题名

不同世代下之教育報酬與能力差異

并列篇名

A Cohort Analysis of Returns to Education with Heterogeneous Ability: The Case of Taiwan

DOI

10.6277/ter.2011.391.3

作者

莊奕琦(Yih-Chyi Chuang);賴偉文(Wei-Wen Lai)

关键词

個人能力異質性 ; 世代效果 ; 教育報酬 ; 強化效果 ; 彌補效果 ; heterogeneous ability ; cohort effect ; returns to education

期刊名称

經濟論文叢刊

卷期/出版年月

39卷1期(2011 / 03 / 01)

页次

81 - 113

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文採用1978年至2004年的行政院主計處「人力運用調查」原始資料,依據不同年群資料分析不同工資條件分配下的邊際教育報酬率。估計結果支持個人能力的異質性將反應在工資分配上,因此傳統以OLS模型估計的平均教育報酬率並不適當,且個人能力的異質住在較年輕世代中最爲明顯。本文亦發現在較年長的世代,教育投資對個人能力呈現強化效果(strengthened effect),即接受教育的結果能強化個人的能力;而較年輕的世代,教育對個人能力則呈現彌補效果(supplementary effect),即教育可補個人能力之不足,且愈年輕的世代,其教育對個人能力的彌補性也愈強。

英文摘要

Using cohort data generated from time series of cross section data from Tai-wan's Manpower Utilization Survey from the period 1978-2004, this paper adopts the Quantile Regression method to estimate heterogeneous rates of return to education conditional on different wage distributions. Estimation results support the heterogeneous-ability hypothesis for wage distribution and cast doubt on the average rate of return to education calculated by the traditional OLS estimation method. The results show that heterogeneity is strongest within the young cohorts; education and ability are complements in the older cohorts and are substitutes in the younger cohorts. This implies that the younger the cohort is and the stronger the complementary effect will be between education and ability, and thus education may reinforce individuals' heterogeneity.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 吳慧瑛(2003)。二十年來教育發展之經濟評估,1978-2001。台灣經濟預測與政策,33,97-130。
    連結:
  2. 莊奕琦、賴偉文(2008)。影響教育成就的因素及九年國民義務教育政策效果評析:台灣質證。人文及社會科學集刊,20(1),25-65。
    連結:
  3. 陳建良、管中閔(2006)。台灣工資函數與工資性別歧視的分量迴歸分析。經濟論文,34(4),435-468。
    連結:
  4. 鄭保志(2004)。工資流動性與終身不均度的年群分析。經濟論文叢刊,32(3),369-393。
    連結:
  5. 鄭保志(2004)。教育擴張與工資不均度:台灣男性全職受雇者之年群分析。經濟論文叢刊,32(2),233-265。
    連結:
  6. Ashenfelter, O.(ed.), Card, D.(ed.)(1999).Handbook of Labor Economic.Amsterdam:Elsevier.
  7. Ashenfelter, O.,Rouse, C.(1998).Income, schooling and ability: Evidence from a new sample of identica l twins.Quarterly Journal of Economics,113(1),253-284.
  8. Blackburn, M. L.,Neumark, D.(1993).Omitted-ability bias and the increase in the return to schooling.Journal of Labor Economics,11(3),521-544.
  9. Bound, J.,Jaeger, D. A.,Baker, R.(1995).Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak.Journal of the American Statistical Association,90,443-450.
  10. Brunello, G.,Ford, M.,Weber, G.(2009).Changes in compulsory schooling, education and the distribution of wage in Europe.Economic Journal,119,516-539.
  11. Buchinsky, M.(1998).The dynamics of changes in the female wage distribution in the USA: A quantile regression approach.Journal of Applied Econometrics,13,1-30.
  12. Buchinsky, M.(1994).Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963-1987: Application of quantile regression.Econometrica,62,405-458.
  13. Card, D.,Lemieux, T.(2001).Can falling supply explain the rising return to college for younger men? A cohort-based analysis.Quarterly Journal of Economics,116(2),705-746.
  14. Chu, C. Y.,Xie, Y.,Yu, R. R.(2005).Effects of sibship Structure revisited: Evidence from intra-family resource transfer in Taiwan.2005 Conference on Panel Study of Family Dynamics
  15. Chu, C.Y.,Tsay, R. S.,Yu, R. R.(2005).Intergenerational transmission of sex-specific differential treatments: The allocation of education resources among siblings.2005 Conference on Panel Study of Family Dynamics
  16. Chuang, Y. C.,Chao, C. Y.(2001).Educational choice, wage determination, and rates of return to education in Taiwan.lnternational Advances in Economic Research,7,479-504.
  17. De Fraja, G.(2002).The design of optimal education policies.Review of Economics Studies,69,437-466.
  18. Deaton, A. S.,Paxon, C. H.(1994).Saving, growth and aging in Tawan.Studies in the Economics of Aging,Chicago:
  19. Denny, K.,O'' Sullivan, V.(2007).Can education compensate for low ability? Evidence from British data.Applied Economics Letters,14,657-660.
  20. Duflo, E.(2001).Schooling and labor market consequences of schooling in Indonesia: Evidence from an unusual policy experiment.American Economic Review,91(4),795-813.
  21. Eide, E.,Showalter, M. H.(1998).The effect of school quality on student performance: A quantile regression approach.Economics Letters,58,345-350.
  22. Garcia, J.,Hernandez, P.,L''opez-Nicolas, A.(2001).How wide is the gap? An investigation of gender wage difference using quantile regression.Empirical Economics,26,149-167.
  23. Gindling, T. H.,Goldfarb, M.,Chang, C. C.(1995).Changing return to education in Taiwan.World Development,23(2),343-356.
  24. Griliches, z.(1977).Estimating the return to schooling: Some econometric problems.Econometrica,45(1),1-22.
  25. Harmon, C.,Walker, 1.(1995).Estimates of the economic return to schooling for the UK.American Economic Review,85,1279- 1286.
  26. Hartog, J.,Pereira, P. T.,Vieira, J. A.(2001).Changing return to education in Portugal during the 1980s and early 1990s: OLS and quantile regression estimarors.Applied Economics,33(8),1021-1037.
  27. Heckman, J. J.(1979).Sample selection bias as a specification error.Econometrica,47(1),153-161.
  28. Heckman, J. J.,Vytlacil, E.(1999).Local instrumental variable and latent variable models fo identifying and bounding treatment effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,96,4730-4734.
  29. Jappelli, T.(1999).The age-wealth profile and the life-cycle hypothesis: A cohorr analysis with a time series of cross-sections of Italian households.Review of Income tlnd Wealth,45(1),57-75.
  30. Juhn, C.,Kevin, M. M.,Brooks, P.(1993).Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill.Journal of Political Economy,101(3),410-442.
  31. Koenker, R.(2005).Quantile Regression.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  32. Koenker, R.,Bassett, G. J.(1978).Regression quantiles.Econometrica,46,33-50.
  33. Koenker, R.,Hallock, K. F.(2001).Quantile regression.Journal of Economic Perspectives,15,143-156.
  34. Machado, J.,Mata, J.(2005).Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression.Journal of Applied Economics,20,445-465.
  35. Mincer, J.(1974).Schooling, Experience and Earning.New York:Columbia University Press.
  36. Mincer, J.,Polachek, S.(1974).Family investmenrs in human capital: Earnings of women.Journal of Political Economy,82,76-108.
  37. Mwabu, T.,Schultz, T. P.(1996).Education return across quantiles of the wage function: Alternative explanation for education by South Africa.American Economic Review,86(2),335-339.
  38. Parish, W.,Willis, R. J.(1993).Daughters, education, and family budgets: Taiwan experiences.Journal of Human Resources,28(4),863-898.
  39. Pereira, Pedro,Silva-Martins, Pedro(2002).Is there a return-risk relationship in education?.Economics Letters,75(2),31-37.
  40. Polachek, S.(1981).Occupational self-selection: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structure.Review of Economics and Statistics,63(1),60-69.
  41. Psacharopoulos, G.(1985).Rerurn to education: A further inrernational update and implications.Journal of Human Resources,20(4),583-604.
  42. Staiger, D.,Stock, J. H.(1997).Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments.Econometrica,65(3),557-586.
  43. Trostel, P.,Walker, I.,Woolley, P.(2002).Estimates of the economic return to schooling for 28 countries.Labour Economics,9(1),1-16.
  44. Willis, R. J.(1986).Wage determinants: A survey and reinterpretation of the human capital earning function.Handbook of Labor Economics,Amsterdam:
  45. 吳慧瑛(1996)。家庭勞動供給的跨期分析。人口、就業與福利,台北:
  46. 張宏基、朱敬一(1996)。用Pseudo Panel Dara 估計台灣男性跨期勞動替代彈性。經濟論文叢刊,24(3),313-337。
  47. 符碧真(1996)。教育投資報酬率長期變化之剖析一以我國發展個案為例。教育研究資訊,4,82-99。
  48. 陳建良(2002)。手足組成、出生序與教育年數─以台灣家庭為對象的實證分析。第六屆經濟發展學術研討會論文,台北:
  49. 黃台心(2000)。我國已婚婦女勞動供給的生命循環分析。經濟論文叢刊,28(1),1-24。
被引用次数
  1. 林柏聿(2016)。學測級分對薪資之影響:以「台灣教育長期追蹤資料」為例。淡江大學產業經濟學系碩士班學位論文。2016。1-86。