题名

整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究－以歐盟憲法條約與里斯本條約爲例

并列篇名

Integration Theory and Treaty Reform in the EU-The Cases of the Constitutional Treaty and the Treaty of Lisbon

DOI

10.6166/TJPS.46(111-157)

作者

盧倩儀(Chien-Yi Lu)

关键词

歐盟 ； 憲法條約 ； 里斯本條約 ； 制度主義 ； 自由派政府間主義 ； the EU ； Constitutional Treaty ； Lisbon Treaty ； Institutionalism ； Liberal Intergovernmentalism

期刊名称

政治科學論叢

卷期/出版年月

46期（2010 / 12 / 01）

页次

111 - 157

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

二○○一年以來歐洲聯盟諸多歷史發展軸線中，以制憲爲底蘊但以里斯本條約收場的歐盟制度改革發展軸線，不僅整段發展完整屬於二○○一年至二○○九年這個歷史片段，同時亦是最爲清晰可辨並且最具歐洲區域整合里程碑意義的一條歷史軸線。此一歷史發展軸線該用什麼樣的理論來解釋？本文沿襲國際關係理論及區域整合研究中國家中心(state-centered)理論與制度主義對話的思辯輪廓，比較自由派政府間主義與制度主義對二○○一年至二○○九年歐盟制度改革歷史發展之解釋力。文章之理論探討部份首先對於兩大學派之共同點加以描述，按著從「國家是否爲單一行爲者」、「政府間談判是否獨佔性地決定整合結果」、以及「超國家機構有無獨立自主影響力」三個面向切入，剖析兩大學派不相容之處。文章隨後評估兩大學派對於二○○一年至二○○九年歐盟制度改革經過之解釋力，發現制度主義能夠對這段整合歷史提供較理想的解釋，因爲從拉肯到里斯本的歷史發展顯示：會員國並非單一行爲者、整合結果也並非單獨由政府間談判排他性地決定、而超國家機構在這十年的制度改革過程中亦明顯發揮了獨立自主的影響力。
英文摘要

Among the various historic developments that have taken place in the European Union in the past decade, the Constitution-making endeavors and the subsequent reform of the institutions through the Lisbon Treaty are the most prominent. Not only was the time line of the reform process more or less contained within the decade, but the impact of the reform-both in terms of results and processes-is also far-reaching. This article assesses the strengths and weaknesses of different integration theories in explaining this Treaty reform process. Following conventional debates in international relations and EU studies, state-centered liberal intergovernmentalism is pitted against institutionalism. After singling out three main differences between these two theoretical camps, i.e., state as unitary actor, intergovernmental negotiations determining integration results, and role of supranational institutions, the article examines actual developments in the Treaty reform process against both theories. It finds that on all three points, institutionalism provides a more satisfactory explanation than liberal intergovernmentalism.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 黃偉峰(2003)。歐盟政治研究中理論方法之分類與比較。人文及社會科學集刊，15(4)，539-594。
    連結：
  2. 蘇宏達(2010)。從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程。問題與研究，49(2)，1-38。
    連結：
  3. Efler, M. 2003. “A Rollercoaster Ride Towards Democracy." in http://www.democracy-international.org/story.html. Latest update 06 December 2003
  4. Guardian. 2005. “Dutch say ‘davastating no' to EU Constitution." in http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/jun/02/eu.politics. Latest update 03 September 2008
  5. Verhofstadt, G. 2000. A Vision for Europe. Speech to the European Policy Centre (September 21). Brussels, Belgium..
  6. Chirac, J. 2000. Our Europe. Speech to the Bundestag (J une 27). Berlin.
  7. Sawer, P. et al. 2008. EU Relerendum: Brussels in Disarray 0ver Ireland 's Rejection of Lisbon Treaty (The Telegraph 14, June) . Brussels.
  8. Moravcsik, A. 2005b. “ Europe Without Illusions." in http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2005/07 /europewithoutill usions/. Latest update 09 October 2007
  9. Fischer, J. 2000. “ From Confederacy to Federation: Thoughts on the Finality of European lntegration." in http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/OO/joschka_fischer_en.rtf. Latest update 03 November 2010
  10. Schröder, G. and Amato, G. 2000. We Are Serious About the Future of Europe (F.A.A.. 21 September). Brussels.
  11. Palmer, J. & Colleagues. 2003. The Convention on fhe Future of Europe has Lost Its Way (Policy Paper). Brussels: The European PoJicy Centre.
  12. Bosselmann, L. 2003. “History." Democracy International, Citizens initiative. in http://www.democracy-intemational.orgleci-history.html. Latest update 03 December 2003
  13. Ciampi, C. A. 2000. Speech upon reception 01 degree "Honoris Causa (July 6)." University of Leipzig.
  14. Moravcsik, A. 2005" “ Brussels Diary." in http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2005/1 0/7060-brusselsdiary/. Latest update 09 October 2007
  15. Moravcsik, A. 2008b “Don't Know? Vote No!" in http://wwwprospectmagazine.co.uk/2008/07/dontknowvoteno/. Latest update 05 ApriJ 2008
  16. Giscard d'Estaing, V. 2002 “ Introductory Speech to the Convention on the Future of Europe." in http://european-convention.eu.int/docs/speeches/1.pdf. Latest update 03 September 2008.
  17. Vucheva, E. 2005. “ France Says Non to the Constitution." in http://euobserver.coml?sid=9&aid=19189. Latest update 23 December 2006
  18. CSCG.2010. “Presentation." in http://www.act4europe.org/code/en/default.asp. Latest update 03 December 2003
  19. Blair, T. 2000. Speech to the Polish Stock Exchange (October 6). Warsaw.
  20. Ansell, C.(2000).The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe.Governance,13(3),303-333.
  21. Aspinwall, M.,Greenwood, J.(1998).Conceptualizing Collective Action in the European Union: An Introduction.Collective Action in the European Union: Interests and the New Politics of Associability,London:
  22. Baldwin, D. A.(1993).Neorealism and Neoliberlaism: the Contemporary Debate.New York:Columbia University Press.
  23. Beach, D.(2005).The Dynamics of European Integration: Why and When EU Institutions Matter.Basingstoke:Palgrave.
  24. Beach, D.(2007).The European Parliament in the 2000 IGC and the Constitutional Treaty Negotiations: From Loser to Winner.Journal of European Public Policy,14(8),1271-1292.
  25. Beach, D.,Christiansen, T.(2007).Introduction: Political Agency in the Constitutional Politics of the European Union.Journal of European Public Policy,14(8),1163-1166.
  26. Börzel, T.(2010).European Governance: Negotiation and Competition in the Shadow of Hierarchy.Journal of Common Market Studies,48(2),191-219.
  27. Bulmer, S.(ed.),Scott, A.(ed.)(1994).Economic and Political Integration in Europe: Internal Dynamics and Global Context.Oxford:Blackwell.
  28. Caporaso, J.(2003).Integrating Institutions-Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union.Comparative Political Studies,36(1-2),7-40.
  29. Christiansen, T.(ed.)(1999).The Social Construction of Europe.Journal of European Public,6(4),528-544.
  30. Closa, C.(2003).ConWEB No. 1/2003ConWEB No. 1/2003,未出版
  31. Crum, B.(2007).Can the EU Presidency Make Its Mark on Interstate Bargains? The Italian and Irish Presidencies of the 2003-04 IGC.Journal of European Public Policy,14(8),1208-1226.
  32. De Clerck-Sachsse, J.(2007).Talking About a Constitution-the Convention on the Future of Europe and Civil Society in the European Union.EU Governance and EU in the World,Paris:
  33. Dimitrakopoulos, D. G.,Kassim, H.(2004).Deciding the Future of the European Union: Preference Formation and Treaty Reform.Comparative European Politics,2,241-260.
  34. Eilstrup-Sangiovani, M.(2006).Debates on European Integration.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Eriksen, E. O.(2004).Comment on 'Deliberative Constitutional Politics and the EU Value-Based Constitution' by Carlos Closa.Deliberative Constitutional Politics in the EU,Oslo:
  36. European Commission(2010).Official Journal of the European Union,C83(53)
  37. European Commission(2009).,Brussels:European Commission.
  38. Flockhart, T.(2010).Europeanization or EU-ization? The Transfer of European Norms across Time and Space.Journal of Common Market Studies,48(4),787-810.
  39. Garrett, G.,Tsebelis, G.(1999).More Reasons to Resist the Temptation of Power Indices in the EU.Journal of Theoretical Politics,11(3),331-338.
  40. Garrett, G.,Tsebelis, G.(1999).Why Resist the Temptation to Apply Power Indices to the European Union?.Journal of Theoretical Politics,11(3),291-308.
  41. Garrett, G.,Tsebelis, G.(2001).Even More Reasons to Resist the Temptation of Power Indices in the EU.Journal of Theoretical Politics,13(1),99-105.
  42. Granger, M. P.(2005).The Future of Europe: Judicial Interference and Preferences.Comparative European Politics,3,155-179.
  43. Grieco, R.(1988).Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism.International Organization,42,485-507.
  44. Haas, E. B.(1958).The Challenge of Regionalism.International Organization,12(4),440-458.
  45. Haas, E. B.(1964).Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  46. Haas, E. B.(1958).The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950-1957.London:Stevens and Sons.
  47. Haas, E. B.(1968).The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950-1957.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  48. Habermas, J.(1996).Between Facts and Norms-Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law.Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
  49. Hall, P.,Taylor R.(1996).Political Science and the Three New Institutionalism.Political Studies,44(5),936-957.
  50. Hix, S.(2005).Neither a Preference-Outlier nor a Unitary Actor: Institutional Reform Preferences of the European Parliament.Comparative European Politics,3,131-154.
  51. Hoffmann, L.(2002).The Convention on the Future of Europe-Thoughts on the Convention-Model.Jean Monnet Working Paper,11/02
  52. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.(2008).Postcript to the 'The Making of A Polity'.European Union Studies Association Review,21(2),5-8.
  53. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.(1999).Making of A Polity. The Struggle over European Integration.Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism,Cambridge:
  54. Hug, S.,König, T.(2007).Domestic Structures and Constitution Building in an International Organization.Review of International Organizations,2(2),105-113.
  55. Hug, S.,König, T.(2002).In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference.International Organization,56(2),447-476.
  56. Hug, S.,Schulz, T.(2007).Referendums in the EU's Constitution Building Process.Review of International Organizations,2(2),177-218.
  57. Jørgensen, K. E.(ed.)(2006).Handbook of European Union Politics.London:Sage Publications.
  58. Kohler-Koch, B.(1996).Catching up with Change: The Transformation of Governance in the European Union.Journal of European Public Policy,3(3),359-380.
  59. Kohler-Koch, B.(1999).The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance.The Transformation of Governance in the European Union,London:
  60. Kohler-Koch, B.(ed.),Eising, R.(ed.)(1999).The Transformation of Governance in Europe.London:Routledge.
  61. König, T.(2005).Measuring and Analyzing Positions on European Constitution-building.European Union Politics,6(3),259-267.
  62. König, T.(2008).The Treaty Reform of the EU: Constitutional Agenda-Setting, Intergovernmental Bargains and the Presidency's Crisis Management of Ratification Failure.Journal of Common Market Studies,46(2),337-363.
  63. König, T.(ed.),Hug, S.(ed.)(2006).Policymaking Processes and the European Constitution: A Comparative Study of Member States and Accession Countries.London and New York:Routledge.
  64. König, T.,Finke, D.(2007).Reforming the Equilibrium? Veto Players and Policy Change in the European Constitution-building Process.Review of International Organizations,2(2),153-176.
  65. König, T.,Hug, S.(2000).Ratifying Maastricht. Parliamentary Votes on International Treaties and Theoretical Solution Concepts.European Union Politics,1(1),93-124.
  66. König, T.,Slapin, J.(2006).From Unanimity to Consensus-An Analysis of the Negotiations at the EU's Constitutional Convention.World Politics,58,413-445.
  67. König, T.,Slapin, J.(2004).Bringing Parliaments Back In. The Sources of Power in the European Treaty Negotiations.Journal of Theoretical Politics,16,357-394.
  68. Lindberg, L. N.(1963).The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  69. Mattli, W.,Slaughter, A.(2008).From 'Europe Before the Court' to the World Before Courts.EUSA Review,21(2),8-10.
  70. McCormick, J.(2005).Understanding the European Union-A Concise Introduction.London:Palgrave Macmillan Publishing.
  71. Mgnette, P.(2004).When does deliberation matter? Constitutional Rhetoric in the Convention on the Future of Europe.Deliberative Constitutional Politics in the EU,Oslo:
  72. Milner, H.(1997).Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  73. Milton, G.(2005).The European Constitution-Its Origins, Negotiation and Meaning.London:John Harper Publishing.
  74. Moravcsik, A.(1997).Taking Preferences Seriously: a Liberal Theory of International Politics.International Organization,51(4),513-553.
  75. Moravcsik, A.(1998).Choice for Europe-Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  76. Moravcsik, A.(2008).Good-bye to 'Federalist' theory.EUSA Review,21(2),2-5.
  77. Moravcsik, A.(2006).What Can We Learn from the Collapse of the European Constitutional Project?.Politische Vierteljahresschrift,47,219-241.
  78. Moravcsik, A.(2005).The European Constitutional Compromise and the Neofunctionalist Legacy.Journal of European Public Policy,12(2),349-386.
  79. Moravcsik, A.(1993).Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach.Journal of Common Market Studies,31(4),473-524.
  80. Moravcsik, A.(1991).Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.International Organization,45,19-56.
  81. Norheim-Martinsen, P. M.(2010).Beyond Intergovernmentalism: European Security and Defence Policy and the Governance Approach.Journal of Common Market Studies,48(5),1351-1365.
  82. Norman, P.(2005).The Accidental Constitution-The Story of the European Convention.Brussels:Euro Comment.
  83. Nye, J. S.(1966).Pan-Africanism and East African Integration.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  84. Parsons, G.(2008).Revisiting Landmark Contributions to EU Studies.European Union Studies Association Review,21(2),1-2.
  85. Pennings, P.,Arnold, C.(2008).Is Constitutional Politics like Politics 'At Home'? The Case of the EU Constitution.Political Studies,56,789-806.
  86. Pierson, P.(1996).The Path to European Integration-A Historical Institutionalist Analysis.Comparative Political Studies,29,123-163.
  87. Puchala, D.(1999).Institutionalism, Intergovernmentalism and European integration: A Review Article.Journal of Common Market Studies,37(2),317-331.
  88. Putnam, R. D.(1998).Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.International Organization,3,427-460.
  89. Reh, C.(2008).The Convention on the Future of Europe and the Development of Integration Theory: A Lasting Imprint?.Journal of European Public Policy,15(5),781-794.
  90. Risse, T.,Kleine, M.(2007).Assessing the Legitimacy of the EU's Treaty Revision Metho eds..Journal of Common Market Studies,45(1),69-80.
  91. Rosamond, B.(2000).Theories of European Integration.New York:St. Martin's Press.
  92. Ruggie, J.(1975).International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends.International Organization,29(3),557-583.
  93. Sandholtz, W.,Zysman, J.(1989).1992: Recasting the European Bargain.World Politics,42,95-128.
  94. Schelling, T. C.(1960).The Strategy of Conflict.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  95. Schneider, G.,Weitsman, P.(1996).The Punishment Trap-Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests.Comparative Political Studies,28(4),582-607.
  96. Schout, A.,Jordan, A.(2005).Co-ordinated European Governance: Self- Organizing or Centrally Steered?.Public Administration,83(1),201-220.
  97. Smith, D. L.,Ray, J. L.(1993).The 1992 Project.The 1992 Project and the Future of Integration in Europe,New York:
  98. Tsebelis, G.(2002).Veto Players: How Political 1nstitutions Work.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  99. Tsebelis, G.(2006).The European Convention and the Rome and Brussels IGCs: A Veto Players Analysis.Policy-making Processes and the European Constitution: A Comparative Study in Member States and Accession Countries,London:
  100. Tsebelis, G.(2008).Thinking about the Recent Past and the Future of the EU.Journal of Common Market Studies,46(2),265-292.
  101. Tsebelis, G.,Proksch, S.(2007).The Art of Political Manipulation in the European Convention.Journal of Common Market Studies,45(1),157-186.
  102. Venables, T.(ed.)(2003).Rethinking European Citizenship.Brussels:European Citizen Action Service.
  103. Warleigh-Lack, A.,Rosamond, B.(2010).Across the EU Studies-New Regionalism Frontier: Invitation to a Dialogue.Journal of Common Market Studies,48(4),993-1013.
  104. Wiener, A.(ed.),Diez, T.(ed.)(2004).European Integration Theory.Oxford:Oxford University press.
  105. Wincott, D.(1995).Institutional Interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism.Journal of Common Market Studies,33(4),597-609.
  106. 洪德欽編(2007)。歐盟憲法。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。
  107. 黃偉峰編(2007)。歐洲聯盟的組織與運作。台北:五南圖書。
  108. 藍玉春(2009)。從建構主義探討形塑中的歐洲認同。全球政治評論，25，81-116。
被引用次数
  1. 陳蔚芳(2020)。德國與歐盟共同防務整合：自由政府間主義的分析。政治科學論叢，85，45-90。
  2. 黃琛瑜(2014)。英國與里斯本條約的批准：自由政府間主義的分析。歐美研究，44(2)，127-161。
  3. 賴昀辰(2018)。歐盟整合理論的新發展：後功能主義對傳統整合理論之挑戰。政治科學論叢，78，137-177。
  4. 賴昀辰(2019)。歐洲議題政治化現象之分析。臺灣民主季刊，16(4)，39-92。
  5. 賴昀辰(2021)。歐盟執委會的權限擴張與制衡：超國家主義與政府間主義的競合。遠景基金會季刊，22(4)，101-149。
  6. 張孟仁(2018)。中國大陸「一帶一路」倡議之效應與歐盟因應之道。國際關係學報，46，63-101。
print cancel