题名

從理性到反思―行政學與行政法基本理論於後現代時期之整合與轉型

并列篇名

From Rational to Reflexive: The Transformation and Convergence of the Theory of Public Administration and Administrative Law

DOI

10.6350/JSSP.200412.0603

作者

廖義銘(I-Ming Liao)

关键词

反思性公共行政 ; 反思性行政法 ; 反思法 ; Reflexive Public Administration ; Reflexive Administrative Law ; Reflexive

期刊名称

人文及社會科學集刊

卷期/出版年月

16卷4期(2004 / 12 / 01)

页次

603 - 626

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

公共行政學上之「新公共管理」,強調以顧客導向取代規則導向,而與傳統行政法之至高價值―依法行政―產生嚴重衝突。此一衝突導致行政學與行政法基本理論面臨必要之轉型。本文以三部份來處理此問題。首先,本文說明在現代國家時期,行政學與行政法在理性主義之基礎上,發展出圍繞「依法行政」和「公共利益」等概念之相關內涵;其次,本文分析行政學與行政法於後現代時期各自遭遇之後現代化問題。最後,本文將論證道,在行政學上,學習型理論及反思性公共行政理論之提出,與行政法上之「反思性行政法」理論之問世,使行政法與行政學典範於後現代時期之整合與整型,可一言以蔽之:從理性到反思。

英文摘要

This article is concerned with the problems of conflict between the New Public Management, which embraces the ”custom-oriented” concept, and the ”rule-oriented” basis of traditional administrative Law. It explores the paradigm-shift of public administration (PA) and administrative law (AL) in the post-modern era. First, this article explains in the modern state, the convergence of the paradigms of PA and AL with the ideas of rationalism. Next, this article explores the tendency of post- modernization of PA, and delegalization and disintegration of AL. Finally, it is argued that the growth of ”Learning Theory” and ”Reflexive Public Administration” and the emergence of ”Reflexive Administrative Law” show that the transformation and convergence of theory of PA and AL could be summarized as a shift from rational to reflexive.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Anthony Gidens(2002)。民族-國家與暴力。台北:左岸文化。
  2. Argyris,C.,Donald A.Schon(1978).Reading.MA:Addisin-Wesley.
  3. Bennett,C.J.,Michael Howlett(1992).The Lessons of Learning:Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change.Policy Science,25,275-276.
  4. Birkinshaw,P.,Harden,I,Lewis,N(1990).Government by Moonlight:The Hybird Parts of the State.London:Sage.
  5. Bohret,C.(1983).Public Administration in the Federal Republic of Germany.Boston:Kluwer-Deventer.
  6. Cranston,R.(1994).Administration LawLaw and Government Action-The Court and Alternative Mechanisms of Review.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  7. David Shaman,David Wheeler(1998).Controlling Industrial Pollution in Developing World.Quality Mgmt,8,69-70.
  8. Denhartdt,R.、Joseph W.Grubbs(2003)。公共行政。台北:五南。
  9. Galligan,D.J.(1992).Administration Law.
  10. Glasbergen,P(1996).Democracy and the Environment: Problem and Prospects.
  11. Gunningham,Neil(1995).Environment,Self-Regulation,and the Chemical Industry:Assessing Responsible Care.Law Policy,17,59-59.
  12. Heclo,H.(1974).Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden:From Releif to Income Maintenance.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  13. Hermann Finer(1947).Rureaucratic Power in National Politics.Boston:Little,Brown.
  14. Hood,C.(1991).69 Public Administration.
  15. Jun,J.S.(1994).Philosophy of Administration.
  16. Jun,J.S.,Ann L.Cunliffe(2002).Paper for the Annual meeting of the Public Administration Theory Network.Ohio:Cleveland.
  17. Kickert,W.(1997).Public Management and Adminstrative Reform in Western Europe.London:Edward Elgar Publishing.
  18. Kooiman,J.(1994).Modern Governance: New Governement-Society Interactions.Calif:Sage.
  19. Kooiman,J.(1993).Modern Governance: New Governement-Society Interactions.Calif:Sage.
  20. Levin,D.N.(1981).Rationality and Freedom: Weber and Beyond.51(1)
  21. Luhmann,N.(1990).Essays on Self-Reference.New York:Columbia University Press.
  22. Luhmann,N.(1987).Autopoitic Law: A New Approach to Law.
  23. Neumann,F.(1964).The Democratic and Autoritarian State.New York:Free Oress.
  24. Osborne,D.、Ted Gaebler(1993)。新政府運動。台北:天下文化。
  25. Paiget,J.(1976).The Constuction of Reality in the Child.New York:Ballantine.
  26. Peters,B.G.(1991).Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Adminstration.
  27. Pitschas,R.(1998)。論德國行政法總論之改革。憲政時代,1(24),141-187。
  28. Rehbinder,E.(1976).Controlling the Environment Enforcement Deficit:West Germany.
  29. Rose,R.(1999).Rethinking Environmental Regulation: Perspectives on Law and Governance.
  30. Rose,R.(1993).Lesson Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space.
  31. Schimitter,P.(1974).The New Corporatism:Social Political Structure in Liberian World.
  32. Senge,Peyer M. 等人(1994)。第五項修練-學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北:天下文化。
  33. Shameek Konar,Mark A Cohen(1997).Information as Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws in Toxic Emission.
  34. Shapiro,M.(1983).Administrative Discretion: The Next Stage.The Yale Law Journal,91,1487-1522.
  35. Skinner,Q.(1978).The Foundations of Mordern Political Thought.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  36. Teubner,G.(1993).Law as an Autopoietic System.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
  37. Vliet,M.V.(1993).Modern Governance: New Governement-Society Interactions.Calif.:Sage.
  38. Werhan,K.(1996).Delegalizing Administrative Law.U.Ill.L.Rev.
  39. 吳瓊恩(1996)。行政學。台北:三民。
  40. 徐振國(2000)。從威權論統合論到新國家論的轉折與檢討。理論與政策,2(14),1-27。
  41. 陳愛娥(2002)。國家角色變遷下的行政組織法。月旦法學教室,1,100-106。
  42. 陳愛娥(2003)。行政任務取向的行政組織法-重新建構行政組織法的考量觀點。月旦法學教室,5,63-73。
  43. 黃錦堂(2000)。行政法
  44. 詹中原(1999)。新公共管理-政府再造的理論與實務。台北:五南。
  45. 廖義銘(2002)。行政法基本理論之改革。台北:翰蘆。
  46. 廖義銘(2000)。新經濟與政府再造。主計月報,534,19-41。
  47. 盧偉斯(2001)。新世紀的行政理論與實務-張潤書教授榮退紀念論文集。台北:三民。
被引用次数
  1. 陳朝建(2004)。談台灣新公法學派之建構——以法律政策的憲法論證爲例。政策研究學報,4,81-104。
  2. (2006)。永續發展下之無牙老虎?─我國環境影響評估法的檢討。靜宜人文社會學報,1(1),79-110。