题名

寡占廠商的內生管理授權決策

并列篇名

Endogenous Delegation Decisions in an Oligopoly Model

DOI

10.6277/TER.2015.431.2

作者

孫嘉宏(Chia-Hung Sun);林瑞益(Ruey-Yih Lin)

关键词

內生管理授權 ; 均衡 ; 數量競爭 ; endogenous delegation ; Stackelberg solution ; quantity competition

期刊名称

經濟論文叢刊

卷期/出版年月

43卷1期(2015 / 03 / 01)

页次

53 - 88

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究建立「管理授權—誘因契約—數量競爭」的三階段賽局模型,研究在一般化廠商家數下,市場均衡時之管理授權型態。廠商擁有者在賽局第一階段同時決定是否要聘雇專業經理人,而決定要聘雇專業經理人的廠商擁有者,在賽局第二階段,同時決定授權給經理人經營之誘因契約,在賽局第三階段,廠商擁有者與專業經理人,依其個別目標同時決定其個別產量。在線性的需求與對稱的成本函數之下,若市場上存在3家以上的廠商,當聘僱經理人的成本較高、市場規模較小,或是生產成本較高時,所有廠商都「不聘雇經理人」;當聘僱經理人的成本較低、市場規模較大,或是生產成本較低時,所有廠商都「聘雇經理人」;當聘僱經理人的成本、市場規模,或是生產成本適中時,部份廠商「聘雇經理人」,而其餘廠商「不聘雇經理人」,在特定條件之下,此混合授權型態中,聘僱經理人廠商的均衡數量與利潤,如同Stackelberg模型的數量領導者,而不聘僱經理人廠商的均衡數量與利潤,如同Stackelberg模型的數量跟隨者。

英文摘要

This study investigates a three-stage game of delegation choice, incentive contract choice, and subsequent quantity choice with a general number of firms. Profit-maximizing owners of firms choose whether to delegate or not to delegate in the first stage, and those firms that choose to delegate decide their incentive contract in the second stage. In the third stage, the owners or managers compete in quantity according to their respective objectives. With linear demand functions and symmetric cost functions, we show that if there are more than three firms in the market and the cost of hiring a manager and production costs are relatively high, or the market size is relatively small, then all firms choose not to delegate. If the costs of hiring a manager and production cost are relatively low, or the market size is relatively large, then all firms choose to delegate. If the cost of hiring a manager, production costs, or the market size is relatively moderate, then some firms choose to delegate, while the others choose not to delegate. In this case, the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium will coincide with the Stackelberg solution.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Amir, Rabah,García, Filomena,Knauff, Malgorzata(2010).Symmetry-Breaking in Two-player Games via Strategic Substitutes and Diagonal Nonconcavity: A Synthesis.Journal of Economic Theory,145,1968-1986.
  2. Baik, Kyung Hwan,Lee, Jong Hwa(2012).Endogenous Timing inContests with Delegation.Economic Inquiry,50,1-12.
  3. Barcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos,Casado-Izaga, F. Javier(2005).Should Share-holders Delegate Location Decisions?.Research in Economics,59,209-222.
  4. Barcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos,Olaizola, Norma(2006).Cost-saving Production Technologies and Strategic Delegation.Australian Economic Papers,45,141-157.
  5. Barros, Fatima(1995).Incentive Schemes as Strategic Variables: An Application to a Mixed Duopoly.International Journal of Industrial Organization,13,373-386.
  6. Basu, Kaushik(1995).Stackelberg Equilibrium in Oligopoly: An Explanation Based on Managerial Incentives.Economics Letters,49,459-464.
  7. Choi, Kangsik,Lu, Yuanzhu(2012).A Note on Endogenous Timing with Strategic Delegation: Unilateral Externality Case.Bulletin of Economic Research,64,253-264.
  8. Fama, Eugene F.,Jensen, Michael C.(1983).Separation of Ownership and Control.Journal of Law and Economics,26,327-349.
  9. Fauli-Oller, Ramon,Motta, Massimo(1996).Managerial Incentives for Takeover.Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,5,497-515.
  10. Fershtman, Chaim,Judd, Kenneth L.(1987).Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly.American Economic Review,77,927-940.
  11. Fumas, Vicente Salas(1992).Relative Performance Evaluation of Management: The Effects on Industrial Competition and Risk Sharing.International Journal of Industrial Organization,10,473-489.
  12. Heywood, John S.,Wang, Zheng(2014).Strategic Delegation under Spatial Price Discrimination.Papers in Regional Science
  13. Heywood, John S.,Ye, Guangliang(2009).Delegation in a Mixed Oligopoly: The Case of Multiple Private Firms.Managerial and Decision Economics,30,71-82.
  14. Jansen, Thijs,van Lier, Arie,van Witteloostuijn, Arjen(2007).A Note on Strategic Delegation: The Market Share Case.International Journal of Industrial Organization,25,531-539.
  15. Jensen, Michael C.,Meckling, William H.(1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior-agency Cost and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial and Economics,3,305-360.
  16. Kopel, Michael,Riegler, Christian(2006).R&D in a Strategic Delegation Game Revisited: A Note.Managerial and Decision Economics,27,605-612.
  17. Kräkel, Matthias,Sliwka, Dirk(2006).Strategic Delegation and Mergers in Oligopolistic Contests.Journal of Economics and Business,58,119-136.
  18. Lambertini, Luca,Trombetta, Marco(2002).Delegation and Firms' Ability to Collude.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,47,359-373.
  19. Matsuyama, Kiminori(2000).Endogenous Inequality.Review of Economic Studies,67,743-759.
  20. Matsuyama, Kiminori(2002).Explaining Diversity: Symmetry-breaking in Complementarity Games.American Economic Review,92,241-246.
  21. Miller, Nolan,Pazgal, Amit(2002).Relative Performance as a Strategic Commitment Mechanism.Managerial and Decision Economics,23,51-68.
  22. Mirrlees, James A.(1976).The Optimal Structure of Incentives and Authority within an Organization.Bell Journal of Economics,7,105-131.
  23. Ritz, Robert A.(2008).Strategic Incentives for Market Share.International Journal of Industrial Organization,26,586-597.
  24. Ross, Stephen A.(1973).The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem.American Economic Review,63,134-139.
  25. Sklivas, Steven D.(1987).The Strategic Choice of Managerial Incentives.RAND Journal of Economics,18,452-458.
  26. Tseng, Mei-Chiun(2002).Managerial Incentives and Heterogeneous Firms.Small Business Economics,18,313-316.
  27. van Witteloostuijn, Arjen,Jansen, Thijs,van Lier, Arie(2007).Bargaining over Managerial Contracts in Delegation Games: Managerial Power,Contract Disclosure and Cartel Behavior.Managerial and Decision Economics,28,897-904.
  28. Vickers, John(1985).Delegation and the Theory of the Firm.Economic Journal,95,138-147.
  29. von Stengel, Bernhard(2010).Follower Payoffs in Symmetric Duopoly Games.Games and Economic Behavior,69,512-516.
  30. White, Mark D(2001).Managerial Incentives and the Decision to Hire Managers in Markets with Public and Private Firms.European Journal of Political Economy,17,877-896.
  31. Zhang, Jianbo,Zhang, Zhentang(1997).R&D in a Strategic Delegation Game.Managerial and Decision Economics,18,391-398.
  32. Ziss, Steffen(2001).Horizontal Mergers and Delegation.International Journal of Industrial Organization,19,471-492.
  33. 李禮仲、鄧哲偉(2003)。公司治理對家族企業的效益。國家政策論壇,92,191-195。
  34. 葉匡時、黃振聰、劉韻僖、彭信衡(1996)。公司上市的原因與上市過程的組織變革。管理評論,15,15-36。