题名

Technology Licensing and Entry in Vertically-Related Markets

并列篇名

垂直相關市場的技術授權與進入

DOI

10.6277/ter.2013.411.1

作者

陳金盛(Chin-Sheng Chen);黃鴻(Hong Hwang);施姵全(Pei-Cyuan Shih)

关键词

最適授權 ; 廠商進入 ; 中間財市場 ; optimal licensing ; entry ; intermediate good markets

期刊名称

經濟論文叢刊

卷期/出版年月

41卷1期(2013 / 03 / 01)

页次

9 - 26

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

本文探討在垂直相關市場下產業內技術授權廠商的最適授權決策。此一授權廠商生產並出售一中間財貨給予下游廠商,且可採用單位權利金(royalty licensing)或固定權利金(fixed-fee licensing)的方式將其技術授權給另一家上游的競爭廠商。本文發現技術授權廠商的最適授權方式可能為固定權利金;藉此下游的潛在廠商較可能進入最終財市場並提高中間財的衍伸性需求。此外,即使這兩種授權方式皆導致下游的潛在廠商進入市場,固定權利金仍可能優於單位權利金。其原因在於:當採用單位權利金的方式來授權時,技術授權廠商必須降低單位權利金來使下游的潛在廠商進入市場,而導致其利潤下降。

英文摘要

This paper investigates the optimal licensing strategy of an insider licensor, which produces and sells an intermediate good in a vertically related market. The licensor can adopt either fixed-fee or royalty licensing. It is found that the licensor firm may prefer fixed-fee to royalty licensing as the former is more likely to induce downstream entry which expands the derived demand. Moreover, even if downstream entry takes place under both regimes, fixed-fee licensing could still be superior to royalty licensing, because the licensor, in order to make room for the entry, cannot enjoy the full cost advantage under royalty licensing.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Anand, B. N.,Khanna, T.(2000).The structure of licensing contracts.Journal of Industrial Economics,48,103-135.
  2. Antelo, M.,Bru, L.(2006).The welfare effects of upstream mergers in the presence of downstream entry barriers.International Economic Review,47,1269-1294.
  3. Arya, A.,Mittendorf, B.(2006).Enhancing vertical efficiency through horizontal licensing.Journal of Regulatory Economics,29,333-342.
  4. Fosfuri, A.,Roca, E.(2004).Optimal licensing strategy: Royalty or fixed-fee?.International Journal of Business and Economics,3,13-19.
  5. Grindley, P. C.,Teece, D. J.(1997).Managing intellectual capital: Licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics.California Management Review,39,8-41.
  6. Kamien, M. I.,Tauman, Y.(2002).Patent licensing: The inside story.The Manchester School,70,7-15.
  7. Macho-Stadler, I.,Martínez-Giralt, X.,Pérez-Castrillo, J. D.(1996).The role of information in licensing contract design.Research Policy,25,43-57.
  8. Mukherjee, A.(2010).Licensing a new product: Fee vs. royalty licensing with unionized labor market.Labour Economics,17,735-742.
  9. Mukherjee, A.,Pennings, E.(2011).Unionization structure, licensing and innovation.International Journal of Industrial Organization,29,232-241.
  10. Mukherjee, A.,Ray, A.(2007).Strategic outsourcing and R&D in a vertical structure.The Manchester School,75,297-310.
  11. Nadiri, M. I.(1993).NBER Working Paper, No. 4423NBER Working Paper, No. 4423,未出版
  12. Nelson, R. R.(Ed.)(1962).The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity: Economic and Social Factors.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  13. Poddar, S.,Sinha, U. B.(2010).Patent licensing from a high-cost firm to a low-cost firm.Economic Record,86,384-395.
  14. Song, J.,Kim, J.(2001).Strategic reaction of vertically integrated firms to downstream entry: Deterrence or accommodation.Journal of Regulatory Economics,19,183-199.
  15. Wang, X. H.(2002).Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated Cournot duopoly.Journal of Economics and Business,54,253-266.
  16. Wang, X. H.(1998).Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model.Economics Letters,60,55-62.
被引用次数
  1. Wang, Ping(2013).Introduction Professor Chao-cheng Mai: A True Scholar We Admire.經濟論文叢刊,41(1),1-8.