题名

租稅競爭、公共財提供與廠商家數

并列篇名

Tax Competition, Provision of Public Goods and the Number of Firms

DOI

10.29765/TEI.201101.0002

作者

郭虹瑩(Horn-In Kuo)

关键词

租稅競爭 ; 公共財 ; 廠商家數 ; 配置生產效率 ; Tax Competition ; Public Goods ; Number of Firms ; Allocative Production Efficiency

期刊名称

經濟研究

卷期/出版年月

47卷1期(2011 / 01 / 31)

页次

27 - 44

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

Lai (2006)一文將利潤移轉效果納入傳統租稅競爭模型中發現:在三國兩廠商的架構下,當廠商進行數量競爭時,利潤移轉效果會讓租稅競爭的程度加劇,因此Oates (1972)提出的假說仍然成立。本篇短文則發現Lai (2006)所獲致的結果,廠商的家數扮演相當關鍵的角色。當本國廠商的生產成本爲同質時,只要本國廠商相對競爭國廠商的家數夠多時,利潤移轉效果會緩和租稅競爭的程度而非加劇,且Oates (1972)假說不一定會成立;當本國廠商的生產成本爲異質時,配置生產效率效果會強化上述結果,使得租稅競爭的程度更爲降低。

英文摘要

Under the three-countries-two-firms duopolistic structure, Lai (2006) incorporates the rent-shifting effect in the typical tax competition model. He finds that when firms compete in terms of quantity, the rent-shifting effect aggravates the under-provision of public goods in a Cournot duopoly, i.e., the Oates hypothesis still holds. However, in this note we find that the number of firms plays an important role in the result which Lai (2006) has obtained. Moreover, if the number of home country manufacturers is larger than the foreign country's under the homogeneous cost structures of the home country manufacturers, the rent-shifting effect will increase (not reduce) the provision of public goods and mitigate (not aggravate) the inefficiency arising from tax competition. On the other hand, under the heterogeneous cost structures of the home country manufacturers, the effect of allocative production efficiency will enhance the above result.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Lai, Y. B.(2006).Capital Tax Competition in the Presence of Rent-Shifting Incentives.Taipei Economic Inquiry,42(1),1-24.
    連結:
  2. Bergstrom, T. C.,Varian, H. R.(1985).When Are Nash Equilibria Independent of the Distribution of Agents' Characteristics?.The Review of Economic Studies,52(4),715-718.
  3. Bond, E. W.,Samuelson, L.(1986).Tax Holidays as Signals.The American Economic Review,76,820-826.
  4. Brander, J. A.,Spencer, B. J.(1985).Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry.Journal of International Economics,18,83-100.
  5. Conrad, K.,Seitz, H.(1997).Infrastructure Provision and International Market Share Rivalry.Regional Science and Urban Economics,27,715-734.
  6. Dixit, A.(1984).International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industries.The Economic Journal,94,1-16.
  7. Dixit, A.(1986).Comparative Statics for Oligopoly.International Economic Review,27,107-122.
  8. Fevrier, P.,Linnemer, L.(2004).Idiosyncratic Shocks in an Asymmetric Cournot Oligopoly.International Journal of Industrial Organization,22,835-848.
  9. Gaudet, G.,Salant, S. W.(1991).Increasing the Profits of a Subset of Firms in Oligopoly Models with Strategic Substitutes.The American Economic Review,81,658-665.
  10. Hoyt, W.,Jensen, R.(1996).Precommitment in a System of Hierarchical Governments.Regional Science and Urban Economics,26,481-504.
  11. Huizinga, H.,Nielsen, S. B.(1997).Capital Income and Profit Taxation with Foreign Ownership of Firms.Journal of International Economics,42,149-165.
  12. Krishna, K.,Thursby, M.(1991).Optimal Policies with Strategic Distortions.Journal of International Economics,31,291-308.
  13. Lee, K.(1997).Tax Competition with Imperfectly Mobile Capital.Journal of Urban Economics,42,222-242.
  14. Long, N. V.,Soubeyran, A.(1997).Cost Heterogeneity, Industry Concentration and Strategic Trade Policies.Journal of International Economics,43,207-220.
  15. Oates, W.(1972).Fiscal Federalism.New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  16. Salant, S.(1984).Export Subsidies as Instruments of Economic and Foreign Policies.University of Michigan, mimeo.
  17. Wagner, W.,Eijffinger, S.(2008).Efficiency of Capital Taxation in an Open Economy: Tax Competition versus Tax Exportation.International Tax public Finance,15,637-646.
  18. Wellisch, D.(2000).Theory of Public Finance in a Federal Stale.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  19. Wilson, D.(1999).Theories of Tax Competition.National Tax Journal,52,269-304.
  20. Wilson, D.(1986).A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition.Journal of Urban Economics,19,296-315.
  21. Wilson, D.,Wildasin, D.(2004).Capital Tax Competition: Bane or Boon.Journal of Public Economics,88,1065-1091.
  22. Zodrow, G.,Mieszkowski, P.(1986).Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods.Journal of Urban Economics,19,356-370.
被引用次数
  1. 郭虹瑩(2015)。成本異質、配置的生產效率與最適的釋股比例。農業與經濟,54,47-72。
  2. 翁堃嵐,石恩銘(2020)。民營化程度、租稅競爭與公共財提供。社會科學論叢,14(1),1-28。
  3. 顏志達,陳伊琪,郭虹瑩(2021)。移轉訂價、逃漏稅責任分攤、內部控制與租稅協調。經濟研究,57(2),211-253。