题名

垂直產品差異與經濟整合的福利分析

并列篇名

Welfare Effects of Economic Integration in the Presence of VIIT

作者

林晏如(Yen-Ju Lin);林燕淑(Yan-Shu Lin);吳芝文(Zhi-Win Wu)

关键词

垂直產業內貿易 ; 經濟整合 ; 垂直產品差異化 ; 福利效果 ; Vertical intra-industry trade ; Economic integration ; Vertical product differentiation ; Welfare effects

期刊名称

經濟論文

卷期/出版年月

42卷4期(2014 / 12 / 01)

页次

647 - 679

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文利用垂直產品差異化模型,探討經濟整合對不同品質產品生產國家福利的影響,以及品質差異程度在經濟整合過程中的重要性。在貿易成本的設定上我們同時考慮文獻上會用的二種型式:運費和關稅。本文發現,這二種設定的經濟整合福利效果差異甚大。在運費型式之下,無論兩國產品品質差異為何,低品質國家在經濟整合過程中必定受益;而高品質國家在品質差異程度不為大時,整合過程可能會出現福利先下降再上升的情況。此隱含在經濟整合過程中,對低品質國家有利時對高品質國家未必有利;但只要是對高品質國家有利則低品質國家也一定受惠。相反地,在關稅設定下,不論不用品質產品生產國的進口關稅稅率為相等或不等,在經濟整合過程中,遭逢傷害的則為低品質產品生產國;高品質國家的福利水準反而是隨著關稅下降持續地上升。顯示關稅型式的經濟整合在二國之間產生了利益衝突,經濟整合不易實行。

英文摘要

This paper constructs a vertical intra-industry trade (VIIT) model to explore the welfare effects of economic integration with different quality products as well as the role of the degree of quality differentiation. We take into account both popular settings of trade costs in the literature-transport costs and tariffs-and find that there is a significant diversity in welfare efficacy. In the transport costs setting, no matter what the product quality differences are, the low quality country will be better off as economic integration proceeds. However, the high quality country might be better off or worse off during the process of economic integration, depending on the degree of quality differentiation. This implies that what is good for the high quality country also benefits the low quality country, but the opposite is not always true. Contrarily, in the tariffs setting, a drop in trade costs definitely benefits the high quality country, while it may harm the low quality country. This shows that a tariff reduction gives rise to a conflict between the two countries, and economic integration is not always an easy road to travel on.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 劉亮君、林燕淑、黃鴻(2011)。所得差距、經濟整合與FDI。經濟論文,39(4),473-497。
    連結:
  2. Anam, M.,Chiang, S. H.(2003).Intraindustry Trade in Identical Products: A Portfolio Approach.Review of International Economics,11,90-100.
  3. Bond, E. W.,Riezman, R. G.,Syropoulos, C.(2004).A Strategic and Welfare Theoretic Analysis of Free Trade Area.Journal of International Economics,64,1-27.
  4. Brander, J. A.,Krugman, P. R.(1983).A Reciprocal Dumping Model of International Trade.Journal of International Economics,15,313-321.
  5. Cabrales, A.,Motta, M.(2001).Country Asymmetries, Endogenous Product Choice and the Timing of Trade Liberalization.European Economics Review,45,87-107.
  6. Clarke, R.,Collie, D. R.(2003).Product Differentiation and the Gains from Trade under Bertrand Duopoly.Canadian Journal of Economics,36,658-673.
  7. Das, S. P.,Donnenfeld, S.(1987).Trade Policy and Its Impact on Quality of Imports.Journal of International Economics,23,77-95.
  8. Ethier, J.(1998).Regionalism in a Multilateral World.Journal of Political Economy,106,1214-1245.
  9. Fajgelbaum, P.,Grossman, M.,Helpman, E.(2011).Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5834Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5834,未出版
  10. Fontagné, L.,Freudenberg, M.,Gaulier, G.(2006).A Systematic Decomposition of World Trade into Horizontal and Vertical IIT.Review of World Economics,142,459-475.
  11. Friberg, R.,Ganslandt, M.(2008).Reciprocal Dumping with Product Differentiation.Review of International Economics,16,942-954.
  12. Fuest, C.(2005).Economic Integration and Tax Policy with Endogenous Foreign Firm Ownership.Journal of Public Economics,89,1823-1840.
  13. Fujiwara, K.(2011).Tariffs and Trade Liberalization with Network Externalities.Australian Economic Papers,50,51-61.
  14. Fung, K. C.(1991).Collusive Intra-Industry Trade.Canadian Journal of Economics,24,391-404.
  15. Furusawa, T.,Lai, L. C.(1999).Adjustment Costs and Gradual Trade Liberalization.Journal of International Economics,49,333-361.
  16. Gustafsson, P.,Segerstrom, P.(2010).North-South Trade with Increasing Product Variety.Journal of Development Economics,92,97-106.
  17. Haufler, A.,Wooton, I.(1999).Country Size and Tax Competition for Foreign Direct Investment.Journal of Public Economics,71,121-139.
  18. Haufler, A.,Wooton, I.(2010).Competition for Firms in an Oligopolistic Industry: The Impact of Economic Integration.Journal of International Economics,80,239-248.
  19. Helpman, E.(1993).Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights.Econometrica,61,1247-1280.
  20. Herguera, I.,Kujal, P.,Petrakis, E.(2002).Tariffs, Quality Reversals and Exit in Vertically Differentiated Industries.Journal of International Economics,58,467-492.
  21. Hwang, H.(1984).Intra-Industry Trade and Oligopoly: A Conjectural Variations Approach.Canadian Journal of Economics,17,126-137.
  22. Kemp, C.(2010).The Gains from Trade in a Cournot-Nash Trading Equilibrium.Review of International Economics,18,832-834.
  23. Kim, T.,Niem, L. D.(2011).Product Quality, Preference Diversity and Intra-Industry Trade.Manchester School,79,1126-1138.
  24. Krishna, P.(1998).Regionalism and Multilateralism: A Political Economy Approach.Quarterly Journal of Economics,113,227-251.
  25. Krugman, P. R.(1979).A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income.Journal of Political Economy,87,253-266.
  26. Levy, I.(1997).A Political Economic Analysis of Free Trade Agreements.American Economic Review,87,506-519.
  27. Li, C.,Wang, J.(2010).Licensing a Vertical Product Innovation.Economic Record,86,517-527.
  28. Moraga-González, J. L.,Viaene, J.-M.(2005).Trade Policy and Quality Leadership in Transition Economies.European Economic Review,49,359-385.
  29. Motta, M.(1992).Sunk Costs and Trade Liberalization.Economic Journal,102,578-587.
  30. Raff, H.(2004).Preferential Trade Agreements and Tax Competition for Foreign Direct Investment.Journal of Public Economics,88,2745-2763.
  31. Reitzes, J. D.(1992).Quality Choice, Trade Policy, and Firm Incentives.International Economics Review,33,817-835.
被引用次数
  1. 梁景洋,李曜成,吳朝欽(2020)。貿易成本與國際商品課稅原則的選擇-垂直產品差異的角色。經濟論文,48(2),217-260+ap1。