反傾銷保護可改善臺灣提控廠商技術效率？

Does Anti-dumping Protection Improve the Technical Efficiency of Complaining Firms in Taiwan?

林家慶(Chia-ching Lin)

反傾銷 ； 技術效率 ； 臺灣廠商 ； anti-dumping ； technical efficiency ； Taiwanese firms

人文及社會科學集刊

29卷3期（2017 / 09 / 01）

453 - 483

繁體中文

目前臺灣仍缺乏反傾銷保護對臺灣廠商技術效率影響的系統性研究，本研究以臺灣1984～2010年所有包含上市公司的反傾銷控訴案例為研究對象，探討反傾銷相關事件對臺灣提控廠商技術效率之影響。研究結果指出，雖然平均而言反傾銷控訴對提控廠商技術效率有正面影響，但仍有約三成案例的實證結果是負面的。其中，對於低技術水準之提控廠商，反傾銷保護可使其技術效率有較大的改善，但這類廠商保護時間拉長後，卻反而會使其技術效率降低；同時，課徵反傾銷稅的時間拉長後，也會導致反效果。這些研究結果可提供政府在審理反傾銷控訴案件時做為參考。

Currently, Taiwan lacks a systematic study on the effect of anti-dumping protection on the technical efficiency of Taiwanese firms. As such, in this study, all cases of anti-dumping complaints of companies listed in Taiwan during 1984 and 2010 are used to investigate the effects of anti-dumping complaints on the technical efficiency of Taiwanese firms. Our research results indicate that, although the average effect of anti-dumping complaints has a positive impact on the technical efficiency of complaining firms, there are still negative results in 30% of cases. Among them, anti-dumping protections can lead to great improvements in the low-technology manufacturers. However, if the protection time for these manufacturers is prolonged, their technical efficiency declines. Additionally, if the duration of imposed anti-dumping duties increases, it could also have the opposite effect. These results can serve as a reference for the government when presiding over anti-dumping complaints.

1. Huang, Chi-huei(2008).The Economic Effects of Taiwan's Anti-dumping Duty on PC Prestress Steel.Taipei Economic Inquiry,44(2),245-292.
   連結：
2. 林家慶(2014)。臺灣反傾銷控訴傷害了下游廠商？。人文及社會科學集刊，26(1)，103-131。
   連結：
3. 林家慶(2012)。臺灣反傾銷控訴效果之實證分析。人文及社會科學集刊，24(4)，469-496。
   連結：
4. 黃智輝(2008)。水泥課徵反傾銷稅的政策效果與競爭力分析—臺灣實證分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，38(2)，1-30。
   連結：
5. 黃智輝(2008)。銅版紙課徵反傾銷稅經濟效果與國家整體利益分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，39(1)，69-96。
   連結：
6. 經濟部貿易調查委員會 2016　〈我國反傾銷稅案件處理情形一覽表〉。2016 年7 月26 日，取自https://www.moeaitc.gov.tw/ITC/main/case/wfrmAntidumpingCases1.aspx?menu_id=1167 (International Trade Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2016, “List of Antidumping Investigation Cases,” Retrieved July 26, 2016, from https://www.moeaitc.gov.tw/ITC/main/case/wfrmAntidumpingCases1.aspx?menu_id=1167)
7. 財政部 2016 〈平衡稅及反傾銷稅課徵實施辦法〉。2016 年7 月26 日，取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=G0350034 (Ministry of Finance, 2016, “The Regulations Governing the Implementation of the Imposition of Countervailing and Anti-Dumping Duties,” Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=G0350034)
8. World Trade Organization 2016 “Trade Topics: Anti-dumping,” Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_e.htm
9. TEJ 資料庫（台灣經濟新報資料庫）2016　〈台灣資料庫〉。2016 年7 月26 日，取自http://www.tej.com.tw (Taiwan Economic Journal Database, 2016, “Taiwan Database,” Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.tej.com.tw)。http://www.tej.com.tw
10. 經濟部國際貿易局 2016　〈中華民國進出口貿易統計〉。2016 年7 月26 日，取自http://cus93.trade.gov.tw/FSCI/ (Bureau of Foreign Trade, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2016, “Trade Statistics,”Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://cus93.trade.gov.tw/FSCI/)
11. 行政院主計總處 2016　〈中華民國行業標準分類〉。2016 年7 月26 日，取自https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/51230162221KI9NIEKP.pdf (Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, 2016, “Standard Industrial Classification of R.O.C.,” Retrieved July 26, 2016, from https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/51230162221KI9NIEKP.pdf)
12. Aghion, Philippe,Bloom, Nick,Blundell, Richard,Griffith, Rachel,Howitt, Peter(2005).Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,120(2),701-728.
13. Baily, Martin Neil,Gersbach, Hans(1995).Efficiency in Manufacturing and the Need for Global Competition.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics,1995,307-358.
14. Battese, George E.,Coelli, Timothy J.(1995).A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data.Empirical Economics,20(2),325-332.
15. Blundell, Richard,Griffith, Rachel,Van Reenen, John(1999).Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms.The Review of Economic Studies,66(3),529-554.
16. Blundell, Richard,Griffith, Rachel,Van Reenen, John(1995).Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation.The Economic Journal,105(429),333-344.
17. Boone, Jan(2000).Competitive Pressure: The Effects on Investments in Product and Process Innovation.The Rand Journal of Economics,31(3),549-569.
18. Coelli, Timothy J.,Rao, D.S. Prasada,O'Donnell, Christopher J.,Battese, George E.(2005).An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis.New York:Springer Science+Business Media, Inc..
19. Cohen, Wesley M.,Klepper, Steven(1996).A Reprise of Size and R&D.The Economic Journal,106(437),925-951.
20. Cohen, Wesley M.,Klepper, Steven(1996).Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: The Case of Process and Product R&D.The Review of Economics and Statistics,78(2),232-243.
21. Crowley, Meredith A.(2006).Do Safeguard Tariffs and Antidumping Duties Open or Close Technology Gaps?.Journal of International Economics,68(2),469-484.
22. Färe, Rolf,Grosskopf, Shawna,Norris, Mary,Zhang, Zhongyang(1994).Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Changes in Industrialized Countries.The American Economic Review,84(1),66-83.
23. Gao, Xiwang,Miyagiwa, Kaz(2005).Antidumping Protection and R&D Competition.The Canadian Journal of Economics,38(1),211-227.
24. Golany, Boaz,Roll, Yaakov(1989).An Application Procedure for DEA.Omega: The International Journal of Management Science,17(3),237-250.
25. Hansen, Wendy L.,Prusa, Thomas J.(1997).The Economics and Politics of Trade Policy: An Empirical Analysis of ITC Decision Making.Review of International Economics,5(2),230-245.
26. Herander, Mark G.,Schwartz, J. Brad(1984).An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties.Southern Economic Journal,51(1),59-79.
27. Kao, Kuo-feng,Peng, Cheng-hau(2016).Anti-dumping Protection, Price Undertaking and Product Innovation.International Review of Economics & Finance,41,53-64.
28. Konings, Jozef,Vandenbussche, Hylke(2005).Antidumping Protection and Markups of Domestic Firms.Journal of International Economics,65(1),151-165.
29. Konings, Jozef,Vandenbussche, Hylke(2007).LICOS Discussion Paper SeriesLICOS Discussion Paper Series,KU Leuven:LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance.
30. Lio, Mon-chi,Hu, Jin-li(2009).Governance and Agricultural Production Efficiency: A Cross-Country Aggregate Frontier Analysis.Journal of Agricultural Economics,60(1),40-61.
31. Miyagiwa, Kaz,Ohno, Yuka(1995).Closing the Technology Gap under Protection.The American Economic Review,85(4),755-770.
32. Nickell, Stephen J.(1996).Competition and Corporate Performance.Journal of Political Economy,104(4),724-746.
33. Ohlin, Bertil(ed.),Hesselborn, Per-Ove(ed.),Wijkman, Per Magnus(ed.)(1977).The International Allocation of Economic Activity.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Prusa, Thomas J.(2001).On the Spread and Impact of Anti-dumping.The Canadian Journal of Economics,34(3),591-611.
35. 林柏生、陳坤銘、洪德欽、溫偉任、陳建維、陳財家(2002)。,臺北=Taipei:經濟部貿易調查委員會=International Trade Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
36. 林柏生、陳坤銘、洪德欽、溫偉任、陳建維、陳財家(2001)。反傾銷制度產業損害經濟分析—美國鋼鐵與高科技產業案例研究。臺北=Taipei:經濟部貿易調查委員會=International Trade Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
37. 張振邦(2000)。國立中山大學政治學研究所=Institute of Political Science, National Sun Yat-sen University。
38. 陳坤銘、陳財家(1999)。反傾銷與股價—臺灣鋼鐵產業個案研究。台灣經濟學會年會論文集，臺北=Taipei:
39. 陳坤銘、楊光華、陳財家(2000)。反傾銷制度與產業保護效果—臺灣個案研究。貿易調查專刊，5，297-329。
40. 黃鴻、辛炳隆(1998)。,臺北=Taipei:經濟部貿易調查委員會=International Trade Commission, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
41. 黃鏡如、傅祖壇、黃美瑛(2008)。績效評估：效率與生產力之理論與應用。臺北=Taipei:新陸書局=Shinlou Books。

1. 林家慶(2019)。台灣廠商躍過反傾銷稅直接投資之實證分析。經濟論文，47(4)，651-679。
2. 林家慶(2022)。反傾銷政策、出口與對外直接投資－台灣之實證分析。經濟論文，50(3)，325-356。