父母對子女教育投資的性別差異－以就學貸款為例

Gender Differences in Parental Choice of Education Investment in Children -The Case of Student Loans

卜少平(Shao-Ping Pu)；駱明慶(Ming-Ching Luoh)

教育投資 ； 性別差異 ； 就學貸款 ； education investment ； gender differences ； student loan

人文及社會科學集刊

27卷2期（2015 / 06 / 01）

361 - 393

繁體中文

使用臺灣高等教育資料庫2005年大一新生的資料，本文探討父母親人力資本投資的性別差異。迴歸分析的結果發現，控制了所得、父母親教育程度以及其他控制變數之後，女性仍有較高的就學貸款比例。此外，就學貸款的性別差異只存在於家中有不同性別子女的家庭，顯示就學貸款的性別差異是父母親人力資本投資選擇的結果。

Using data from the 2005 Survey of Freshmen in the Integrated Higher Education Database System in Taiwan, we study the gender differences in student loan take-up rates. After controlling for family income, parental education and other control variables, female students still are more likely to have student loans. In addition, gender differences in student loans only exist among students from families with both sons and daughters, but not among those from families with sons or daughters only. This shows that the gender differences in student loans are the results of parental choice of human capital investment in children.

1. 駱明慶(2002)。誰是台大學生—性別、省籍與城鄉差異。經濟論文叢刊，30(1)，113-147。
   連結：
2. 駱明慶(2001)。教育成就的省籍與性別差異。經濟論文叢刊，29(2)，117-152。
   連結：
3. 駱明慶(2004)。升學機會與家庭背景。經濟論文叢刊，32(4)，417-455。
   連結：
4. 彭森明 2006〈臺灣高等教育資料系統之建置與應用（3/3）：94 學年大一新生（D00087_1）〉。2015 年1 月6 日，原始數據取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫http://srda.sinica.edu.tw，doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-D00087_1(Peng, Samuel, 2006, “Taiwan Higher Education Data System and Its Applications,”January 6, 2015, Original Data Retrieved from “Survey Research Data Archive, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica,” http://srda.sinica.edu.tw, doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-D00087_1)
5. 教育部統計處 2014　〈歷年校數，教師，職員，班級，學生及畢業生數（39–102 學年度）〉。《主要教育統計圖表》，2014 年12 月4 日， 取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/main_statistics/seriesdata.xls (Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education, 2014, “Number of Schools, Teachers, Staffs, Classes, Students, and Graduates by Year (1950–2013),” The Main Tables and Charts of Educational Statistics, Retrieved December 4, 2014, from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/main_statistics/seriesdata.xls)
6. 教育部統計處 2005　《大學生學習及生活意向調查報告》。臺北：教育部統計處。(Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education, 2005, The Report of the Intensions Survey of College Students' Learning and Life. Taipei: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education.)
7. Angrist, Josh(2002).How Do Sex Ratios Affect Marriage and Labor Markets? Evidence from America's Second Generation.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,117(3),997-1038.
8. Becker, Gary S.(1993).Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
9. Das Gupta, M.(1987).Selective Discrimination against Female Children in Rural Punjab, India.Population and Development Review,13(1),77-100.
10. Kaestner, Robert(1997).Are Brothers Really Better? Sibling Sex Composition and Educational Achievement Revisited.The Journal of Human Resources,32(2),250-284.
11. Lin, Ming-jen,Liu, Jin-tan,Qian, Nancy(2014).More Missing Women, Fewer Dying Girls: The Impact of Sex-Selective Abortion on Sex at Birth and Relative Female Mortality in Taiwan.Journal of the European Economic Association,12(4),899-926.
12. Lin, Ming-jen,Luoh, Ming-ching(2008).Can Hepatitis B Mothers Account for the Number of Missing Women? Evidence from Three Million Newborns in Taiwan.The American Economic Review,98(5),2259-2273.
13. Mishra, V.,Roy, T. K.,Retherford, R. D.(2004).Sex Differentials in Childhood Feeding, Health Care, and Nutritional Status in India.Population and Development Review,30(2),269-296.
14. Olds, Kelly B.(2006).Female Productivity and Mortality in Early-20th-Century Taiwan.Economics and Human Biology,4(2),206-221.
15. Oster, Emily(2005).Hepatitis B and the Case of the Missing Women.Journal of Political Economy,113(6),1163-1216.
16. Pande, Rohini P.(2003).Selective Gender Differences in Childhood Nutrition and Immunization in Rural India: The Role of Siblings.Demography,40(3),395-418.
17. Parish, W. L.,Willis, R. J.(1993).Daughters, Education, and Family Budgets: Taiwan Experiences.Journal of Human Resources,28(4),863-898.
18. Qian, Nancy(2008).Missing Women and the Price of Tea in China: The Effect of Sex-Specific Earnings on Sex Imbalance.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,123(3),1251-1285.
19. Salmi, Jamil(2003).LCSHD Paper Series, No. 44LCSHD Paper Series, No. 44,Washington, DC:World Bank.
20. Sen, Amartya(1990).More than 100 Million Women Are Missing.The New York Review of Books,37(20),61-66.
21. Stock, James H.,Watson, Mark W.(2012).Introduction to Econometrics.New York:Pearson Education.
22. 張惠雯(1999)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Education, National Changhua University of Education。
23. 陳佩瑛、蔡虹音(2006)。就學貸款行為與大學生繼續就讀研究所意願之相關研究。臺灣高等教育資料庫之建置及相關議題之探討—第二階段成果報告研討會，臺北=Taipei:
24. 楊瑩(1983)。我國大學院校學雜費徵收標準與助學貸款等措施之研究：兼論我國大專院校生家庭社經背景。國立編譯館館刊，12(1)，275-340。
25. 蕭霖(1995)。全方位的教育經費補助—就學貸款。教育研究資訊，5(2)，105-117。

1. 陳杏容(2022)。從受助成為助人者：受助家庭子女就讀社工系或就職社工之經驗探究。社會政策與社會工作學刊，26(1)，1-44。
2. (2019)。打造經濟弱勢孩童的夢想撲滿─兒童及少年未來教育與發展帳戶內涵暨執行狀況初探。社區發展季刊，165，258-269。
3. (2020)。女性單親家長教育投資：經驗與效益。社區發展季刊，170，94-114。