「工作福利」治理下「個人化服務模式」對失業者權利與義務的影響

The Influences of an Individualized Services Model on the Rights and Obligations of the Unemployed under Workfare Governance

李健鴻(Chien-Hung Lee)

個人化服務模式 ； 工作福利 ； 積極促進 ； 失業給付 ； individualized services model ； workfare ； activation ； unemployment benefit

人文及社會科學集刊

27卷1期（2015 / 03 / 01）

45 - 88

繁體中文

本文探討臺灣的就業保險失業給付制度在「工作福利」治理原則下，導入實施「一案到底」的「個人化服務」模式後，對於失業者在申請失業給付時權利與義務的影響。研究發現，「一案到底」的「個人化服務」模式，基於強化「工作福利」的治理原則，藉由「未執行尋職義務就停止失業給付」做為控制手段，設計出「預約制的尋職時間管理機制」、「強化尋職義務的失業認定機制」、「早期介入的個人化就業諮詢機制」三項治理機制，要求失業給付申請人必須遵守更多的尋職義務與就業諮詢義務，其結果是迫使失業給付申請人處在一種「消極性參與」的處境中，只能被動接受國家安排的尋職義務措施，導致失業給付申請人的自主性下降。

This article aims to analyze the influence of the individualized services model implemented by employment insurance institutions on the rights and obligations of unemployment benefit applicants under workfare governance in Taiwan. The first main finding is that the ＂one client served by one steward＂ individualized services model follows the workfare governance principle of requiring the unemployed to performed job-search obligations before receiving unemployment benefits, as a means of control. The second main finding is that the individualized services model was designed with three mechanisms which require unemployment benefit applicants to undertake greater job-search obligations and related counseling. They must make an appointment to manage jobsearch time, carry out greater job-search obligations according to unemployment identity rules, and receive individualized early-intervention employment counseling. As a result, unemployment benefit applicants fall into the situation of passive participation, resulting in decreased autonomy for unemployment benefit applicants because they just passively receive job-search guidelines from the state.

1. 王永慈(2007)。「積極促進」（activation）概念的解析。東吳社會工作學報，16，151-173。
   連結：
2. 李健鴻(2008)。契約主義下「績效」與「公平」的兩難：台灣就業服務體制的社會風險管理分析。政大勞動學報，23，113-144。
   連結：
3. 李健鴻(2010)。「積極促進」治理下就業保險失業給付制度的實踐困境。臺灣民主季刊，7(2)，125-176。
   連結：
4. 郭俊巖(2010)。美國工作福利政策的形成與轉化：以 AFDC 改革為例。台灣社會福利學刊，8(2)，117-159。
   連結：
5. 勞動力發展署 2010〈 失業認定單一窗口一案到底作業模式試辦計畫〉。臺北：勞動力發展署。(Workforce Development Agency, 2010, “Unemployment Identification One Stop Service One Client Serviced by One Steward Model Pilot Plan,” Taipei: Workforce Development Agency.)。
6. Hasselpflug, Søren 2005 “Availability Criteria in 25 Countries,” Finansministeriet Working Paper, No. 12/2005. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://www.fm.dk/db/Filarkiv/10568/arbpap1205.pdf
7. 勞動力發展署 2010 〈 失業給付取消抽牌叫號　玉里站率先試辦單一窗口一案到底〉。勞動力發展署全國就業e 網新聞稿，3 月16 日。2013 年5 月22 日，取自http://wecare.mol.gov.tw/lcs_web/contentlist_c1_p01.aspx?ProgId=102030&SNO=695 (Workforce Development Agency, 2010, “Unemployment Benefit Cancel Draw Call Number, Yu-li Station Take Pilot for One Stop Service One Client Serviced by One Steward Model,” Workforce Development Agency Employment Country e Internet Newsletter, March 16. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://wecare.mol.gov.tw/lcs_web/contentlist_c1_p01.aspx?ProgId=102030&SNO=695)
8. 勞動力發展署 2012 〈 就業保險給付要項注意事項〉。臺北：勞動力發展署。(Workforce Development Agency, 2012b, “Employment Insurance Benefit Points Precautions,” Taipei: Workforce Development Agency.)。
9. 勞動力發展署 2011 〈 就業保險失業認定作業原則〉。臺北：勞動力發展署。(Workforce Development Agency, 2011, “Employment Insurance Unemployment Identification Principle,” Taipei:Workforce Development Agency.)
10. 張舒婷 2009 〈 拿納稅人血汗錢　也應負擔義務〉。中國時報，2月8日，A4版。(Chang, Shu-ting, 2009, “Take Taxpayers' Hard-earned Money, Also Should Be Bear Obligations,” China Times, February 8, p. A4.)
11. 勞動力發展署 2012 〈 推動就業服務一案到底作業模式計畫〉。臺北：勞動力發展署。(Workforce Development Agency, 2012, “Employment Service One Client Serviced by One Steward Model Plan,” Taipei: Workforce Development Agency.)。
12. 勞動部 2009 《 98 年領取失業給付勞工之就業關懷調查》。勞動部全球資訊網，2013 年 5 月 22日，取自http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy98/9806menu.htm(Ministry of Labor, 2009, The Employment Caring Survey for Unemployment Benefit Recipient in 2009. Ministry of Labor Global Information Internet, Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy98/9806menu.htm)
13. Borghi, Vando,Van Berkel, Rik(2007).Individualised Service Provision in an Era of Activation and New Governance.International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,27(9/10),413-424.
14. Bothfeld, Silke,Betzelt, Sigrid(2010).The Paradoxes of Activation Policies and the Re-definition of the Normative Framework of the Welfare State.Conference of Employment Policies Requested-Social Risk and Risk Management of Globalised Economy,Budapest, Hungary:
15. Clasen, Jochen,Clegg, Daniel(2006).Beyond Activation: Reforming European Unemployment Protection Systems in Post-Industrial Labour Markets.European Societies,8(4),527-553.
16. Dingeldey, Irene(2004).Welfare State Transformation between 'Workfare' and an 'Enabling' State: New Goals and New Forms of Governance.Espanet Conference, European Social Policy: Meeting the Needs of a New Europe
17. Eichhorst, W.(ed.),Kaufmann, O.(ed.),Konle-Seidl, R.(ed.)(2008).Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences with Activation Schemes in Europe and the US.Berlin:Springer Press.
18. Grubb, David(2000).Eligibility Criteria for Unemployment Benefits.OECD Economic Studies,31,148-184.
19. Gustafson, Raya(2006).London,Metropolitan University.
20. Haagh, Louise(2006).Equality and Income Security in Market Economies: What's Wrong with Insurance?.Social Policy and Administration,40(4),385-424.
21. Handler, Joel F.(2003).Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe: From Status to Contract.Journal of European Social Policy,13(3),229-243.
22. Heikkilä, Matti(ed.)(1999).Linking Welfare and Work.Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Foundation, European Union.
23. Jessop, Bob、梁書寧譯(2008)。思索資本主義國家的未來。臺北=Taipei:韋伯文化=Weber Culture。
24. Kopac, Anja(2002).Implementation of Activity Testing and the Roles of Discretion.COST A13 Working Meeting,Florence, Italy:
25. Lødemel, Ivar,Trickey, Heather(2001).'An Offer You Can't Refuse': Workfare in International Perspective.UK:The Policy Press.
26. Marshall, T. H.(1950).Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays.Cambridge:University of Cambridge Press.
27. Peck, Jamie(2001).Workfare States.New York:Guilford Publish Press.
28. Serrano Pascual, Amparo(ed.),Magnusson, Lars(ed.)(2007).Reshaping Welfare States and Activation Regimes in Europe.Brussels:P.I.E. Peter Lang Press.
29. Van Berkel, Rik(ed.),Møller, Iver Hornemann(ed.)(2002).Active Social Policies in the EU: Inclusion through Participation?.UK:The Policy Press.
30. Van Berkel, Rik(ed.),Valkenburg, Ben(ed.)(2007).Making It Personal: Individualising Activation Services in the EU.UK:The Policy Press.
31. Van Berkel, Rik,Borghi, Vando(2008).Review Article: The Governance of Activation.Social Policy and Society,7(3),393-402.
32. 丁玉珍、陳秀玲(2013)。推動一案到底就業服務模式之意義與實務策略。就業安全半年刊，12(2)，58-64。
33. 王篤強(2001)。「強制工作」與「財產累聚」—兩種貧窮對策觀點。社區發展季刊，95，85-95。
34. 江宛琦(2011)。就業保險制度下之推介就業情形與後續作法。就業安全半年刊，10(1)，67-70。
35. 吳佳玲(2013)。國立政治大學勞工研究所=Institute for Labour Research, National Chengchi University。
36. 吳淑瑛(2013)。一案到底就業服務模式之革新及推動情形。就業安全半年刊，12(1)，5-12。
37. 辛炳隆、李健鴻(2012)。行政院國家發展委員會委託研究報告行政院國家發展委員會委託研究報告,行政院國家發展委員會=National Development Council, Executive Yuan。
38. 許金龍(2008)。「失業認定單一窗口一案到底」作業模式之探討。就業安全半年刊，7(2)，73-80。
39. 許洺滉(2009)。從失業認定單一窗口談早期再就業服務小組政策規劃設計擬議。就業安全半年刊，8(1)，70-76。
40. 藍科正、林淑慧(2011)。行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局委託研究報告行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局委託研究報告,行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局=Bureau of Vocational Training Affairs, Council of Labor, Executive Yuan。

1. 黃偉誌,黃志隆,洪筱筑(2021)。職業訓練下的轉銜風險探討：以台中市芳療整體保養職業工會為例。社會發展研究學刊，28，100-138。
2. 劉念琪,林鈺欽(2021)。由勞動力彈性觀點探討企業對工時法令修改之制度適應。人力資源管理學報，21(1)，27-56。
3. 阮曉眉(2021)。新自由主義化的社會投資：經濟化、人力資本與國家治理。國家發展研究，21(1)，1-42。
4. 葉崇揚、古允文(2017)。從生產性福利體制到社會投資福利國家：臺灣與韓國的比較。社會政策與社會工作學刊，21(1)，97-147。
5. (2020)。社會投資與女性貧窮：生命歷程政策的觀點。社區發展季刊，170，130-147。