题名

轉型法院與法治主義:論最高行政法院對違法行政命令審查的積極趨勢

并列篇名

Transitional Court and the Rule of Law: On Judicial Activism of the Supreme Administrative Court in Reviewing Administrative Rules

DOI

10.6350/JSSP.200212.0515

作者

葉俊榮(Jiunn-Rong Yeh);張文貞(Wen-Chen Chang)

关键词

轉型 ; 法院 ; 法治主義 ; 司法積極主義 ; 憲法政治 ; 權力分立 ; 行政法院 ; 行政命令 ; 司法審查 ; Transition ; court ; rule of law ; judicial activism ; constitutional politics ; separation of powers ; administrative court ; administrative rule ; judicial review

期刊名称

人文及社會科學集刊

卷期/出版年月

14卷4期(2002 / 12 / 01)

页次

515 - 559

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

行政訴訟法於民國八十七年底大幅修正,行政法院的組織也於翌年初重新調整。面臨轉型的行政法院,是否因此一制度變革而產生判決取向的變更?而此一變更是否對司法院大法官的釋憲機能產生影響?基於行政命令的審查涉及法治主義的落實與權力部門間的互動與制衡,本文選擇以最高行政法院對行政命令的審查為研究對象,利用判決電子化之便,跳脫傳統的指標判決評釋方法,對行政法院判決進行量化分析以掌握判決趨勢。 本文發現,最高行政法院於改制之後,對行政命令的審查與拒絕適用明顯轉趨積極。在轉型脈絡中,法院展現「司法積極主義」,不僅合乎國內外先例,也能適時建立法院的威望,值得肯定,惟行政法院所顯露的司法積極主義,卻帶有強烈「形式法治主義」色彩。行政法院應擺脫形式法治主義,從實質理念與程序溝通著眼,強化判決的訊息釋放功能,真正擔負起司法監督行政、保障人民權益的功能。

英文摘要

The Law of Administrative Litigation Procedure was revised substantially in the end of 1998 and as a result, the Administrative Court was reorganized in the spring of the next year. It is therefore intriguing whether and how the Administrative Court has responded to such a profound institutional change with its court decisions and styles of legal reasoning, and whether such reorientation of the Administrative Court has affected the judicial review function of the Grand Justices of the Judicial Yuan. This Article discusses the Supreme Administrative Court's review of administrative rules, as it is concerned with constitutional principles of the rule of law and checks and balances of governmental branches. With the electronic database created by the Judicial Yuan, the authors employ an empirical method, instead of the traditional leading case approach, to analyze the changing patterns of court decisions. This Article finds that after the reorganization, the Supreme Administrative Court (the Court) has become both active in reviewing administrative rules and straightforward in rejecting unlawful rules in individual cases. In a transitional context, a court's display of judicial activism not only is consistent with similar experiences exhibited by other courts, at home and abroad, but also can enhance greatly the institutional respect of a court. Judicial activism shown by the Court, however, has been colored with legal formalism. The authors suggest that the Court may leave behind legal formalism and shift the focus to substantive rights and procedural concerns. By strengthening the message-sending function of court decisions, the Court may actually play an active role in the protection of human rights and the supervision of administration.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 葉俊榮 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong(2002)。從「轉型法院」到「常態法院」:論大法官釋字第二六一號與第四九九號解釋的解釋風格與轉型脈絡。國立臺灣大學法學論叢 National Taiwan University Law Journal,31(2)
    連結:
  2. 葉俊榮 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong(1999)。從國家發展與憲法變遷論大法官的釋憲機能:一九四九年至一九九八年 Function of Constitutional Interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices in the Context of National Development and Constitutional Change: 1949-1998。國立臺灣大學法學論叢 National Taiwan University Law Journal,28(2)
    連結:
  3. (1991).Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective.
  4. Ackerman, Bruce(1991).We the People: Foundations.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  5. Amar, Akhil Reed(1999).Intratextualism.Harvard Law Review,112
  6. Bickel, Alexander M.(1986).The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics.New Haven, Conn.:Yale University Press.
  7. Brzezinski, Mark F., Garlicki, Leszek(1995).Judicial Review in Post-Communist Poland: The Emergence of a Rechtsstaat?.Stanford Journal of International Law,31
  8. Calabresi, Steven G.(1998).Textualism and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty.George Washington Law Review,66
  9. Clark, David S.(1975).Judicial Protection of the Constitution in Latin America.Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly,2
  10. Dworkin, Ronald(1981).The Forum of Principle.New York Law Review,56
  11. Dyzenhaus, David(1999).Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order.Hart Publishing.
  12. Easterbrook, Frank H.(1998).Textualism and the Dead Hand.George Washington Law Review,66
  13. Ely, John Hart(1980).Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  14. Farer, Tom(1995).Consolidating Democracy in Latin America: Law, Legal Institutions and Constitutional Structure.American University Journal of Law and Policy,10
  15. Fisher, Louis(1988).Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretations as Political Process.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  16. Habermas, Juergen(1998).Between Facts and Norms.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
  17. Harel, Alon(1999).Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order.Hart Publishing.
  18. Hartwig, Matthias(1992).The Institutionalization of the Rule of Law: The Establishment of Constitutional Courts in the Eastern European Countries.American Journal of International Law and Policy,450
  19. Hirschl, Ran(2000).The Political Origins of Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization: Lessons from Four Constitutional Revolutions.Law & Social Inquiry,25
  20. Hirschl, Ran(2000).The Structure for Hegemony: Understanding Judicial Empowerment through Constitutionalization in Culturally Divided Polities.Stanford Journal of International Law,36
  21. Jackson, Vicki C., Tushnet, Mark(1999).Comparative Constitutional Law.New York:Foundation Press.
  22. Knight, Jack, Epstein, Lee(1998).Choices Justice Make.
  23. Knight, Jack, Epstein, Lee(1996).On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy.Law & Society Review,30
  24. Kommers, Donald P.(1997).The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany.Durham:Duke University Press.
  25. Krug, Peter(1997).Departure from the Centralized Model: The Russian Supreme Court and Constitutional Control of Legislation.Virginia Journal of International Law,37
  26. Lovell, George I.(2000).That Sick Chicken Won't Hurt: The Limits of A Judicially Enforced Nondelegation Doctrine.Constitutional Commentary,17
  27. MacCormick, Neil(1999).Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order.Hart Publishing.
  28. O''Brien, David M.(2000).Constitutional Law and Politics: Struggles for Power and Governmental Accountability.
  29. Pierce, Jr. Richard J.(1999).Administrative Law and Process.
  30. Rubenfeld, Jed(1998).The Moment and the Millennium.George Washington Law Review,66
  31. Scalia, Antonin(1997).A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law.Princeton University Press.
  32. Sheive, Sarah Wright(1995).Central and Eastern European Constitutional Courts and the Antimajoritarian Objection to Judicial Review.Law & Policy in International Business,26
  33. Shuck, Peter, Elliott, Donald(1990).To the Chevron Station, An Empirical Study of Federal Administrative Law.Duke Law Journal,1990
  34. Strauss, David A.(1998).The New Textualism in Constitutional Law.George Washington Law Review,66
  35. Sypnowich, Christine(1999).Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order.Hart Publishing.
  36. Tate, C. Neal(1994).The Judicialization of Politics in the Philippines and Southeast Asia.International Political Science Review,15
  37. Tate, C. Neal(1993).Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts: A Time Series Analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961-1987.Law & Society Review,27
  38. Teitel, Ruti(1994).Post-Communist Constitutionalism: A Transitional Perspective.Columbia Human Rights Law Review,26
  39. Teitel, Ruti(1997).Transitional Jurisprudence: The Role of Law in Political Transformation.Yale Law Journal,106
  40. Toharia, Jose J.(1975).Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain.Law & Society Review,9
  41. Tushnet, Mark(1996).Federalism and Liberalism.Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law,4
  42. Varga, Csaba(1993).Transformation to Rule of Law from No-law Societal Contexture of the Democratic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe.Connecticut Journal of International Law,8
  43. Wannenmacher, Flex Max(1996).It's Not Enough to Just Say 'No': There's So Much to Judicial Review Than Merely Negating.Berkeley:University of California, Department of Political Science.
  44. Winer, Anthony S.(2000).Why the 'New Non-delegation' May Not Be So New.William Mitchell Law Review,27
  45. 吳庚 Wu, Geng(1996)。行政法之理論與實用。台北:吳庚。
  46. 吳庚 Wu, Geng(2000)。台灣法學會第三十屆年會「新世紀台灣法制之展望」研討會。台北:
  47. 翁岳生 Weng, Yueh-Sheng(1995)。論法官之法規審查權。國立臺灣大學法學論叢 National Taiwan University Law Journal,24(2)
  48. 張文貞 Chang, Wen-Chen(2001).Transition to Democracy, Constitutionalism, and Judicial Activism: Taiwan in Comparative Constitutional Perspective.Yale Law School.
  49. 張文貞 Chang, Wen-Chen(1995)。行政命令訂定程序的改革:多元最適程序原則的提出。國立台灣大學法律研究所。
  50. 許宗力 Hsu, Tzong-Li(1999)。憲法與法治國行政
  51. 許宗力 Hsu, Tzong-Li(1993)。法與國家權利
  52. 葉俊榮 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong(2000)。行政法
  53. 葉俊榮 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong(1996)。司法判決的量化研究:行政法院環保判決的結構分析 Quantative Analysis on Judicial Decisions: A Structural Analysis on。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,26(1)
  54. 葉俊榮 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong(1999)。行政法案例分析與研究方法。台北:三民書局。
  55. 葉俊榮 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong(1994)。行政法院環保判決之研究(二)。行政院國家科學委員會。
  56. 葉俊榮 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong(1993)。行政法院環保判決之研究(一)。行政院國家科學委員會。
  57. 葉俊榮 Yeh, Jiunn-Rong(1996)。司法院大法官附期限憲法解釋的分析 An Analysis of Council of Grand Justices Interpretations Imposing Compliance Deadlines。行政院國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學 Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China Part C: Humanities and Social Sciences,6(1)
  58. 劉軍寧 Liu, Jun-Ning(1994)。第三波:二十世紀末的民主化浪潮 The Third Wave: Democratization in the late Twentieth Century。台北:五南。
被引用次数
  1. 陳英鈐(2014)。確認訴訟與行政規範審查:德國與我國制度發展的比較研究。臺大法學論叢,43(4),1391-1468。
  2. 許禎元(2009)。論教師行政課責的合憲性與適法性。學校行政雙月刊,61,178-195。
  3. 李立如(2008)。司法審查之表述功能與社會變革:以性別平等原則在家庭中的落實為例。臺大法學論叢,37(1),31-78。
  4. 林俞君(2022)。司法審查下的官僚裁量權:從交易成本觀點檢視大法官解釋對違法行政命令修訂的影響。公共行政學報,62,1-41。
  5. 盧彥竹、蒙志成(2015)。重新檢視台灣司法獨立性—民眾支持與制度制衡的實證分析。臺灣民主季刊,12(4),141-88。
  6. 邱瑞朝(2017)。從法治主義談長期照顧行政法制。德明學報,41(2),1-31。
  7. 施能傑(2008)。政府業務終結的分析架構。公共行政學報,28,85-113。
  8. 湯誌龍、孫建行(2009)。高中職教師對教育部公文知覺分析—以兼代課鐘點支給函爲例。人文社會科學研究,3(2),69-90。
  9. 王金壽(2014)。台灣環境運動的法律動員:從三件環境相關判決談起。臺灣政治學刊,18(1),1-72。
  10. 張文貞(2016)。2015 年行政法發展回顧。臺大法學論叢,45(S),1455-1491。
  11. (2005)。通姦罪合憲性解釋之評析。台灣本土法學雜誌,77,35-53。
  12. (2008).Democracy-driven Transformation to Regulatory State: The Case of Taiwan.National Taiwan University law review,3(2),31-59.
  13. (2012)。行政命令的抽象司法審查─以法國法為中心。中研院法學期刊,11,129-202。
  14. (2018)。法規命令之具體司法審查與訴訟類型── 評司法院釋字第742號解釋。憲政時代,43(3),45-81。
  15. (2021)。論行政訴訟法上之都市計畫審查。月旦法學雜誌,308,44-61。
  16. (2024)。憲法財產權保障的司法自制與積極。臺大法學論叢,53(1),1-78。