從水文空間關聯性探討地區減災責任—以鹽水溪流域為例

Exploring Flood Characteristics of Source and Impact Areas for Runoff Management - A Case of Yanshuei River Basin

10.6128/CP.202312_50(4).0003

張學聖(Hsueh-Sheng Chang)；薛博孺(Po-Ru Hsueh)

洪災風險外部成本 ； 逕流分擔 ； PHD-model ； DEA ； Externality of Flood Risk ； Runoff Distribution ； PHD-Model ； DEA

都市與計劃

50卷4期（2023 / 12 / 15）

527 - 550

繁體中文;英文

隨氣候變遷極端氣候的加劇，以及災害風險不確定性與成本效益之考量，凸顯傳統防洪工程對耐災與減災的有限性，使得水土整合規劃與流域綜合治理成為韌性國土的重要理念，其中「逕流分擔」即為國土洪災調適的重要策略之一。逕流分擔係將超額逕流量轉由淹水潛勢地區負擔，然而在流域系統複雜的交互關係中，普遍認知河川地文與水體流動將暴雨逕流由上游帶至下游地區，以致多數都市地區屢見洪水積淹現象，此流域空間的連結性仍尚未被明確界定；且若淹水現象影響人類活動將構成洪水災害，在上、中、下游非均質發展的情形下，洪災責任在流域各地區間應如何分配以提升洪災治理效率實為一重要課題。基此，本文透過流域空間關聯分析之研究設計，嘗試轉用投入產出概念於三維空間中，建立洪水逕流關聯矩陣，找尋流域各地區間地表逕流的互動關係，藉以界定洪水致災與受災區位特性，並納入「水文循環的公平性」與「洪災治理效率」兩觀點，考量都市發展程度與洪災暴露度，設計三種逕流分擔方案進行效率評估與比較，其中方案三以「致災比例」進行分配，將流域存在洪水積淹的空間不對等性及災害風險外部性等納入考量，較現行以「受災比例」的分擔原則更具減洪效率，同時也較具逕流責任分配的公平性。

Traditional projects of flood mitigation have been limited by the uncertainty of disaster risk and cost-effectiveness as climate change induces a rise in extreme rainfall events. Integrated flood management has become an important concept for resilience. "Runoff control" is the important strategy for reducing flood risk in the watershed. "Runoff control" is one of the strategies for flood adaptation, and the principle is that flood potential areas are responsible for excess runoff. Keeping the complex interaction of a basin in mind, we commonly recognized that most flooding in urban areas is due to the hydrologic connectivity of river flow bringing the ground runoff from upstream to downstream. However, the spatial connectivity in watersheds is still undefined. Therefore, it is a critical issue how to distribute the responsibility of runoff control to improve the disaster-mitigation efficiency in case of heterogeneity in a watershed. This study applied the source-to-impact analysis to clarify runoff interaction between 39 regions in the Yanshuei River Basin and defined the spatial inequality of flood-induced and disaster-stricken areas, which demonstrated the external cost of flood risk. In terms of "the fairness of hydrological cycle" and "flood management efficiency", this paper evaluated the flood protection efficiency of a different division of responsibilities in the watershed. The conclusions include (I) Empirically confirming the upstream is the main flood-induced region, and the downstream is the main disaster-affected region. (II) Assigning runoff responsibility by flood-induced ratio is a relatively acceptable principle for watershed management. The results aim to provide an implementation reference for the coordination of water and urban departments.

1. 何彥陞(2017)。河川生態價值評估與生態補償之研究─以零淨損失為中心。臺灣土地研究，20(1)，37-70。
   連結：
2. 張學聖,蘇麗元,程韋涵(2018)。從逕流責任觀點下探討減洪土地使用規劃。都市與計劃，45(1)，81-101。
   連結：
3. Chang, H. S.,Su, Q.(2021).Exploring the coupling relationship of stormwater runoff distribution in watershed from the perspective of fairness.Urban Climate,36,100792.
4. Ciullo, A.,Kwakkel, J. H.,De Bruijn, K. M.,Doorn, N.,Klijn, F.(2020).Efficient or Fair? Operationalizing Ethical Principles in Flood Risk Management: A Case Study on the Dutch-German Rhine.Risk Analysis,40(9),1844-1862.
5. Clément, V.,Rey-Valette, H.,Rulleau, B.(2015).Perceptions on equity and respon sibility in coastal zone policies.Ecological Economics,119,284-291.
6. Cruz, R. V. O.(1999).Integrated Land Use Planning and Sustainable Watershed Manage- ment.Journal of Philippine Development,47(26),27-49.
7. Dai, L.,van Doorn-Hoekveld, W. J.,Wang, R. Y.,van Rijswick, H. F. M. W.(2019).Dealing with distributional effects of flood risk management in China: Compensation mechanisms in flood retention areas.Water International,44(5),607-621.
8. Dawson, D. A.,Vercruysse, K.,Wright, N.(2020).A spatial framework to explore needs and opportunities for interoperable urban flood management.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences,378(2168),20190205.
9. Doorn, N.(2015).The Blind Spot in Risk Ethics: Managing Natural Hazards.Risk Analysis,35(3),354-360.
10. Du, J.,Qian, L.,Rui, H.,Zuo, T.,Zheng, D.,Xu, Y.,Xu, C. Y.(2012).Assessing the effects of urbanization on annual runoff and flood events using an integrated hydrological modeling system for Qinhuai River basin, China.Journal of Hydrology,464-465,127-139.
11. Gourevitch, J. D.,Singh, N. K.,Minot, J.,Raub, K. B.,Rizzo, D. M.,Wemple, B. C.,Ricketts, T. H.(2020).Spatial targeting of floodplain restoration to equitably mitigate flood risk.Global Environmental Change,61,102050.
12. Haghighatafshar, S.,Nordlöf, B.,Roldin, M.,Gustafsson, L. G.,Jansen, J.,Jonsson, K.(2018).Efficiency of blue-green stormwater retrofits for flood mitigation-Conclusions drawn from a case study in Malm.Sweden, Journal of Environmental Management,207,60-69.
13. Jiang, X.,Liu, Y.,Zhao, R.(2019).A Framework for Ecological Compensation Assessment: A Case Study in the Upper Hun River Basin.Northeast China, Sustainability,11(4),1205.
14. Johnson, C.,Penning-Rowsell, E.,Parker, D.(2007).Natural and imposed injustices: the challenges in implementing ‘fair’ flood risk management policy in England.Geographical Journal,173(4),374-390.
15. Kabisch, S.,Koch, F.,Gawel, E.,Haase, A.,Knapp, S.,Krellenberg, K.,Nivala, J.,Zehnsdorf, A.(2018).Urban Transformations: Sustainable Urban Development Through Resource Efficiency, Quality of Life and Resilience.Cham:Springer.
16. Liao, K. H.,Chan, J. K. H.,Huang, Y. L.(2019).Environmental justice and flood prevention: The moral cost of floodwater redistribution.Landscape and Urban Planning,189,36-45.
17. Thaler, T.,Hartmann, T.(2016).Justice and flood risk management: reflecting on differ- ent approaches to distribute and allocate flood risk management in Europe.Natural Hazards,83(1),129-147.
18. Tone, K.(2002).A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis.European journal of operational research,143(1),32-41.
19. Ustaoğlu, F.,Tepe, Y.,Taş, B.(2020).Assessment of stream quality and health risk in a subtropical Turkey river system: A combined approach using statistical analysis and water quality index.Ecological Indicators,113,105815.
20. Vercruysse, K.,Dawson, D. A.,Glenis, V.,Bertsch, R.,Wright, N.,Kilsby, C.(2019).Developing spatial prioritization criteria for integrated urban flood management based on a source-to-impact flood analysis.Journal of Hydrology,578,124038.
21. Vorogushyn, S.,Bates, P. D.,de Bruijn, K.,Castellarin, A.,Kreibich, H.,Priest, S.,Schröter, K.,Bagli, S.,Blöschl, G.,Domeneghetti, A.,Gouldby, B.,Klijn, F.,Lammersen, R.,Neal, J. C.,Ridder, N.,Terink, W.,Viavattene, C.,Viglione, A.,Zanardo, S.,Merz, B.(2018).Evolutionary leap in large-scale flood risk assessment needed.WIREs Water e1266,5(2),e1266.
22. WMO(2016).,Geneva:World Meeorological Organization.
23. WMO(2009).Integrated Flood Management Concept Paper.Geneva:World Meteorological Organization.
24. 王俊敏,沈菊琴(2016)。跨域水環境流域政府協同治理：理論框架與實現機制。江海學刊，2016(5)，214-219。
25. 李志萌(2013)。域生態補償：實現地區發展公平、協調與共贏。鄱陽湖學刊，2013(1)，5-17。
26. 張燕,張洪(2010)。以生態補償實現水土資源開發的帕累托最優。水土保持研究，2010(4)，109-113。
27. 許晨陽,錢爭鳴,李雍容,彭本榮(2009)。域生態補償的環境責任界定模型研究。自然資源學報，24(8)，1488-1496。
28. 曾文慧(2008)。域越界污染規制：對中國跨省水污染的實證研究。經濟學（季刊），2008(1)，447-464。
29. 經濟部水利署（2020），逕流分擔技術手冊，「臺北市政府全球資訊網」，https://reurl.cc/q0GdDR，2020年12月7日。
30. 劉格非,李欣(2004)。外部性理論於「土石流特定水土保持區」劃定之應用。臺大工程學刊，92，105-118。