淡水河系水質與景觀改善效益之評估

10.29765/TEI.199801.0002

蕭代基；錢玉蘭；蔡麗雪

假設市場評價法 ； 景觀與水質改善的經濟效益 ； 愿付價值 ； contingent valuation method ； willingness-to-pay ； value of improving water quality and scenery

經濟研究

35卷1期（1998 / 01 / 01）

29 - 59

繁體中文

本文採用雙界二分選擇問題的假設市場評價法，同時估計淡水河系景觀與水質改善的經濟效益，結果發現大部份的個人社經變數皆顯著地影響個人對水質或景觀改善的願付價値(WTP)，此外也發現願付金額起始點偏誤的問題，値得繼續研究。 利用WTP函數估計式，計算得水質改善的加權平均WTP値約爲1,300元／人年，各級水質改善的總經濟效益約爲80億元／年；景觀改善之經濟效益約爲1,500元／人年至1,900元／人年，各級景觀改善的總經濟效益約爲96億元／年至120億元／年。這些水質與景觀改善的效益値，再加上其他效益估計値，如防洪效益，就可以與淡水河系防洪及水污染防治工程的投資成本與維護成本相比較。

This paper applies a double-bounded referendum contingent valuation survey in a case study that evaluates the benefits resulting from improvements in the water quality of and in the scenery surrounding the Tamshui river system in the Taipei Metropolitan Area in Taiwan. It is found that people's willingness-to-pay (WTP) for water quality and scenery improvements is highly dependent on personal characteristics such as age and income. The empirical estimation shows that the WTP is around NT$1300 per person per year for marginally improving water quality and is NT$1500-1900 for improvements in the scenery. For residents living in the Taipei Metropolitan Area, the total values are around NT$8 billion for marginally improving water quality to three different levels and are betweenNT$9.6 billion and NT$12 billion for improving scenery to two different levels. The environmental benefits are comparable to the total costs of those projects which are aimed at improving the water quality of the four rivers in the Tamshui river system.

1. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Leamer, E., Portney, P., Randner, R., Schuman, H.(1993).Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.Federal Register,58(10)
2. Bishop, R. C., Heberlein, Thomas(1979).Measuring Values of Extra-market Goods: are Indirect Measures Based?.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,61(5)
3. Cameron, T. A.(1992).Combining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for the Valuation of Nonmarket Goods.Land Economics,68
4. Cameron, T. A.(1988).A New Paradigm for Valuing Nonmarket Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,15(3)
5. Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., Wilson, K. N.(1993).Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment.Amsterdam:North-Holland Press.
6. Diamond, P.(1996).Testing the Internal Consistency of Contingent Valuation Surveys.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,30
7. Diamond, P., Hausman, J.(1993).Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment.Amsterdam:North-Holland.
8. Diamond, P., Hausman, J., Loonard, G., Denning, M.(1993).Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment.Amsterdam:North-Holland.
9. Grossman, G. M.(1995).Economics of Sustainable Development.UK:Cambridge University Press.
10. Hanemann, W. M.(1984).Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66(3)
11. Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J., Kanninen, B.(1991).Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73
12. Harrison, G.(1992).Valuing Public Goods with the Contingent Valuation Method: A Critique of Kahneman and Knetsch.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,23
13. Herriges, J., Shogren, J.(1996).Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,30
14. Holmes, T., Kramer, R.(1995).An Independent Sample Test of Yea-Saying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,29
15. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.(1992).Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,22
16. Loomis, J. B.(1992).The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer.Water Resources Research,28(3)
17. McConnell, K.(1997).Income and the Demand for Environmental Quality.Environmental and Development Economics,2
18. McConnell, K.(1990).Models for Referendum Data: the Structure of Discrete Choice Models for Contingent Valuation.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,18
19. Mitchell, R. C., Carson, R. T.(1989).Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method.Washington, DC:Resources for the Future.
20. Nickerson, C.(1993).Valuing Public Goods: A Comment on Harrison's Critique of Kahneman and Knetsch.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,25(2)
21. Nickerson, C.(1995).Does Willingness to Pay Reflect the Purchase of Moral Satisfaction? A Reconsideration of Kahneman and Knetsch.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,28(1)
22. O''Doherty, R. K.(1995).A Review of Benefit Transfer: Why and How?.British Review of Economic Issues,17(43)
23. Randall, A., Hoehn, J.(1996).Embedding in Market Demand Systems.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,30
24. Smith, V. K.(1992).Arbitrary Values, Good Causes, and Premature Verdicts.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,22
25. Wu, P. -I., Hsieh, W. -H.(1996).The Economics of Pollution Control in the Asia Pacific.Cheltenham, UK:Edward Elgar.
26. Wu, S. -T., Hsu, F. -S.(1989).A Estimation of Recreational Benefit from Water Quality Improvement, the Case of River Tanshui.Sino-US Binational Conference on Environmental Protection and Social Development,Taipei, Taiwan:
27. 臺灣經濟研究院(1990)。重大環保工程計畫經濟效益評估。行政院環境保護署。
28. 劉錦添 Liu, Jin-Tan(1995)。單界與雙界二分選擇評估方法之比較－保護關渡沼澤區經濟效益之應用。經濟論文叢刊 Taiwan Economic Review
29. 劉錦添 Liu, Jin-Tan(1990)。淡水河水質改善的經濟效益評估－封閉式假設市場評價法之應用。經濟論文 Academia Economic Papers，18(2)
30. 錢玉蘭 Chien, Yu-Lan(1994).Davis, CA,University of California.

1. 曾偉君、陳宗薊、王世銘(2017)。國人對於保育台灣黑熊之願付價值估計。農業與經濟，58，103-130。
2. 胡志平(2021)。桃園市暴雨水減災的假設市場價格及其空間迴歸分析。地理學報，100，39-69。
3. 賴靜瑤,蕭嘉誼,鄭羽舒,楊淑喻,林祐樂,林伊桂,王韻晴(2016)。從綠色消費觀點探討環境意識對消費者使用油電混合低底盤公車意願的效果。綠色經濟期刊，2，a1-a21。
4. 林億明、林幸君(2009)。衡量行動電話基地台設置之外部成本：假設市場評估法之應用。亞太經濟管理評論，13(1)，1-16。
5. 蘇明達、林佳穎、吳佩瑛(2005)。抗議性樣本與答覆「無法確定」樣本之特質：這一群人對假設市場價值評估結果之影響。調查研究：方法與應用，17，65-110。
6. 謝敬華、柳婉郁、林信維(2020)。臺灣水稻田生物多樣性之經濟價值評估。農業經濟叢刊，26(1)，57-104。
7. 顏如汾、黃炳文(2007)。農民團體對行銷諮詢願付價值之研究—以品牌水果爲例。農業經濟半年刊，81，121-164。
8. 楊壽麟、吳麗敏、吳巽庚、吳珮瑛(2007)。條件評估選擇式資料的理論詮釋與實證檢視—對台灣戶外遊憩效益評估研究的一些啟示。戶外遊憩研究，20(2)，1-37。
9. 葉寶文、傅祖壇(2007)。酒後駕車行為之取締的願付風險價值研究。運輸計劃，36(4)，509-533。
10. 葉欣誠、陳孟毓、于蕙清(2017)。我國民眾減緩全球暖化之願付價值與影響因素分析。都市與計劃，44(4)，339-374。
11. 鄭惠萍、曹校章(2017)。澎湖國家風景區海洋運動觀光經濟效益分析。大專體育學刊，19(1)，19-33。
12. (1999)。認知訪談在調查研究上的應用--以假設市場評價法為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，9(3)，555-574。
13. (2005)。消費者對旅遊資訊願付價值評估之研究—以台北地區為例。朝陽學報，10，309-328。