/global-competitive-ness-report-2015-2016/competitiveness-rankings/, Nov. 15, 2016.
  72. World Economic Forum(2015).The global competitiveness report 2015-2016.World Economic Forum.
  73. Yigitcanlar, T.(2009).Planning for knowledge-based urban development: Global perspectives.Journal of Knowledge Management,13(5),228-242.
  74. Yigitcanlar, T.(2014).Position paper: Benchmarking the performance of global and emerging knowledge cities.Expert Systems with Applications,41(12),5549-5559.
  75. Yigitcanlar, T.(2011).Knowledge-based urban development redefined: From theory to prac-tice knowledge-based development of cities.Summit Proceedings of the 4th Knowledge Cities World Summit,Gonçalves:
  76. Yigitcanlar, T.,Baum, S.,Horton, S.(2007).Attracting and retaining knowledge workers in knowledge cities.Journal of Knowledge Management,11(5),6-17.
  77. Yigitcanlar, T.,Kamruzzaman, M.,Buys, L.,Ioppolo, G.,Sabatini-Marques, J.,Costa, E. M.,Yun, J. J.(2018).Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework.Cities,81,145-160.
  78. Yigitcanlar, T.,Lönnqvist, A.(2013).Benchmarking knowledge-based urban development performance: Results from the international comparison of Helsinki.Cities,31,357-369.
  79. Yigitcanlar, T.,O’Connor, K.,Westerman, C.(2008).The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience.Cities,25(2),63-72.
  80. Yigitcanlar, T.,Velibeyoglu, K.,Martinez-Fernandez, C.(2008).Rising knowledge cities: The role of urban knowledge precincts.Journal of Knowledge Management,12(5),8-20.
  81. 中華民國戶政司（2015），人口統計資料，「中華民國戶政司全球資訊網」，https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346，2016年11月5日。
  82. 內政部不動產資訊平臺（2015），房價負擔能力統計，「內政部不動產資訊平臺」，http://pip.moi.gov.tw/v2/e/scre0105.aspx，2016年3月6日。
  83. 內政部移民署（2015），統計資料，「內政部移民署全球資訊網」，https://www.immigration.gov.tw/5382/5385/7344/7350/8883/，2015年09月03日。
  84. 文化部文化資產局（2016），臺灣世界遺產潛力地圖，「文化部文化資產局網站」，https://twh.boch.gov.tw/taiwan/index.aspx?lang=zh_tw，2019年10月03日。
  85. 新竹市政府主計處（2014），各機關所辦理統計調查，「新竹市政府主計處網站」，https://dep-auditing.hccg.gov.tw/ch/index.jsp，2015年12月15日。
  86. 行政院（2015a），國情簡介―圖表資料，「行政院網站」，https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/51BCA519727F88FF，2015年09月03日。
  87. 行政院（2015d），新聞與公告，「行政院網站」，https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/6485009ABEC1CB9C，2015年09月05日。
  88. 行政院（2015c），總體經濟概況，「行政院網站」，https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/4F655F114E18B450，2015年09月04日。
  89. 行政院（2015b），政策與計畫―專案報告，「行政院網站」，https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/7D11D24030E7F958，2015年09月04日。
  90. 行政院（2015f），重要施政成果―前瞻基礎建設，「行政院網站」，https://www.ey.gov.tw/achievement/6D60436E66CF17C0，2020年10月13日。
  91. 行政院（2015e），重要施政成果―產業創新，「行政院網站」，https://www.ey.gov.tw/achievement/F856D03EF813C8E7，2020年10月13日。
  92. 行政院主計總處（2015d），最新統計指標，「行政院主計總處網站」，https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/pointlist.asp，2019年10月03日。
  93. 行政院主計總處（2015a），家庭收支調查，「行政院主計總處網站」，https://win.dgbas.gov.tw/fies/a11.asp?year=104，2016年11月2日。
  94. 行政院主計總處（2015b），總體統計資料庫，「中華民國統計資訊網」，https://nstatdb.dgbas.gov.tw/dgbasall/webmain.aspx?sys=100&funid=defjsp，2015年09月03日。
  95. 行政院主計總處（2015c），縣市重要統計指標，「中華民國統計資訊網」，https://winsta.dgbas.gov.tw/DgbasWeb/ZWeb/StateFile_ZWeb.aspx，2015年09月03日。
  96. 行政院主計總處（2016），新聞稿―104年12月份物價變動概況，「中華民國統計資訊網」，https://www.stat.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas03/bs3/news/10412/newstotal10412.pdf，2016年01月03日。
  97. 林海萍,胡太山(2018)。臺灣南部產業之空間發展與創新知識互動。都市與計劃，45(3)，211-235。
  98. 胡太山,張素莉(2001)。技術基礎設施、產業聚群與與地方創新網絡建構之初探︰以新竹科學園區暨周邊地區為例。建築與規劃學報，2(1)，27-42。
  99. 國家發展委員會（2017），各鄉鎮市區人口密度，「政府資料開放平臺」，https://data.gov.tw/dataset/8410，2018年03月16日。
  100. 張芳全(2008)。過量及低度高等教育與失業率之國際分析。教育研究與發展期刊，4(3)，79-116。
  101. 教育部統計處（2016），教育統計―縣市統計指標，「教育部統計處網站」，https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News.aspx?n=82CAED1A33B4CD83&sms=DBDDB8DC17D0D8C4，2016年11月3日。
  102. 黃暖雲(2015)。臺劇運用新媒體平臺創新行銷模式之探討。臺灣經濟研究月刊，38(7)，129-136。
  103. 新竹科學園區管理局（2016），新竹科學工業園區年報，「新竹科學園區網站」，https://www.sipa.gov.tw/home.jsp?serno=201001210117&mserno=201001210113&menudata=ChineseMenu&contlink=include/menu03.jsp，2016年09月10日。
  104. 衛生福利部統計處（2016），衛生福利統計調查，「衛生福利部統計處網站」，https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/mp-113.html，2015年12月26日。
print cancel