大學雙二一退學制度與學生規避退學行為

COLLEGE DUAL HALF DISMISSAL POLICY AND STUDENTS' AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR

陶宏麟(Hung-Lin Tao)；吳東陽(Dong-Yang Wu)

退學 ； 雙二一 ； 學分 ； 停修 ； 課程 ； Dismissal ； Dual half dismissal policy ； Credits ； Withdrawal ； Courses

經濟論文

49卷2期（2021 / 06 / 01）

201 - 244

繁體中文

本文分析退學制度下的四個議題：什麼樣的學生比較可能被退學；退學制度是否能提昇學生的學業表現；學生以什麼策略規避二一；發生二一後學生的修課行為是否改變？首先，男性、轉學生、曾休學、有學貸、學測分數低的學生較可能被退學。其次，發生二一的學生未來不及格率會下降。接著，在規避二一策略的有效性上，以不平均分配各科投入時間與規避二一有最顯著之正相關。在雙二一的退學制度下，有二一記錄的學生其未來所修的課可能既「不好過」，又「不營養」，他們的停修學分比自己以前停修的少，他們比以前更不會不平均分配各科投入時間，他們很可能會得到老師的通融，但因而及格的學分比例相當有限。因此，他們不及格比例的下降也包含了自己的努力。

This study investigates four issues of college dismissal policy. Who is more likely to be dismissed? Would a college dismissal policy enhance students' academic performance? What strategies are efficient for students to avoid dismissal? Could students that have failed half of the credits of a semester once change their course-taken behavior in the future? First of all, male students or those transferred from another school, students of resumption, and students with a student loan or with low General Scholastic Ability Test scores are more likely to be dismissed. Second, having failed half of the credits in a semester decreases a student's future failure rate. Third, distortion of study time among courses is positively correlated with avoiding failure of half the credits of courses in the future semester. Finally, after failure of half the credits of courses in a semester, students may take difficult to pass and not-easy-A courses; the amount of their course withdrawal declines, as well as the imbalance of time they spend on studying for each course. They may receive mercy from their course instructors; however, the possibility of them actually passing the course is low. In conclusion, their effort also contributes to bringing down their own failure rate.

1. 何萬順, O.-S.,林俊儒, J.-R.(2017)。大學學業退學制度的批判與反思。教育研究集刊，63(3)，77-106。
   連結：
2. 李浩仲, H.-C.,李文傑, W.-C.,連賢明, H.-M.(2016)。多『錢』入學?從政大學生組成看多元入學。經濟論文，44(2)，207-250。
   連結：
3. 李浩仲, H.-C.,李文傑, W.-C.,連賢明, H.-M.,王平, P.,簡錦漢, K.(2020)。哪類孩子最受教?從政大校務資料看學生表現。經濟論文叢刊，48(2)，139-185。
   連結：
4. 李維倫, W.-L.,古慧雯, H.-W.,駱明慶, M.-C.,林明仁, M.-J.(2020)。入學管道與學習表現。經濟論文叢刊，48(1)，31-76。
   連結：
5. 駱明慶, M.-C.(2018)。誰是台大學生（2001-2014）多元入學的影響。經濟論文叢刊，46(1)，47-95。
   連結：
6. Ahmed, J. U.,Chowdhury, M. H. K.,Rahman, S.,Talukder, A. M. H.(2014).Academic Probation: An Empirical Study of Private University Students.Research in Education,92(1),1-17.
7. Bachan, R.(2017).Grade Inflation in UK Higher Education.Studies in Higher Education,42(8),1580-1600.
8. Carvalho, R. G. G.(2016).Gender Differences in Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Personality.Personality and Individual Differences,94,54-58.
9. Casey, M. D.,Cline, J.,Ost, B.,Qureshi, J. A.(2018).Academic Probation, Student Performance, and Strategic Course-Taking.Economic Inquiry,56(3),1646-1677.
10. Cornelisz, I.,Velden, R. V. D.,Wolf, I. D.,Klaveren, C. V.(2019).The Consequences of Academic Dismissal for Academic Success.Studies in Higher Education,45(11),1-15.
11. Demeter-Karaszi, Z.,Pallay, K.,Tóth, D. A.(2019).A Comparative Study of Termination of Student Status in Central Europe.Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation,3(1),1-5.
12. Duckworth, A. L.,Seligman, M. E.(2006).Self-Discipline Gives Girls the Edge: Gender in Self-Discipline, Grades, and Achievement Test Scores.Journal of Educational Psychology,98(1),198-208.
13. Finefter-Rosenbluh, I.,Levinson, M. L.(2015).What Is Wrong with Grade Inflation (if Anything)?.Philosophical Inquiry in Education,23(1),3-21.
14. Fischer, F.,Schult, J.(2013).Sex Differences in Secondary School Success: Why Female Students Perform Better.European Journal of Psychology of Education,28(2),529-543.
15. Fletcher, J. M.,Tokmouline, M.(2017).Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA),未出版
16. Keng, S. H.(2016).The Effect of a Stricter Academic Dismissal Policy on Course Selection, Student Effort, and Grading Leniency.Education Finance and Policy,11(2),203-224.
17. Lai, F.(2010).Are Boys Left Behind? The Evolution of the Gender Achievement Gap in Beijing’s Middle Schools.Economics of Education Review,29(3),383-399.
18. Lindo, J. M.,Sanders, N. J.,Oreopoulos, P.(2010).Ability, Gender, and Performance Standards: Evidence from Academic Probation.American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2(2),95-117.
19. Musgrave, R.,Musgrave, P. B.(1989).Public Finance in Theory and Practice.New York:McGraw-Hill.
20. Popov, S. V.,Bernhardt, D.(2013).University Competition, Grading Standards, and Grade Inflation.Economic Inquiry,51(3),1764-1778.
21. Wright, N. A.(2020).Perform Better, or Else: Academic Probation, Public Praise, and Students Decision-Making.Labour Economics,62,Article 101773.
22. 張簡育婷, Y.-T.(2017)。國立中央大學經濟學系=Department of Economics, National Central University。
23. 陳婉琪, W.-C.,陳承佑, C.-Y.,林明仁, M.-J.(2201)。多元入學與選才機制—台北大學學生表現之校務資料分析。台灣經濟學會2016年年會，台北=Taipei:
24. 陳意涵, Y.-H.(2016)。國立宜蘭大學應用經濟與管理學系=Department of Applied Economics and Management, National Ilan University。
25. 陶宏麟, H.-L.,吳幸蓁, S.-J.,陳碧繙, B.-S.(2017)。大學入學管道與學業表現—以東吳大學為例。世新經濟2017年學術研討會，台北=Taipei:
26. 葉高華, K.-H.(2018)。大學多元入學是否有利『家境好』的學生?。台灣社會學刊，64，171-195。
27. 謝奕弘, Y.-H.(2015)。國立清華大學經濟學系=Department of Economics, National Tsing Hua University。

1. 李文基(2022)。高等教育退學之供給面因素分析－學校教學資源和入學管道招生名額配置對大學退學人數的影響。經濟論文，50(1)，75-115。
2. (2024)。放寬退學標準對大學生學業學習是福還是禍？－北部某大學校務資料之實證。人文及社會科學集刊，36(1)，3-44。