魯凱族的道德經濟：社會組織、傳統農耕與災害應對

The Moral Economy of Rukai Society: Social Organization, Traditional Agriculture, and Natural Hazards Prevention

巴清雄(Qing-xiong Ba)；台邦．撒沙勒(Sasala Taiban)；王宏仁(Hong-zen Wang)

道德經濟 ； 魯凱族 ； 最小化風險 ； 再分配 ； 互惠 ； moral economy ； Rukai ； risk minimization ； redistribution ； reciprocity

人文及社會科學集刊

33卷3期（2021 / 09 / 01）

451 - 490

繁體中文

本研究探討霧臺魯凱族的農業實作與社會組織文化如何相互鑲嵌，進而構成道德經濟的一環。研究資料主要來自第一作者從2015年迄今，對19位族人的正式訪問、部落的日常生活觀察，以及2015-2017年間的親自農事耕作與記錄。研究發現，霧臺魯凱社會道德經濟最重要的組織原則是「最小化風險」。在農耕實作上，透過混作栽培、輪耕、現地保存等方法來降低地力消耗、蟲害、天災的問題。在社會文化上，透過頭目貴族進行的資源重分配、族人之間的分享互惠，同時降低了部落最底層人的生存風險，以及自然災害發生的機率。

This paper explores how agricultural practices in Rukai society are embedded in its social cultural institutions, which constitute a part of Rukai's moral economy. The data were mainly collected by the first author and include formal interviews with 19 Rukai elders, field observations, and participation in farming from 2015 to 2017. The research findings indicate that the most important principle of Rukai's moral economy is ＂risk minimization.＂ Agricultural practices of mixed plantation, shifting cultivation, and not harvesting specific crops are used to minimize the risk of soil exhaustion, insect pests, and damage from other natural disaster. Socio-culturally, the principle of risk minimization is invoked in the redistribution of resources from talyalai (chiefs or nobles) to common people and reciprocity among the people, both of which minimize the subsistence risk of the poorest people and reduce the impact of natural hazards.

1. 張宜君, Yi-chun,林宗弘, Thung-hong(2012)。不平等的災難：921地震下的受災風險與社會階層化。人文及社會科學集刊，24(2)，193-231。
   連結：
2. 鄭瑋寧, Wei-ning(2010)。文化形式的商品化、「心」的工作和經濟治理：以魯凱人的香椿產銷為例。台灣社會學，19，107-146。
   連結：
3. Altieri, M. A.,Nicholls, C. I.(2017).The Adaptation and Mitigation Potential of Traditional Agriculture in a Changing Climate.Climatic Change,140(1),33-45.
4. Blaikie, P. M.,Cannon, T.,Davis, I.,Wisner, B.(1994).At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters.London:Routledge.
5. Cohen, Myron L.(1976).House United, House Divided: The Chinese Family in Taiwan.New York:Columbia University Press.
6. Cretney, Raven Marie(2016).Local Responses to Disaster: The Value of Community Led Post Disaster Response Action in a Resilience Framework.Disaster Prevention and Management,25(1),27-40.
7. Granovetter, Mark(1985).Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology,91(3),481-510.
8. Hanazaki, N.,Berkes, F.,Seixas, C. S.,Peroni, N.(2013).Livelihood Diversity, Food Security and Resilience among the Caiçara of Coastal Brazil.Human Ecology,41(1),153-164.
9. Kolawole, O. D.(2001).Local Knowledge Utilization and Sustainable Rural Development in the 21st Century.Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor,9(3),13-15.
10. Lin, Thung-hong(2015).Governing Natural Disasters: State Capacity, Democracy, and Human Vulnerability.Social Forces,93(3),1267-1300.
11. Lo, Ming-cheng,Fan, Yun(2020).Brightening the Dark Side of ‘Linking Social Capital’? Negotiating Conflicting Visions of Post-Morakot Reconstruction in Taiwan.Theory and Society,49(1),23-48.
12. Marin, A.,Berkes, F.(2013).Local People’s Accounts of Climate Change: To What Extent Are They Influenced by the Media?.WIREs Climate Change,4(1),1-8.
13. Oliver-Smith, A.(ed.),Hoffman, S. M.(ed.)(1999).The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective.New York:Routledge.
14. Paudel, M. N.(2012).Adaptation Mechanisms in Agriculture for Climate Change in Nepal.Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment,11(1),81-85.
15. Polanyi, Karl(1957).The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time.Boston:Beacon Press.
16. Rajasekaran, B.,Warren, D. M.,Babu, S. C.(1991).Indigenous Natural-Resource Management Systems for Sustainable Agricultural Development-A Global Perspective.Journal of International Development,3(3),387-401.
17. Rakshit, A.,Bhowmick, M. K.(2012).Unrealized Potential of Traditional Knowledge in Combating Climate Change.SATSA Mukhaptra Annual Technical Issue,16,68-73.
18. Scott, James C.(1998).Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.New Haven:Yale University Press.
19. Scott, James C.(1976).The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia.New Haven:Yale University Press.
20. Swiderska, K.,Song, Yi-ching,Li, Jing-song,Reid, Hannah,Mutta, Doris(2011).International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) BriefingInternational Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) Briefing,未出版
21. Taiban, Sasala,Lin, Hui-nien,Ko, Chun-chieh(2020).Disaster, Relocation, and Resilience: Recovery and Adaptation of Karamemedesane in Lily Tribal Community after Typhoon Morakot, Taiwan.Environmental Hazards,19(2),209-222.
22. 巴清雄, Qing-xiong(2018)。國立臺灣大學農藝學系=Department of Agronomy, College of Bioresources and Agricultural, National Taiwan University。
23. 王俊豪, Jiun-hao,陳美芬, Mei-fen(2015)。原住民部落因應氣候災害風險之行動研究。台灣農學會報，16(3)，197-211。
24. 台邦．撒沙勒, Sasala(2014).重修屏東縣志．原住民族.屏東=Pingtung:屏東縣政府=Pingtung County Government.
25. 台邦．撒沙勒, Sasala(2012)。災難、遷村與社會脆弱性：古茶波安的例子。臺灣人類學刊，10(1)，51-92。
26. 台邦．撒沙勒, Sasala(2016).Kucapungane：魯凱族好茶部落歷史研究.臺北=Taipei:國史館=Academia Historica.
27. 佐佐木高明, Koumei,深野康久, Yasuhisa(2013)。魯凱族的山田燒墾農業。文明凝視下的地方生活：魯凱族社會文化之研究論文集，臺北=Taipei:
28. 屏東縣內埔戶政事務所 2020 　〈109年02月份屏東縣霧台鄉各村鄰戶數與戶籍動態登記統計表〉，2020年3月4日，取自https://www-ws.pthg.gov.tw/Upload/2015pthg/93/relfile/11134/459357/2b5c306a–796b–4b1e-af54–1876697ec53b.pdf (Neipu Household Registration Office, Pingtung County, 2020, “Household Registration Statistics, Wutai, Pingtung, February 2020,” Retrieved March 4, 2020, from https://www-ws.pthg.gov.tw/Upload/2015pthg/93/relfile/11134/459357/2b5c306a–796b–4b1e–af54–1876697ec53b.pdf)
29. 國家災害防救科技中心 2011 　〈莫拉克颱風社會衝擊與復原調查（第一期）〉，2020年3月4日，取自https://easy2do.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/easy2do/images/ncdr/socialsurvey/NCDR99T03.pdf (National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction, 2011, “Social Impacts and Recovery Survey of Typhoon Morakot,” Retrieved March 4, 2020, from https://easy2do.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/easy2do/images/ncdr/socialsurvey/NCDR99T03.pdf)
30. 裴家騏, Jai-chyi(2015)。臺灣原住民族的傳統於野生動物管理之應用—以西魯凱族為例。原住民族文獻，23，11-17。
31. 蔡友月, Yu-yueh(2009).達悟族的精神失序：現代性、變遷與受苦的社會根源.臺北=Taipei:聯經=Linking Publishing.
32. 鄭瑋寧, Wei-ning(2019).關係的心：資本主義過程中的魯凱人觀、情感與家的社群性.臺北=Taipei:中央研究院民族學研究所=Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.
33. 鄭瑋寧, Wei-ning(2019)。「權力」、情緒與分歧的未來：當代Taromak魯凱人的政治社群性。政治的消融與萌生：新自由主義國家的治理效應，新北市=New Taipei City:
34. 蕭鄉唯 2020 　〈當田野工作成為一段神話：建構共同的過去〉，《芭樂人類學》。2020年2月19日，取自https://guavanthropology.tw/article/6779 (Hsiao, Hsiang-wei, 2020, “When Fieldwork Becomes a Part of Myth: The Construction of the Common Past,” Guavanthropology. Retrieved February 19, 2020, from https://guavanthropology.tw/article/6779)