题名

團員關鍵性、忠誠行爲與團體動能的關聯

并列篇名

Situational Analysis on the Association between Membership Criticality, Loyal Behaviors and Group Dynamics

DOI

10.6350/JSSP.201106.0037

作者

張守中(Kirk Chang);李宜玲(I-Ling Lee);鄭國泰(Kuo-Tai Cheng)

关键词

團體動能 ; 忠誠 ; 管理 ; 成員資格 ; 利益 ; group dynamics ; loyalty ; management ; membership ; interests

期刊名称

人文及社會科學集刊

卷期/出版年月

23卷2期(2011 / 06 / 01)

页次

37 - 71

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究以兩個子研究分析忠誠行爲與國體動能之間的關聯性。研究一以實驗室情境模擬法進行,樣本爲六十名大學生,透過一系列的投資遊戲,來分析團體對忠誠行爲與非忠誠行爲之反應。研究一發現團員展現忠誠行爲時會收到較正面的評價,展現非忠誠行爲時則收到較負面的評價;若是高關鍵性團員展現非忠誠行爲時(關鍵性是以團員對團體的重要性而定),則會收到最負面的評價,而且此非忠誠行爲會影響團體整體表現。但低關鍵性團員展現非忠誠行爲時,對團體整體表現的影響則不大。研究二以另外六十名大學生爲樣本,研究設計同於研究一,進一步分析忠誠行爲與成員感受的關聯。研究二發現,相較於低關鍵性團員,高關鍵性團員在展現非忠誠行爲峙,會激起其他團員更多的反感情緒。團體裡的其它團員,即使是犧牲自己的利益,也要懲罰那些對國體不忠誠的團員。這些發現指出,非忠誠行爲並不是解釋固體動能、關體表現變差的唯一因素,非忠誠團員本身對團體的關鍵性也必須予以考量。最後,本文討論這些新發現對國總管理政策之啟發,並對公共和私人部門之管理人員提出建言。

英文摘要

This research project aimed to examine group reactions towards acts of loyalty versus disloyalty. Study One revealed that, compared to their counterparts, members with loyal behavior received more positive evaluations from the group. Critical members with disloyal behaviors received the worst evaluations and generated negative impact on group performance, in which criticality was defined as individual significance towards their own group. Yet, non-critical members with disloyal behaviors did not generate any salient impact on group performance. Study Two indicated that critical members with disloyal behavior provoked more negative emotions than non-critical members with disloyal behavior. General group members were keen to punish the disloyal members, even sacrificing their own interests. This research suggested that disloyal behavior may not be the sole factor accounting for deteriorated group dynamics and performance, because the degree criticality of disloyal members is also of importance. Implication of the findings and their contribution to the theoretical framework of group management are evaluated. Suggestions for group leaders, personnel officers, and managerial practitioners are discussed accordingly.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 范馬克、張守中、哈克萊(2005)。領導模式對團體穩定性的影響。中華心理學刊,47(4),365-380。
    連結:
  2. 張守中、陳美貴(2006)。團體界線的開放性、團體表現與成員流動性之關聯。中華心理學刊,48(4),411-424。
    連結:
  3. Keralas 2008 Leader of the Congress Party, India. Retrieved June 13, 2008, from http://www.soniagandhi.org/php/showContent.php?linkid=1
  4. Axelrod, R.(1984).The Evolution of Cooperation.New York:Basic Books.
  5. Branscombe, N. R.,Wann, D. L. ,Noel, J. G.,Coleman, J.(1993).Ingroup or Outgroup Extremity: Importance of the Threatened Social Identity.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,19,381-388.
  6. Chang, K.,Lu, L.(2007).Characteristics of Organizational Culture, Stressors and Well-being-The Case of Taiwanese Organizations.Journal of Managerial Psychology,22(6),549-568.
  7. Coull, A.,Yzerbyt, V. Y.,Castano, E.,Paladino, M. P.,Leemans, V.(2001).Protecting the Ingroup: Motivated Allocation of Cognitive Resources in the Presence of a Threatening Ingroup Members.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations,4,327-339.
  8. Ellemers, N.,Kortekaas, P.,Ouwerkerk, J.(1999).Self-categorization, Commitment to the Group, and Group Self Esteem as Related but Distinct Aspects of Social Identity.European Journal of Social Psychology,29,371-389.
  9. Fehr, E.,Gaechter, S.(2002).Altruistic Punishment in Humans.Nature,415,137-140.
  10. Foddy, M.,Smithson, M.,Schneider, S.,Hogg, M.(1990).Resolving Social Dilemmas: Dynamic, Structural, and Intergroup Aspects.Philadelphia:Psychology Press.
  11. Hart, C.,Van Vugt, M.(2006).From Fault Line to Group Fission: Understanding Membership Changes in Small Groups.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,32(3),1-13.
  12. Hertel, G.,Kerr, N. L.(2001).Priming Ingroup Favoritism: The Impact of Normative Scripts in the Minimal Group Paradigm.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,37,316-324.
  13. Hogg, M.(2001).A Social Identity Model of Leadership.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Review,5,184-200.
  14. Hothersall, D(1995).History of Psychology.New York:McGraw-Hill, Inc..
  15. Jetten, J.,Spears, R.,Manstead, A. S. R.(1997).Distinctiveness Threat and Prototypicality: Combined Effects on Intergroup Dis-crimination and Collective Self-esteem.European Journal of Social Psychology,27,635-657.
  16. Kenrick, D.,Li, N. P.,Butner, J.(2003).Dynamical Evolutionary Psychology: Individual Decision Rules and Emergent Social Norms.Psychological Review,110,3-28.
  17. Kruglanski, A. W.,Higgins, E. T.(2003).Social Psychology- A General Reader.New York:Psychology Press.
  18. Latané, B.(1981).The Psychology of Social Impact.American Psychologist,36,343-356.
  19. Levine, J. M.(1989).Reaction to Opinion Deviance in Small Groups.Psychology of Group Influence,Hillsdale, NJ:
  20. Levine, J. M.,Moreland, R. L.(2002).Group Reactions to Loyalty and Disloyalty.Group Cohesion, Trust, and Solidarity,Amsterdam:
  21. Marques, J. M.,Abrams, D.,Paez, D.,Martinez-Taboada, C.(1998).The Role of Categorization and In-group Norms in Judgments of Groups and Their Members.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75,976-988.
  22. Moreland, R. L.,Levine, J. M.(1982).Socialization in Small Groups: Temporal Changes in Individual-group Relations.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,New York:
  23. Moreland, R. L.,McMinn, J. G.(1999).Gone but Not Forgotten: Loyalty and Betrayal Among Ex-members of Small Groups.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,25,1476-1486.
  24. Stern, P. C.(1995).Why Do People Sacrifice for Their Nations?.Political Psychology,16,217-235.
  25. Tajfel, H.,Turner, J. C.(1986).The Social Identity Theory of Inter-group Behavior.Psychology of Intergroup Relations,Chicago:
  26. Van Vugt, M.(2001).Community Identification Moderating the Impacto of Financial Incentives in a Natural Social Dilemma.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,27,1440-1449.
  27. Van Vugt, M.(2004).Follow the Leader, but at What Cost.The Psychologist,17,274-277.
  28. Van Vugt, M.,De Cremer, D.(1999).Leadership in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Group Identification on Collective Actions to Provide Public Goods.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76,587-599.
  29. Van Vugt, M.,Hart, C. M.(2004).Social Identity as Social Glue: The Origins of Group Loyalty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86,585-598.
  30. Van Vugt, M.,Van Lange, P. A. M.(2006).Psychological Adaptations for Prosocial Behavior.Evolution and Social Psychology,New York:
  31. Watson, D.,Clark, A.,Tellegen, A.(1988).Development and Validation of Brief Measure of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54,1063-1070.
  32. Yamagishi, T.(1986).The Structural Goal/Expectation Theory of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas.Advances in Group Processes,Greenwich, CT:
  33. Yamagishi, T.(1988).Exit from the Group as an Individualistic Solution to the Free-rider Problem in the US and Japan.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,24,530-542.
  34. Zdaniuk, B.,Levine, J. M.(2001).Group Loyalty: Impact of members' Identification and Contributions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,37,502-509.
  35. Ziller, R. C.(1965).Toward a Theory of Open and Closed Groups.Psychological Bulletin,64,164-182.