题名

經濟學遊戲教學模式的學習成效分析

并列篇名

A Learning Effectiveness Analysis of Game-Based Teaching in Economics

DOI

10.6277/TER.202012_48(4).0004

作者

鄭保志(P. C. Roger Cheng)

关键词

遊戲教學 ; 學習成效 ; 差異中差異法 ; 試題反應理論 ; game-based teaching ; learning effect ; difference-in-differences approach ; item response theory

期刊名称

經濟論文叢刊

卷期/出版年月

48卷4期(2020 / 12 / 01)

页次

573 - 610

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文探討學生在遊戲教學模式下學習經濟學的成效。我們一共招募了22個《經濟學》班級約1,500名學生,分爲實驗組(遊戲教學)與對照組(單向講授),針對相同的主題範圍進行一次前測與兩次後測,藉由比較兩組間前後測的差異來驗證遊戲教學的效果。實證結果顯示,兩組學生的學習投入時間沒有顯著差異,但遊戲教學會讓學生對《經濟學》產生較爲正面的態度。在短期學習成效方面,遊戲教學的優勢主要展現在難度較高的進階試題;而在中長期記憶方面,遊戲教學則是全面一致地有統計上顯著優勢,包括教案未涵蓋到的主題,顯示其正面的外溢效果。

英文摘要

This article examines the effectiveness of game-based teaching on student achievement in a principles of microeconomics course. A total of twenty-two classes (nearly 1,500 students) participated in the study - fourteen of which (the treatment group consisting of 996 students) made use of two classroom games throughout the first half of the semester while the remaining eight classes (the control group consisting of 488 students) used the lecture-oriented approach. On the same range of topics covering markets, welfare, and public-sector policies, all classes jointly implemented one pretest and two post-tests. We find that students in the treatment group exhibited a more positive attitude toward economics, achieved a significantly greater short-term improvement in their understanding of advanced topics, but differed little in hours of study. Furthermore, the use of classroom games increased the mid-term retention of economic knowledge significantly and comprehensively, including a positive spillover effect on concepts not covered in the games.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Ball, Sheryl B.,Eckel, Catherine,Rojas, Christian(2006).Technology Improves Learning in Large Principles of Economics Classes: Using Our WITS.American Economic Review,96(2),442-446.
  2. Becker, William E. (2001), “What Does the Quantitative Research Literature Really Show About Teaching?” Unpublished Paper, Indiana University.
  3. Becker, William E.,Watts, Michael(2001).Teaching Methods in U.S. Undergraduate Economics Courses.Journal of Economic Education,32(3),269-279.
  4. Becker, William E.,Watts, Michael(1996).Chalk and Talk: A National Survey on Teaching Undergraduate Economics.American Economic Review,86(2),448-453.
  5. Colander, David,McGoldrick, KimMarie(2009).The Economics Major as Part of a Liberal Education.American Economic Review,99(2),611-623.
  6. Dickie, Mark(2006).Do Classroom Experiments Increase Learning in Introductory Microeconomics?.Journal of Economic Education,37(3),267-288.
  7. Durham, Yvonne,McKinnon, Thomas,Schulman, Craig(2007).Classroom Experiments: Not Just Fun and Games.Economic Inquiry,45(1),162-178.
  8. Dynan, Karen E.,Rouse, Cecilia Elena(1997).The Underrepresentation of Women in Economics: A Study of Undergraduate Economics Students.Journal of Economic Education,28(4),350-368.
  9. Emerson, Tisha L. N.,English, Linda K.(2016).Classroom Experiments: Is More More?.American Economic Review,106(5),363-367.
  10. Emerson, Tisha L. N.,English, Linda K.(2016).Classroom Experiments: Teaching Specific Topics or Promoting the Economic Way of Thinking.Journal of Economic Education,47(4),288-299.
  11. Emerson, Tisha L. N.,Taylor, Beck A.(2004).Comparing Student Achievement across Experimental and Lecture-Oriented Sections of a Principles of Microeconomics Course.Southern Economic Journal,70(3),672-693.
  12. Feiner, Susan,Roberts, Bruce(1995).Using Alternative Paradigms to Teach about Race and Gender: A Critical Thinking Approach to Introductory Economics.American Economic Review,85(2),367-371.
  13. Ferber, Marianna A.(1995).The Study of Economics: A Feminist Critique.American Economic Review,85(2),357-361.
  14. Frank, Björn(1997).The Impact of Classroom Experiments on the Learning of Economics: An Empirical Investigation.Economic Inquiry,35(4),763-769.
  15. Gremmen, Hans,Potters, Jan(1997).Assessing the Efficacy of Gaming in Economic Education.Journal of Economic Education,28(4),291-303.
  16. Jensen, Elizabeth J.,Owen, Ann L.(2001).Pedagogy, Gender, and Interest in Economics.Journal of Economic Education,32(4),323-343.
  17. Robb, Roberta Edgecombe,Robb, A. Leslie(1999).Gender and the Study of Economics: The Role of Gender of the Instructor.Journal of Economic Education,30(1),3-19.
  18. Watts, Michael,Becker, William E.(2008).A Little More than Chalk and Talk: Results from a Third National Survey of Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Economics Courses.Journal of Economic Education,39(3),273-286.
  19. Watts, Michael,Schaur, Georg(2011).Teaching and Assessment Methods in Undergraduate Economics: A Fourth National Quinquennial Survey.Journal of Economic Education,42(3),294-309.
  20. Yandell, Dirk(1999).Effects of Integration and Classroom Experiments on Student Learning and Satisfaction.Proceedings: Economics and the Classroom Conference,Pocatello, ID:
  21. 余民寧, Min-ning(2009).試題反應理論(IRT)及其應用.台北市=Taipei:心理出版社=Psychological Publishing Co., Ltd..
被引用次数
  1. 趙莉芬(Li-Fen CHAO);吳美玲(Mei-Ling WU);蕭冰如(Ping-Ru HSIAO)(2024)。遊戲化教學運用在護理教育。護理雜誌。71(4)。12-18。