题名

兩稅合一與動態均衡下的所得分配

并列篇名

Corporate Tax Integration and Income Distribution in Dynamic Equilibrium

DOI

10.6277/ter.2002.302.3

作者

江莉莉(Lily Jiang)

关键词

兩稅合一 ; 動態一般均衡 ; 所得分配 ; corporate tax integration ; dynamic general equilibrium ; income distribution

期刊名称

經濟論文叢刊

卷期/出版年月

30卷2期(2002 / 06 / 01)

页次

205 - 227

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文於一個所得分配內生形成的動態一般均衡模型中,探討營利事業所得稅與綜合所得稅整合的重分配效果。模型中經濟個體的時間偏好互異,所累積的資本量因而各不相同,形成一特定的所帶分配型態。在此架構下,本研究分析兩稅合一引發要素價格變動後,各經濟個體的儲蓄行為之調整,進而比較新舊二個所得分配型態的差異。利用模擬分析,本研究發現,兩稅合一降低分配不均程度,且整合程度愈高,分配均等化的效果愈大。在經濟效率方面,股利減除或扣抵的部份整合,長可連成Pareto改善;至於完全整合下,須視企業保留盈餘的比例與二稅 稅率的差距而定。此外,從總體經濟變數與不均度指標值的動態調整 過程發現,兩稅部份整合在提升經濟效率與分配均等化的效果上是不分軒輊的。

英文摘要

This paper investigates the distribution effects of integrating corporate and personal income taxes in a dynamic general equilibrium model characterized by endogenous formation of income distribution. Given inherent heterogeneity in economic agents' rates of time preference, a unique distribution of income naturally emerges. In this setting, the study analyzes agents' reaction to integration and makes comparisons of income inequalities between the original steady state and the new one. Simulation results suggest that tax integration cuts down income inequality and the equalization effect is positively correlated with the degree of integration. AI; to the efficiency effect, partial integration is shown to be a Pareto improvement, whereas, full integration may generate efficiency gains or asses, depending on the ratio of earnings retained and the difference between the two tax rates. Finally, the transitional dynamics show that partial integration is effective with respect to both inequality and aggregate variables.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Auerbach, A. L., Kotlikoff, L. J.(1987).Dynamic Fiscal Policy.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  2. Fullerton, D., King, A., Shoven, J., Whalley, J.(1981).Corporate tax integration in the United States: a general equilibrium approach.American Economic Review,71
  3. Fullerton, D., Rogers, D. L.(1993).Who Bears the Lifetime Tax Burden?.Washington, D. C.:Brookings Institution.
  4. King, R. G., Plosser, C. I., Rebelo, S. T.(1988).Production, Growth and Business Cycles: I. The Basic Neoclassical Model.Journal of Monetary Economics,21
  5. Pereira, A.(1993).A dynamic general equilibrium analysis of corporate tax integration.Journal of Policy Modeling,15(1)
  6. Sarte, Pierre-Daniel G.(1997).Progressive taxation and income inequality in dynamic competitive equilibrium.Journal of Public Economics,66
  7. Young, H. P.(1990).Progressive taxation and equal sacrifice.American Economic Review,80
被引用次数
  1. 陳聽安、陳國樑(2015)。二十一世紀我國所得稅制度的建構—營利事業所得稅部分。社會科學論叢,9(1),95-188。
  2. 吳世英(2012)。租稅、企業組織型態和效率損失。經濟論文叢刊,40(1),37-71。
  3. (2008)。取消「軍教免稅」政策之財政、福利與經濟互動效果。財稅研究,40(1),175-196。
  4. (2023)。兩稅合一與分配不均。臺灣銀行季刊,74(4),33-52。
  5. (2024)。稅制與所得分配不均-兩稅合一的準實驗。經濟論文叢刊,52(2),155-195。