首次政黨輪替對檢察體系影響：以陳定南法務部長時期一、二審檢察長調動為例

The Impact of Taiwan's First Regime Shift on the Prosecutorial System: Appointment and Transfer of Chief Prosecutors of Taiwan High and District Prosecutors Offices during the Ding-nan Chen Period

陳鴻章(Hung-Chang Chen)；王金壽(Chin-Shou Wang)

政黨輪替 ； 檢察長 ； 檢察人事 ； 陳定南 ； regime shift ； chief prosecutor ； prosecutorial personnel ； Ding-nan Chen

人文及社會科學集刊

25卷4期（2013 / 12 / 01）

599 - 645

繁體中文

在2000年政黨輪替後，帶著掃除黑金、改革理念的陳定南擔任法務部長。檢察人事權是法務部長可以控制和影響檢察體系的重要手段之一。本論文要探討在陳定南擔任法務部長期間，檢察體系的人事變動是否和過去不同。本論文透過一、二審檢察長的量化資料以及質化的深度訪談資料，討論陳定南的人事調動是否和其他法務部長有所不同。本文將指出，陳定南是歷年來最有企圖心去改變檢察人事結構，也是有最大規模人事調動的法務部長。然後，受限於檢察體系的正式以及非正式的限制，陳定南無法全面性的改造檢察人事，而只能作局部性的突破。

Ding-nan Chen, with strong ambition and a reform plan, became the Minister of Justice after the first regime shift in 2000. Prosecutor personnel are one of most important tools for the Minister of Justice to control and influence the prosecutorial system. We focused on the chief prosecutors of Taiwan's High Prosecutors Office and its branches, and the District Prosecutors Office. In this paper, using quantitative and qualitative data, we discussed whether Ding-nan Chen was different from other Ministers of Justice interms of prosecutorial personnel changes. We argue that Ding-nan Chen was the most eager one to change the prosecutorial personnel structure and had the largest number of appointments and transfers. However, Chen was limited by formal and informal personnel institutions. He could not radically change the prosecutorial personnel.

1. 王金壽(2008)。司法獨立與民主可問責性：論台灣的司法人事權。台灣政治學刊，12(2)，115-164。
   連結：
2. 王金壽(2012)。台灣司法政治的興起。台灣政治學刊，16(1)，59-117。
   連結：
3. 楊國文 2004 〈檢察首長痛批破壞體制〉。自由時報，10 月 12 日，第 19 版。2007 年 11 月 18日，取自 http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2004/new/oct/12/today-so10.htm (Yang, Guo-wen, 2004,“Chief Prosecutors Say That the Institution Was Crushed,” The Liberty Times, October 12, p. 19. Retrieved November 18, 2007, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2004/new/oct/12/today-so10.htm)
4. 陳永富 2000 〈黑金戰前易將 魄力或是躁進：陳定南打破成規的人事力或許讓人耳目一新，但造成人心浮動亦受質疑〉。聯合報，6 月 17 日，第 9 版。(Chen, Yung-fu, 2000, “Ding-nan Chen Will Transfer the Chief Prosecutors before the Anti-Corruption War,” United Daily News , June 17, p. 9.)
5. Mitnick, Barry M. 2006 “Origin of the Theory of Agency: An Account by One of the Theory's Originators,” Retrieved May 25, 2013, from http://www.pitt.edu/~mitnick/agencytheory/agencytheoryoriginrev11806r.htm
6. 劉鳳琴 2004 〈北檢檢察長人選難擺平：陳定南決選後再派任〉。中國時報，11 月 16日，Ａ10 版。 (Lu, Hong-zin, 2004,“The Dilemma of Chief Prosecutor Appointment in Taipei Is Not Easy to Overcome," China Times, November 16, p. A10.)
7. 吳巡龍 2007〈斬斷檢長任命黑手〉。中國時報，4 月 3 日，第 A15 版。 (Wu, Hsun-lung, 2007“Against the Intervention of the Chief Prosecutor Appointment,” China Times, April 3, p. A15.)
8. 陳鋕銘 2007 〈解開檢察長頭上的緊箍咒〉。 檢改會網站 ，2007 年 4 月 23 日， 取 自 http://www.pra-tw.org/view_topic.aspx?t=4652 (Chen, Chi-ming, 2007,“Take off the Chief Prosecutor's Band-Tightening Spell,”Prosecutors Reform Association, Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://www.pra-tw.org/view_topic.aspx?t=4652)
9. 陳瑞仁 2007 〈輸掉戰役，贏得戰爭〉。檢改會網站，2007 年 4 月 23 日，取自 http://www.pra-tw.org/view_ topic.aspx?t=4936 (Chen, Rui-ren, 2007,“Lost the Battle but Won the War,” Prosecutors Reform Association, Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://www.pra-tw.org/view_ topic.aspx?t=4936)
10. 陳鋕銘 2007 〈檢察長調動諮詢程序芻議〉。 檢改會網站 ，2007 年 4 月 23 日， 取 自http://www.pra-tw.org/view_topic.aspx?t=4633 (Chen, Chi-ming, 2007,“A Tentative Proposal on the Transfer Consultation Process of Chief Prosecutors," Prosecutors Reform Association, Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://www.pra-tw.org/view_topic.aspx?t=4633)
11. 劉鳳琴 2007 〈拂逆上意 前車可鑑 未起訴拉艦案 黃當年被換主因〉。中國時報，3 月 31 日，A4 版。(Lu, Hong-zin, 2007, “Non- Prosecution Decision of the La Fayette Frigate Pro-curement Commission Corruption Was the Main Reason of Chief Prosecutor Huangʼs Transfer,” China Times, March 31, p. A4.)
12. 陳瑞仁(編) 1999 《檢察改革實錄》。檢察官改革協會：未出版。(Chen, Rui-ren (ed.), 1999, The Record of Prosecutors Reform. Prosecutors Reform Association : Unpublished.)。
13. Bendor, Jonathan.(1988).Formal Models of Bureaucracy.British Journal of Political Science,18(3),353-395.
14. Kiewiet, D. Roderick,McCubbins, Mathew D.(1991).The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
15. Mitnick, Barry M.(1975).The Theory of Agency: The Policing "Paradox" and Regulatory Behavior.Public Choice,24,27-42.
16. Moe, Terry M.(2005).Political Control and the Power of the Agent.The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization,22(1),1-29.
17. Moe, Terry M.(1984).The New Economics of Organization.American Journal of Political Science,28(4),739-777.
18. Prillaman, William C.(2000).The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law.Westport, CT:Praeger.
19. Ross, Stephen A.(1973).The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem.The American Economic Review,63(2),134-139.
20. Shapiro, Susan P.(2005).Agency Theory.Annual Review of Sociology,31,263-284.
21. Taagepera, Rein,Shugart, Matthew Soberg(1989).Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems.New Haven:Yale University Press.
22. Waterman, Richard W.,Meier, Kenneth J.(1998).Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion?.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,8(2),173-202.
23. 王文玲、蕭白雪(2007)。為官的品格：陳定南留給我們的未完成事業。台北=Taipei:商周=Business Weekly Publications。
24. 陳敦源(2002)。民主與官僚：新制度論的觀點。臺北=Taipei:韋伯=Weber。
25. 劉恆妏(2002)。戰後台灣司法人之研究：以司法官訓練文化為主的觀察。思與言，40(1)，125-182。
26. 檢察官改革協會編(2008)。正義之劍：檢改會十週年紀念專輯。臺南=Tainan:展聖企業=Chan Sheng Graphic Art。
27. 檢察官改革協會編(2008)。正義之劍：檢改會十週年紀念專輯。臺南=Tainan:展聖企業=Chan Sheng Graphic Art。

1. 陳鴻章、郭子靖、王金壽(2018)。臺灣司法獨立改革運動：對於司法體系人事運作的影響。政治科學論叢，76，61-102。
2. 余致力(2016)。民主與行政：政黨輪替對文官體系的衝擊與影響。文官制度季刊，8(3)，1-20。