洪水保險風險衡量與動態財務模擬分析：以基隆河流域住宅洪災為例

A Simulation Study of Risk Measure and Dynamic Financial Analysis for Flood Insurance: An Example of Taiwan Keelung River District

10.6226/NTUMR.2015.MAY.R.10069

楊曉文(Sharon S. Yang)；黃雅文(Ya-Wen Hwang)

洪水保險 ； 風險衡量 ； 動態財務分析 ； flood insurance ； risk measure ； dynamic financial analysis

臺大管理論叢

25卷2期（2015 / 06 / 01）

83 - 118

繁體中文

台灣近年廣受洪災損失威脅，本研究探討洪水保險保費擬定對保險公司經營洪水保險之影響。因洪災損失具巨災特性，本文目的在於考量尾端風險衡量指標做為洪水保險保費評估之依據，並以動態財務分析模擬比較尾端風險衡量指標和傳統期望值定價方法對公司財務的影響以及分析商品設計採自負額或再保險之影響。由於洪災損失具有地域性，本文以糠瑞林（2005）所發展之台灣洪災損失模型進行基隆河流域住宅洪災損失之模擬分析；動態財務分析之資產模型是依據台灣產險公司資產分佈來假設資產配置及資產動態過程。研究結果發現因洪災損失具厚尾分配性質，以期望值（Expectation）做為保費標準易使保險公司產生清償問題，以尾端風險衡量指標（如CTE、TSD）衡量保費較能降低經營風險，且再保險機制可以顯著降低保險公司發行洪水保險之風險。本研究提供洪水保險保費評估之動態財務分析架構及盈餘評估結果，研究之架構及結果可提供政府與保險公司發行洪水保險之參考。

In recent years, Taiwan has been threatened by flood risk. This study attempts to evaluate the flood insurance premium in Taiwan. Particularly, we focus on the catastrophic feature of flood losses and apply three tail risk measures to evaluate the premium. Dynamic financial analysis is carried out to examine the effect of risk measure on the financial soundness of the insurer. The effects of the deductible and reinsurance are also investigated. We employ the domestic flood model proposed by Kang (2005) to simulate flood loss using the Keelung River District as an example. The asset model for dynamic financial analysis is built based on the asset allocation of a domestic property liability insurance company. We find that the probability of insolvency of insurers is high when they apply the expected value to price flood insurance. In order to reduce the risk, insurers have to apply CTE or TSD to measure the premium for flood insurance. Moreover, we find that the reinsurance mechanism could significantly reduce the insolvency risk. The evaluation framework and the simulated results in this paper can benefit the government or insurance companies who deal with flood insurance.

1. 洪鴻智、洪嘉宜(2007)。不確定環境下的洪災保險供給決策。臺灣經濟預測與政策，37(2)，75-110。
   連結：
2. 張靜貞、羅紀琼、林振輝(2003)。基隆河汐止、五堵地區居民參與洪災保險意願之研究。臺灣經濟預測與政策，34(1)，39-61。
   連結：
3. 張靜貞、蘇明道、糠瑞林、許文科、鄧慰先、周磊(2007)。防洪工程之成本效益與風險評估－以基隆河流域整治計畫為例。臺灣經濟預測與政策，37(2)，111-137。
   連結：
4. 張瓊婷(2007)。洪水風險交易制度之建構與分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，37(3)，83-105。
   連結：
5. 許文彥、羅依雯(2003)。以動態財務分析作為產險業的早期預警系統。風險管理學報，5(2)，215-231。
   連結：
6. 蕭代基、黃星翔、洪銘堅、盧孟明、羅以倫(2007)。淡水河流域洪災損失機率風險分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，37(3)，31-53。
   連結：
7. 內政部，2014，內政統計年報：消防－災害損失，http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp，搜尋日期：2014 年2 月5 日。(Ministry of the Interior. 2014. Statistical yearbook of interior. http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp. Accessed Feb. 5, 2014.)
8. Holton, G. A. 2002. History of value-at-risk: 1922-1998. Working paper, Contingency Analysis, Boston, MA
9. Leavens, D. H. 1945. Diversification of planning. Trusts and Estates, 80: 469-473
10. 保險事業發展中心，2011，保險資料庫，http://www.tii.org.tw/fcontent/database/sta_test/database04.asp，搜尋日期：2011 年3 月10 日。(Taiwan Insurance Institute. 2011. Insurance statistics database. http://www.tii.org.tw/fcontent/database/sta_test/database04.asp. Accessed Mar. 10, 2011.)。http://www.tii.org.tw/fcontent/database/sta_test/database04.asp
11. Swiss Re. 2014. Sigma world insurance database. http://www.sigma-explorer.com/. Accessed Feb. 5, 2014.http://www.sigma-explorer.com/
12. Artzner, P.(1999).Application of coherent risk measures to capital requirements in insurance.North American Actuarial Journal,3(2),11-25.
13. Artzner, P.,Delbaen, F.,Eber, J. M.,Heath, D.(1999).Coherent measures of risk.Mathematical Finance,9(3),203-228.
14. Baosheng, W.(Ed.),Zhao-Yin, W.(Ed.), Guangquan W.(Ed.),Gordon G. H. H.(Ed.),Honwei, F.(Ed.),Jinchi, H.(Ed.)(2002).Flood Defence.New York, NY:Science Press.
15. Bowers, N. L.,Gerber, H. U.,Hickman, J. C.,Jones, D. A.,Nesbitt, C. J.(1997).Actuarial Mathematics.Schaumbur, IL:The Society of Actuaries.
16. Cheng, J. D.,Huang, Y. C.,Wu, H. L.,Yeh, J. L.,Chang, C. H.(2005).Hydrometeorological and landuse attributes of debris flows and debris floods during typhoon Toraji, July 29-30, 2001 in central Taiwan.Journal of Hydrology,306(1-4),161-173.
17. Cox, J. C.,Ingersoll, J. E.,Ross, S. A.(1985).A theory of the term structure of interest rates.Econometrica,53,385-408.
18. Crichton, D.(2002).UK and global insurance responses to flood hazard.Water International,27(1),119-131.
19. D'Arcy, S. P.,Gorvett, R. W.(2004).The use of dynamic financial analysis to determine whether an optimal growth rate exists for a property-liability insurer.Journal of Risk and Insurance,71(4),583-615.
20. Dhaene, J.,Henrard, L.,Landsman, Z.,Vandendorpe, A.,Vanduffel, S.(2008).Some results on the CTE-based capital allocation rule.Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,42(2),855-863.
21. Dowd, K.,Blake, D.(2006).After VaR: The theory, estimation, and insurance applications of quantile-based risk measures.Journal of Risk and Insurance,73(2),193-229.
22. Ermolieva, T. Y.,Fisher, G.,Obersteiner, M.(2003).Interim Report No. IR-03-023Interim Report No. IR-03-023,International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
23. Freeman, P. K.,Kunreuther, H.(2002).Environmental risk management for developing countries.Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance,27(2),196-241.
24. Furman, E.,Landsman, Z.(2006).On some risk-adjusted tail-based premium calculation principles.Journal of Actuarial Practice,13(1),175-190.
25. Furman, E.,Landsman, Z.(2006).Tail variance premium with applications for elliptical portfolio of risks.ASTIN Bulletin,36(2),433-462.
26. Furman, E.,Landsman, Z.(2005).Risk capital decomposition for a multivariate dependent gamma portfolio.Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,37(3),635-649.
27. Furman, E.,Landsman, Z.(2010).Multivariate tweedie distributions and some related capital-at-risk analyses.Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,46(2),351-361.
28. Giorgio, S.(2002).Measures of risk.Journal of Banking and Finance,26(7),1253-1272.
29. Gissing, A.,Blong, R.(2004).Accounting for variability in commercial flood damage estimation.Australian Geographer,35(2),209-222.
30. Gorvett, R. W.(1998).Champaign, IL.,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
31. Hsu, W. K.,Huang, P. C.,Chang, C. C.,Chen, C. W.,Hung, D. M.,Chiang, W. L.(2011).An integrated flood risk assessment model for property insurance industry in Taiwan.Natural Hazards,58(3),1295-1309.
32. Huffman, P. J.(1978).Asset share mathematics.Transactions of Society of Actuaries,30,277-286.
33. Ingleton, J.(Ed.)(1999).Natural Disaster Management.London, UK:Tudor Rose.
34. Ker, A. P.,Coble, K. H.(1998).On choosing a base coverage level for multiple peril crop insurance contracts.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,23(2),427-444.
35. Lai, L. H.(2010).Risk estimate of rice damaged due to flood.Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications,11(3),1243-1248.
36. Lai, L. H.,Wu, P. H.(2010).Risk analysis of rice losses caused by typhoon for Taiwan.Contemporary Management Research,6(2),141-157.
37. Lai, L. H.,Wu, P. H.(2008).Estimating the threshold value and loss distribution: Rice damaged by typhoons in Taiwan.African Journal of Agricultural Research,3(12),818-824.
38. Lin, M. L.,Jeng, F. S.(2000).Characteristics of hazards induced by extremely heavy rainfall in central Taiwan-Typhoon Herb.Engineering Geology,58(2),191-207.
39. Scawthorn, C.(1999).Modeling flood events in the US.Euro conference on global change and catastrophe risk management,Luxemburg:
40. Skipper, H. D.(1998).International Risk and Insurance: An Environmental-Managerial Approach.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
41. Wang, S. S.(2000).A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance Risks.Journal of Risk and Insurance,67(1),15-36.
42. Wang, S. S.(2002).CAS Risk Capital Management Call Paper Program, CPP-26CAS Risk Capital Management Call Paper Program, CPP-26,SCOR Reinsurance Company.
43. Wang, S. S.(1996).Premium calculation by transforming the layer premium density.ASTIN Bulletin,26(1),71-92.
44. Wang, S. S.,Young, V. R.,Panjer, H. H.(1997).Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices.Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,21(2),173-183.
45. Wirch, J. L.(1999).Raising value at risk.North American Actuarial Journal,3(2),106-115.
46. Wu, C. C.,Kuo, Y. H.(1999).Typhoons affecting Taiwan: Current understanding and future challenges.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,80(1),67-80.
47. Wurbs, R.,Toneatti, S.,Sherwin, J.(2001).Modelling uncertainty in flood studies.Water Resources Development,17(3),353-363.
48. 方舟顧問有限公司(1997)。洪災保險制度（潭底洋地區）案例調查分析。台北，台灣=Taipei, Taiwan:經濟部水資源局=Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
49. 王如意、蘇明道(2001)。台北盆地及鹽水溪流域示範區颱洪災害危險度分析（三）。台北，台灣=Taipei, Taiwan:經濟部水資源局=Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
50. 張齡方、蘇明道(2001)。空間資料於洪災損失推估之應用。農業工程學報，47(1)，20-28。
51. 陳雅雯(2004)。台北，台灣=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學風險管理與保險學研究所=Department of Risk Management and Insurance, National Chengchi University。
52. 賴麗華、謝秀宜(2007)。台灣地區颱風洪水保險需求之研究。保險專刊，23(1)，73-90。
53. 糠瑞林(2005)。台北，台灣=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所=Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University。
54. 糠瑞林、蘇明道、張齡方、林美君(2005)。工商業淹水災害損失曲線。臺灣水利季刊，53(2)，21-30。
55. 闕志勳、林義堅、黃怡盈、江珮甄、陳建廷(2002)。國立政治大學資訊管理學系專案報告國立政治大學資訊管理學系專案報告,台北，台灣=Taipei, Taiwan:。