孝道的認同與實踐－以「成年兒子與父母同住決策」為分析對象

Identification and Implementation of Filial Norms: Adult Sons' Decision to Live with Elderly Parents

10.6191/jps.2012.12

魯慧中(Huei-Chung Lu)；鄭保志(P. C. Roger Cheng)

孝道 ； 同住決策 ； 單變數probit模型 ； 部分可觀察資訊之雙變數probit模型 ； filial piety ； co-residence ； univariate probit ； bivariate probit with partial observability

人口學刊

45期（2012 / 12 / 01）

111 - 154

繁體中文

孝道的「認同」和「實踐」分屬於兩種不同的表現層次，前者為「心理」層次，後者則屬於「行為」層次。本研究使用「華人家庭動態資料庫」（Panel Study of Family Dynamics, PSFD）的兩代配對資料，以實證的角度檢視臺灣社會中，親、子兩代對於「婚後同住」以及「奉養父母」之孝道觀念是否存在認同差異，並觀察兩代的孝道認同度是否會深刻影響到兩代同住的實踐。我們發現，子代不論在「同住觀念」或是「奉養觀念」上的認同度均比親代來得高，因此並不支持「傳統孝道觀念逐漸消失」的論點。另一方面，考慮父母在「同住決策」中可能扮演的角色，我們分別應用「單變數probit模型」及「部分可觀察資訊之雙變數probit模型」進行比較分析；估計結果發現，子代對「婚後同住」孝道的認同度確實會影響到其與父母同住的意願。

Identification and implementation of filial piety differ from each other, as the former is a psychological issue and the latter is a behavioral one. This study examines whether a higher level of identification with filial piety concepts by both generations significantly increases the propensity toward coresidence using PSFD (Panel Study of Family Dynamics) data. Considering that elderly parents may participate in the co-residence decision, we adopt not only a conventional univariate probit model but also a bivariate probit model with partial observability to explain the nuclearization of the family structure in modern Taiwan. Our empirical results show that filial piety is not diminishing in Taiwan's society, and that the strength of filial norms has a positive impact on adult sons' propensity to live with their parents.

1. Greene, W. H. 1996. “Marginal Effects in the Bivariate Probit Model.” NYU Working Paper No. EC-96-11. http://archive.nyu.edu/bitstream/2451/26254/2/EC-96-11.pdf (Date visited: October 7, 2010)
2. Chu, C. Y. C. and R. R. Yu. 2004. “Bequeathable Assets, Kinship Pressure, and Visits by Adult Children.” http://psfd.sinica.edu.tw/load/load007.pdf (Date visited: November 30, 2005)
3. Abowd, J. M.,Farber, H. S.(1982).Job Queues and the Union Status of Workers.Industrial and Labor Relations Review,35(3),354-367.
4. Aquilino, W. S.(1990).The Likelihood of Parent-Adult Child Coresidence: Effects of Family Structure and Parental Characteristics.Journal of Marriage and Family,52(2),405-419.
5. Becker, G. S.(1991).A Treatise on the Family.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
6. Bernheim, B. D.,Shleifer, A.,Summers, L. H.(1985).The Strategic Bequest Motive.Journal of Political Economy,93(6),1045-1076.
7. Chang, M. C.(1995).Structural Changes of the Elderly and Its Cultural, Socio-Economics, and Health Implications: The Case of Taiwan.Families, Human Resources and Social Development,Taipei, Taiwan:
8. Chu, C. Y. C.,Yu, R. R.(2001).Bequeathable Assets, Social Networks and Child Visits.International Meeting on Age Structure Transitions and Policy Dynamics: The Allocation of Public and Private Resources Across Generations,Taipei:
9. Cox, D.(1990).Intergenerational Transfers and Liquidity Constraints.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,105(1),187-217.
10. Cox, D.(1987).Motives for Private Income Transfers.Journal of Political Economy,95(3),508-546.
11. Cox, D.,Rank, M. R.(1992).Inter-Vivos Transfers and Intergenerational Exchange.The Review of Economics and Statistics,74(2),305-314.
12. Culter, L. J.,Cho, J.,Yust, B. L.,Franklin, E. M.(1999).Generational Differences in Orientations to Coresidence in Chongju, South Korea.Journal of Family and Economic Issues,20(4),367-386.
13. Greene, W. H.(2000).Econometric Analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
14. Haurin, D. R.,Haurin, R. J.,Garasky, S.(2001).Group Living Decisions as Youths Transition to Adulthood.Journal of Population Economics,14(2),329-349.
15. Hermalin, A. I.(ed.)(2002).The Well-Being of the Elderly in Asia: A Four-Country Comparative Study.Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press.
16. Lee, Y. J.,Parish, W. L.,Willis, R. J.(1994).Sons, Daughters, and Intergenerational Support in Taiwan.American Journal of Sociology,99(4),1010-1041.
17. Lin, I. F.,Goldman, N.,Weinstein, M.,Lin, Y. H.,Gorrindo, T.,Seeman, T.(2003).Gender Differences in Adult Children's Support of Their Parents in Taiwan.Journal of Marriage and Family,65(1),184-200.
18. Logan, J. R.,Bian, F.(1999).Family Values and Coresidence with Married Children in Urban China.Social Forces,77(4),1253-1282.
19. Meng, C. L.,Schmidt, P.(1985).On the Cost of Partial Observability in the Bivariate Probit Model.International Economic Review,26(1),71-85.
20. Poirier, D. J.(1980).Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models.Journal of Econometrics,12(2),209-217.
21. Rosenzweig, M. R.,Wolpin, K. I.(1993).Intergenerational Support and the Life-Cycle Incomes of Young Men and Their Parents: Human Capital Investments, Coresidence, and Intergenerational Financial Transfers.Journal of Labor Economics,11(1),84-112.
22. Sasaki, M.(2002).The Causal Effect of Family Structure on Labor Force Participation Among Japanese Married Women.The Journal of Human Resources,37(2),429-440.
23. Sun, S. H. L.(2008).Not Just a Business Transaction': The Logic and Limits of Grandparental Childcare Assistance in Taiwan.Childhood,15(2),203-224.
24. Takagi, E.,Silverstein, M.(2011).Purchasing Piety? Coresidence of Married Children with Their Older Parents in Japan.Demography,48(4),1559-1579.
25. Thornton, A.(ed.),Lin, H. S.(ed.)(1994).Social Change and the Family in Taiwan.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
26. Thornton, A.(ed.),Lin, H. S.(ed.)(1994).Social Changes and the Family in Taiwan.Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.
27. Won, Y. H.,Lee, G. R.(1999).Living Arrangements of Older Parents in Korea.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,30(2),315-328.
28. Yasuda, T.,Iwai, N.,Yi, C. C.,Xie, G.(2011).Intergenerational Coresidence in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan: Comparative Analyses Based on the East Asian Social Survey 2006.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,42(5),703-722.
29. Yeh, K. H.(2002).Is Living with Elderly Parents Still a Filial Obligation for Chinese People?.Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,3(1),61-84.
30. Yi, C. C.,Lin, J. P.(2009).Types of Relations Between Adult Children and Elderly Parents in Taiwan: Mechanisms Accounting for Various Relational Types.Journal of Comparative Family Studies,40(2),305-324.
31. 行政院主計處(1990)。,臺北:。
32. 徐良熙、林忠正(1984)。家庭結構與社會變遷：中美「單親家庭」之比較。中國社會學刊，8，1-22。
33. 陳肇男、史培爾(1990)。臺灣地區現代化過程對老人居住安排之影響。人口變遷與經濟社會發展研討會，臺北:
34. 楊國樞、葉光輝、黃囇莉(1989)。孝道的社會態度與行為：理論與測量。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，65，171-227。
35. 葉光輝(1997)。年老父母居住安排的心理學研究：孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，83，121-168。
36. 齊力(1990)。臺灣地區近二十年來家戶核心化趨勢的研究。國立臺灣大學社會學刊，20，41-83。
37. 齊力(1992)。社會經濟地位與父子二代間的居住安排：臺灣地區家戶組成變遷影響因素之研究。第二屆中國人的心理與行為科際學術研討會，臺北:
38. 羅紀琼(1987)。近十年來臺灣老人家庭結構變遷的研究。臺灣經濟預測，18(2)，83-107。

1. 蔡明昌,吳瓊洳(2019)。台灣南部地區未成年子女及其父母之子職實踐研究。嘉大教育研究學刊，43，1-31。
2. 郭祐誠(2022)。高房價對跨世代間居住安排之影響。住宅學報，31(1)，63-80。
3. 黃茗稜,王光旭(2023)。臺灣大學生孝道觀念、奉養父母態度與影響因素之研究。社會科學論叢，17(1)，1-54。
4. 劉千嘉(2019)。高齡親代與中壯子代之經濟依附行為探討：親子與家戶的分析。人口學刊，59，89-129。
5. 劉千嘉(2021)。與父母同住的兒「女」們：與父母同住的成年女性的照顧協力分析。人口學刊，62，139-195。
6. 吳瓊洳(2020)。未成年子女與成年子女子職實踐之研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊，22，31-58。
7. 葉光輝,吳志文(2020)。成為老年父母的照顧者：成年子女的孝道信念、代間多重時空框架經驗整合能力及代間照顧者角色認同。中華輔導與諮商學報，59，1-33。
8. 張詠菡(2019)。臺灣青壯年人口的居住轉換序列分析。人口學刊，58，39-87。
9. 張詠菡(2022)。臺灣中高齡人口與子女同住的年齡、時期、世代變化。人口學刊，64，101-155。
10. (2015)。跨國／境照顧圈的形成與隱喻：（東南亞）婚姻移民的照顧與工作。社區發展季刊，149，211-229。