使用能力集合擴展決定專案中子系統開發之優先順序

Competence Set Expansion for Determining the Development Precedence among Various Subsystems in a Project

10.6226/NTURM2005.16.1.21

胡宜中(Yi-Chung Hu)；邱榆淨(Yu-Jing Chiu)

系統開發 ； 專案管理 ； 能力集合 ； 灰色理論 ； 整數規劃 ； system development ； project management ； competence set ； grey theory ； integer programming

臺大管理論叢

16卷1期（2005 / 12 / 01）

21 - 40

繁體中文

在一個系統開發專案中，如何決定各子系統間的開發優先順序在其中扮演著重要的角色。然而，在缺乏相關經驗與未獲得足夠資訊下，決策者可能無法主觀決定此一發展優先順序。若就能力集合擴展而言，則可以視一個系統開發專案為達成某一決策問題之期望目標所需之能力集合。此時，各個子系統為能力集合中為達成專案目標所需獲得或開發之技能。我們藉由灰關聯分析獲取子系統間開發所需之執行成本，並運用Li(1999)所提出適用於能力集合擴展之整數規劃法求得具最小開發成本之學習序列，以由此獲得子系統間的開發優先順序。因此，本文之目的在於提出一個新的方法以解決所執行之系統開發專案中，子系統間的開發順序無法有效決定的問題。我們以臺灣運輸安全相關系統之開發，來說明所提出方法的可行性及有用性。

For a project of the system development, the determination of the development precedence among the subsystems plays an important role. However, the decision maker may not appropriately determine the development precedence among the subsystems in a project resulting from the inexperience and inadequate information. From the viewpoint of the competence set expansion, a project, consisting with subsystems that are needed to be developed, can be treated as the needed competence set for attaining the desired goal. In such a competence set, each subsystem can be viewed as a competence. In this paper, we use the grey relation to acquire the cost between any two subsystems. In order to acquire the development precedence, an integer programming method proposed by Li (1999) is employed to determine the learning sequence with the minimum cost. That is, this paper aims to propose a new method to resolve a problem in which the development precedence among the subsystems in a project cannot be effectively determined. An empirical case concerning transportation safety systems in Taiwan is used to illustrate the usefulness and feasibility of the proposed method.

1. Abeyasinghe, M. C. L.,Greenwood, D. J.,Johansen, D. E.(2001).An efficient method for scheduling construction projects with resource constraints.International Journal of Project Management,19(1),29-45.
2. Ackoff, R. L.(1970).A concept of corporate planning.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
3. Adamopoulos, G. I.,Pappis, C. P.,Karacapilidis, N. I.,Roman Skowiński (Eds.),Maciej Hapke (Eds.)(2000).Scheduling under fuzziness.NY:Physica-Verlag.
4. Al-Jibouri, S.(2002).Effects of resource management regimes on project schedule.International Journal of Project Management,20(4),271-277.
5. Anatoliy, I. S.,Tetyana, A. J.(2003).Fuzzy temporal characteristics of for project management on the network models basis.European Journal of Operational Research,147(2),253-265.
6. Brucker, P.,Knust, S.(2003).Lower bounds for resource-constrained project scheduling problems.European Journal of Operational Research,149(2),302-313.
7. Carlier, J.,Neron, E.(2003).On linear lower bounds for the resource constrained project scheduling problem.European Journal of Operational Research,149(2),314-324.
8. Chiu, Y. J.,Tzeng, G. H.(2002).Evaluating intelligent transportation security systems using MCDM.Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering,Greece:
9. Cleland, D. I.,King, W. R.(1983).System analysis and project management.NY:McGraw-Hill.
10. Con, K. A.(1985).Fundamentals of Master Scheduling for the Project Manager.Project Management Journal,16(2),78-89.
11. Deckro, R. F.,Hebert, J. E.(2002).Modeling diminishing returns in project resource planning.Computers & Industrial Engineering,44(1),19-33.
12. Deng, J. L.(1982).Control problems of grey systems.Systems and Control Letters,1(5),288-294.
13. Feng, J. W.,Yu, P. L.(1998).Minimum spanning table and optimal expansion of competence set.Journal of Optimization Theory and Application,99(3),655-679.
14. Genest, L.,Grabot, B.,Moutarlier, P.,Roman Skowiński (Eds.),Maciej Hapke (Eds.)(2000).Scheduling under fuzziness.NY:Physica-Verlag.
15. Hsu, Y. T.,Chen, C. M.(2000).A novel fuzzy logic system based on n-version programming.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,8(2),155-170.
16. Hu, Y. C.,Chen, R. S.,Tzeng, G. H.(2002).Generating learning sequences for decision makers through data mining and competence set expansion.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,32(5),679-686.
17. Hu, Y. C.,Chen, R. S.,Tzeng, G. H.,Chiu, Y. J.(2003).Acquisition of compound skills and learning costs for expanding competence sets.Computers and Mathematics with Applications,45(5-6),831-848.
18. Hwang, M. J.,Chiang, C. I.,Chiu, I. C.,Tzeng, G. H.(2001).Multi-stages optimal expansion of competence sets in fuzzy environment.International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,3(3),486-492.
19. Kelley(1961).Critical path planning and scheduling mathematical basis.Operations Research,9(3),296-320.
20. Li, H, L.,Yu, P. L.(1994).Optimal competence set expansion using deduction graph.Journal of Optimization Theory and Application,80(1),75-91.
21. Li, H. L.(1999).Incorporating competence sets of decision makers by deduction graphs.Operations Research,47(2),209-220.
22. Li, J. M.,Chiang, C. I.,Yu, P. L.(2000).Optimal multiple stage expansion of competence set.European Journal of Operational Research,120(3),511-524.
23. Malcolm, D. G.,Roseboom, J. H.,Clark, C. E.,Pazar, W.(1959).Applications of a technique for R&D program evaluation (PERT).Operations Research,7(5),646-669.
24. Opricovic, S.,Tzeng, G. H.(2002).Multicriteria planning of post-earthquake sustainable reconstruction.Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,17(3),211-220.
25. Pinto, J. K.,Slevin, D. P.(1988).Project Success: Definition and measurement techniques.Project Management Journal,19(1),67-72.
26. Saaty, T. L.(1980).The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation.New York:McGraw-Hill.
27. Simon, M. A.(1977).The new science of the management decision.New York:Prentice-Hall.
28. Steyn, H.(2002).Project management applications of the theory of constraints beyond critical chain scheduling.International Journal of Project Management,20(1),75-80.
29. Tukel, O. I.,Wasti, S. N.(2001).Analysis of supplier buyer relationships using resource constrained project scheduling strategies.European Journal of Operational Research,129(2),271-276.
30. Tzeng, G. H.,Tsaur, S. H.(1994).The multiple criteria evaluation of grey relation model.The Journal of Grey System,6(2),87-108.
31. Vlach, M.,Roman S□owinski (Eds.),Maciej Hapke (Eds.)(2000).Scheduling under fuzziness.NY:Physica-Verlag.
32. Wang, Z.,Klir, G. J.(1992).Fuzzy measure theory.New York:Plenum Press.
33. Yoon, K. P.,Hwang, C. L.(1995).Mult4pkaflribute decision making: an introduction.London:Sage.
34. Yu, P. L.(1990).Forming winning strategies: an integrated theory of habitual domain.NY:Springer-Verlag.
35. Yu, P. L.,Zhang, D.(1990).A foundation for competence set analysis.Mathematical Social Sciences,20(3),251-299.
36. 毛治國(1998)。智慧化運輸系統的特性與我國的推動策略。台灣地區運輸系統智慧化推動策略研討會論文集
37. 王晉元、卓訓榮、鍾世忠、呂宗熙、黃隆洲、孟億里、錢建中、盧宗成、張惠汶(2001)。先進安全車輛研發策略之研究（技術報告）先進安全車輛研發策略之研究（技術報告）,台北:交通部運輸研究所。
38. 史開泉、吳國威、黃有評(1994)。灰色信息關係論。台北:全華科技圖書公司。
39. 交通部運輸研究所(1999)。The progress and relative techniques in intelligent transportation systems（技術報告編號No.87-59-660）The progress and relative techniques in intelligent transportation systems（技術報告編號No.87-59-660）,台北:交通部運輸研究所。
40. 葉若春(1989)。生產計劃與管制。台北:中興管理顧問公司。
41. 鄧振源(1989)。層級分析法的內涵特性與應用（下）。中國統計學報，27(7)，13767-13782。
42. 鄧振源(2002)。計畫評估：方法與應用。台北:海洋大學運籌規劃與管理研究中心。
43. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法的內涵特性與應用（上）。中國統計學報，27(6)，13707-13724。

1. 蔡榮發、蔡宛玲、王佩淳(2013)。運用能力集合擴展規劃產品生產程序。臺大管理論叢，23(2)，263-296。
2. 廖建翔、許建隆、張芳凱、李有仁(2017)。資訊管理研究在台灣：歷史回顧與未來展望。臺大管理論叢，27(4)，169-206。
3. 蕭文正,胡宜中,邱榆淨(2019)。灰色多準則決策於租賃業汽車貸款之風險評估與管理。商略學報，11(4)，253-270。