混合法庭：國際刑法制度中追訴嚴重犯罪的新模式

Hybrid Courts: New Forms of Prosecuting Serious Crimes in International Criminal Law

王保鍵(Pao-chien Wang)

混合法庭 ； 國際刑事法院 ； 國際人道法 ； 轉型正義 ； hybrid court ； International Criminal Court ； international humanitarian law ； transnational justice

人文及社會科學集刊

27卷3期（2015 / 09 / 01）

507 - 546

繁體中文

本文透過檢視聯合國相關文本資料，運用個案研究法，討論混合法庭設立的背景及其理論基礎，並對東帝汶重罪特別法庭、科索沃重罪特別法庭、獅子山重罪特別法庭、柬埔寨重罪特別法庭、黎巴嫩問題特別法庭、非洲特別法庭等六個個案加以研析。本文主要研究發現為：（1）混合法庭有助於滿足轉型正義，提升衝突後國家的社會和諧性；（2）混合法庭可作為衝突後國家的重要法治工具，重建衝突後國家的內國司法體系；（3）混合法庭具有整合不同司法系統的功能，促使混合法庭成為國際刑法制度中追訴嚴重犯罪之新模式。

This essay analyzes the background and theory of hybrid courts by reviewing United Nation documents. In addition, the methodology of this essay follows the case study method. The cases under examination in this essay focus on the Special Panels for Serious Crimes in East Timor, Regulation 64 Panels in the Courts of Kosovo, Special Court for Sierra Leone, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Special Tribunal for Lebanon, and Extraordinary African Chambers. The main findings of this essay are: (1) in post-conflict states, society will be more harmonious by achieving transnational justice, which is a benefit of employing the hybrid court; (2) the hybrid court is a key legal tool to rebuild the domestic judicial system of post-conflict states; (3) by integrating a different judicial system, the hybrid court will allow for new forms of prosecuting serious crimes in international criminal law.

1. 陳牧民(2008)。美國為何承認科索沃獨立。台灣國際研究季刊，4(3)，19-33。
   連結：
2. Neou, Kassie and Jeffrey C. Gallup 1997 “Human Rights and the Cambodian Past: In Defense of Peace Before Justice,” Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/archive/dialogue/1_08/articles/554.html
3. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) 2005 “Syrian Troops Leave Lebanese Soil,” Retrieved December 31, 2014, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4484325.stm
4. U.S. Department of State 1999 “Ethnic Cleansing in Kosovo: An Accounting,” Retrieved August 8, 2014, from http://www.state.gov/www/global/human_rights/kosovoii/homepage.html
5. ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross) 2004 “What Is International Humanitarian Law?” Retrieved August 13, 2014, from http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/legal-fact-sheet/humanitarian-law-factsheet.htm
6. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) 2012 “Profile: Chad's Hissene Habre,” Retrieved August 21, 2014, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa– 18927845
7. Judah, Tim 2000 “The Kosovo Liberation Army,” Retrieved August 5, 2014, from http://www.kosovo.net/kla8.html
8. ICD (International Crimes Database) 2013 “Hybrid,” Retrieved August 8, 2014, from http://www.internationalcrimesdata-base.org/Courts/Hybrid.http://www.internationalcrimesdata-base.org/Courts/Hybrid
9. (2003).Foday Saybana Sankoh, an African Revolutionary, Died on July 29th, Aged 65.The Economist,Aug 7th
10. Guilfoyle, Douglas 2011 “International Cooperation in the Prosecution of Somali Pirates,” Retrieved March 28, 2015, from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmfaff/writev/1318/m09.htm
11. WCRO (War Crimes Research Office) 2005 “Special Panels for Serious Crimes in East Timor Status Updates,” Retrieved August 5, 2014, from http://www.wcl.american.edu/warcrimes/easttimor_status.cfm
12. United Nations 1998 “To Remedy the Deficiencies of Ad Hoc Tribunals,” Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://legal.un.org/icc/general/overview.htm
13. United Nations 2006 “Report of the Secretary-General on the Establishment of a Special Tribunal for Lebanon,” Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://www.stl-tsl.org/en/documents/un-documents/un-secretary-general-reports/256-report-of-the-secretarygeneral-on-the-establishment-of-a-special-tribunal-for-lebanon
14. ECCC (Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia) 2014 “Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for Crimes against Humanity,” Retrieved August 12, 2014, from http://eccc.gov.kh/en/articles/nuon-chea-and-khieu-samphan-sentenced-life-imprisonment-crimes-against-humanity
15. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) 2012 “Africa's Fatou Bensouda Is New ICC Chief Prosecutor,” Retrieved December 31, 2014, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-16029121
16. TRIAL (Track Impunity Always) 2014 “The UNMIK Programme,” Retrieved August 8, 2014, from http://www.trial-ch.org/en/resources/tribunals/hybrid-tribunals/programme-of-international-judges-in-kosovo/the-unmik-programme.html
17. CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) 2014 “A History of Residential Schools in Canada,” Retrieved August 15, 2014, from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/a-history-of-residential-schools-in-canada-1.702280
18. Deng, David K. 2014 “Special Court for Serious Crimes (SCSC): A Proposal for Justice and Account-ability in South Sudan,” Retrieved December 31, 2014, from http://www.southsu-dannewsagency.com/news/press-releases/special-court-for-serious-crimes-in-south-sudan
19. BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) 2013 “Q&A: Charles Taylor on Trial,” Retrieved December 28, 2014, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa–10878424
20. UNHR (United Nations Human Rights) 2011 “Cambodia—20 Years on from the Paris Peace Agreements,” Retrieved August 11, 2014, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/Cambodia-20yearsonfromtheParisPeace.aspx
21. East Timor Government 2012 “History of East Timor,” Retrieved August 5, 2014, from http://www.easttimor-government.com/history.htm
22. Alamuddin, Amal,Jurdi, Nidal Nabil,Tolbert, David(2014).The Special Tribunal for Lebanon: Law and Practice.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
23. Arsanjani, Mahnoush H.(1999).The International Criminal Court and National Amnesty Laws.Proceedings of the Annual Meeting,93,65-68.
24. Baker, Roozbeh (Rudy) B.(2009).Universal Jurisdiction and the Case of Belgium: A Critical Assessment.ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law,16(1),141-167.
25. Bruch, Elizabeth M.(2010).Hybrid Courts: Examining Hybridity through a Post-colonial Lens.Boston University International Law Journal,28(1),1-38.
26. Dickinson, Laura A.(2003).The Relationship between Hybrid Courts and International Courts: The Case of Kosovo.New England Law Review,37(4),1059-1072.
27. Dickinson, Laura A.(2003).The Promise of Hybrid Courts.The American Journal of International Law,97(2),295-310.
28. George, Alexander L.,Bennett, Andrew(2005).Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
29. Gerring, John(2007).Case Study Research: Principles and Practices.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
30. Hamilton, Tomas,Ramsden, Michael(2014).The Politicisation of Hybrid Courts: Observations from the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia.International Criminal Law Review,14(1),115-147.
31. Higgins, Gillian(2009).The Impact of the Size, Scope and Scale of the Miloševic Trial and the Development of Rule 73.Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights,7(2),240-261.
32. Higonnet, Ethel(2005).Student Scholarship PapersStudent Scholarship Papers,未出版
33. Hughes, Edel(ed.),Schabas, William(ed.),Thakur, Ramesh Chandra(ed.)(2007).Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice.New York:United Nations University Press.
34. International Criminal Court=ICC(2010).Review Conference on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Official Records,Netherlands:
35. International Crisis Group=ICG(2008).Chad: A New Conflict Resolution Framework.Brussels:International Crisis Group.
36. Ivanišević, Bogdan(2008).The War Crimes Chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From Hybrid to Domestic Court.New York:International Center for Transitional Justice.
37. Jalloh, Charles Chernor(ed.)(2014).The Sierra Leone Special Court and Its Legacy: The Impact for Africa and International Criminal Law.New York:Cambridge University Press.
38. Majzub, Diba(2002).Peace or Justice? Amnesties and the International Criminal Court.Melbourne Journal of International Law,3(2),247-280.
39. Mbaku, John Mukum(2014).Foresight Africa: Top Priorities for the Continent in 2014Foresight Africa: Top Priorities for the Continent in 2014,未出版
40. McAuliffe, Padraig(2011).Hybrid Tribunals at Ten: How International Criminal Justice's Golden Child Became an Orphan.Journal of International Law and International Relations,7(1),1-65.
41. Miller, Joseph C.(1975).The Politics of Decolonization in Portuguese Africa.African Affairs,74(295),135-147.
42. Nouwen, Sarah M. H.(2006).'Hybrid Courts': The Hybrid Category of a New Type of International Crimes Courts.Utrecht Law Review,2(2),190-214.
43. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights=OHCHR(2008).Rule-of-law Tools for Post-conflict States: Maximizing the Legacy of Hybrid Courts.Geneva:Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
44. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights=OHCHR(2009).Rule-of-law Tools for Post-conflict States: Amnesties.Geneva:Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
45. Reiger, Caitlin,Wierda, Marieke(2006).The Serious Crimes Process in Timor-Leste: In Retrospect.New York:International Center for Transitional Justice.
46. Romano, Cesare P. R.(ed.),Nollkaemper, André(ed.),Kleffner, Jann K.(ed.)(2004).Internationalized Criminal Courts: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia.New York:Oxford University Press.
47. Scharf, Michael(1999).The Amnesty Exception to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.Cornell International Law Journal,32(3),507-527.
48. Skaar, Elin(ed.),Gloppen, Siri(ed.),Suhrke, Astri(ed.)(2005).Roads to Reconciliation.Maryland:Lexington Books.
49. Skinnider, Eileen(2007).Experiences and Lessons from 'Hybrid' Tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor and Cambodia.Symposium on the International Criminal Court,China: Beijing:
50. Smis, Stefaan,Van der Borght, Kim(1999).Belgium: Act Concerning the Punishment of Grave Breaches of International Humanitarian Law.International Legal Materials,38(4),918-925.
51. Vujačić, Veljko(2003).Why Nationalist Discourse Really Matters: Two Studies of Serbian Nationalism.Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans,5(1),91-97.
52. Williams, Sarah(2012).Hybrid and Internationalised Criminal Tribunals.Oxford:Hart Publishing.
53. Zacklin, Ralph(2004).The Failings of Ad Hoc International Tribunals.Journal of International Criminal Justice,2(2),541-545.
54. 朱婉琪(2010)。台灣國際新頁：推動「國際人權五法」立法。新世紀智庫論壇，49，97-100。
55. 吳乃德(2006)。轉型正義和歷史記憶：台灣民主化的未竟之業。思想，2，1-34。
56. 洪茂雄(2006)。蒙特內哥羅獨立公投的意義。新世紀智庫論壇，34，104-108。
57. 嚴震生(2014)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北=Taipei:行政院國家科學委員會=National Science Council, Executive Yuan。

1. 蔡季廷、陳紀安(2017)。前南斯拉夫國際刑事法庭的政策對波赫刑事司法體系結構轉型之影響。臺灣民主季刊，14(1)，53-94。
2. 杜正宇(2017)。論二戰時期的臺灣大空襲（1938-1945）。國史館館刊，51，59-95。
3. 郭雪真(2020)。武裝衝突期間軍隊的文化資產保護角色及其實踐：2003年伊拉克戰爭的影響。問題與研究，59(1)，55-106。
4. 王保鍵(2016)。論桃園客庄型態與客家政策。臺灣民主季刊，13(4)，93-125。
5. 顏永銘(2018)。轉型正義的實踐與影響：東帝汶經驗檢視。思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，56(4)，33-70。
6. 楊婉莉(2020)。淺析紅色通報機制及其效力－以國際案例為例。軍法專刊，66(1)，107-149。