臺灣反傾銷控訴傷害了下游廠商？

Are Antidumping Suits Hurting Taiwan's Downstream Industries?

林家慶(Chia-Ching Lin)

反傾銷 ； 下游廠商 ； 廠商利潤 ； 事件研究法 ； antidumping ； downstream industries ； firms' profits ； event study

人文及社會科學集刊

26卷1期（2014 / 03 / 01）

103 - 131

繁體中文

關於上游反傾銷控訴對下游廠商之影響，目前臺灣仍缺乏一整體性之研究。本研究以1992～2011年21件臺灣反傾銷案例共83家廠商為研究對象，其中包括了18種不同的下游產業。研究結果指出，臺灣反傾銷控訴對國內下游廠商不一定都是負面影響，平均而言，反而使下游廠商超額報酬增加約2%。而影響下游廠商超額報酬之主要因素為產業特性，例如，市場結構、涉案產品進口滲透率及關稅稅率等。

In Taiwan, there is not yet sufficient and integrated research on how antidumping suits filed by upstream vendors impact the downstream industries. In this paper, we have studied a total of 21 antidumping cases in Taiwan during the period of 1992 to 2011, involving 83 companies from 18 different downstream industries. The result suggests that the antidumping suits in Taiwan may not necessarily lead to negative influences on the downstream industries in the country. Rather, they have resulted in, on average, a 2% increase in the abnormal return of the downstream industries. The main factors influencing the abnormal returns are industry-specific, for example, the market structure, the import penetration ratio of the products in question, and the tariff rate, among others.

1. 林祖嘉、林素菁(1994)。台灣地區住宅需求價格彈性與所得彈性之估計。住宅學報，2，25-48。
   連結：
2. 林素菁、林祖嘉(2001)。台灣地區住宅供給彈性之估計。住宅學報，10(1)，17-27。
   連結：
3. 黃智輝(2008)。銅版紙課徵反傾銷稅經濟效果與國家整體利益分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，39(1)，69-96。
   連結：
4. 黃智輝(2008)。水泥課徵反傾銷稅的政策效果與競爭力分析—臺灣實證分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，38(2)，1-30。
   連結：
5. 黃智輝(2008)。台灣預力鋼線反傾銷稅經濟效益分析。經濟研究，44(2)，245-292。
   連結：
6. 經濟部貿易調查委員會 2013 〈我國反傾銷稅案件處理情形一覽表〉。2013年10月7日，取自http://www.moeaitc.gov.tw/itcweb/ic/wFrmIcCase.aspx?programid=20&Type=1&Show=all (International Trade Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2013, “List of Antidumping Investigation Cases,” Retrieved October 7, 2013, from http://www.moeaitc.gov.tw/itcweb/ic/wFrmIcCase.aspx?programid=20&Type=1&Show=all)
7. Viner, Jacob 1923 Dumping: A Problem in International Trade. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. World Trade Organization 2013 Trade Topics: Anti-dumping. Retrieved October 7, 2013, from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm
9. 台灣經濟新報（TEJ） 2013 〈台灣資料庫〉。2013 年 10 月 7 日，取自 http://www.tej.com.tw (Taiwan Economic Journal, 2013, “Taiwan Database,” Retrieved October 7, 2013, from http://www.tej.com.tw)
10. 國際貿易局 2013 〈我國進出口貿易統計〉。2013 年 10 月 7 日，取自 http://cus93.trade.gov.tw/FSCI/ (Bureau of Foreign Trade, 2013, “Trade Statistics,” Retrieved October 7, 2013, from http://cus93.trade.gov.tw/FSCI/)
11. Anderson, Simon P.,Schmitt, Nicolas,Thisse, Jacques-François(1995).Who Benefits from Antidumping Legislation.Journal of International Economics,38(3-4),321-337.
12. Armitage, Seth(1995).Event Study Methods and Evidence on Their Performance.Journal of Economic Surveys,9(1),25-52.
13. Belderbos, René,Vandenbussche, Hylke,Veugelers, Reinhilde(2004).Antidumping Duties, Undertakings, and Foreign Direct Investment in the EU.European Economic Review,48(2),429-453.
14. Blonigen, Bruce A.,Tomlin, KaSaundra,Wilson, Wesley W.(2004).Tariff-Jumping FDI and Domestic Firms' Profits.Canadian Journal of Economics,37(3),656-677.
15. Borenstein, Severin,Zimmerman, Martin B.(1988).Market Incentives for Safe Commercial Airline Operation.American Economic Review,78(5),913-935.
16. Campbell, John Y.,Lo, Andrew W.,MacKinlay, Archie C.(1997).The Econometrics of Financial Markets.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
17. Feinberg, Robert M.,Kaplan, Seth(1993).Fishing Downstream: The Political Economy of Effective Administered Protection.Canadian Journal of Economics,26(1),150-158.
18. Gallaway, Michael P.,Blonigen, Bruce A.,Flynn, Joseph E.(1999).Welfare Costs of the U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws.Journal of International Economic,49(2),211-244.
19. Haaland, Jan I.,Wooton, Ian(1998).Antidumping Jumping: Reciprocal Antidumping and Industrial Location.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,134(2),340-362.
20. Hall, Robert Ernest(1988).The Relation between Prices and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry.Journal of Political Economy,96(5),921-947.
21. Hartigan, James C.,Kamma, Sreenivas,Perry, Philip R.(1989).The Injury Determination Category and the Value of Relief from Dumping.Review of Economics and Statistics,71(1),183-186.
22. Hartigan, James C.,Perry, Philip R.,Kamma, Sreenivas(1986).The Value of Administered Protection: A Capital Market Approach.Review of Economics and Statistics,68(4),610-617.
23. Hoekman, Bernard M.,Leidy, Michael P.(1992).Cascading Contingent Protection.European Economic Review,36(4),883-892.
24. Hughes, John S.,Lenway, Stefanie,Rayburn, Judy(1997).Stock Price Effects of U.S. Trade Policy Responses to Japanese Trading Practices in Semi-Conductors.Canadian Journal of Economics,30(4),922-942.
25. Ishikawa, Jota,Lee, Ki-Dong(1997).Backfiring Tariffs in Vertically Related Markets.Journal of International Economic,42(3-4),395-423.
26. Jackson, J. H.(ed.),Vermulst, E. A.(ed.)(1989).Antidumping Law and Practice.New York:Harvester Wheatsheaf.
27. Kierzkowski, H.(ed.)(1987).Protection and Competition in International Trade.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
28. Krupp, Corinne M.,Skeath, Susan(2002).Evidence on the Upstream and Downstream Impacts of Antidumping Cases.North American Journal of Economics and Finance,13(2),163-178.
29. Lenway, Stefanie,Rebbein, Kathleen,Starks, Laura(1990).The Impact of Protectionism on Firm Wealth: The Experience of the Steel Industry.Southern Economic Journal,56(4),1079-1093.
30. Liebman, Benjamin H.,Tomlin, Kasaundra M.(2007).Steel Safeguards and the Welfare of U.S. Steel Firms and Downstream Consumers of Steel: A Shareholder Wealth Perspective.Canadian Journal of Economics,40(3),812-842.
31. Mahdavi, Mahnaz,Bhagwati, Amala(1994).Stock Market Data and Trade Policy: Dumping and the Semiconductor Industry.The International Trade Journal,8(2),207-221.
32. Malhotra, Nisha,Gulati, Sumeet(2010).The Effects of the 1996 U.S.-Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement on the Industrial Users of Lumber: An Event Study.Contemporary Economic Policy,28(2),275-287.
33. Parsons, Craig(2005).The Effect of the Semiconductor Trade Agreement on Japanese Firms.The Singapore Economic Review,50(1),117-129.
34. Ries, John C.(1993).Windfall Profits and Vertical Relationships: Who Gained in the Japanese Auto Industry from VERs.The Journal of Industrial Economics,41(3),259-276.
35. Sleuwaegen, Leo,Belderbos, René,Jie-A-Joen, Clive(1998).Cascading Contingent Protection and Vertical Market Structure.International Journal of Industrial Organization,16(6),697-718.
36. Webb, Michael(1992).The Ambiguous Consequences of Antidumping Laws.Economic Inquiry,30(3),437-448.
37. 左峻德、楊秀玲(1998)。,臺北=Taipei:經濟部貿易調查委員會=International Trade Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
38. 杜巧霞(1999)。,臺北=Taipei:經濟部貿易調查委員會=International Trade Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
39. 沈中華、李建然(2000)。事件研究法：財務與會計實證研究必備。臺北=Taipei:華泰文化事業股份有限公司=Hwa Tai Publishing。
40. 周賓凰、蔡坤芳(1997)。臺灣股市日資料特性與事件研究法。證券市場發展季刊，9(2)，1-27。
41. 金成隆(1999)。臺灣上市公司盈餘╱股價關聯性之研究。中山管理評論，7(1)，81-100。
42. 陳坤銘、陳財家(1999)。反傾銷與股價—臺灣鋼鐵產業個案研究。台灣經濟學會年會論文集，臺北=Taipei:
43. 陳坤銘、楊光華、陳財家(2000)。反傾銷制度與產業保護效果—臺灣個案研究。貿易調查專刊，5，297-329。
44. 黃孟瑩、黃智輝(2009)。臺灣毛巾課徵反傾銷稅之經濟效果分析。臺灣銀行季刊，60(1)，224-260。
45. 黃智輝(2003)。反傾銷案件產業損害調查經濟效益實證分析—我國案例探討。臺灣銀行季刊，54(4)，216-248。

1. 林家慶(2017)。反傾銷保護可改善臺灣提控廠商技術效率？。人文及社會科學集刊，29(3)，453-483。
2. 林家慶(2019)。台灣廠商躍過反傾銷稅直接投資之實證分析。經濟論文，47(4)，651-679。
3. 林家慶(2022)。反傾銷政策、出口與對外直接投資－台灣之實證分析。經濟論文，50(3)，325-356。
4. 林家慶、林昱君(2017)。臺商被美國提控反傾銷之實證分析—中國大陸第三國效果存在嗎？。臺灣經濟預測與政策，47(2)，1-36。