题名

能源稅、所得稅與雙重紅利效果

并列篇名

Energy Taxes, Income Taxes and Double Dividend Effects

DOI

10.6277/ter.2012.404.2

作者

曹添旺(Tien-Wang Tsaur);吳家瑋(Chia-Wei Wu);陳顗文(I-Wen Chen)

关键词

能源稅 ; 所得稅 ; 雙重紅利效果 ; 英倫式小型開放經濟 ; energy taxes ; income taxes ; double dividend effects ; british small open economy model

期刊名称

經濟論文叢刊

卷期/出版年月

40卷4期(2012 / 12 / 01)

页次

461 - 480

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文建構一個英倫式小型開放經濟模型(British small open economy model,此一經濟「小」到不能左右進口能源的價格; 卻「大」到足以影響出口最終財的價格),探討課徵能源稅對實質匯率、所得稅率、勞動就業及能源進口量的影響。根據相關變數之比較靜態分析,研究提升就業之雙重紅利效果的要件。分析發現: 家計單位的消費邊際效用彈性、原先的能源和勞動相對份額、污染佔能源使用量的比例、勞動供給彈性與國外對本國出口品之需求彈性的相對大小,是課徵能源稅能否產生雙重紅利效果的關鍵。基於關鍵參數是來自:消費者的「主觀心態」、一國景氣榮枯、租稅結構及生產技術發展程度; 故當局在考慮藉由課徵能源稅產生雙重紅利效果時,必須注意本國產品特性、民眾消費習慣、財政收支、經濟景氣以及本國與外國的生產技術相對發展程度等條件。

英文摘要

This paper develops a ”British” small open economy (i.e., this kind of economy is too small to affect the world price of its imports but large enough to affect the price of its exports of final goods) to investigate the effects of an energy tax on real exchange rates, income tax rates, the employment of labor, and the imports of energy. Based on the comparative static analysis of these relevant variables, the conditions for obtaining an employment double dividend are derived. This study shows that the relative magnitude among the households' elasticity of marginal utility to consumption, the initial relative share of labor and energy inputs, the proportion of pollution outputs to energy inputs, the elasticity of labor supply, and the elasticity of export demand are the critical determinants of whether there may be a double dividend effect. The results imply that the consumer's subjective attitude, the structure of the tax, the status of the current economy, and the relative degree of domestic economic development compared to abroad should be considered when the government attempts to achieve a double dividend through the imposition of an energy tax.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 經濟部能源局 (2010),《能源統計年報》,台北:經濟部能源局。(Energy Statistical Annual Reports (2010), Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs, R.O.C.
  2. Samuelson, P. A. (1947), Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Bayindir-Upmann, T. and Raith, M. G. (1997), "Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A drawback for a revenue-neutral tax reform", University of Bielefeld, Institure of Mathematical Economics working paper, no. 274.
  4. Depew, B. and Sørensen, T. A. (2012), "The elasticity of labor supply to the firm over the business cycle", IZA Discussion Paper, no. 5928.
  5. Benati, L.(2000).Some empirical evidence on the discourage worker effect.Economics Letters,70,387-395.
  6. Blanchard, O. J.,Fischer, S.(1989).Lectures on Macroeconomics.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  7. Bosello, F.,Carraro, C.,Galeotti, M.(2001).The double dividend issue: Modelling strategies and empirical findings.Environment and Development Economics,6,9-45.
  8. Bovenberg, A. L.(1998).Environmental taxes and the double dividend.Empirica,25,15-35.
  9. Bovenberg, A. L.,de Mooij, R. A.(1994).Environmental levies and distortionary taxation.American Economic Review,94,1085-1089.
  10. Bovenberg, A. L.,Goulder, L. H.(1996).Optimal environment taxation in the presence of other taxes: General-equilibrium analysis.American Economic Review,86,985-1000.
  11. Bovenberg, A. L.,Van der Ploeg, F.(1998).Green policies and public finance in a small open economy.Scandinavian Journal of Economics,100,593-610.
  12. Bovenberg, A. L.,Van der Ploeg, F.(1994).Environmental policy, public finance, and the labour market in a second best world.Journal of Public Economics,55,349-390.
  13. Brunello, G.(1996).Labour market institutions and the double dividend hypothesis.Environmental Fiscal Reform and Unemployment,Dordrecht, Netherlands:
  14. Bye, B.(2000).Environmental tax reform and producer foresight: An intertemporal computable general equilibrium analysis.Journal of Policy Modeling,22,719-752.
  15. Carraro, C.(Ed.),Siniscalco, D.(Ed.)(1997).New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  16. Carraro, C.,Galeotti, M.,Gallo, M.(1996).Environmental taxation and unemployment: Some evidence on the double dividend hypothesis in Europe.Journal of Public Economics,62,148-182.
  17. Carraro, C.,Soubeyran, A.(1996).Environmental taxation and employment in a multi-sector general equilibrium model.Environmental Fiscal Reform and Unemployment,Dordrecht, Netherlands:
  18. Chen, C. N.,Tsaur, T. W.(1983).Currency substitution and foreign inflation.Quarterly Journal of Economics,98,177-184.
  19. Chen, C. N.,Tsaur, T. W.,Liu, S. C.(1989).Foreign inflation, currency substitution, and terms-of-trade dynamics.Journal of Political Economy,97,955-964.
  20. Chen, S. K.(2000).Endogenous real exchange rate fluctuations in an optimizing open economy model.Journal of International Money and Finance,19,185-205.
  21. Conrad, K.,Löschel, A.(2005).Recycling of eco-taxes, labor market effects and the true cost of labor-A CGE analysis.Journal of Applied Economics,8,259-278.
  22. Deroubaix, J. F.,Lévègue, F.(2006).The rise and fall of French ecological tax reform: Social acceptability versus political feasibility in the energy tax implementation process.Energy Policy,24,940-949.
  23. Dornbusch, R.(1976).Expectations and exchange rate dynamics.Journal of Political Economy,84,1161-1176.
  24. Goulder, H. L.(1995).Effect of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: An intertemporal general equilibrium analysis.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,29,271-297.
  25. Imbs, J.,Mèjean, I.(2010).,Directotate General Economic and Monetary Affairs , European Commission.
  26. Kahn, J. R.,Farmer, A.(1999).The double dividend, second-best worlds, and real-world environmental policy.Ecological Economics,30,433-439.
  27. Kiuila, O.,Sleszynski, J.(2003).Expected effects of the ecological tax reform for the Polish economy.Ecological Economics,46,103-120.
  28. Koskela, E.,Schöb, R.(1999).Alleviating unemployment: The case for green tax reforms.European Economic Review,43,1723-1746.
  29. Kumbaroğlu, G. S.(2003).Environmental taxation and economic effects: A computable general equilibrium analysis for Turkey.Journal of Policy Modeling,25,795-810.
  30. Kuper, G. H.(1996).The effects of energy taxes on productivity and employment: The case of the Netherlands.Resource and Energy Economics,18,137-159.
  31. Lee, D. R.,Misiolek, W. S.(1986).Substituting pollution taxation for general taxation: Some implications for efficiency in pollution taxation.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,13,338-347.
  32. Long, C.(1953).Impact of effective demand on the labor supply.American Economic Review,43,458-467.
  33. Oates, W. E.(1993).Pollution charges as a source of public revenues.Economic Progress and Environmental Concerns,Berlin:
  34. Parry, I. W. H.(1995).Pollution taxes and revenue recycling.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,29,64-77.
  35. Parry, I. W. H.,Brento, A. M.(2000).Tax deductions, environmental policy, and the 'double dividend' hypothesis.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,39,67-96.
  36. Pearce, D. W.(1991).The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming.Economic Journal,101,938-948.
  37. Repetto, R.,Dower, R. C.,Jenkins, R.,Geoghegan, J.(1992).Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy.Washington D. C.:World Resoure Institute.
  38. Richter, W. F.,Schneider, K.(2003).Energy taxation: Reasons for discriminating in favor of the production sector.European Economic Review,47,461-476.
  39. Roson, R.(2003).Climate change policies and tax recycling schemes: Simulations with a dynamic general equilibrium model of the Italian economy.Review of Urban and regional Development Studies,15,26-44.
  40. Terkla, D.(1984).The efficiency value of effluent tax revenue.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,11,107-123.
  41. Tonn, B.,Peretz, J. H.(2007).State-level benefits of energy efficiency.Energy Policy,35,3665-3674.
  42. Tullock, G.(1967).Excess benefit.Water Resources Research,3,643-644.
  43. Welsch, H.,Viola, E.(2004).Environmental fiscal reform in Germany: A computable general equilibrium analysis.Environmental Economics and Policy Studies,6,197-219.
被引用次数
  1. (2016)。能源環境稅對總體經濟與電力需求之影響。臺灣能源期刊,3(2),203-216。