题名

金融機構跨業經營及轉投資之利潤與風險:全球實證分析

并列篇名

DO REGULATION AND OWNERSHIP AFFECT BANK PERFORMANCES? GOVERNANCE MAY MATTER

DOI

10.29628/AEP.200209.0002

作者

沈中華(Chung-Hua Shen);張雲翔(Yuen-Hsiang Chang)

关键词

銀行管制 ; 銀行體系 ; 綜合銀行 ; 政府效能 ; Bank regulation ; Banking system ; Universal bank ; Governance

期刊名称

經濟論文

卷期/出版年月

30卷3期(2002 / 09 / 01)

页次

275 - 310

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文首先特別針對金融機構跨業經營及轉投資是否有助於銀行績效,進行實證分析。其次探討在不同的政府紀律及管理能力之下,限制度的提高或降低,對於銀行利潤以及風險的影響,將發生何種影響。 本文使用46個國家,共計8,113家銀行,樣本期間為1995年至1999 年進行實證研究。本文的實證結果為:一、政府紀律及管理能力較差的國家,應該盡可能解除其商業銀行在從事證券業、保險業及持有非金融相關事業的限制,以免造成銀行利潤的損失。二、一國如欲限制其商業銀行從事證券業、保險業及持有非金融相關事業,則此國之政府紀律及管理能力必須具備一定的水準,否則提高限制度將加速其銀行利潤的減少。

英文摘要

This paper studies the impacts of the restrictions on a commercial bank's ability to engage in three financial activities and one non-financial activity and their effects on a bank's profits and risks. The former three includes securities, insurance, and real estate, while the latter contains a mix of banking and commerce. Our model further specifies the impacts as the function of government governance (the rule of law), which may overturn the adverse influence into a good influence. Our study demonstrates that restrictions on commercial banks' ability to engage in securities and insurance and restrictions on the mixing of banking and commerce will reduce their profit. However, good governance mitigates these adverse impacts. When the governance index exceeds roughly 8.5, the previous negative effects turn positive. Restrictions on real estate, however, do have positive effects on bank profit, but the impacts of restrictions on banks' risks are, however, less important. While restrictions on securities are found to raise banks' risk, restrictions on the remaining three activities are insignificant in our statistical analyses.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Bank Administration Institute and Boston Consulting Group(1999).Putting It Together: Convergence Strategies for Banking, Insurance, and Investments.
  2. Estrella, A.(2001).Mixing and Matching Prospective Financial Sector Mergers and Market Valuation.Journal of Banking and Finance,25(12)
  3. Frankel, A. B., Montgomery, J. D.(1991).Financial Structure: An International Perspective.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1
  4. Ho, Thomas S. Y., Saunder, A.(1981).The Determinants of Bank Interest Margin: Theory and Empirical Evidence.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,16
  5. Kroszner, R. S., Rajan, R. G.(1994).Is the Glass-Steagall Act Justified? A Study of the U.S. Experience with Universal Banking Before 1933.American Economic Review,84(4)
  6. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W.(1998).Law and Finance.Journal of Political Economy,106(6)
  7. Lown, C. S., Osler, C. L., Strahan, P. E., Sufi, A.(2000).The Changing Landscape of the Financial Services Industry: What Lies Ahead? Federal Reserve Bank of New York.Economic Policy Review,6(4)
  8. Puri, M.(1996).Commercial Banks in Investment Banking Conflict of Interest or Certification Role?.Journal of Financial Economics,40
  9. Santomero, A., Babbel, D.(2001).Financial Markets, Instruments, and Institutions.Boston:McGraw-Hill.
  10. Sinkey, Jr. J. F.(1998).Commercial Bank Financial Management in the Financial-Services Industry.New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
  11. White, Eugene(1986).Before the Glass-Steagall Act: An Analysis of the Investment Banking Activities of National Banks.Explorations in Economic History,23(1)
  12. 沈中華 Shen, Chung-Hua(2002).Credit Rationing for Bad Companies in Bad Years: Evidence from Bank Loan Transaction Data.International Journal of Finance and Economics,7(8)
  13. 沈中華 Shen, Chung-Hua(2002)。美英德日四國銀行績效表現與原因。
  14. 沈中華 Shen, Chung-Hua(1998)。邁向綜合銀行之路。臺北銀行月刊 Taipei Bank Monthly Journal,28(4)
  15. 沈中華 Shen, Chung-Hua(2001)。金融現代法案與銀行跨業證券及保險的過去。
  16. 沈中華 Shen, Chung-Hua(2001)。銀行的異業合併-互補性與文化差異。貨幣市場,5(3)
  17. 沈中華 Shen, Chung-Hua, Huang, A. H.(2003).Are Performances of Bank and Firms Linked? And If So, Why?.Journal of Policy Modeling,25
  18. 沈中華 Shen, Chung-Hua、 張雲翔 Chang, Yuen-Hsiang(2001)。歐系綜合銀行與美系分業銀行何者較能增加銀行績效?-由46國資料比較分析 Universal Banking Versus Separated Banks: Which SystemHave Better Performances?。台灣金融財務季刊 Taiwan Banking & Finance Quarterly,2(2)
被引用次数
  1. 曾國峰(2019)。「反媒體壟斷法」草案演進與規範辨證。中華傳播學刊,35,3-41。
  2. 曾昭玲、陳昭如(2012)。我國上市上櫃銀行非傳統業務收入與表外交易業務規模之風險性研究。台灣管理學刊,12(2),139-157。
  3. 陳錦村、陳玉華(2004)。金融控股公司的轉投資行為、治理機制能否有效提昇經營績效。臺灣金融財務季刊,5(2),55-77。
  4. 陳寧馨、許永明、邱美菁(2011)。台灣銀行業多角化經營對績效的影響。商略學報,3(3),155-174。
  5. 陳曉蓉、梁雅珺(2015)。臺灣銀行業進入中國之模式選擇:借鏡世界前200 大銀行。兩岸金融季刊,3(4),1-31。
  6. 陳信吉、梁宏康、李建然(2007)。金融公司購併溢價與被併公司高階管理團隊特質之關聯性。人力資源管理學報,7(4),25-44。
  7. 沈中華、呂青樺(2006)。影響大陸地區銀行獲利能力與風險的因素。中國大陸研究,49(3),119-142。
  8. 張慶明、王鳳生(2004)。銀行監理、高階經理報償與最適投資決策。亞太經濟管理評論,8(1),27-47。
  9. (2004)。金融控股公司的轉投資行為、治理機制能否有效提昇經營績效。臺灣金融財務季刊,5(2),55-77。
  10. (2007)。金控公司自我擴張型合併之研究:期間模型實證分析。公平交易季刊,15(2),95-127。
  11. (2018)。本國商業銀行多角化經營對績效的影響。臺灣銀行季刊,69(4),1-26。