結構下的行動－高雄柴山果農面對人猴關係轉變之調適與抵抗

Human Action in Oppressive Structure: The Adjustment and Resistance of Fruit Farmers to the Shift in Human-monkey Relationships at Chaishan in Kaohsiung

倪進誠(Chin-Cheng Ni)；薛婷婷(Ting-Ting Hsueh)

結構 ； 行動 ； 空間權力 ； 人猴關係 ； 柴山 ； structure ； action ； power of space ； human-monkey relationships ； Chaishan

人文及社會科學集刊

25卷2期（2013 / 06 / 01）

345 - 383

繁體中文

本文欲探討高雄柴山野保法公布前後及近年成立壽山自然公園等事件下，果農與獼猴間關係的轉變，擬就「結構下的行動」之視角，強調具有主從的二元性思維，並以保育獼猴即是保障其空間權力之觀點，發展果農的調適與抵抗，採質性取向之文獻回顧、環境調查、參與觀察及深入訪談等方法進行。研究發現野保法公布前，人類是柴山的支配者，獼猴因可販賣遂成資源；野保法施行後，果農失去空間的支配權，獼猴反為災害，研發果園防猴策略，也產生了持續種作、棄耕、轉型等被動調適行為。果農行為乍看是由個體決定，事實上卻受土地權非自有、壽山自然公園束縛與綠色團體監督等結構力量所扞格，鑑於補救措施不如預期，持續溝通請求無效，更以抗議、訴訟等積極行動、雜以少數非法作為從事抵抗，為最終取得空間權力而奮鬥。未來將保育放在社會脈絡的規範下，應是努力的方向。

This study discusses the shift in human-monkey relationships before and after the passage of the Wildlife Conservation Law, as well as the issue of foundation of Shoushan Natural Park in Chaishan. The researchers approach this topic from the perspective of the duality of human action in an oppressive structure, emphasizing their subordinate and principal positions in order, and adopt the point of view that conserving the monkeys is the same as protecting their spatial rights, interpreting the intention of a variety of human actions. The qualitative methods of literature review, environment investigation, participation observation and in-depth interviews were used. It was found that fruit farmers were dominant over Chaishan before the passage of the law. A program by the government to purchase Macaca cyclopis monkeys captured by the farmers did help the farmers. After passage of the law, people lost their dominance over this area. Macaca cyclopis became a hazard. The farmers' responses were to develop devices to scare the monkeys away, then to make advanced decisions including carrying on their cultivation, abandoning their planting or transforming to other land uses. In theory, the adjustment of the farmers was decided by themselves, but many restrictions for the farmers in fact remained, such as no land rights the limits of environmental laws, the intervention of green organizations, and so on. Due to these major differences between the farmers' expectation and the practical reality of compensation, the farmers presented petition, protested to the government, fought in the courts, and engaged in some illegal behaviors to resist the power from the oppressive structure. In the future, the new consideration that initiates a social context could be a possible way to mitigate such conflicts.

1. 何明修(2007)。公民社會的限制─台灣環境政治中的結社藝術。臺灣民主季刊，4(2)，33-65。
   連結：
2. 聯合報 2000 〈搶救柴山 51 團體昨陳情〉。 6 月17 日， 17 版。(United Daily News, 2000,“51 Groups Presented the Petitions for Rescuing Chaishan,” June 17, p. 17.)
3. 林金福 2011 〈壽山地區臺灣獼猴─見真章─真心情〉。2011年11月11日，取自 http://formosan-rock-monkey.blogspot.com/2011/04/blog-post_21.html (Lin, Chin-fu, 2011, “Sincerely Feeling for Macaca Cyclopis in Chaishan,” Retrieved November 11, 2011, from http://formosan-rock-mokey.blogspot.com/2011/04/blog-post_21.html)
4. 楊和倫 1996 〈軍方對最後淨土棄守柴山資源淪入財團虎口〉。 2011 年11 月26 日，取自 http://library.taiwanschoolnet.org/cyberfair2004/hcvsb/main6/4.htm (Yang, Ho-lun, 1996, “Chaishan Abandoned by the Military to Be Coveted for Business Groups,” Retrieved November 26, 2011, from http://library.taiwanschoolnet.org/cyberfair2004/hcvsb/main6/4.htm)
5. 中央氣象局 2011 〈高雄1981-2010 年最高溫大於或等於30 度之每月平均天數〉。 2011 年11 月11 日，取自http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/climate/monthlyMean/Taiwan_txmaxge30day.htm (Central Weather Bureau, 2011,“Average Days of Being or above 30℃ on the Highest Temperature for a Month between 1981-2010 in Kaohsiung,＂ Retrieved November 11, 2011 ，from http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/climate/monthlyMean/Taiwan_txmaxge30day.htm)
6. 聯合報 2000 〈地方公論〉。 6 月24日， 18 版。(United Daily News, 2000,“Local Public Opinions,” June 24, p. 18.)
7. 聯合報 2008 〈獼猴耍流氓 攔路專搶婦人〉。2 月29日， C2 版。(United Daily News, 2008,“Monkeys Robbed the Passing Women Acted Like Bandits,” February 29, p. C2.)
8. Swinhoe, R. 1862 “On the Mammals ofthe Island of Formosa (China),” Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1862: 347- 365
9. 高雄市柴山會 2009 〈柴山桃源里舊部落訪查與觀察紀錄〉。 2011 年11 月26 日，取自 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/takaohill/21266078 (Takaohill Organization, 2009,“Notes of Investigation and Observation on Old Vil1age in Chaishan,＂ Retrieved November 26, 2011
10. 高雄市政府民政局 2011〈各里歷年戶口數統計〉。2011年11月11日，取自 http://cabu.kcg.gov.tw/cabu2/statis61B3.aspx (Civil Affairs Bureau of Kaohsiung City Government, 2011, “Statistics of Number of Household in Calender Year,” Retrieved November 11, 2011, from http://cabu.kcg.gov.tw/cabu2/statis61B3.aspx)
11. 東森電子報 2003 〈高市／柴山土地重測、方便原住居民承購承租〉。 2011 年11 月23 日，取自http://www.nownews.com/2003/04123/123-1443831.htm (Now News, 2003,“Land Resurvey for Easily Getting to Residents in Chaishan, Kaohsiung,＂ Retrieved November 23, 2011 , from http://www.nownews.com/2003/04123/123-1443831.htm)
12. 行政院農業委員會 2008 〈造林保林愛護大地〉。Mita 電子報，第16期，2011年11月26日，取自 http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?showtype=pda&catid=13830&showtype=pda (Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, 2008, “Forestation and Preservation to Protect Environment,” Mita Newsletter, 16, Retrieved November 26, 2011, from http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?showtype=pda&catid=13830&showtype=pda
13. 中央通訊社 2011 〈柴山地權爭議、羅世雄協調〉。 2011 年4 月29 日，取自 http://tw.news. yahoo.com/%E6%9F%B4%E5%B1%B1%E5%9C%B0%E6%AC%8A%E7%88%AD%E8%AD%B0-%E7%BE%85%E4%B8%96%E9%9B%84%E5%8D%94%E8%AA%BF-131920253.html (Central News Agency, 2011,“Controversy of Land Right in Chaishan Negotiated by Shi-hsiung Luo,＂ Retrieved Apri1 29, 2011 , from http://tw.news. yahoo.com/%E6%9F%B4%E5%B1%B1%E5%9C%B0%E6%AC%8A%E7%88%AD%E8%AD%B0-%E7%BE%85%E4%B8%96%E9%9B%84%E5%8D%94%E8%AA%BF-131920253.html)
14. 維基百科 2008 〈壽山〉。 2011 年11 月11 日，取自 http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A3%BD%E5%B1%B1_(%E9%AB%98%E9%9B%84%E5%B8%82) (Wikipedia, 2008, “Shoushan,＂ Retrieved November 11, 2011, from http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A3%BD%E5%B1%B1_(%E9%AB%98%E9%9B%84%E5%B8%82)
15. 高雄市政府地政局 2005 〈柴山地界糾紛、地政處診斷解決〉。 2011 年11 月26 日，取自 http://eland.kcg.gov.tw/land/News/Detail.aspx?SN=259 (Land Administration Bureau of Kaohsiung City Government, 2005,“Controversy of Land Boundary Surveyed by Land Administration Bureau,＂ Retrieved November 26, 2011, from http://eland.kcg.gov.tw/land/News/Detail.aspx?SN=259)
16. 自由時報 2011 〈全國第一座壽山國家自然公園今開園〉。 12 月6 日， A5 版。(The Liberty Times, 2011,“First National Nature Park of Shoushan in Taiwan Was Opened,＂ December 6, p.A5.)
17. 高雄高等行政法院 2004 〈柴山居民等三人請求作物賠償判決書〉。高雄：高雄高等行政法院。 (Kaohsiung High Administrative Court, 2004, “Judgment for a Petition to Compensate the Crop Loss from Three Residents in Chaishan,” Kaohsiung: Kaohsiung High Administrative Court.)
18. 高雄市議會 2010 〈高雄市議會舉辦「柴山國家自然公園」公聽會記錄〉。 2011 年11 月11 日，取自 http://61.67.232.229/ArDocCDN/AR00/AR001075/Content/AR001075AX0155/%E5%85%AC%E8%81%BD%E6%9C%83%E2%94%80%E6%9F%B4%E5%B1%B1%E5%9C%8B%E5%AE%B6%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E5%85%AC%E5%9C%92.pdf (Kaohsiung City Council, 2010, “Meeting Minutes of the Public Hearing on Chaishan National Nature Park,”Retrieved November 11, 2011, from http://61.67.232.229/ArDocCDN/AR00/AR001075/Content/AR001075AX0155/%E5%85%AC%E8%81%BD%E6%9C%83%E2%94%80%E6%9F%B4%E5%B1%B1%E5%9C%8B%E5%AE%B6%E8%87%AA%E7%84%B6%E5%85%AC%E5%9C%92.pdf)
19. 聯合報 2000 〈柴山劫 促進會抨放任特權踩擱〉。 4 月30 日， 17 版。(United Daily News, 2000,“Takaohill Organization Attacked Privileged Trample Had Become a Calamity in Chaishan,” April 30, p. 17.)
20. 最高行政法院 2005 〈柴山居民等三人請求作物賠償上訴暨上訴理由狀〉。臺北：最高行政法院。(Supreme Administrative Court, 2005, “The Petition for Appealing to Compensate the Crop Loss from Three Residents in Chaishan,” Taipei: Supreme Administrative Court.)
21. 聯合報 1999 〈柴山列為國家公園見解兩極〉。 9 月11 日， 18 版。(United Daily News, 1999,“Division into Two Opposing Extremes for Foundation of Chaishan National Park,” September 11, p. 18.)
22. Belt, H.(2004).Networking Nature, or Serengeti Behind the Dikes.History and Technology,20(3),311-333.
23. Bhaskar, R. A.(1989).Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy.London:Verso.
24. Cardoso, P.,Erwin, T. L.,Borges, P.,New, T. R.(2011).The Seven Impediments in Invertebrate Conservation and How to Overcome Them.Biological Conservation,144(2011),2647-2655.
25. Cloke, P.(ed.),Crang, P.(ed.),Goodwin, M.(ed.)(2005).Introducing Human Geographies.London:Arnold.
26. Dudley, J. P.,Ginsberg, J. R.,Plumptre, A. J.,Hart, J. A.,Campos, L. C.(2002).Effects of War and Civil Strife on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitats.Conservation Biology,16(2),319-329.
27. Ezealor, A. U.,Giles, R. H.(1997).Vertebrate Pests of a Sahelian Wetland Agro-ecosystem: Perceptions and Attitudes of the Indigenes and Potential Management Strategies.International Journal of Pest Management,43(2),97-104.
28. Featherstone, S.(2003).Protection for Hunters.Outdoor Life,210(9),17-18.
29. Foucault, M.(1979).Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.New York:Vintage Books.
30. Gregory, D.(1982).Regional Transformation and Industrial Revolution: A Geograhy of the Yorkshire Woolen Industry.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
31. Gregory, D.(ed.),Walford, R.(ed.)(1989).Horizons in Human Geography.London:Macmillan.
32. Grimble, R.,Chan, M. K.(1995).Stakeholder Analysis for Natural Resource Management in Developing Countries.Natural Resources Forum,19(2),113-124.
33. Harker, D.,Bates, D. C.(2007).The Black Bear Hunt in New Jersey: A Constructionist Analysis of an Intractable Conflict.Society and Animals,15(4),329-352.
34. Jack, B.(2003).Nature Conservation and Human Rights: English Nature's Role in the Notification and Confirnation of SSSIs.Environmental Law Review,5(3),198-205.
35. Jacobs, M. H.(2007).Wildlife Value Orientations in the Netherlands.Human Dimensions of Wildlife,12(5),359-365.
36. Jagnow, C. P.,Stedman, R. C.,Luloff, A. E.,San Julian, G. J.,Finley, J. C.,Steele, J.(2006).Why Landowners in Pennsylvania Post Their Property Against Hunting.Human Dimensions of Wildlife,11(1),15-26.
37. Kaltenborn, B. P.,Bjerke, T.,Nyahongo, J.(2006).Living with Problem Animals: Self-Reported Fear of Potentially Dangerous Species in the Serengeti Region, Tanzania.Human Dimensions of Wildlife,11(6),397-409.
38. Karanth, K. K.,Kramer, R. A.,Qian, S. S.,Christensen, N. L.(2008).Examining Conservation Attitudes, Perspectives, and Challenges in India.Biological Conservation,141(2008),2357-2367.
39. Kellert, S. R.(1993).Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behavior toward Wildlife among the Industrial Superpowers: United States, Japan, and Germany.Journal of Social Issues,49(1),53-69.
40. Laudati, A. A.(2010).The Encroaching Forest: Struggles Over Land and Resources on the Boundary of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda.Society and Natural Resources,23(8),776-789.
41. Lefebvre, H.,Nicolson-Smith, D.(trans.)(1991).The Production of Space.Oxford:Blackwell.
42. Lindsey, P. A.,Romañach, S. S.,Matema, S.,Matema, C.,Mupamhadzi, I.,Muvengwi, J.(2011).Dynamics and Underlying Causes of Illegal Bushmeat Trade in Zimbabwe.Oryx,45(1),84-95.
43. Massey, D.(1994).Space, Place and Gender.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
44. McCall, G. J.(ed.),Simmons, J. L.(ed.)(1969).Issues in Participant Observation: A Text and Reader.Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley.
45. McShane, T.,Hirsch, P.,Trung, T. C.,Songorwa, A.,Kinzig, A.,Monteferrif, B.,Mutekanga, D.,Thang, H. V.,Dammert, J.,Pulgar-Vidal, M.,Welch-Devine, M.,Brosius, J.,Coppolillo, P.,Connor, S.(2011).Hard Choices: Making Trade-offs between Biodiversity Conservation and Human Well-being.Biological Conservation,144(2011),966-972.
46. Nawaz, M. A.,Swenson, J. E.,Zakaria, V.(2008).Pragmatic Management Increases a Flagship Species, the Himalayan Brown Bears, in Pakistan's Deosai National Park.Biological Conservation,141(9),2230-2241.
47. Neumann, R.(2004).Moral and Discursive Geographies in the War for Biodiversity in Africa.Political Geography,23(7),813-837.
48. Opotow, S.(1993).Animals and the Scope of Justice.Journal of Social Issues,49(1),71-85.
49. Peet, R.(1998).Modern Geographical Thought.Oxford:Blackwell.
50. Pred, A.(1986).Place, Practice and Structure: Social and Spatial Trasformation in Southern Sweden: 1750-1850.Cambridge:Polity Press.
51. Rajpurohit, L. S.,Chhangani, A. K.,Rajpurohit, R. S.,Bhaker, N. R.,Rajpurohit, D. S.,Sharma, G.(2006).Man-Monkey Conflict and Urbanization in Non-human Primates.International Journal of Primatology,27(Suppl 1),221-222.
52. Rosaldo, R.(1989).Imperialist Nostalgia.Representations,26(Special Issue),107-122.
53. Sayer, A.(1992).Method in Social Science.London:Hutchinson.
54. Soja, E. W.(1996).Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real and Imagined Places.Cambridge:Blackwell.
55. Thrift, N.(1983).On the Determination of Social Action in Space and Time.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,1(1),23-57.
56. Tuan, Yi-fu(1979).Landscapes of Fear.New York:Pantheon.
57. Wilkie, D. S.,Morelli, G. A.,Demmer, J.,Starkey, M.,Telfer, P.,Steil, M.(2006).Parks and People: Assessing the Human Welfare Effects of Establishing Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation.Conservation Biology,20(1),247-249.
58. Zerner, C.(ed.)(2000).People, Plants, and Justice.New York:Columbia University Press.
59. Zhang, L.,Wang, N.(2003).An Initial Study on Habitat Conservation of Asian Elephant, with a Focus on Human Elephant Conflict in Simao, China.Biological Conservation,112(3),453-459.
60. Zimmerer, K.(2000).The Reworking of Conservation Geographies: Nonequilibrium Landscapes and Nature-Society Hybrids.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,90(2),356-369.
61. Zinn, H. C.,Manfredo, M. J.,Barro, S. C.(2002).Patterns of Wildlife Value Orientations in Hunters' Families.Human Dimensions of Wildlife,7,147-162.
62. 吳瓊洳(2006)。以Foucault的規訓觀論述校園內的權力運作：以台灣中部一所國民中學為例。初等教育學刊，25，17-36。
63. 夏鑄九編譯、王志弘編譯(1994)。空間的文化形式與社會理論讀本。臺北=Taipei:明文=Mingwen。
64. 張仕緯(2000)。中部地區臺灣獼猴危害農作物現況調查。特有生物研究，2，1-12。
65. 黃莉婷(2008)。雲林科技大學文化資產維護系=Department of Cultural Heritage Conservation, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology。
66. 賈山民(2002)。國立中山大學生物科學系研究所=Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University。
67. 鄭水萍(1995)。柴山記事。高雄=Kaohsiung:高雄市立中正文化中心管理處=Kaohsiung Chiang Kai-shek Cultural Center Administration。
68. 鄭國泰(2007)。管制治理：理論與實務分析。高雄=Kaohsiung:麗文文化=LiWen Publishers Co., Ltd.。