921大地震災後重建經費之民眾捐款意願－CVM法之應用

Citizen's Willingness to Donate for Reconstructing Disaster Areas Caused by the 921 Earthquake-An Application of CVM

10.29765/TEI.200601.0003

傅祖壇(Tsu-Tan Fu)；楊文山(Wen-Shan Yang)；葉寶文(Powen Yeh)

大災害 ； 慈善捐款 ； 假設市場評估法 ； 願捐額度 ； Disaster ； Charity donation ； Contingency valuation method ； Willingness to donate

經濟研究

42卷1期（2006 / 01 / 31）

57 - 74

繁體中文

本文旨在分析台灣民眾對921重建經費之捐款意願，我們進行全台性的電話抽樣調查，並利用假設市場評估法(Contingent Valuation Method, CVM)來推估民眾之願意捐款額。利用雙界模式推估民眾之願意增加之所得稅稅額之中位數，平均每戶為4,576元。由此粗估全台之願意捐款額度為每年216億或352億元。我們亦發現民眾之願意捐款的額度會因本人有沒有受傷、有沒有親人或朋友過世、本人有沒有捐錢習慣、性別、教育程度、所得等社會經濟變數而有所差異。

This paper attempts to investigate willingness to donate (WTD) of citizens in Taiwan for reconstructing disaster areas caused by the 921 earthquake. To serve such purpose, we conducted an island wide telephone survey in 1999 and employed the contingent valuation method for empirical estimation. The results show that the median estimate of such WTD by an additional annual income tax is 4,567 NT dollars by the double-bound model. The total WTD by citizens in Taiwan thus can be estimated to be between 21.6 and 35.2 billions NT dollars by the model. It is also found that individual WTD will vary by demographic variables such as sex, education, income, relationship to victims, and donation habit.

1. Becker, G.,R. Febrero,P.Schwartz(1974).A Theory of Social Interactions.The Essence of Bedor
2. Cameron, T. A.,J. Quiggin(1994).Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with a Follow-UP Questionnaire.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,27,218-234.
3. Dacy, D. C.,H. Kunreuther(1969).The Economics of Natural Disasters: Implications for Federal Policy
4. De Alessi, L.(1967).A Utility Analysis of Post-Disaster Cooperation.Papers in Non-Market Decision Making,3,85-90.
5. Douty, C. M.(1972).Disasters and Charity: Some Aspects of Cooperative Economic Behavior.American Economic Review,62(4),580-590.
6. Fu, T. T.,J. T. Liu,J. K. Hammit(1999).Consumer Willingness to Pay for Low-Pesticide Fresh Produce in Taiwan.Journal of Agricultural Economics,50(2),220-233.
7. Hanemann, W. M.(1984).Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66(3),332-341.
8. Hanemann, W. M.,J. Loomis,B. Kanninen(1991).Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73,1255-1263.
9. Hoehn, J.P.,A. Randall(1987).A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,14,226-247.
10. Nelson, W.(1982).Applied Life Data Analysis
11. Reece, W. S.(1979).Charitable Contributions: New Evidence on Household Behavior.American Economic Review,69,142-151.
12. Smith, V. H.,M. R. Kehoe,M. E. Cremer(1995).The Private Provision of Public Goods: Altruism and Voluntary Giving.Journal of Public Economics,58,107-126.
13. Thompson, J. D.,R. W. Hawkes,G. W. Baker,D. W. Chapman(1962).Disaster, Community Organization and Administrative Processes.Man and Society in Disaster
14. Wu, P. I.,W. H. Hsieh,R. Mendelsohn,D. Shaw(1996).Demand for Environmental Quality: Comparing Models for Contingent Policy Referendum Experiments.In The Economics of Pollution Control in the Asia Pacific
15. Yen, S. T.(2002).An Econometric Analysis of Household Donation in the USA.Applied Economics Letters,9,837-841.
16. 楊文山、周玉慧(1999)。九二一地震災變的社會、心理反應與災後重建。災變與重建國際研討會

1. 池伯尉、尤素娟(2015)。花蓮地區長期照顧家庭主要照顧者時間貨幣價值之探討—福康評估法之應用。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，34(6)，634-645。
2. 熊師瑤,許雅涵,翁雅芸,余民寧(2023)。自我超越的情緒與超越自我的表現：敬畏情緒的正向影響效果。中華輔導與諮商學報，68，71-113。