题名

台灣汽車保險風險分類之實證分析

并列篇名

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF RISK CLASSIFICATION IN THE TAIWANESE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE MARKET

作者

彭盛昌(Sheng-Chang Peng);利菊秀(Chu-Shiu Li);劉純之(Chwen-Chi Liu)

关键词

汽車保險 ; 風險分類 ; 理賠預測 ; Automobile insurance ; Risk classification ; Claim prediction

期刊名称

經濟論文

卷期/出版年月

47卷2期(2019 / 06 / 01)

页次

297 - 338

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文主要檢驗汽車保險現行採用及額外之風險因子是否為有效的風險分類?以台灣全體產險公司自用小客車三種車體損失險保單為研究對象,建立不同風險因素組合的預測模型,估計其預測變數係數,再透過估計之預測模型進行樣本內與樣本外的預測,以確認預測模型的準確性。本文的實證結果顯示,在現行採用的訂價風險因素,甲式保單顯示理賠係數是相對重要的風險分類因素;乙式保單則是理賠係數與從車因素;丙式保單則是被保險人的年齡。其次,在額外的風險分類分析,本文發現甲式及乙式保單均顯示前一保單年度的理賠經驗是重要的風險分類資訊,此意謂前三年的理賠係數應給予前一年之理賠經驗給予相對較高的權重,如此保費的訂定或許可以達到更公平。由於目前在實務上,三種保單的定價因素都相同,尤其在費率自由化之後,本文的實證結果,可建議保險公司進行實際的風險分類規劃時,針對不同保單可以考量不同的核保或訂價因素之參考依據,進行有效風險分類差異化的費率創新。

英文摘要

This study examines whether the characteristics of risk classification are effective by developing different models to predict claim occurrences. We use three unique types (Form A, Form B, and Form C) of coverage for vehicle damage insurance data in Taiwan. We first identify the basic characteristics of policyholders and vehicles which are currently applied by insurers for property damage to vehicles. We further investigate some supplementary information, which requires small information cost for the insurers to obtain from the insureds. Our evidence shows that, for the crucial risk classification based on the current official rating formula, claim coefficient is a relatively critical factor for Form A, while claim coefficient and car age are important for Form B, and policyholder age is important for Form C. We also find that some additional information such as the claim record in the previous policy year provides useful information for risk classification. Our findings imply that the official rating formula may consider various risk factors among different types of coverage for damage to vehicles. In fact, insurers could improve claim prediction by adding unused information such as the claim record in the previous policy year or other factors. Thus, the deregulation of automobile insurance rating can benefit from an efficient risk classification.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 利菊秀, C.-S.,林志豪, C.-H.,劉純之, C.-C.(2010)。風險分類與道德風險─汽車保險未限定駕駛人保單的損失評估。經濟論文,38(4),619-659。
    連結:
  2. 利菊秀, C.-S.,彭盛昌, S.-C.,劉純之, C.-C.(2008)。汽車保險不明車損的誘發性理賠─台灣的實證分析。經濟論文,36(3),249-275。
    連結:
  3. 汪琪玲, K. C.(2006)。台灣車體損失險契約中存在之訊息不對稱問題。台大管理論叢,16(2),161-186。
    連結:
  4. 汪琪玲, K. C.(2006)。台灣車體損失險上的動機效果。台大管理論叢,17(1),31-58。
    連結:
  5. 詹芳書, L. F.-S.(2014)。再探台灣車體保險之道德危險─以2005至2007年資料為證。經濟論文,42(2),173-195。
    連結:
  6. 蔡英哲, Y.-C.,曾郁仁, L. Y.,鄭安峰, A. A. F.(2006)。台灣車體損失保險不對稱訊息的實證研究。管理學報,23(2),227-240。
    連結:
  7. Andersson, H.(2005).The Value of Safety as Revealed in the Swedish Car Market: An Application of the Hedonic Pricing Approach.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,30(3),211-239.
  8. Bair, S.-T.,Huang, R. J.,Wang, K. C.(2012).Can Vehicle Maintenance Records Predict Automobile Accidents?.Journal of Risk and Insurance,79(2),567-584.
  9. Bond, E. W.,Crocker, K. J.(1991).Smoking, Skydiving and Knitting: The Endogenous Categorization of Risks in Insurance Markets with Asymmetric Information.Journal of Political Economy,99,177-200.
  10. Braver, E. R.,Trempel, R. E.(2004).Are Older Drivers Actually at Higher Risk of Involvement in Collisions Resulting in Deaths or Non-Fatal Injuries among Their Passengers and Other Road Users?.Injury Prevention,10,27-32.
  11. Brockett, P. L.,Golden, L. L.(2007).Biological and Psychobehavioral Correlates of Credit Scores and Automobile Insurance Losses: Toward an Explication of Why Credit Scoring Works.Journal of Risk and Insurance,74(1),23-63.
  12. Brown, R. L.,Charters, D.,Gunz, S.,Haddow, N.(2007).Colliding Interests-Age as an Automobile Insurance Rating Variable: Equitable Rate-Making or Unfair Discrimination?.Journal of Business Ethics,72,103-114.
  13. Butler, P.,Butler, T.,Williams, L.(1988).Sex-Divided Mileage, Accident, and Insurance Cost Data Show That Auto Insurers Overcharge Most Women.Journal of Insurance Regulation,6,243-423.
  14. Crocker, K. J.,Snow, A.(1986).The Efficiency Effects of Categorical Discrimination in the Insurance Industry.Journal of Political Economy,94,321-344.
  15. Crocker, K. J.,Snow, A.(1992).The Social Value of Hidden Information in Adverse Selection Economies.Journal of Public Economics,48,317-347.
  16. Crocker, K. J.,Snow, A.(1985).The Efficiency of Competitive Equilibria in Insurance Markets with Asymmetric Information.Journal of Public Economics,26,201-219.
  17. Dionne, G.(ed.)(2000).Handbook of Insurance.London:Kluwer.
  18. Dionne, G.,Ghali, O.(2005).The (1992) Bonus-Malus System in Tunisia: An Empirical Evaluation.Journal of Risk and Insurance,72,609-633.
  19. Doerpinghaus, H. I.,Schmit, J.,Yeh, J.(2008).Age and Gender Effects on Auto Liability Insurance Payouts.Journal of Risk and Insurance,75(3),527-550.
  20. Forgue, R. E.(1983).Consumer Opinions of Automobile Insurance Classification, Pricing Practices and Proposed Reforms.Journal of Insurance Regulation,1(3),323-337.
  21. Gardner, L. A.,Marlett, D. C.(2007).The State of Personal Auto Insurance Rate Regulation.Journal of Insurance Regulation,26(2),39-69.
  22. Harrington, S.,Doerpinghaus, H.(1993).The Economics and Politics of Automobile Insurance Rate Classification.Journal of Risk and Insurance,60(1),59-84.
  23. Hosmer, D. W.,Lemeshow, S.(2000).Applied Logistic Regression.New York:WileyInterscience Publication.
  24. Hoy, M.(1982).Categorizing Risks in the Insurance Industry.Quarterly Journal of Economics,97,321-336.
  25. Kellison, B.,Brockett, P.,Shin, S.-H.,Li, S.(2003).Technical Report, Bureau of Business Research, The University of Texas at AustinTechnical Report, Bureau of Business Research, The University of Texas at Austin,Bureau of Business Research, The University of Texas at Austin.
  26. Lemaire, J.(1985).Automobile Insurance: Actuarial Models.Boston, MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  27. Lemaire, J.(1995).Bonus-Malus Systems in Automobile Insurance.Boston, MA:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  28. Lemaire, J.(1977).La Soif du Bonus.Astin Bulletin,9,181-190.
  29. Li, C.-S.,Lin, C.-H.,Liu, C.-C.,Woodside, A.(2012).Dynamic Pricing in Regulated Insurance Markets with Heterogeneous Insurers: Strategies Nice versus Nasty for Customers.Journal of Business Research,65,968-976.
  30. Li, C.-S.,Liu, C.-C.,Peng, S.-C.(2013).Bundled Automobile Insurance Coverage and Accidents.Accident Analysis and Prevention,50,64-72.
  31. Li, C.-S.,Liu, C.-C.,Peng, S.-C.(2012).Is Claim Experience a Good Factor to Predict Automobile Insurance Claim Occurrences?.Asia-Pacific Risk and Insurance Association 16th Annual Conference
  32. Li, C.-S.,Liu, C.-C.,Peng, S.-C.(2013).The Expiration Date Effects of Automobile Insurance Contracts: The Curious Case of Last Policy Month Claims in Taiwan.Geneva Risk and Insurance Review,38,23-47.
  33. Li, C.-S.,Liu, C.-C.,Yeh, J.-H.(2007).The Incentive Effects of Increasing Per-Claim Deductible Contracts in Automobile Insurance.Journal of Risk and Insurance,74,441-459.
  34. Miller, M.,Smith, R. A.(2003).Actuarial Study, EPIC ActuariesActuarial Study, EPIC Actuaries,Actuarial Study, EPIC Actuaries.
  35. Moreno, I.,Vázquez, F. J.,Watt, R.(2006).Can Bonus-Malus Alleviate Insurance Fraud?.Journal of Risk and Insurance,73,123-151.
  36. Peng, S.-C.,Li, C.-S.,Liu, C.-C.(2016).Deregulation, Pricing Strategies, and Claim Behavior in the Taiwan Automobile Insurance Market.Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,52(4),869-885.
  37. Puelz, R.,Kemmsies, W.(1993).Implications for Unisex Statutes and Risk-Pooling: The Costs of Gender and Underwriting Attributes in the Automobile Insurance Market.Journal of Regulatory Economics,5(3),289-301.
  38. Tefft, B. C.(2008).Risks Older Drivers Pose to Themselves and to Other Road Users.Journal of Safety Research,39(6),577-582.
  39. Wang, J. L.,Chung, C.-F.,Tzeng, L. Y.(2008).An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Increasing Deductibles on Moral Hazard.Journal of Risk and Insurance,75,551-566.
  40. Youden, W. J.(1950).Index for Rating Diagnostic Tests.Cancer,3(1),32-35.