永續發展與公共行政―從山美與里佳經驗談社區自治與「共享性資源」的管理

Public Administration for Sustainable Development-Self-Governance and Common-Pool Resources Management in Taiwan's Indigenous Communities

10.6350/JSSP.200206.0261

湯京平(Ching-Ping Tang)；呂嘉泓(Chia-Hung Lu)

以社區為主體的自然資源管理 ； 資源使用者自治 ； 共享性資源的悲劇 ； 達娜伊谷 ； 集體保育行動 ； 制度誘因 ； Community-Based Natural Resource Management ； Self-governance of Appropriators ； the Tragedy of the Commons ； Tanayiku ； Collective Conservation Action ； Institutional Incentives

人文及社會科學集刊

14卷2期（2002 / 06 / 01）

261 - 287

繁體中文

本研究擬以山美與里佳兩社區的保育努力為案例，來探討「以社區為主體的自然資源管理」(community-based natural resource management)體系在台灣的施行，並探討此類資源管理對山地社區永續發展的重要功能。由於「共享性資源」(common-pool resources)往往是地方的永續發展的關鍵性因素，加上其易因遭到濫用而迅速耗竭的特性，國際間已發展出相當完整的理論架構，對此一議題進行有系統的實證研究，冀對開發中國家的經濟成長與環境保護有所幫助。鑑於國內在這方面研究尚未有突破性的進展，故擬以此案例研究，討論正式與非正式制度及發展策略，在山地社區管理當地自然資源所扮演的角色。要成功地改變貧窮、資源耗盡的現狀，需要社區民眾的集體行動，來遵守村中保育的協議（公約），並進一步對抗外來的「盜獵」者。此間，有些社區能成功地吸收外部資源，凝結內在力量，而獲致較佳之成果，而有些社區則面臨較大的困境，較不被外界認同。什麼因素解釋這樣的差異？本研究除將針對集體行動的邏輯、共享性自然資源的特性，以及制度性誘因等相關理論提出解釋外，並希望此案例分析將有助於社區重建、山地／原住民政策、自然資源管理、以及永續發展等政府政策，提供建議。

Many indigenous communities around the world have established their own long-enduring institutional arrangements for governing their common-pool (CPRs) resources such as local fisheries, forests, and water systems. Although such indigenous institutional arrangements may have been around for long and have functioned well, they are often challenged once these communities are open to the outside world, because newcomers to the community no longer share the same understanding and respect for the indigenous arrangements. Reckless use by these newcomers often result in rapid depletion of the local common-pool resources. A critical question is how new institutional arrangements can be developed such that sustainable use of the resources can be restored. The efforts of Shan-Mei and Li-Chia Village in restoring their indigenous governance systems for natural resources via collective action have encountered similar challenges, but experienced different levels of success. One of them not only negotiated with outsiders to obtain autonomy in governing local CPRs but also to gain considerable capital for development, while the other failed to get either such empowerment or outsider resources. This paper discusses the causes of such differences, and concludes that governmental support to indigenous conservation programs by awarding sufficient autonomy and financial assistance would benefit both conservation and development. Such authority to govern local resources creates and sustains multiple incentives for local residents to engage in effective management of local common pool resources.

1. (1995).Natural Capital and Human Economic Survival.VT:International Society for Ecological Economics.
2. (1996).Democracy ＆ Green Political Thought: Sustainability, Rights and Citizenship.London:Routledge.
3. Agrawal, Arun, Gibson, C. C.(1999).Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation.World Development,27(4)
4. Arnold, J. E. M., Campbell, J. G.(1986).Proceedings of the Conference on Common Property Resource Management.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
5. Bebbington, Anthony(1997).Social Capital and Rural Intensification: Local Organization and Islands of Sustainability in the Rural Andes.The Geographical Journal,163(2)
6. Belsky, J. M.(1999).'Misrepresenting Communities: The Politics of Community-Based Rural Ecotourism' in Gales Point Manatee, Belize.Rural Sociology,64(4)
7. Benjaminsen, T. A.(1997).Natural Resource Management, Paradigm Shifts, and the Decentralization Reform in Mali.Human Ecology,25(1)
8. Bernstein, Richard J.(1976).The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory.PA:University of Pennsylvania Press.
9. Blomquist, William(1992).Dividing the Waters: Governing Groundwater in Southern California.San Francisco, CA:Institute for Contemporary Studies.
10. Brugmann, J.(1996).Planning for Sustainability at the Local Government Level.Environmental Impact Assessments Review,16
11. Bryant, Raymond L., Bailey, Sinead(1997).Third World Political Ecology.London; New York:Routledge.
12. Chong, Dennis(1991).Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
13. Cobb, C, Cobb, J.(1994).The Green National Product: A Proposal Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare.NY:University of Press of American.
14. Coleman, J. S.(1990).Foundations of Social Theory.Cambridge, MA:The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
15. Daly, H. E., Cobb, Jr. J. B.(1994).For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economic toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future.Boston:Beacon Press.
16. Dasgupta, Partha(1982).The Control of Resources.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
17. Demsetz, Harold(1967).Toward a Theory of Property Rights.American Economic Review,62
18. Dryzek, J. S.(1997).The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourse.New York:Oxford University Press.
19. Earth Council(1993).Sustainable Development Indicators (SDI).San Jose:Earth Council.
20. Farrington, John, Bebbington, Anthony, Wellard, Kate, Lewis, David(1993).Reluctant Partners? Non-Governmental Organizations, the State and Sustainable Agricultural Development.NY:Routledge.
21. Faucheux, S., Muir, E., O'' Connor, M.(1997).Neoclassical Natural Capital Theory and 'Weak' Indicators for Sustainability.Land Economics,73(4)
22. Feeny, David(1988).World Deforestation in the Twentieth Century.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
23. Gibson, Clark C., Koontz, Tomas(1998).When 'Community' Is Not Enough: Institutions and Values in Community-Based Forest Management in southern Indiana.Human Ecology,26(4)
24. Gordon, H. S.(1954).The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery.Journal of Political Economy,62
25. Hammond, Allen(1995).Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development.Washington DC:World Resource Institute.
26. Hardin, G.(1968).The Tragedy of the Commons.Science,162
27. Heiman, M. K.(1997).Community Attempts at Sustainable Development through Corporate Accountability.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,40(5)
28. Howarth, R. B.(1993).Intergenerational Transfers and the Social Discount Rate.Environment and Resource Economics,3(August)
29. Jodha, N. S.(1996).Rights to Nature.Washington, DC:Island Press.
30. King, G., Keohane, R. O., Verba, S.(1994).Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
31. Lam, Wai Fung(1998).Governing Irrigation Systems in Nepal: Institutions, Infrastructure, and Collective Action.San Francisco, CA:ICS Press.
32. Lee, Kai N.(1993).Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment.Washington DC:Island Press.
33. McDaniel, Josh(1997).Communal Fisheries Management in the Peruvian Amazon.Human Organization,56(2)
34. Milbrath, Lester W.(1989).Envisioning A Sustainable Society: Learning our Way Out.Albany, NY:State University of New York.
35. Norton, B. G., Toman, M. A.(1997).Sustainability: Ecological and Economic Perspectives.Land Economics,73(4)
36. Olsen, Barbara(1997).Environmentally Sustainable Development and Tourism: Lessons from Negril, Jamaica.Human Organization,56(3)
37. Ophuls, W.(1973).Toward a Steady State Economy.San Francisco, CA:Freeman.
38. Ostrom, E.(1990).Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action.Cambridge; New York:Cambridge University Press.
39. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J.(1994).Rules, Games, ＆ Common-Pool Resources.Michigan:The University of Michigan Press.
40. Ostrom, E., Schroeder, L., Wynne, S.(1993).Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development.Oxford:Westview Press.
41. Ostrom, Elinor(1992).Crafting Institutions for Self-governing Irrigation Systems.San Francisco, CA:ICS Press.
42. Ostrom, Elinor(1997).Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis.Bloomington, IN:
43. Page, Talbot(1997).On the Problem of Achieving Efficiency and Equity, Intergenerationally.Land Economics,73(4)
44. Putnam, R. D.(1993).Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton, NJ ＆ London:Princeton University Press.
45. Rees, J.(1990).Natural Resources: Allocation, Economics and Policy.London:Routledge.
46. Roberts, Peter(1997).The Shape of Things to Come - McLoughlin's Approach and Strategies for Sustainable Development.European Planning Studies,5(6)
47. Schelling, Thomas C.(1995).Intergenerational Discounting.Energy Policy,23(April/ May)
48. Songorwa, A. N.(1999).Community-Based Wildlife Management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are the Communities Interested?.World Development,27(12)
49. Tang, Shui-Yan(1992).Institutions and Collective Action: Self-Governance in Irrigation.San Francisco:Institute for Contemporary Studies.
50. United Nations(1993).Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting.NY:United Nations.
51. Weale, Albert(1992).The New Politics of Pollution.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
52. Weimer, D., Vining, A.(1989).Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
53. Western, David, Wright, Michael(1994).Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation.Washington DC:Island Press.
54. Wilson, J. Q.(1995).Political Organizations.Princeton, N. J.:Princeton University Press.
55. 山美社區發展協會(1999)。嘉義縣阿里山鄉山美社區發展協會八十八年度收支結算表。
56. 王俊秀 Wang, Juju Chin-Shou(1994)。環境主義是一種生活方式：都市社區環保地盤的建構，環境社會學的出發－讓故鄉的風水有面子。台北:桂冠。
57. 王俊秀 Wang, Juju Chin-Shou(1999)。全球變遷下的社區淨土論述，全球變遷與變遷全球。台北:巨流。
58. 王嵩山(1990)。阿里山鄒族的歷史與政治。台北:稻鄉。
59. 行政院國家科學委員會(1999)。89年度永續發展研究計畫規劃課題之重點說明。
60. 呂嘉泓 Lu, Chia-Hung(2000)。社區營造在永續發展中之角色－以嘉義縣山美社區為例。國立中正大學政治學研究所。
61. 李天民 、 湯宏忠(1999)。永遠的達娜伊谷－阿里山鄒族山美社區工作紀實。
62. 李永展 Lee, Yung-Jaan(1995)。社區環境權與社區發展。社區發展季刊 Community Development Journal，69
63. 李永展 Lee, Yung-Jaan(1999)。永續發展：大地反撲的省思。台北:巨流。
64. 林振春 Lin, Jenn-Chuen(1994)。如何凝聚社區意識、整建社區社會。理論與政策 Theory and Policy，32
65. 林益仁 Lin, Oliver Y. R.(1998)。飲鴆的獵人：環境議題中的科學與宗教。台北:原尊文化。
66. 林瑞穗 Lin, Rui-Sui(1996)。社區發展與村里組織功能問題之探討。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
67. 邱國光(1992)。社區發展工作的規劃與展望－邁向互動、互助、互敬的新境界。社區發展季刊 Community Development Journal，58
68. 徐震 Hsu, James C.(1992)。社區與社區發展。台北:正中。
69. 徐震 Hsu, James C.(1995)。論社區意識與社區發展。社會建設 The Journal of Social Development，90
70. 浦忠成(1995)。鄒族的生存空間。台北:順益台灣原住民博物館。
71. 高揚昇(1999)。創造雙贏的國家公園政策。政策月刊，45
72. 高揚昇(1999)。山地鄉的農業發展契機。政策月刊，47
73. 張錦秀 Chang, Chan-Shioa(1993)。雲林縣崙背鄉農村社區發展規劃之研究。嘉義農專學報 Journal of National Chia-Yi Institute of Agriculture，32
74. 湯京平 Tang, Ching-Ping, Tang, Shui-Yan(2001).Negotiated Autonomy: Transforming Self-governing Institutions for Local Common-Pool Resources in Two Tribal Villages in Taiwan.Human Ecology,29(1)
75. 華加志(1999)。原住民就業問題與因應措施。政策月刊，46
76. 蔡宏進 Tsai, Hong-Chin(1993)。鄉村發展的理論與實際。台北:東大。
77. 關智宇(1999)。非營利組織與政府組織合作關係之研究－以台北社區理事長與里長為對象。國立中正大學政治學研究所。

1. 包正豪(2012)。原鄉的基層社區治理：宜蘭縣南澳鄉 K 村個案研究。台灣原住民族研究季刊，5(1)，73-98。
2. 陳思先、陳均豪(2018)。地方政府節能誘因採用之研究─以政治市場觀點切入之實證調查。中國行政評論，24(3)，82-127。
3. 戴興盛(2007)。反思經濟誘因、自然保育與集體行動。環境教育研究，5(1)，1-39。
4. 戴興盛、莊武龍(2009)。誘因排擠與社區保育集體行動臺灣東部兩個案例之比較研究。地理學報，56，17-38。
5. 傅岳邦(2017)。我國地方政府永續發展政策產出與相關因素。政治科學論叢，73，31-80。
6. 洪廣冀、何俊頤(2018)。自然資源治理與原住民部落發展：後發展與後人類的視角。考古人類學刊，89，93-141。
7. 黃宏森(2006)。共享性資源的網絡治理：台灣農田水利資源管理個案分析。公共行政學報，21，73-114。
8. 黃詩涵、黃坤山、湯京平(2009)。災後重建政策與誘因排擠—以九二一地震後某社區營造集體行動爲例。政治學報，48，1-31。
9. 賴兩陽(2015)。以社區為基礎推動原住民族部落觀光產業的過程與成效：部落推動者的觀點。社會政策與社會工作學刊，19(1)，45-90。
10. 廖學誠,姚佳瑩(2018)。原住民族參與集水區治理之制度分析：以宜蘭縣崙埤社區為例。地理研究，68，89-114。
11. 羅光達、陳金哲、張筵儀(2011)。水權費開徵之可行性評估。政治學報，51，53-103。
12. 石之瑜(2004)。水泥與糞便：開展湘西小溪鄉「生態扶貧」論述的能動機緣。中國大陸研究，47(4)，119-131。
13. 湯京平、張元嘉(2013)。社區發展、市民社會與生態政治─以恆春半島灰面鷲的參與式保育為例。政治學報，56，1-25。
14. 蕭代基、郭彥廉、張瓊婷(2003)。自然資源的參與式管理與地方自治制度。臺灣經濟預測與政策，34(1)，1-37。
15. 謝妙勤、戴興盛(2007)。保育為先苗栗縣後龍溪區域性河川保育之集體行動與制度分析。地理學報，48，67-86。
16. 張春炎(2009)。媽媽的革命與正義的消費者文化？台灣綠色消費運動初探。傳播與管理研究，9(1)，95-158。
17. 張春炎(2013)。地方文化傳播與社區營造：苗栗「灣寶社區」動員之初探研究。新聞學研究，116，173-206。
18. (2003)。中寮鄉社區發展與自主治理之研究—共用資源分析法(CPRs Approach)之應用。土地經濟年刊，14，217-252。
19. (2004).When New Public Management Runs into Democratization: Taiwan's Public Administration in Transition.Issues & Studies,40(3/4),59-100.
20. (2004)。觀光地景、部落與家從新竹司馬庫斯部落的觀光發展探討文化與共享資源的管理。地理學報，37，51-97。
21. (2006)。合作與參與：社區發展的困境與策略。社區發展季刊，115，408-418。
22. (2006)。取用者自治與水資源管理：比較我國嘉南地區與美國加州雷蒙集水區之地下水治理。政治學報，40，1-39。
23. (2006)。原住民族觀光發展的地方建構：鄒族山美社區個案。地理研究，44，35-58。
24. (2021)。發展體制、侍從主義與公民實踐：一個原住民小山村的後發展啟示。台灣社會學，41，143-193。