政治爭議與公共理性自由主義的方案

Political Disagreements and a Proposal of Public Reason Liberalism

許漢(Hahn Hsu)

公共理性 ； 價值多元的事實 ； 公共善 ； 自由民主的政治文化與公共認同的傳統信念 ； 公民品德 ； public reason ； fact of value pluralism ； public good ； political culture and publicly accepted traditional heritages of a liberal democracy ； civic virtues

人文及社會科學集刊

33卷3期（2021 / 09 / 01）

529 - 565

繁體中文

本文提出一個公共理性自由主義的觀念，是基於羅爾斯的政治自由主義所提出的一些修改，包括公共理性的內容、其理論地位以及方法論面的一些想法：一、公共理性所規範的政治議題是廣的；二、公共理性是一般政治道德原則，不只是政治價值或理想，是實質的，不只是程序規範；三、公共理性的內容包括公共善以及政治終極目的；四、公共理性的觀念與適用假設了社會有一定的自由民主的政治文化：五、公共理性自由主義在方法論上放棄羅爾斯抽離的原初處境，公共理性的方法是脈絡化、植根在一個自由民主社會中的政治文化及公共認同的傳統文化中的信念。

This paper proposes an idea of public reason liberalism, based on some revisions of Rawls's political liberalism, which will include the following: 1) the scope of public reason is broader than Rawls's; 2) the idea of public reason is to function as a general principle of liberal political morality, not just as a political value or a political ideal, not just providing procedural regulations but also being substantive; 3) the content of public reason includes public goods and the political final end; and 4) the idea of public reason applies only for a society with a liberal democratic culture; 5) regarding the methodology of theorizing, public reason liberalism rejects Rawls's idea of original position, and instead adopts as its method the principle of public reason, which is contextualized and embedded in the political culture and publicly accepted traditional heritages of a liberal democracy.

1. 林火旺, Huo-wang(2004)。公共理性的功能及其限制。政治與社會哲學評論，8，47-77。
   連結：
2. 許漢, Hahn(2009)。容忍之困難與可能的解決之道。政治與社會哲學評論，28，1-48。
   連結：
3. 曾國祥, Roy(2004)。自由主義與政治的侷限。政治與社會哲學評論，8，79-120。
   連結：
4. 顏厥安, Chueh-an(2004)。公共理性與法律論理。政治與社會哲學評論，8，1-46。
   連結：
5. Brower, Bruce(1994).The Limits of Public Reason.The Journal of Philosophy,91(1),5-26.
6. Chan、 Joseph(2000).Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism.Philosophy & Public Affairs,29(1),5-42.
7. Darwall, Stephen(1998).Philosophical Ethics.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
8. Enoch, David(2015).Against Public Reason.Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy,Oxford:
9. Forst, Rainer(2017).Toleration.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
10. Gaus, Gerald,Courtland, Shane D.,Schmidtz, David(2018).Liberalism.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
11. Heyd, David(ed.)(1996).Toleration: An Elusive Virtue.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
12. Hobbes, Thomas,Tuck, Richard(ed.)(1991).Leviathan.Cambridge:Cambridge University press.
13. Horton, John(2003).Rawls, Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification.Contemporary Political Theory,2(1),5-23.
14. Larmore, Charles(1990).Political Liberalism.Political Theory,18(3),339-360.
15. Larmore, Charles(1996).The Morals of Modernity.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
16. Popper, Karl(2013).The Open Society and Its Enemies.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
17. Quong, Jonathan(2018).Public Reason.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
18. Quong, Jonathan(2011).Liberalism without Perfection.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
19. Rawls, John(1999).The Law of Peoples.John Rawls: Collected Papers,Cambridge, MA:
20. Rawls, John(1999).A Theory of Justice.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
21. Rawls, John(2005).Political Liberalism.New York:Columbia University Press.
22. Rawls, John(1999).The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.John Rawls: Collected Papers,Cambridge, MA:
23. Rawls, John(1999).Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.John Rawls: Collected Papers,Cambridge, MA:
24. Raz, Joseph(1998).Disagreement in Politics.The American Journal of Jurisprudence,43,25-52.
25. Reidy, David(2000).Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough.Res Publica,6(1),49-72.
26. Richardson, Henry S.(ed.),Williams, Melissa S.(ed.)(2009).Moral Universalism and Pluralism: NOMOS XLIX.New York:New York University Press.
27. Sandel, Michael(1998).Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
28. Scanlon, T. M.(2003).The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
29. Steven Wall, (ed.)(2015).The Cambridge Companion to Liberalism.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
30. Walzer, Michael(1997).On Toleration.New Haven:Yale University Press.
31. Weithman, Paul(2010).Why Political Liberalism: On John Rawls’s Political Turn.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
32. 周保松, Po Chung(2015).自由人的平等政治.香港=Hong Kong:香港中文大學出版社=The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
33. 陳宜中, I-chung(2001)。羅爾斯與政治哲學的實際任務。政治科學論叢，14，47-74。