题名

Energy and Carbon Embodied in the Exports of Taiwan: An Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis

并列篇名

台灣出口品之能源及碳隱含量：投入產出結構分解分析

DOI

10.6277/TER.201803_46(1).0001

作者

林師模(Shih-Mo Lin)；張雅棠(Ya-Tang Chang)；林晉勗(Jin-Xu Lin)

关键词

embodied carbon ； input-output ； structural decomposition analysis ； carbon tax ； 碳隱含量 ； 投入產出 ； 結構分解分析 ； 能源稅

期刊名称

經濟論文叢刊

卷期/出版年月

46卷1期（2018 / 03 / 01）

页次

1 - 46

内容语文

英文
中文摘要

This paper computes the energy and carbon intensities of the Taiwanese economy in 1996, 2001 and 2006 to figure out the changes in energy and carbon embodied in products and exports and the contributing factors. We use structural decomposition analysis to find the relative contribution of five factors causing the changes in the energy and carbon embodied in exports. From 1996 to 2001, the changes in the direct energy efficiency, the structure of intermediate inputs and the structure of exports were the most important factors contributing to the changes of energy and carbon embodied in Taiwan's exports. Between 2001 and 2006, the structure of exports has been the most important factor causing the changes. This paper also explores whether energy policy could have effectively reduced the energy and carbon embodied in Taiwan’s exports. Our results show imposing a carbon tax on using fossil fuels would have decreased the carbon embodied in exports only moderately from 1996 to 2001. However, the carbon embodied in exports would have decreased significantly from 2001 to 2006 after taxation, implying that a carbon tax would have been a more effective policy in the latter period.
英文摘要

本文估算台灣1996、2001及2006年出口品的能源及碳隱含量，以衡量能源及碳隱含量的變化情形及其影響因素。文中利用結構分解分析將出口品能源及碳隱含量變化的影響因子區分為五個因子，結果發現在1996至2001年間，能源使用效率、中間財的投入結構，以及出口結構的變化是造成台灣出口品能源及碳隱含量變化的主要因素;而在2001至2006年間則是以出口結構的變化為主要影響因子。此外，本文也同時評估台灣能源政策對減少出口品之能源及碳隱含量的有效性，研究結果顯示，在1996年至2001年間，若對化石能源課徵碳稅僅能微幅降低出口品之能源及碳隱含量，但在2001年至2006年間卻能使出口品之能源及碳隱含量明顯的減少，亦即在2001年至2006年間碳稅政策較前一段期間來得更有效。
主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Liang, Chi-Yuan(2009).The Effect of Energy Tax on Energy Demand and the Economy of Taiwan.Taiwan Economic Forecast and Policy,40,45-78.
    連結：
  2. Yang, Hao-Yen(2009)。Economic Effects of Energy Taxation: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis in the Presence of Parameter Uncertainty。Taiwan Economic Forecast and Policy，40，79-125。
    連結：
  3. IEA (2016), IEA/OECD Key World Energy Statistics, 2016 Edition.
  4. Leontief, Wassily (1936), “Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105-125
  5. Aasness, Jørgen,Bye, Torstein,Mysen, Hans Terje(1996).Welfare Effects of Emission Taxes in Norway.Energy Economics,18,335-346.
  6. Ang, Beng Wah,Liu, Feng Ling(2001).A New Energy Decomposition Method: Perfect in Decomposition and Consistent in Aggregation.Energy,26,537-548.
  7. Baranzini, Andrea,Goldemberg, José,Speck, Stefan(2000).A Future for Carbon Taxes.Ecological Economics,32,395-412.
  8. Bernstein, Mark A.,Griffin, James(2006).Regional Differences in the Price-Elasticity of Demand for Energy.SantaMonica:RAND Corporation.
  9. Bohlin, Folke(1998).The Swedish Carbon Dioxide Tax: Effects on Biofuel Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions.Biomass and Bioenergy,15,283-291.
  10. Bordigoni, Mathieu,Hita, Alain,Le Blanc, Gilles(2012).Role of Embodied Energy in the European Manufacturing Industry: Application to Short-Term Impacts of a Carbon Tax.Energy Policy,43,335-350.
  11. Bullard, Clark W.,Herendeen, Robert A.(1975).The Energy Cost of Goods and Services.Energy Policy,3,268-278.
  12. Bullard, Clark W.,Penner, Peter S.,Pilati, David A.(1978).Net Energy Analysis: Handbook for Combining Process and Input-Output Analysis.Resources and Energy,1,267-313.
  13. Buterbaugh, Kevin(2008).Trade and the Environment.Trade and the Environment,3,571-578.
  14. Casler, Stephen D.,Rose, Adam(1998).Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the US Economy: A StructuralDecomposition Analysis.Environmental and Resource Economics,11,349-363.
  15. Casler, Stephen,Hannon, Bruce(1989).Readjustment Potentials in Industrial Energy Efficiency and Structure.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,17,93-108.
  16. Chang, Ya-Tang(2013).Taoyuan City,Department of International Business, Chung Yuan Christian University.
  17. Chang, Yih-Feng,Lin, Sue-Jane(1998).Structural Decomposition of Industrial CO2 Emission in Taiwan: An Input-Output Approach.Energy Policy,26,5-12.
  18. Chen, Chia-Yon,Rose, Adam(1990).A StructuralDecomposition Analysis of Changes in Energy Demand in Taiwan: 1971-1984.Energy Journal,11,127-146.
  19. Chung, Hyun-Sik(1998).Industrial Structure and Source of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in East Asia: Estimation and Comparison.Energy and Environment,9,509-534.
  20. Chung, Hyun-Sik,Rose, Hae-Chun(2001).A Residual-Free Decomposition of the Sources of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Case of the Korean Industries.Energy,26,15-30.
  21. Dietzenbacher, Erik,Los, Bart(1998).Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity.Economic Systems Research,10,307-323.
  22. Dinh, Hong Linh(2015).Taoyuan City,Chung Yuan Christian University.
  23. Gowdy, John M.,Miller, Jamie L.(1987).Technological and Demand Change in Energy Use: An Input-Output Analysis.Environment and Planning A,19,1387-1398.
  24. Greening, Loran A.,Davis, Willian B.,Schipper, Lee(1998).Decomposition of Aggregate Carbon Intensity for the Manufacturing Sector: Comparison of Declining Trends From 10 OECD Countries for the Period 1971-1991.Energy Economics,20,43-65.
  25. Greening, Lorna A.,Ting, Michael,Krackler, Thomas J.(2001).Effects of Changes in Residential End-Uses and Behavior on Aggregate Carbon Intensity: Comparison of 10 OECD Countries for the Period 1970 Through 1993.Energy Economics,23,153-178.
  26. Harrison, Gleen W.,Kriström, Bengt(1997).General Equilibrium Effects of Increasing Carbon taxes in Sweden.Arbetsrapport,325
  27. Hawdon, David,Pearson, Peter(1995).Input-output simulations of energy, environment, economy interactions in the UK.Energy Economics,17,73-86.
  28. Hoekstra, Rutger,van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J.M.(2002).Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical flows in the Economy.Environmental and Resource Economics,23,357-378.
  29. Houthakker, H. S.,Verleger, Philip K., Jr.,Sheehan, Dennis P.(1974).Dynamic Demand Analyses for Gasoline and Residential Electricity.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,56,412-418.
  30. IEA(2007).Energy Use in the New Millennium: Trends in IEA Countries.Paris:IEA.
  31. IPCC(2007).Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report.Geneva, Switzerland:IPCC.
  32. Kagawa, Shigemi,Inamura, Hajime(2001).A Structural Decomposition of Energy Consumption Based on A Hybrid Rectangular Input-Output Framework: Japan's Case.Economic Systems Research,13,339-363.
  33. Kondo, Yoshinori,Moriguchi, Y.,Shimizu, H.(1998).CO2 Emissions in Japan: Influences of Imports and Exports.Applied Energy,59,163-174.
  34. Lee, Kao-Chao(2005)。Practices of the Input-Output Analysis。Taipei:Council for Economic Planning and Development。
  35. Lenzen, Manfred(1998).Primary Energy and Greenhouse Gases Embodied in Australian final Consumption: An Input-Output Analysis.Energy Policy,26,495-506.
  36. Leontief, Wassily(1970).Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach.Review of Economics and Statistics,52,262-271.
  37. Liang, Qiao-Mei,Fan, Ying,Wei, Yi-Ming(2007).Carbon Taxation Policy in China: How to Protect Energy and Trade-Intensive Sectors?.Journal of Policy Modeling,29,311-333.
  38. Lin, Boqiang,Li, Xuehui(2011).The Effect of Carbon Tax on Per Capita CO2 Emissions.Energy Policy,39,5137-5146.
  39. Liu, Hongtao,Xi, Youmin,Guo, Ju'e,Li, Xia(2010).Energy Embodied in the International Trade of China: An Energy Input-Output Analysis.Energy Policy,38,3957-3964.
  40. Liu, Na,Ang, Beng Wah(2007).Factors Shaping Aggregate Energy Intensity Trend for Industry: Energy Intensity Versus Product Mix.Energy Economics,29,609-635.
  41. Lu, Chuanyi,Tong, Qing,Liu, Xuemei(2010).The Impacts of Carbon tax and Complementary Policies on Chinese Economy.Energy Policy,38,7278-7285.
  42. Machado, Giovani,Schaeffer, Roberto,Worrell, Ernst(2001).Energy and Carbon Embodied in the International Trade of Brazil: An Input-Output Approach.Ecological Economics,39,409-424.
  43. Madlener, Reinhard,Bernstein, Ronald,González, Miguel Ángel Alva(2011).Econometric Estimation of EnergyDemand Elasticities.E.ON Energy Research Center Series,3
  44. Mäenpää, Ilmo,Siikavirta, Hanne(2007).Greenhouse Gases Embodied in the International Trade and Final Consumption of Finland: An Input-Output Analysis.Energy Policy,35,128-143.
  45. Manne, Alan S.,Richels, Richard G.(1990).CO2 Emission Limits: An Economic Cost Analysis for the USA.Energy Journal,11,51-74.
  46. Miller, Ronald E.,Blair, Peter D.(2009).Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  47. Morgenstern, Richard D.,Ho, Mun,Shih, Jhih-Shyang,Zhang, Xuehua(2004).TheNear-TermImpacts of CarbonMitigation Policies on Manufacturing Industries.Energy Policy,32,1825-1841.
  48. Nakata, Toshihiko,Lamont, Alan(2000).Analysis of the Impacts of Carbon Taxes on Energy Systems in Japan.Energy Policy,29,159-166.
  49. Nordhaus, Willian D.(1990).Global Warming: Slowing the Greenhouse Express.Setting National Priorities,192-209.
  50. Nordströmm, Håkan,Vaughan, Scott(1999).Trade and the Environment, Special Studies 4.Geneva:World Trade Organization.
  51. OECD(1997).The Environmental Effects of Freight.Paris:OECD.
  52. Pan, Jiahua,Phillips, Jonathan,Chen, Ying(2008).China's Balance of Emissions Embodied in Trade: Approaches to Measurement and Allocating International Responsibility.Oxford Review of Economic Policy,24,354-376.
  53. Park, Hi-Chun,Heo, Eunnyeong(2007).The Direct and Indirect Household Energy Requirements in the Republic of Korea from 1980 to 2000-An Input-Output Analysis.Energy Policy,35,2839-2851.
  54. Peters, Glen P.,Hertwich, Edgar G.(2006).Pollution Embodied in Trade: The Norwegian Case.Global Environmental Change,16,379-387.
  55. Pløger, Ellen(1984).The Effects of Structural Changes on Danish Energy Consumption.Proceedings of the Fifth IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis) Task Force Meeting on Input-Output Modeling,Berlin:
  56. Rose, Adam,Chen, Chia-Yon(1991).Sources of Change in Energy Use in the US Economy, 1972-1982: A Structural Decomposition Analysis.Resources and Energy,13,1-21.
  57. Rose, Adam,Hertwich, Stephen(1996).Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis: A Critical Appraisal.Economic Systems Research,8,33-62.
  58. Siriwardena, Kanchana,Wijayatunga, Priyantha D. C.,Fernando,W. J. L. S.,Shrestha, Ran M.,Attalage, Rahula A.(2007).EconomyWide Emission Impacts of Carbon and Energy Tax in Electricity Supply Industry: A Case Study on Sri Lanka.Energy Conversion and Management,48,1975-1982.
  59. Symons, Elizabeth,Proops, John,Gay, Philip(1994).Carbon Taxes, ConsumerDemand and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Simulation Analysis for the UK.Fiscal Studies,15,19-43.
  60. United Nations(2012).Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific.Bangkok:UN ESCAP.
  61. Wang, Zhi,Wei, Shang-Jin,Zhu, Kunfu(2013).NBER Working Paper SeriesNBER Working Paper Series,未出版
  62. Whalley, John,Wigle, Randall(1991).Cutting CO2 Emissions: The Effects of Alternative Policy Approaches.Energy Journal,12,109-124.
  63. Wissema,Wiepke,Dellink, Rob(2007).AGE Analysis of the Impact of a Carbon Energy Tax on the Irish Economy.Ecological Economics,61,671-683.
  64. Wood, Richard,Lenzen, Manfred(2009).Structural Path Decomposition.Energy Economics,31,335-341.
  65. Wu, Rong-Hwa,Chen, Chia-Yon(1990).On the Application of Input-Output Analysis to Energy Issues.Energy Economics,12,71-76.
print cancel