题名

穩健會計與盈餘持續性-考慮不同組成的穩健性指標

并列篇名

Accounting Conservatism and Earnings Persistence: A Consideration of Conservatism Index Components

DOI

10.6552/JOAR.2011.52.3

作者

鄭哲惠(Che-Hui Cheng);吳博欽(Po-Chin Wu);薛富井(Fu-Jiing Shiue)

关键词

穩健會計 ; 盈餘持續性 ; 應計項目組成 ; 現金流量組成 ; Conservatism accounting ; Earnings persistence ; Accrual component of earnings ; Cash flow component of earnings

期刊名称

會計評論

卷期/出版年月

52期(2011 / 01 / 01)

页次

77 - 101

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文以評價攸關的觀點,檢視會計穩健與盈餘持續性的關係。實證結果顯示,公司的盈餘穩健性愈高,盈餘持續性愈低且盈餘回復速度較快。然而,當會計政策較偏向中立者時,不論盈餘持續性或盈餘回復速度均表現最佳。此外,應計項目組成在穩健會計所扮演的角色亦獲得支持,且當應計項目組成的穩健性趨於中立性時,應計項目資訊確實較現金流量表現出較高的盈餘持續性,而隨著穩健程度提升,此關係則會有反轉的現象。最後,目前IASB與FASB共同組成的會計準則調和委員會提到穩健原則與中立性的品質具有衝突,因此在財務會計準則觀念性架構中不再包括穩健性或審慎性的資訊特性,而本文的實證結果與目前準則制定的目標一致。

英文摘要

This paper explores the relationship between accounting conservatism and earnings persistence from the point of view in valuation relevance. The empirical tests generally support our hypothesis that accounting conservatism is negatively related to earnings persistence and positively related to mean reversion. Moreover, we investigate whether earnings persistence can reflect the information about accounting conservatism in the accrual and cash flow components. The empirical results show that accounting conservatism brings about substantial improvements in accrual components, and is negatively related to earnings persistence. The IASB and the FASB recently developed a common Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, conservatism tends to conflict with neutrality. Accordingly, this framework does not include conservatism or prudence as desirable qualities of financial reporting information. This outcome is consistent with the objectives of the joint FASB/IASB projects.

主题分类 社會科學 > 財金及會計學
参考文献
  1. Gassen, J. 2008. Are stewardship and valuation usefulness compatible or alternative objectives of financial accounting? Working paper, Humboldt University.
  2. Paek, W., L. H. Chen, and H. Sami. 2007. Accounting conservatism, earnings persistence and pricing multiples on earnings. Working paper, Sungkyunkwan University Business School.
  3. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)/ Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 2008. Exposure draft: Conceptual framework for financial reporting: The objective of financial reporting and qualitative characteristics and constraints of decision-useful financial reporting information..
  4. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)/ Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 2006. Discussion paper: Preliminary views on an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting: The objective of financial reporting and qualitative characteristics of decision-useful financial reporting information.
  5. Jarva, H. 2010. Asymmetry in cash flows and accounting conservatism. Working paper, Oulu University.
  6. Ahmed, A. S.,Duellman, S.(2007).Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis.Journal of Accounting and Economics,43,411-437.
  7. Bandyopadhyay, S. P.,Chen, C.,Huang, A. G.,Jha, R.(2010).Accounting conservatism and the temporal trends in current earnings' ability to predict future cash flows versus future earnings: Evidence on the trade-off between relevance and reliability.Contemporary Accounting Research,27,413-460.
  8. Basu, S.(1997).The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings.Journal of Accounting and Economics,24,3-37.
  9. Callen, J. L.,Segal, D.,Hope, O.(2010).The pricing of conservative accounting and the measurement of conservatism at the firm-year level.Review of Accounting Studies,15,145-178.
  10. Chi, W.,Liu, C.,Wang, T.(2009).What affects accounting conservatism: A corporate governance perspective.Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics,5,47-59.
  11. Christensen, J.,Demski, J.(2004).Asymmetric monitoring: Good versus bad news verification.Schmalenbach Business Review,56,206-222.
  12. Collins, D. W.,Maydew, E. L.,Weiss, I. F.(1997).Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years.Journal of Accounting and Economics,24,39-67.
  13. Dechow, P. M.(1994).Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance the role of accounting accruals.Journal of Accounting and Economics,18,3-42.
  14. Dichev, I. D.,Tang, V. W.(2008).Matching and the changing properties of accounting earnings over the last 40 years.The Accounting Reviews,83,1425-1460.
  15. Dichev, I. D.,Tang, V. W.(2009).Earnings volatility and earnings predictability.Journal of Accounting and Economics,47,160-181.
  16. Givoly, D. C.,Hayn, K.,Natarajan, A.(2007).Measuring reporting conservatism.The Accounting Review,82,65-106.
  17. Givoly, D.,Hayn, C.(2000).The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative?.Journal of Accounting and Economics,29,287-320.
  18. Khan, M.,Watts, R. L.(2009).Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism.Journal of Accounting and Economics,48,132-150.
  19. Kim, M.,Kross, W.(2005).The ability of earnings to predict future operating cash flows has been increasing-not decreasing.Journal of Accounting Research,43,753-780.
  20. Krishnan, G. V.,Visvanathan, G.(2008).Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors accounting expertise and accounting conservatism.Contemporary Accounting Research,25,827-857.
  21. LaFond, R.,Roychowdhury, S.(2008).Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism.Journal of Accounting Research,46,101-134.
  22. LaFond, R.,Watts, R.(2008).The information role of conservative.The Accounting Review,83,447-478.
  23. Pae, J.(2007).Unexpected accruals and conditional accounting conservatism.Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,34,681-704.
  24. Pae, J.,Thornton, D. B.,Welker, M.(2005).The link between earnings conservatism and the price-to-book ratio.Contemporary Accounting Research,22,693-717.
  25. Penman, S. H.,Zhang, X. J.(2002).Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns.The Accounting Review,77,237-264.
  26. Roychowdhury, S.,Watts, R. L.(2007).Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, market-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting.Journal of Accounting and Economics,44,2-31.
  27. Schipper K.,Vincent, L.(2003).Earnings quality.Accounting Horizons,17(Supplement),97-110.
  28. Sloan, R. G.(1996).Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?.The Accountings Review,71,289-315.
  29. Tian, X.,Collins, D. W.,Hribar, P.(2010).The confounding effects of operating cash flow asymmetric timeliness on the Basu measure of conditional conservatism.2010 American Accounting Associating Annual Meeting,San Francisco, USA:
  30. Watts, R. L.(2003).Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications.Accounting Horizons,17,207-221.
  31. Xie, H.(2001).The mispricing of abnormal accruals.The Accounting Review,76,357-373.
  32. Zhang, J.(2008).The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers.Journal of Accounting and Economics,45,27-45.
被引用次数
  1. 陳昭蓉、許崇源(2014)。穩健會計與員工認股權。會計評論,59,37-72。
  2. 戴怡蕙(2020)。審計委員會的財務專家會影響穩健性嗎?。中華會計學刊,16(1),37-85。
  3. 廖秀梅,李建然(2022)。審計委員會設置及其品質與盈餘穩健性。會計評論,74,151-192。
  4. 廖秀梅、湯麗芬、李建然(2016)。董監事暨重要職員責任保險與盈餘穩健性。會計評論,63,109-150。
  5. 劉洪鈞、李政倫、丁緯(2014)。違約風險與盈餘穩健性之關聯性:中國國營V.S.民營企業。會計與財金研究,7(2),71-84。
  6. 劉嘉雯、陳漢鐘、許文馨、林修葳、王泰昌(2017)。會計穩健性:基於亞洲國家資料研究之回顧。臺大管理論叢,27(4),207-254。
  7. 劉政淮、陳俊合、張竹淵(2012)。以企業生命週期論析盈餘及其組成持續性。台灣管理學刊,12(2),205-225。
  8. 潘榮男,黃瓊慧,陳靜宜,余俊憲(2020)。內控品質與穩健會計關係之研究-以初次公開發行公司為例。企業管理學報,45(1),1-27。
  9. 汪瑞芝、李依純(2015)。所得稅資訊內涵對盈餘持續性之影響。當代會計,16(2),145-173。
  10. 謝齊莊,李淑華(2022)。穩健特性與應計項目持續性。管理實務與理論研究,16(1),105-120。
  11. 謝齊莊、李淑華(2015)。應計項目持續性與穩健會計之非線性關係。會計評論,60,35-71。
  12. 詹凌菁、彭火樹、郭翠菱、吳安妮(2016)。臺灣會計領域研究之回顧與展望。管理學報,33(1),139-187。