創造性問題解決訓練對研究績效的影響

The Effects of Creative Problem Solving Training on R & D Performance

10.6226/NTURM1999.9.2.137

王精文(Ching-Wen Wang)；洪瑞雲(Ruey-Yun Horng)

研究績效 ； 創造性問題解決訓練 ； 創造思考能力 ； 認知型態 ； Creative Problem Solving Training ； R & D Performance ； Creative Thinking ； Cognitive Type

臺大管理論叢

9卷2期（1999 / 03 / 01）

137 - 159

繁體中文

本研究目的在探討創造性問題解決訓練對研究績效的影響。以某國營機構106位研究員為受試者，依其參與方便性，分為三實驗組與一控制組。實驗組71位受試者分三梯次接受12時的創造性問題解決訓練及二次三時的追蹤訓練，控制組則未受訓。全部受試者皆參與前後測驗，各施予拓弄思圖形創造思考測驗及梅氏個人風格量表。過去三年平均研究報告數量、技術服務、期刊報告數量及年度考績作為衡量研究員未訓練前的研究績效標準，而訓練後一年的研究績效作為觀察訓練效果的依據。結果以實驗組前後測比較顯示，受試者在流暢力、應變力、獨創力皆較進步，且較傾向外向、直覺的思考型態。實驗組控制組後測的比較顯示，實驗組受試者在考績、年度報告、協同作者期刊論文、協同作者技術服務、技術服務總和皆比控制組受試者的後測佳，而訓練至後測時間的長短會影響訓練的效果。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Creative Problem Solving training(CPS)on R & D performance. One hundred and six R & D workers of a large government-owned manufacturing company in Taiwan participated in the study. Seventy-one of them were divided into three groups and received 12 hours of CPS training and two 3-hours follow-ups over one-year period in a time-series design. The remaining 35 subjects serves as the control. All subjects were administered the Circle Test of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicators before and after the CPS training. R & D performance in terms of averaged numbers of annual research reports, technical services, and published papers and performance rating three years before the CPS and one year after the CPS training were compared. Result showed that subject in all experimental groups showed higher fluency, flexibility, and originality, in thinking, and become more extroverted, intuitive in cognitive type after training. In terms of R & D performance, experimental groups outperformed the control group in performance rating number of annual reports, number of technical services, and number of co-authored published papers. The time lag between the CPS and the posttest was also a factor contribution to the training effects.

1. Agor, W. H.(1989).Intuition in Organization.Newburg Park, CA:Sage Publication.
2. Baker, N. R., Winkofsky, E., Langmeyer, L., Sweeney, D. J.(1976).Idea Generation: A procrustean Bed of Variables, Hypothesed and Implication.College of Business Administration, Univ of Cincinnati.
3. Basadur, M., Graen, G. B., Geen, S. G.(1982).Training on Creative Problem Solving: Effects on Ideation and Problem Finding and Solving in an Industrial Research Organization.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,30
4. Brown, M. G., Svenson, R. A.(1988).Measuring R＆D Productivity.Research Technology Management,31
5. Brown, W. B., Gobeli, D.(1992).Observation on the Measurement of R＆D Productivity: a case study.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,39(4)
6. Business Week(1993).American Inventors are Reinventing Themselves.Business Week
7. Carlyn, M.(1977).An Assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.Journal of Personality Assessment,41
8. Cattell, R. B.(1966).Scientific Creativity: It Recognition and Development.John Wiley Sons, Inc..
9. Collier, D. W.(1977).Measuring the Performance of R＆D Department.Research Management,March
10. Cummings, A., Oldham, G. R.(1997).Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts for the High Potential Employee.California Management Review,40(1)
11. Dunnelte, M. O.(1976).Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
12. Fontenot, N. A.(1992).Effects of Training in Creativity and Creative Problem Finding upon Business People.The Journal of Social Psychology,133(1)
13. Glaster, M. A.(1995).Measuring Intuition Industrial Research Institute.
14. Golann, S. E.(1963).Psychological Study of Creativity.Psychological Bulletin,60
15. Gordon, W. J. J.(1956).Operational Approach to Creativity.Harvard Business Review,34(6)
16. Guilford, J. P.(1967).The Nature of Human Intelligence.New York:McGraw-Hill.
17. Harmon, L. R.(1958).The 1957 University of Utah Conference on the Identification of Creative Scientific Talent Salt Lake City.Utah Univer. Press.
18. Hequest, M.(1992).Creative Training Gets Creative.Training,February
19. Hsu, M. L., Haour, G.(1991).Creative to Innovative R＆D Policy.Taiwan Management Journal,1(2)
20. Jung, C. G.(1926).Psychological Types.NYC:Harcourt.
21. Kao, J.(1989).Entrepreneur ship, Creativity ＆ Organization, Test, Cases, and Readings.London:Prentice-Hall, Inc..
22. Lee, T. H., Fisher, J. C., Yau, T. S.(1986).Is Your R＆D on Track? General Managers Need not Despair About How to Tell.Harvard Business Review,Jan/ Feb
23. Myers, I. B., Briggs, K. C.(1962).Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.Princeton, N. J.:Educational Testing Serrie.
24. Nystorm, H.(1979).Creativity and Innovation.Chichester, England:John Wiley and Sons.
25. Osborn, A. F.(1963).Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving.N. Y.:Scribner's.
26. Parnes, S. J.(1972).Creative Behavior Guidebook.N. Y.:Saribners.
27. Porter, M. E.(1990).The Competitive Advantage of Nations.New York:Free Press.
28. Raudsepp, E. V.(1982).How to Create New Ideas.Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc..
29. Shean, J. M.(1979).The Effects of Training in Creative Problem Solving on Divergent Thinking and Organizational Perceptions of Students of School Administration.Journal of Creative Behavior,13
30. Stahl, M. J., Steger, J. A.(1977).Measuring Innovation and Productivity - A Peer Rating Approach.Research Management,20(1)
31. Steckroth, R. L., Slocun, J. W., Smis, H. P.(1980).Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Making, 1.
32. Taylor, D. W.(1960).Thinking and Creativity.Ann N. Y. Acad Sci,91
33. Torrance, E. P., Torrance, J. P.(1966).Test of Creative Thinking, Norm-Technical Manual.Princeton, NJ:Personnel Press.
34. Torrance, E. P., Torrance, J. P., Williams, S. J., Horng, R. Y., Crable, A. B.(1978).Handbook for Training Future Problem Solving Teams.Nebraska:Licoln, Future Problem Solving Bowl.
35. Wehr, G.(1971).Portrait of Jung: An Illustrated biography.NYC:Herder and Herder.
36. Wheatley, W. J., Anthony, W. P., Maddux, E. N.(1991).Selecting and Training Strategic Planners with Imagination and Creativity.The Journal of Creative Behavior,25(1)
37. 朱叡琮(1997)。企業文化類型、創造力與業務人員績效關係之研究。靜宜大學管理科學研究所。
38. 洪瑞雲 Horng, Ruey-Yun、 王精文 Wang, Ching-Wen(1985)。修訂羅塞浦創造力測驗。管理科學學報 Journal of Management Science，2(1)
39. 徐文光(1982)。我國未來管理人才的創造力實證研究－以交大管研所為例。國立交通大學管理科學研究所。

1. 陳玉樹、周志偉(2009)。目標導向對創造力訓練效果之影響：HLM成長模式分析。課程與教學，12(2)，19-45。
2. 張淑娟、施教旺(2012)。以任務特性觀點探討創新創意專案的學習效果。科學教育學刊，20(5)，461-482。
3. 鄭伯壎(2003)。台灣的組織行為研究：過去、現在、及未來。應用心理研究，19，35-87。
4. (2002)。團隊知識轉換與知識創造的實驗研究－知識螺旋理論的驗證Experimental Study of the Team Knowledge Conversion Abilities and Innovation: An Examination of the Knowledge Spiral Theory。管理與系統，9(1)，29-60。
5. (2003)。創造力實踐的基礎建設：評量方法的發展。資優教育，86，10-20。
6. (2003)。創造性問題解決訓練對管理者問題解決過程的影響。交大管理學報，23(1)，183-208。