题名

臺灣的大學聯考和補習風氣:擴充大學招生名額與低學費政策對社會流動的影響

并列篇名

Higher Education and Cramming for Examinations: The Roles of Educational Quotas and Low-tuition Policies on Social Mobility

DOI

10.6350/JSSP.201109.0311

作者

張瀞云(Jing-Jun Chang)

关键词

升學補習 ; 教育名額限制 ; 借貸限制 ; 社會流動 ; 低學費政策 ; cramming for examination ; educational quota ; borrowing constraint ; social mobility ; low-tuition policy

期刊名称

人文及社會科學集刊

卷期/出版年月

23卷3期(2011 / 09 / 01)

页次

311 - 339

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文嘗試於補習已成社會風氣且勞動工資爲外生固定參數的前提下,討論當社會存在父母所得有高有低、而小孩資質雖不同但分配相同的兩個所得階層家庭時,政府擴增大學名額和降低高等教育學費,對會支援補習的家長(或補習學生)總人數、補習總支出和跨代向上流動的影響。我們認爲大學名額的擴增將同時提升高所得和低所得家庭小孩受高等教育的比例,利於向上跨代流動;並因聯考最低錄取分數的降低,鼓勵原本無望錄取的考生,選擇加入補習,復以人口結構中高等教育畢業之技術勞力家庭比例增加,願意讓小孩補習的家長數目增多,而使得社會之補習總人數和補習總支出皆上升,其次,當政府對高等教育採低學費政策時,將因降低教育成本而增強受高等教育誘因,低所得和高所得家庭的補習支出均上揚;若高等教育名額不變且補習支出對聯考分數的提升具邊際報酬遞減作用時,低學費政策並將利於向上跨代流動。

英文摘要

This study sets up to develop a cramming-for-examination model with an economy characterized by heterogeneous-ability individuals, an educational quota for attending universities, and capital market imperfection, in an attempt to discuss the possible impacts of educational quotas and low-tuition policies on cramming decisions and social mobility. We show that an increase in educational quotas might increase the cramming expenditures and social mobility since they raise the opportunities for median-ability individuals to pass the entrance examination by cramming for examinations. However the low-tuition policy will be good for social upward mobility only in a specific condition.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 林忠正、黃璀娟(2009)。補習文化。人文及社會科學集刊,21(4),587-643。
    連結:
  2. 鄭保志(2004)。工資流動性與終身不均度的年群分析。經濟論文叢刊,32(3),369-393。
    連結:
  3. 駱明慶(2004)。升學機會與家庭背景。經濟論文叢刊,32(4),417-445。
    連結:
  4. Aghion, Philippe,Bolton, Patrick(1997).A Theory of Trickle-down Growth and Development with Debt Overhang.Review of Economic Studies,64(2),151-172.
  5. Becker, Gary S.,Tomes, Nigel(1979).An Equilibrium Theory of the Distribution of Income and intergeneration Mobility.Journal of Political Economy,87(6),1153-1189.
  6. Caucutt, Elizabeth M.,Kumar, Krishna B.(2003).Higher Education Subsidies and Heterogeneity: A Dynamic Analysis.Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,27(8),1459-1502.
  7. Cheng, P.C. Roger,Chu, C. Y. Cyrus(1998).Estimating the Intergenerational Income mobility Matrix Using Pseudo Panel Data.The Political Economy of the Development in Taiwan into the 21st Century,Northampton, MA:
  8. Chu, C. Y. Cyrus(1991).Primogeniture.Journal of Political Economy,99(1),78-99.
  9. Couch, K. A.,Morand, O. F.(2005).Inequality, Mobility, and the Transmission of Ability.Journal of macroeconomics,27(2),365-377.
  10. Das, Mausumi(2007).Persistent Inequality: An Explanation Based on Limited Parental Altruism.Journal of Development Economics,84(1),251-270.
  11. Fershtman, Chaim,Murphy, Kevin M.,Weiss, Yoram(1996).Social Status, Education, and Growth.Journal of Political Economy,104(1),108-132.
  12. Glomm, Gerhard(1997).Parental Choice of Human Capital Investment.Journal of Development Economics,53(1),99-114.
  13. Grossmann, Volker(2008).Risky Human Capital Investment, Income Distribution, and Macroeconomic Dynamics.Journal of Macroeconomics,30(1),19-42.
  14. Hendel, Igal,Shapiro, Joel,Willen, Paul(2005).Educational Opportunity and Income Inequality.Journal of Public Economics,89(5-6),841-875.
  15. Krugman, Paul R.(2000).Technology, Trade and Factor Prices.Journal of International Economics,50(1),51-71.
  16. Leamer, Edward E.(2000).What's the Use of Factor Contents?.Journal of International Economics,50(1),17-49.
  17. Maoz, Yishay D.,Moav, Omer(1999).Intergenerational Mobility and the Process of Development.The Economic Journal,109,677-697.
  18. Mookherjee, Dilip,Napel, Stefan(2007).Intergenerational Mobility and the Macroeconomic History Dependence.Journal of Economic Theory,137(1),49-78.
  19. Napel, Stefan,Schneider, Andrea(2008).Intergenerational Talent Transmission, Inequality, and Social Mobility.Economics Letters,99(2),405-409.
  20. Staffolani, Stefano,Valentini, Enzo(2007).Bequest Taxation and Efficient Allocation of Talents.Economic Modeling,24,648-672.
被引用次数
  1. 張瀞云(2012)。教育配額、累進稅和長期產出。經濟論文,40(1),79-109。
  2. 張瀞云、張瀞云(2013)。台灣高等教育政策調整對社會公平面的影響。經濟論文叢刊,41(4),443-484。