题名

財務危機公司內部治理對會計師簽發繼續經營疑慮意見的影響:台灣上市公司之實證研究

并列篇名

The Influence of Corporate Governance on a CPA's Going-concern Opinion for Financially Distressed Firms: An Empirical Study for Firms Listed in the Taiwan Stock Exchange

DOI

10.6226/NTURM2011.21.2.187

作者

吳清在(Tsing-Zai C. Wu);邱正仁(Jeng-Ren Chiou);鄭莉(Li Cheng)

关键词

繼續經營疑慮意見 ; 審計品質 ; 公司治理 ; going-concern opinion ; audit quality ; corporate governance

期刊名称

臺大管理論叢

卷期/出版年月

21卷2期(2011 / 06 / 01)

页次

187 - 217

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

會計師簽發繼續經營疑慮意見必須權衡「經濟依賴」與「聲譽維持」兩個因素的影響,本文以存在危機警訊的樣本探討公司內部治理機制對會計師表示繼續經營疑慮意見的影響。對公司來說更換會計師的成本不高,而會計師卻有避免被更換的動機,致使會計師本質上會為了滿足客戶需求而使獨立性受損;此外台灣企業失敗引起的審計訴訟風險不高,降低「聲譽維持」誘因對會計師簽發查核意見的影響。實證結果發現會計師對於存有財務危機警訊的公司簽發查核意見時,客戶董監事持股比率與未擔任董監事的大股東持股比率越高,會計師會降低簽發繼續經營疑慮意見;客戶董監事股權質押比率提高或董事長有兼任總經理的情況下,會計師會提高簽發繼續經營疑慮意見的機率。

英文摘要

For a financially distressed firm, the decision of a CPA to issue a going-concern opinion must consider the trade-off between ”economic dependence” and ”reputation protection”. In this paper, we investigate the influence of corporate governance on a CPA's going-concern opinion for financially distressed firms. As the cost to switch its CPA is inexpensive for a firm, the CPA has motive of not being dismissed. Such ”economic dependence” consequently leads to a compromise of CPA's independence. Moreover, since the probability of auditor litigation caused by business failure is low in Taiwan, the motive of ”reputation protection” for a CPA reduces. Our empirical results indicate that the larger shares directors and supervisors hold, the less likelihood a CPA issuing a going-concern opinion. Similar results are found for the outside blockholdings. Where the shares of directors and supervisors are used as collateral and the chairman of the board also serves as the CEO, the likelihood of a CPA to issue a going-concern opinion increases.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 資訊科學
基礎與應用科學 > 統計
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. Chiou, J. R.,Hsiung, T. C.,Kao, L. F.(2002).A study of the relationship between financial distress and collateralized shares.Taiwan Accounting Review,3(1),79-111.
    連結:
  2. Yeh, Y. H.,Ko, C. E.,Su, Y. H.(2003).Ultimate control and expropriation of minority shareholders: New evidence from Taiwan.Academia Economic Papers,31(3),263-299.
    連結:
  3. 李建然、陳政芳、李啟華(2003)。董監事持股集中度與會計師獨立性-對會計師出具繼續經營疑慮查核意見之影響。當代會計,4(2),191-209。
    連結:
  4. 劉嘉雯、王泰昌(2005)。繼續經營有重大疑慮審計意見第33號審計公報之影響。管理學報,22(4),525-548。
    連結:
  5. Anderson, C. A.,Anthony, R. N.(1986).The new corporate directors.New York, NY:Wiley.
  6. Ashton, R. H.,Graul, P. R.,Newton, J. D.(1989).Audit delay and the timeliness of corporate reporting.Contemporary Accounting Research,5(2),657-673.
  7. Bazerman, M. H.,Morgan, K. P.,Loewenstein, G. F.(1997).The impossibility of auditor independence.Sloan Management Review,38(4),89-94.
  8. Blay, A. D.(2005).Independence threats, litigation risk, and the auditor's decision process.Contemporary Accounting Research,22(4),759-789.
  9. Carcello, J. V.,Neal, T. L.(2000).Audit committee composition and auditor reporting.The Accounting Review,75(4),453-467.
  10. Carcello, J. V.,Palmrose, Z. V.(1994).Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients.Journal of Accounting Research,32(Supplement),1-30.
  11. Chen, A.,Kao, L. F.,Tsao, M.,Wu, C.(2007).Building a corporate governance index from the perspectives of ownership and leadership for firms in Taiwan.Corporate Governance,15(2),251-261.
  12. Chen, K. C. W.,Church, B. K.(1992).Default on debt obligations and the issuance of going-concern opinions.Auditing,11(2),30-49.
  13. Chow, C. W.,Rice, S. J.(1982).Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching.The Accounting Review,57(2),326-335.
  14. Chung, H.,Kallapur, S.(2003).Client importance, non-audit services, and abnormal accruals.The Accounting Review,78(4),931-955.
  15. Craswell, A. T.,Francis, J. R.,Taylor, S. L.(1995).Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations.Journal of Accounting and Economics,20(3),297-322.
  16. Daily, C. M.,Dalton, D. R.(1994).Corporate governance and the bankrupt firm.Strategic Management Journal,15(8),643-654.
  17. DeAngelo, L. E.(1981).Auditor size and audit quality.Journal of Accounting and Economics,3(3),183-199.
  18. DeFond, M. L.,Raghunandan, K.,Subramanyam, K. R.(2002).Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinion.Journal of Accounting Research,40(4),1247-1274.
  19. Dichev, I. D.(1998).Is the risk of bankruptcy a systematic risk?.The Journal of Finance,53(3),1131-1147.
  20. Dopuch, N.,Holthausen, R.,Leftwich, R.(1986).Abnormal stock returns associated with media disclosures of "subject to" qualified audit opinions.Journal of Accounting and Economics,8(2),93-117.
  21. Dopuch, N.,Holthausen, R.,Leftwich, R.(1987).Predicting audit qualifications with financial and market variables.The Accounting Review,62(3),431-454.
  22. Fama, E. F.(1980).Agency problems and the theory of the firm.The Journal of Political Economy,88(2),288-307.
  23. Fama, E. F.,Jensen, M. C.(1983).Separation of ownership and control.Journal of Law and Economics,26(2),301-325.
  24. Fearnley, S.,Beattie, V.,Brandt, R.(2005).Auditor independence and audit risk: A reconceptualization.Journal of International Accounting Research,4(1),39-71.
  25. Geiger, M.,Raghunandan, K.,Rama, D. V.(1998).A note on going-concern modified audit reports and subsequent bankruptcies before and after No. 59..Accounting Enquiries,8(1),117-139.
  26. Goldman, A.,Barlev, B.(1974).The auditor-firm conflict of interests: Its implications for independence.The Accounting Review,49(4),707-718.
  27. Gujarati, D. N.(2003).Basic econometrics.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
  28. Jensen, M. C.(1993).The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems.The Journal of Finance,48(3),831-880.
  29. Jensen, M. C.,Meckling, W. H.(1976).Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure.Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360.
  30. Joe, J. R.(2003).Why press coverage of a client influences the audit opinion.Journal of Accounting Research,41(1),109-133.
  31. Johnstone, K. M.,Sutton, M. H.,Warfield, T. D.(2001).Antecedents and consequences of independence risk: Framework for analysis.Accounting Horizons,15(1),1-18.
  32. Jones, F. L.(1996).The information content of the auditor's going concern evaluation.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,15(1),1-27.
  33. Knapp, M. C.(1985).Audit conflict: An empirical study of the perceived ability of auditors to resist management pressure.The Accounting Review,60(2),202-211.
  34. Krishnan, J.,Krishnan, J.(1996).The role of economic trade-offs in the audit opinion decision: An empirical analysis.Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance,11(4),565-586.
  35. Lee, T. S.,Yeh, Y. H.(2004).Corporate governance and financial distress: Evidence from Taiwan.Corporate Governance: An International Review,12(3),378-388.
  36. Loebbecke, J. K.,Eining, M. M.,Willingham, J. J.(1989).Auditors' experience with material irregularities: Frequency, nature and detectability.Auditing,9(1),1-28.
  37. McKeown, J. C.,Mutchler, J.,Hopwood, W.(1991).Towards an explanation of auditor failure to modify the audit opinions of bankrupt companies.Auditing,10(Supplement),1-13.
  38. Menon, K.,Schwartz, K. B.(1987).An empirical investigation of audit qualification decisions in the presence of going concern uncertainties.Contemporary Accounting Research,3(2),302-315.
  39. Mutchler, J. F.(1985).A multivariate of the auditor's going-concern opinion decision.Journal of Accounting Research,23(2),668-682.
  40. Mutchler, J. F.,Hopwood, W.,McKeown, J. M.(1997).The influence of contrary information mitigating factors on audit opinion decision on bankrupt companies.Journal of Accounting Research,35(2),295-310.
  41. Nichols, D. R.,Price, K. H.(1976).The auditor-firm conflict: An analysis using concepts of exchange theory.The Accounting Review,51(2),335-346.
  42. Palmrose, Z. V.(1987).Litigation and independent auditors: The role of business failures and management fraud.Auditing,6(2),90-103.
  43. Pratt, J.,Stice, J. D.(1994).The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees.The Accounting Review,69(4),639-656.
  44. Raghunandan, K.,Rama, D. V.(1995).Audit opinion for companies in financial distress:Before and after SAS No. 59.Auditing,14(1),50-63.
  45. Reynolds, J. K.,Francis, J. R.(2001).Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office level auditor reporting decisions.Journal of Accounting and Economics,30(3),375-400.
  46. St. Pierre, K.,Anderson, J. A.(1984).An analysis of the factors associated with lawsuits against public accountants.The Accounting Review,59(2),242-263.
  47. Umar, A.,Anandarajan, A.(2004).Dimensions of pressures faced by auditors and its impact on auditors' independence.Managerial Auditing Journal,19(1),99-116.
  48. Whittred, G. P.(1980).Audit qualifications and the timeliness of corporate annual reports.The Accounting Review,55(4),563-577.
  49. Yeh, Y. H.,Lee, T. S.,Woidtke, T.(2001).Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan.International Review of Finance,2(1/2),21-48.
  50. 杜玉振、黃荃、林容竹(2002)。董事會特性對經營績效、財務決策之影響研究-以台灣上市公司為例。管理與系統,9(3),345-368。
  51. 周行一、陳錦村、陳坤宏(1996)。家族企業、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究。中國財務學刊,4(1),115-139。
  52. 林嬋娟(2003)。現行會計師聘任之決策。台北=Taipei, TW:財團法人證券暨期貨市場發展基金會=Securities & Futures Institute。
  53. 俞洪昭、戚務君、李承易(2000)。我國會計師受懲戒原因與種類之關聯性分析。風險管理學報,2(2),37-56。
  54. 審計準則公報第十六號《繼續經營之評估》=SAS No. 16 going concern
  55. 張瑞當、方俊儒、曾玉琦(2007)。核心代理問題與盈餘管理機制之探討。管理學報,24(1),17-39。
  56. 黃振豊、呂紹強(2000)。企業財務危機預警模式之研究-以財務及非財務因素構建。當代會計,1(1),19-40。
被引用次数
  1. Yeh, Yin-Hua,Chou, Hsin-I(2016).Corporate Governance in Taiwan: A Survey.經濟論文叢刊,44(1),127-184.
  2. 陳怡如、洪玉舜(2015)。前期繼續經營疑慮意見與公司治理對會計師事務所更換方向與後續審計意見購買之研究。中華會計學刊,11(1),29-78。
  3. 戴怡蕙、林嬋娟、李德冠(2016)。將繼續經營假設存有重大疑慮公司股票列為全額交割股的影響。證券市場發展季刊,28(3),49-92。
  4. 黃劭彥、邱安安、王子揚(2012)。繼續經營疑慮修正式無保留之審計意見:公司更換會計師與審計意見購買之研究。台灣管理學刊,12(1),47-67。
  5. 孔繁華(2021)。查核會計師的合法與專家權力重要嗎?財務風險客戶與審計品質觀點。管理與系統,28(4),431-477。
  6. 盧鈺欣、林昱成、林育伶(2016)。資料探勘技術在繼續經營疑慮意見診斷模型之應用。會計評論,63,77-108。
  7. 薛敏正,葉淑玲,陳靜宜(2021)。會計師簽證網絡與審計獨立性:來自繼續經營疑慮審計意見的實證分析。臺大管理論叢,31(3),203-235。
  8. 楊東錦、陳皆碩、林芳綺(2015)。審計公費調降之決定因素:公司治理之觀點。中華會計學刊,11(2),241-290。
  9. 余芯慧,何里仁(2022)。審計委員會之設置及其品質對關鍵查核事項揭露之影響。管理學報,39(3),301-356。
  10. 詹凌菁、彭火樹、郭翠菱、吳安妮(2016)。臺灣會計領域研究之回顧與展望。管理學報,33(1),139-187。
  11. 張振山,王宏瑞(2022)。公司治理是否影響企業的經營績效?-家族與非家族企業的比較。證券市場發展季刊,34(2),97-144。
  12. (2016).The effect of mandatory disclosure requirements and disclosure types of auditor fees on earnings management: Evidence from Taiwan.Asia Pacific Management Review,21(4),181-195.
  13. (2024)。會計師輪調對關鍵查核事項揭露的影響。當代會計,25(1),115-163。