科學知識與水政治：旗山溪治水爭議之個案研究

Scientific Knowledge and the Politics of Water: The Controversy on the Cishan River Flood Control

范玫芳(Mei-Fang Fan)；張簡妙琳(Miao-Lin Zhang Jian)

科學知識 ； 治水 ； 在地知識 ； 公民參與 ； 公民科學 ； scientific knowledge ； flooding control ； local knowledge ； citizen participation ； citizen science

人文及社會科學集刊

26卷1期（2014 / 03 / 01）

133 - 173

繁體中文

當前在極端氣候與環境變遷的挑戰下，水患治理成為具高度爭議與複雜性的重要課題。本文旨在探討旗山溪治水爭議中，政府與相關組織之間的權力運作以及科學知識生產的動態互動過程。剷除高莖作物的知識論戰突顯了權力與資源的不對等、既有法規標準的僵化，以及治水政策的盲點。地方公民團體以在地經驗與知識挑戰官方的治水論述和知識宣稱，透過學習學科領域專業知識與諮詢水利專家，積極參與水患的治理。個案除了突顯治水場域中不同知識的相互競逐，更展現了以在地知識脈絡為基礎，並結合治水知識，以發展適當的治水良方。

In the context of the challenges of extreme climate and environmental changes, flooding governance has become highly controversial and complex. This article addresses the exercise of power between the government and related organizations, as well as the dynamics of the scientific knowledge production process in the Cishan River flood control dispute. The dispute concerning the eradication of high-stem crops highlights the problematic asymmetries of power and resources, rigid regulations and standards, and a flood control policy blind spot. Local citizen groups have challenged the official discourse and experts' knowledge claims based on local knowledge. Civic groups have acquired disciplinary expertise, consulted flood control experts, and actively participated in the governance of the flooding. The case highlights different types of knowledge which compete with each other in the flood control arena, and civic groups' using context-based local knowledge combined with flood control expertise to develop an appropriate flood control approach.

1. 杜文苓、李翰林(2011)。環境資訊公開的民主實踐課題—以霄裡溪光電廢水汙染爭議為例。臺灣民主季刊，8(2)，59-98。
   連結：
2. 杜文苓、施麗雯、黃廷宜(2007)。風險溝通與民主參與：以竹科宜蘭基地之設置為例。科技、醫療與社會，5，71-110。
   連結：
3. 周任芸譯(2007)。風險社會、不確定性和科學民主化：STS的未來（Brian Wynne演講）。科技、醫療與社會，5，15-42。
   連結：
4. 周桂田(2007)。新興風險治理典範之芻議。政治與社會哲學評論，22，179-233。
   連結：
5. 范玫芳(2007)。風險論述、公民行動與灰渣掩埋場設置爭議。科技、醫療與社會，5，43-70。
   連結：
6. 湯京平、邱崇原(2010)。專業與民主：台灣環境影響評估制度的運作與調適。公共行政學報，35，1-28。
   連結：
7. 張豐年 2012 〈都市防洪示範區之研究──以台南市為例〉。水患治理監督聯盟，2013 年 9 月 13日，取自http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/10988 (Zhang, Fong-nian, 2012, “A Pilot Case Study on Urban Flood Control: Using Tainan as an Example,” Taiwan Water Watch Alliance, Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/10988)
8. 焦點新聞網 2012 〈林富寶：利用河川地，讓旗山觀光更具可看性〉。焦點新聞網，5月26日。2013年 8月16日，取自http://www.kaonews.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-3857 (KAO News, 2012, “County Councilor Fu-bao Lin: Making Good Use of the River Land, Let Cishan Sightseeing More Attractive,” KAO News, May 26. Retrieved August 16, 2013, from http://www.kaonews.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-3857)
9. 李允傑 2008 〈治水不力，中央與地方的共業〉。《國政評論》，7 月 24 日。2013 年 9 月 13 日，取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/4479 (Li, Yun-jie, 2008, “Both Central and Local Government Failed to Implement Flood Control,” NPF Commentary, July 24. Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/4479)
10. 尊懷文教基金會 2010 〈請大家主持公道──第二次對第七河川局 88 水災三大工程不當事宜發表訴求〉。2012 年 10 月 18 日，取自 http://zun-huai.org.tw/news3-1_main.asp?root_id=8 (Zunhuai Culture and Education of the Foundation, 2010, “Please Uphold Justice: Appeal to Seventh River Management Office for the Three Improper Hydraulic Projects after the Typhoon Morakot,” Retrieved October 18, 2012, from http://zun-huai.org.tw/news3-1_main.asp?root_id=8)
11. 陸以正 2008 〈413 億治水巨款，不可交地方〉。《國政評論》，7 月 24 日。2013 年 9 月 13 日，取自http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/4483 (Lu, Yi-zheng, 2008, “NT$41.3 Billion Budget for Flood Control Should Not Be Rendered to Local Governments,” NPF Commentary, July 24. Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/4483)
12. 監察院 2010 〈行政院復糾正案三〉，《監察院公報》2734: 57-69。(Control Yuan, 2010, “Corrective Measure Response 3, Control Yuan Bulletin,” Control Yuan Gazette 2734: 57-69.)
13. 李根政2007 〈水患治理， 民間批判與建言〉。水患治理監督聯盟， 2013 年9 月13 日， 取自http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/8 (Li, Gen-zheng, 2007 , "Civil Criticism and Recommendations for Flood Control ," Taiwan Water Watch Alliance , Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/8 )
14. 徐蟬娟 2013 〈治了又淹怎麼辦？風災後的治水建言〉。環境資訊中心，2013 年 9 月 13 日，取自http://e-info.org.tw/node/90309 (Xu, Chan-juan, 2013, “Flood Comes Again: Recommendations for Flood Control after a Typhoon,” Taiwan Environmental Information Center, Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://e-info.org.tw/node/90309)
15. 胡思聰 2009 〈未雨綢繆，慎防水患〉。《國政評論》，4月15日。2013年9月13日，取自http://www.npf.org.tw/getqr/5734 (Hu, Si-cong, 2009, “Prevention Is Better than Cure, Be Aware of Floods,” NPF Commentary, April 15. Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://www.npf.org.tw/getqr/5734)
16. 經濟部水利署 2010 〈河川區域種植規定〉。水利法規查詢系統，2012年10月20，取自http://wralaw.wra.gov.tw/wralawgip/cp.jsp?lawId=8a8a852d1fca5b0c011fcb066baf001c (Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2010, “Planting Directions in River Areas,” Inquiry System for Water Resource Regulations, Retrieved October 20, 2012, from http://wralaw.wra.gov.tw/wralawgip/cp.jsp?lawId=8a8a852d1fca5b0c011fcb066baf001c)
17. 蘇福男 2009 〈旗山堤防是古蹟？文化局駁七河局〉。自由時報電子報，9 月 4 日。2014 年 1 月12日，取自http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2009/new/sep/4/today-south22.htm (Su, Fu-nan, 2009, “Is Cishan Embankment a Heritage? Bureau of Cultural Heritage Refuted the Seventh River Management Office,” The Liberty Times, September 4. Retrieved January 12, 2014, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2009/new/sep/4/today-south22.htm)
18. 客家新聞雜誌 2012 〈客家新聞雜誌第 278 集：高莖作物風波〉。2013 年 10 月 8日，取自 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPi6IDVuiXo (Hakka News Magazine, 2012, “Hakka News Magazine Episode 278: The Incidence of High-stem Crops,” Retrieved October 8, 2013, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPi6IDVuiXo)
19. 經濟部水利署 2008 〈河川水庫疏濬標準作業規範〉。水利法規查詢系統，2012 年 10 月 20 日，取自http://wralaw.wra.gov.tw/wralawgip/cp.jsp?displayLaw=true&lawId=8a8a852d2017dc3001201931c82f00e0 (Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2008, “Standard Operation Regulations for River and Reservoir Dredging,” Inquiry System for Water Resource Regulations, Retrieved October 20, 2012, from http://wralaw.wra.gov.tw/wralawgip/cp.jsp?displayLaw=true&lawId=8a8a852d2017dc3001201931c82f00e0)
20. 黃修文 2008 〈在大雨過後──從卡玫基水患看易淹水地區治理計畫的一些盲點〉。環境資訊中心，2013 年9 月 13日，取自http://e-info.org.tw/node/36120 (Huang, Xiu-wen, 2008, “After the Rain: Using the Example of Flood Kalmaegi to Examine the Drawbacks of the Management Plan for Flood-prone Areas,” Taiwan Environmental Information Center, Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://e-info.org.tw/node/36120)
21. 陳明成 2009 〈高縣╱議員林富寶籲觀光交通處加速整建旗山橋地景橋進度〉。今日新聞，11 月5日。2013年8月16日，取自 http://www.nownews.com/2009/11/05/11477-2529255.htm#ixzz2cUJe0kk5 (Chen, Ming-cheng, 2009, “County Councilor Fu-bao Lin Requested Tourism and Traffic Department to Accelerate the Refurbishment Programme of Cishan Landscape Bridge,” NOWnews, November 5. Retrieved August 16, 2013, from http://www.nownews.com/2009/11/05/11477-2529255.htm#ixzz2cUJe0kk5)
22. 立法院公報處（編）2010 〈立法院第 7 屆第 5 會期經濟委員會第 2 次全體委員會議紀錄〉，《立法院公報》99(15): 230–231。(Official Gazette Department, Legislative Yuan (ed.), 2010, “The 2nd Meeting Record of the Legislative Yuan 7th Tenure 5th Session of the Economics Committee,” The Legislative Yuan Gazette 99(15): 230–231.)
23. 張豐年 2012 〈曾文溪流域整體治理規劃治理議題協調會議〉。水患治理監督聯盟，2013 年 9 月 13 日，取自 http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/10990 (Zhang, Fong-nian, 2012, “The Negotiation Meeting on the Management Issues of Watershed Management for the Zengwun River,” Taiwan Water Watch Alliance, Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/10990)
24. 尊懷文教基金會 2010 〈旗山溪 88 水災後第一次研討會總結〉。2012 年 10 月 30 日，取自 http://zun-huai.org.tw/news1-1_main.asp?root_id=99 (Zun-huai Culture and Education of the Foundation, 2010, “The Summary of the First Workshop of Cishan River after the Typhoon Morakot,” Retrieved October 30, 2012, from http://zun-huai.org.tw/news1-1_main.asp?root_id=99)
25. 曾瑾珮 2008 〈咚∼1410 億元掉到水裡了嗎？水患治理民間觀察〉。水患治理監督聯盟，2013 年 9 月 13 日， 取 自 http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/708 (Ceng, Jin-pei, 2008, “Was NT$141 Billion Lost in the Water? A Civil Observation on Flood Control,” Taiwan Water Watch Alliance, Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/708)
26. 立法院公報處（編） 2009 〈立法院第 7 屆第 4 會期第 10 次會議紀錄〉，《立法院公報》98(68): 179-180。(Official Gazette Department, Legislative Yuan (ed.), 2009, “The 10th Joint Meeting Record of the Legislative Yuan 7th Tenure 4th Session Committees,” The Legislative Yuan Gazette 98(68): 179-180.)
27. 劉力仁 2013 〈學者︰治水不能只靠下水道〉。環境資訊中心，2013 年 9 月 13 日，取自 http://e-info.org.tw/node/89904 (Liu, Li-ren, 2013, “Flood Control Cannot Merely Depend on Drainage, As Indicated by Scholars,” Taiwan Environmental Information Center, Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://e-info.org.tw/node/89904)
28. 徐蟬娟 2013 〈康芮颱風災後的治水建言〉。水患治理監督聯盟，2013 年 9 月 13 日，取自 http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/11591 (Xu, Chan-juan, 2013, “Recommendations for Flood Control after the Typhoon Kong-Rey Disaster,” Taiwan Water Watch Alliance, Retrieved September 13, 2013, from http://waterwatch.ngo.org.tw/node/11591)
29. 高雄市旗山區公所 2012〈旗山區行政區域圖各里地圖〉。2013 年 8 月 16 日，取自 http://cishan88.kcg.gov.tw/?Guid=1cab4334-8e8a-ed90-97a9-62977c40efb5 (Cishan District Office, Kaohsiung City, 2012, “Administrative District Map for Villages in Cishan District,” Retrieved August 16, 2013, from http://cishan88.kcg.gov.tw/?Guid=1cab4334-8e8a-ed90-97a9-62977c40efb5)
30. 張文亮 2011 〈台灣農田水利古典砌石工法〉。2012 年 10 月 18 日，取自 http://hippo.bse.ntu.edu.tw/~wenlian/teach/teach11/teach11-1-6.doc (Zhang, Wen-liang, 2011, “The Classical Masonry Construction Method of Taiwanese Irrigation,” Retrieved October 18, 2012, from http://hippo.bse.ntu.edu.tw/~wenlian/teach/teach11/teach11-1-6.doc)
31. 文化資產局 2007 〈文化資產個案導覽──旗山堤防〉。2013年4月16日，取自http://www.boch.gov.tw/boch/frontsite/cultureassets/caseBasicInfoAction.do?method=doViewCaseArchiteture&caseId=MA09606000007&version=2&assetsClassifyId=1.1&templateType=1&caseMenuId=6 (Bureau of Cultural Heritage, 2007, “Cultural Assets Case Guide: The Cishan Embankment,” Retrieved April 16, 2013, from http://www.boch.gov.tw/boch/frontsite/cultureassets/caseBasicInfoAction.do?method=doViewCaseArchiteture&caseId=MA09606000007&version=2&assetsClassifyId=1.1&templateType=1&caseMenuId=6)
32. 黃佳琳 2012 〈憂馬頭山「掩」面失色，居民集結抗爭〉。自由時報電子報，5 月 18 日。2013 年 8 月 16 日，取自 http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/may/18/today-south8.htm (Huang, Jia-lin, 2012, “Worried about the Landfill in Matou Mountain, Residents Gathered to Protest,” The Liberty Times, May 18. Retrieved August 16, 2013, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/may/18/today-south8.htm)
33. 高雄市旗山區公所 2012 〈認識旗山〉。2014 年 1 月 12 日，取自 http://cishan88.kcg.gov.tw/?Page=NoScript&Guid=f0a6d42d-c3a8-57ce-ad09-042ddda98bd5 (Cishan District Office, Kaohsiung City, 2012, “About Cishan,” Retrieved January 12, 2014, from http://cishan88.kcg.gov.tw/?Page=NoScript&Guid=f0a6d42d-c3a8-57ce-ad09-042ddda98bd5)
34. 客家電視台 2013 〈村民大會第320集：剷除農作物〉。2013 年 10月8日，取自https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJcZd6goSiY (Hakka TV, 2013, “Villagers' Meeting Episode 320: Eradicate Crops,” Retrieved October 8, 2013, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJcZd6goSiY)
35. 立法院公報處（編） 2010〈立法院第7屆第5會期第2次會議紀錄〉，《立法院公報》99(10): 60–72。(Official Gazette Department, Legislative Yuan (ed.), 2010, “The 2nd Joint Meeting Record of the Legislative Yuan 7th Tenure 5th Session Committees,” The Legislative Yuan Gazette 99(10): 60–72.)
36. Amsterdamska, O.(ed.),Hackett, Edward J.(ed.),Lynch, Michael(ed.),Wajcman, Judy(ed.)(2008).The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.
37. Bäckstrand, Karin(2003).Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance.Global Environmental Politics,3(4),24-41.
38. Bakker, Karen(2012).Water: Political, Biopolitical, Material.Social Studies of Science,42(4),616-623.
39. Blume, Stuart S.(1974).Toward a Political Sociology of Science.New York:Free Press.
40. Carroll, Patrick(2012).Water and Technoscientific State Formation in California.Social Studies of Science,42(4),489-516.
41. Clarke, Adele E.(1998).Disciplining Reproduction: Modernity, American Life Sciences, and the Problems of Sex.Berkeley:University of California Press.
42. Collins, Harry,Evans, Robert(2002).The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.Social Studies of Science,32(2),235-296.
43. Cornwell, M.,Campbell, L.(2012).Co-producing Conservation and Knowledge: Citizen-based Sea Turtle Monitoring in North Carolina, USA.Social Studies of Science,42(1),101-120.
44. Frickel, S.(ed.),Moore, K.(ed.)(2006).The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power.Madison, Wis:University of Wisconsin Press.
45. Lash, S.(ed.),Szerszynski, B.(ed.),Wynne, B.(ed.)(1996).Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology.London:Sage.
46. Latour, Bruno(1987).Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society.Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press.
47. Merton, Robert K.,Storer, Norman W.(ed.)(1973).The Sociology of Science.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
48. Nygren, Anja(1999).Local Knowledge in the Environment-Development Discourse: From Dichotomies to Situated Knowledges.Critique of Anthropology,19(3),267-288.
49. Reed, Maureen G.,McIlveen, Kirsten(2006).Toward a Pluralistic Civic Science?: Assessing Community Forestry.Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal,19(7),591-607.
50. Renn, O.,Burns, W. J.,Kasperson, J. X.,Kasperson, R. E.,Slovic, P.(1992).The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications.Journal of Social Issues,48(4),137-160.
51. Scott, Dianne,Barnett, Clive(2009).Something in the Air: Civic Science and Contentious Environmental Politics in Post-apartheid South Africa.Geoforum,40(3),373-382.
52. Slovic, Paul(1999).Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-assessment Battlefield.Risk Analysis,19(4),689-701.
53. Yearley, Steven(2005).Making Sense of Science: Understanding the Social Studies of Science.London:Sage.
54. 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2007)。經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所 2007 《高屏溪水系旗山溪上游治理規劃報告（月眉橋至甲仙攔河堰範圍界）》。臺中：經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所。(Water Resources Planning Institute, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2007, Report on River Planning of Cishan River (Reach between Ye-mei Bridge and Jia-syen Bridge). Taichung: Water Resources Planning Institute, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs.)經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所 2007 《高屏溪水系旗山溪上游治理規劃報告（月眉橋至甲仙攔河堰範圍界）》。臺中：經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所。(Water Resources Planning Institute, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2007, Report on River Planning of Cishan River (Reach between Ye-mei Bridge and Jia-syen Bridge). Taichung: Water Resources Planning Institute, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs.),臺中=Taichung:經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所=Water Resources Planning Institute, Water Resources Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
55. 經濟部水利署第七河川局(2010)。莫拉克颱風災後旗山溪旗山地區整體治理情形說明。旗山溪研討會
56. 監察院(2010)。,人權保障委員會=Human Rights Protection Committee。
57. 蔡宗憲(2003)。國立成功大學水利及海洋工程學系在職專班=Department of Hydraulics & Ocean Engineering (on the job class), National Cheng Kung University。
58. 蔡淑玲(2011)。國立成功大學政治經濟學研究所=Graduate Institute of Political Economy, National Cheng Kung University。
59. 魯台營(2012)。國立高雄大學都市發展與建築研究所=Graduate Institute of Urban Development and Architecture, National University of Kaohsiung。

1. 曾玟學、周桂田(2017)。氣候變遷與耗水產業雙人舞：水資源治理之路徑依賴分析。思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌，55(1)，1-63。
2. 陳震遠,陳震遠(2023)。公民為何（不）科學：新竹我們要喝乾淨水行動聯盟的運動軌跡（2017-2020）。科技醫療與社會，36，1-51。
3. 范玫芳,邱智民(2019)。事業廢棄物治理模式之困境與契機：旗山農地汙染案為例。台灣政治學刊，23(1)，1-41。
4. 施佳良,杜文苓(2019)。挑戰空汙：初探社區行動科學的在地實踐。傳播研究與實踐，9(1)，1-32。
5. (2023)。環境法案如何進入政策議程？如何獲得立法通過？《溫室氣體減量及管理法》的個案分析（2006～2015）。政治學報，76，111-144。