题名

對外直接投資與研究發展

并列篇名

Foreign Direct Investment and Research and Development

DOI

10.29628/AEP.200703.0003

作者

蔡宜臻(Yi-Cheng Tsai);邱俊榮(Jiunn-Rong Chiou)

关键词

對外直接投資 ; 跨國廠商 ; 研究發展 ; Foreign direct investment ; Multinational firm ; Research and development

期刊名称

經濟論文

卷期/出版年月

35卷1期(2007 / 03 / 01)

页次

53 - 82

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文探討當跨國廠商從事對外直接投資而面對較低廉的勞動成本時,是否會對其研發意願產生負面的影響。本文採用一個生產過程需要勞動與技術兩種投入要素的不完全競爭模型來進行分析。本文主要的結論如下:無論市場結構為何,當勞動與技術為互補性投入時,直接投資會使跨國廠商從事研發的意願提高;當勞動與技術為替代性投入時,直接投資對廠商研發量的影響方向並不確定。當地主國工資水準越低或市場規模越大,跨國廠商的研發量將越可能因直接投資而減少。當地主國廠商並未從事產品研發,若勞動與技術為互補性投入,競爭的市場結構會使跨國廠商因直接投資而引發的研發量較獨占時為高;若勞動與技術為替代性投入,競爭的市場結構不一定會比獨占更能提高因直接投資所引發的研發量。當地主國廠商亦從事研發競爭,若勞動與技術為互補性投入,地主國廠商的研發量必會因跨國廠商的直接投資而減少;若勞動與技術為替代性投入,跨國廠商的研發量因而減少時,地主國廠商的研發量有可能因跨國廠商的直接投資而增加。

英文摘要

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether a lower labor cost in the host country will negatively affect a multinational firm's R&D investment. An imperfectly competitive market structure and a production function with labor and technology in puts are utilized in this paper. The main findings in this paper are as follows. (1) If labor and technology are complementary inputs, the multinational firm will increase its R&D investment as it invests outward. (2) If labor and technology are substitute inputs, the impact of outward direct investment on multinational firm's R&D investment is ambiguous. It is shown that the lower the host country's wage or the larger the market size, the more likely it is that the multinational firm's R&D investment will decrease due to outward direct investment. (3) In the case that a host country's firm also invests in R&D, its R&D investment will decrease while facing foreign direct investment as labor and technology are complementary. On the contrary, as labor and technology are substitutes, the host firm's R&D investment may increase while facing foreign direct investment.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 徐世勳、吳秉叡(2002)。WTO架構下開放對大陸投資之經貿影響評估。台灣經濟預測與政策,33,75-110。
    連結:
  2. 陳建隆、徐芳霞(2003)。防禦型對外直接投資與內生化研發水準。經濟論文,31,577-603。
    連結:
  3. Das, S. P.(2002).Foreign Direct Investment and the Relative Wage in a Developing Economy.Journal of Development Economics,67,55-77.
  4. d''Aspremont, C.,A. Jacquemin(1988).Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers.American Economic Review,78,1133-1138.
  5. de Bondt, R.,L. Sleuwaegen,R. Veugelers(1988).Innovative Strategic Groups in Multinational Industries.European Economic Review,32,905-925.
  6. Glass, A. J.,K. Saggi(1999).FDI Policies under Shared Factor Markets.Journal of International Economics,49,309-332.
  7. Grossman, G. M.,E. Helpman,A. Szeidl(2006).Optimal Integration Strategies for the Multinational Firm.Journal of International Economics,70,216-238.
  8. Harris, R. G.,N. Schmitt(2001).Strategic Export Policy with Foreign Direct Investment and Import Substitution.Journal of Development Economics,64,293-312.
  9. Helpman, E.,M. J. Melitz,S. R. Yeaple(2004).Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms.American Economic Review,94,300-316.
  10. Kamien, M. I.,E. Muller,I. Zang(1992).Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels.American Economic Review,82,1293-1306.
  11. Petit, M. L.,F. Sanna-Randaccio(2000).Endogenous R&D and Foreign Direct Investment in International Oligopolies.International Journal of Industrial Organization,18,339-367.
  12. Petit, M. L.,F. Sanna-Randaccio(1998).Technological Innovation and Multinational Expansion: A TWO-Way Link?.Journal of Economics,68,1-26.
  13. Skaksen, M. Y.,I. R. Sørensen(2001).Should Trade Unions Appreciate Foreign Direct Investment.Journal of International Economics,55,379-390.
  14. Veugelers, R.,P. V. Houte(1990).Domestic R&D in the Presence of Multinational Enterprises.International Journal of Industrial Organization,8,1-15.
  15. Wang, J.-Y.,M. Blomstrom(1992).Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer: A Simple Model.European Economic Review,36,137-155.
  16. Yeaple, S. R.(2003).The Complex Integration Strategies of Multinationals and Cross Country Dependencies in the Structure of Foreign Direct Investment.Journal of International Economics,60,293-314.
  17. 王鶴松(2003)。加入WTO後兩岸經貿互動的利益與風險。中國商銀月刊,22,1-10。
  18. 吳榮義(2000)。挽救傳統產業必須對症下藥。台灣經濟研究院經濟評論。
  19. 潘治民、黃鴻(1986)。一階段與二階段方法求解均衡值之異同。經濟論文叢刊,14,213-223。
  20. 蔡宏明(2005)。中國大陸高科技產業發展及台商大陸投資。經濟情勢暨評論季刊,11,25-57。
被引用次数
  1. 陳光政、曹壽民(2010)。創新活動、國際化與公司績效:以台灣上市公司之國外直接投資檢測。管理學報,27(3),205-224。
  2. 陳香梅,胡偉民,林正新(2022)。稅務資訊交換機制對台灣上市公司海外分支機構股權斷鏈之影響。經濟論文,50(2),199-239。
  3. 彭美玲(2009)。三角貿易對研究發展與購買技術的影響:以台灣製造業爲例。應用經濟論叢,86,187-218。