歐盟整合理論的新發展：後功能主義對傳統整合理論之挑戰

Recent Developments in Integration Theory: Challenges of Post-Functionalism to Traditional Integration Theories

10.6166/TJPS.201812_(78).0005

賴昀辰(Yun-chen Lai)

歐洲聯盟 ； 整合理論 ； 後功能主義 ； 功能主義 ； 認同 ； EU ； Integration Theory ； Post-functionalism ； Functionalism ； Identity

政治科學論叢

78期（2018 / 12 / 01）

137 - 177

繁體中文

歐洲統合運動自上世紀展開以來，學界針對區域整合提出許多理論，其中最被廣爲討論的爲新功能主義及政府間主義。然而，傳統整合理論在解釋近來限制歐洲統合進程的新政治現象，包括公眾對於歐洲統合運動的關注度上升、國族認同影響歐洲統合運動，以及新型態政治光譜出現等新現象時，面臨頗大困境。後功能主義將「後實證學派」強調之「認同」整合進本屬「實證學派」之功能主義脈絡，具有理論之突破性，因此，後功能主義在觀察歐洲統合進程最新發展及限制上可提供新的視角。本文發現，基於現今公眾對歐洲議題的關注，以及認同在歐洲整合議題扮演的重要性持續上升，後功能主義觀點爲當代歐洲統合研究帶入新變項及新思維。本文亦希望藉由帶入後功能主義觀點，爲國內歐洲研究學界帶來新思考方向。

Since the beginning of the regional integration of Europe in the 1950s, scholars have developed numerous theories to explain European integration. The most discussed theories are neo-functionalism and intergovermentalism. Neo-functionalists state that the spillover effects brought about by successful cooperation causes integration to become enlarged and expanded, while intergovernmentalists argue that the construction of international regimes requires the consent of national states. The debate between neo-functionalism and intergovernmentalism has been mainstream in EU studies. However, traditional integration theories provide poor explanations for the new political phenomenon in Europe. Politicization and identity constrain the development of European integration. To explain the new political phenomenon, Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks proposed a new integration theory, i.e., post-functionalism. Post-functionalism integrates identity, which is the emphasis of post-positivism, into functionalist viewpoints that originated from positivism. Thus, it provides a new perspective for observing European integration.

1. 曾怡仁、張惠玲(2000)。區域整合理論的發展。問題與研究，39(8)，53-71。
   連結：
2. 黃偉峰(2003)。歐盟政治研究中理論方法之分類與比較。人文及社會科學集刊，15(4)，539-594。
   連結：
3. 盧倩儀(1999)。從歐盟移民政策決策過程談自由派政府間主義。問題與研究，38(3)，19-32。
   連結：
4. 盧倩儀(2010)。整合理論與歐盟條約修改之研究─以歐盟憲法條約與里斯本條約為例。政治科學論叢，46，111-157。
   連結：
5. 鍾志明(2010)。歐洲共同體創始階段之歷史制度分析：經濟與安全的權衡。政治科學論叢，46，1-29。
   連結：
6. 藍玉春(2005)。歐盟多層次治理：論點與現象。政治科學論叢，24，49-75。
   連結：
7. 蘇宏達(2010)。從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程。問題與研究，49(2)，1-38。
   連結：
8. Baldwin, R. E.(1995).The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union.European Economic Review,39(3-4),474-481.
9. Baldwin, R. E.,Francois, J. F.,Portes, R.(1997).The Costs and Benefits of Eastern Enlargement: The Impact on the EU and Central Europe.Economic Policy,12(24),125-176.
10. Bickerton, C. J.,Hodson, D.,Puetter, U.(2015).The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era.Journal of Common Market Studies,53(4),703-722.
11. Borriello, A. & A. Crespy. 2017. “The EU Is at a Crossroads between Federalism and Political Disintegration.” in http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/01/19/the-eu-is-at-a-crossroads-between-federalism-and-political-disintegration/. Latest update 2 February 2018.
12. Börzel, T. A.,Risse, T.(2009).Revisiting the Nature of the Beast- Politicization, European Identity, and Postfunctionalism: A Comment on Hooghe and Marks.British Journal of Political Science,39(1),217-220.
13. Boyer, R.(2016).Brexit: The Day of Reckoning for the Neofunctionalist Paradigm of European Union.Socio-Economic Review,14(4),836-849.
14. Brewer, M. B.(1999).The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?.Journal of Social Issues,55(3),429-444.
15. Crouch, Colin(ed.),Streeck, Wolfgang(ed.)(2006).The Diversity of Democracy: Corporatism, Social Order and Political Conflict.Oxfordshire:Edward Elgar.
16. De Vries, C. E.,Edwards, E. E.(2009).Taking Europe to Its Extremes: Extremist Parties and Public Euroscepticism.Party Politics,15(1),5-28.
17. De Wilde, P.(2011).No Polity for Old Politics? A Framework for Analyzing the Politicization of European Integration.Journal of European Integration,33(5),559-575.
18. De Wilde, P.,Trenz, Hans-Jörg(2012).Denouncing European Integration: Euroscepticism as Polity Contestation.European Journal of Social Theory,15(4),537-554.
19. De Wilde, P.,Zürn, M.(2012).Can the Politicization of European Integration Be Reversed?.Journal of Common Market Studies,50(s1),137-153.
20. Deutsch, K. W.,Burrell, S. A.,Kann, R. A.(1957).Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience.Princenton:Princenton University Press.
21. Druckman, D.(1994).Nationalism, Patriotism, and Group Loyalty: A Social Psychological Perspective.Mershon International Studies Review,38(Supplement 1),43-68.
22. Eichenberg, R. C.,Dalton, R. J.(2007).Post-Maastricht Blues: The Transformation of Citizen Support for European Integration, 1973-2004.Acta Politica,42(2-3),128-152.
23. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M.(2006).Debates on European Integration: A Reader.London:Plagrave.
24. European Parliament(2016).Major Changes in European Public Opinion Regarding the European Union.
25. Fligstein, Neil(2008).Euroclash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
26. Green-Pedersen, C.(2007).The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe.Political Studies,55(3),607-628.
27. Haas, E. B.(1958).The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
28. Haas, E. B.(1961).International Integration: The European and the Universal Process.International Organization,15(3),366-392.
29. Hoffmann, S.(1966).Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe.Daedalus,95(3),862-915.
30. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.(2008).European Union?.West European Politics,31(1-2),108-129.
31. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.(2001).Multi-Level Governance and European Integration.Maryland:Rowman & Littlefield.
32. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.(2009).A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.British Journal of Political Science,39(1),1-23.
33. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.(2016).Community, Scale, and Regional Governance: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
34. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.(2018).Re-engaging Grand Theory: European Integration in the 21st Century.EUI RSCAS Working Paper,43
35. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.,Schakel, A. H.,Osterkatz, S. C.,Niedzwiecki, S.,Shair-Rosenfield, S.(2016).Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
36. Hooghe, L.,Marks, G.,Wilson, C. J.(2002).Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?.Comparative Political Studies,35(8),965-989.
37. Hutter, Swen(ed.),Edgar, Grand(ed.),Kriesi, Hanspeter(ed.)(2016).Politicising Europe.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
38. Inglehart, R.(1967).An End to European Integration?.American Political Science Review,61(1),91-105.
39. Inglehart, R.(1970).The New Europeans: Inward or Outward-Looking?.International Organization,24(1),129-139.
40. Jessop, B.(2004).Multilevel Governance and Multilevel Metagovernance. Changes in the EU as Integral Moments in the Transformation and Reorientation of Contemporary Statehood.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
41. Joerges, Christian(ed.),Mény, Yves(ed.),Weiler, J. H. H.(ed.)(2000).What Kind of Constitution for What Kind of Polity.San Domenico Italy:European University Institu.
42. Klor, E. F.,Shayo, M.(2010).Social Identity and Preferences over Redistribution.Journal of Public Economics,94(3-4),269-278.
43. Kreppel, A.,Hix, S.(2003).From 'Grand Coalition' to Left-Right Confrontation: Explaining the Shifting Structure of Party Competition in the European Parliament.Comparative Political Studies,36(1-2),75-96.
44. Kriesi, H.,Grande, E.,Dolezal, M.,Helbling, M.,Höglinger, D.,Hutter, S.,Wüest, B.(2012).Political Conflict in Western Europe.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
45. Kučerová, I.,Nedomlelová, I.(2015).Applying Integration Theories on Development of Cooperation in Central Europe.Proceedings of the 12th International Conference Liberec Economic Forum
46. Lindberg, L.(1963).The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
47. Lindqvist, E.,Östling, R.(2013).Identity and Redistribution.Public Choice,155(3-4),469-491.
48. Majone, G.(1994).The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe.West European Politics,17(3),77-101.
49. Maricut-Akbik, A.(2018).EU Politicization beyond the Euro Crisis: Immigration Crises and the Politicization of Free Movement of People.Comparative European Politics,17(3)
50. Marks, G.,Hooghe, L.,Nelson, M.,Edwards, E.(2006).Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality.Comparative Political Studies,39(2),155-175.
51. Marks, G.,Liesbet, H.,Blank, K.(1996).European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-Level Governance.Journal of Common Market Studies,34(3),341-378.
52. Maurizio, Carbone(ed.)(2010).National Politics and European Integration: From the Constitution to the Lisbon Treaty.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing.
53. Medrano, J. Díez,Gutiérrez, P.(2001).Nested Identities: National and European Identity in Spain.Ethnic and Racial Studies,24(5),753-778.
54. Mette, Sangiovanni(ed.)(2006).Debates on European Union: A Reader.Basingstock:Palgrave.
55. Mitrany, D. 1943. A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Express.
56. Moravcsik, A.(1993).Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach.Journal of Common Market Studies,31(4),473-524.
57. Moravcsik, A.(1995).Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder.Journal of Common Market Studies,33(4),611-628.
58. Pollack, M. A.(2001).International Relations Theory and European Integration.Journal of Common Market Studies,39(2),221-244.
59. Risse, Thomas(2015).A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
60. Roccas, S.,Brewer, M. B.(2002).Social Identity Complexity.Personality and Social Psychology Review,6(2),88-106.
61. Rosamond, B.(2000).Theories of European Integration.London:Macmillan Education.
62. Schimmelfennig, F.(2014).European Integration in the Euro Crisis: The Limits of Postfunctionalism.Journal of European Integration,36(3),321-337.
63. Schmitter, P. C.(2009).On the Way to a Post-Functionalist Theory of European Integration.British Journal of Political Science,39(1),211-215.
64. Schmitter, P. C.,Lefkofridi, Z.(2016).Neo-Functionalism as a Theory of Disintegration.Chinese Political Science Review,1(1),1-29.
65. Sinn, Hans-Werner(2002).EU Enlargement and the Future of the Welfare State.Scottish Journal of Political Economy,49(1),104-115.
66. Statham, P. 2008. “Political Party Contestation over Europe in Public Discourses: Emergent Euroscepticism?” in https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2001-2010/2008/wp08_08.pdf. Latest update 11 Feb 2018.
67. Statham, P.,Trenz, Hans-Jörg(2013).How European Union Politicization Can Emerge through Contestation: The Constitution Case.Journal of Common Market Studies,51(5),965-980.
68. Statham, P.,Trenz, Hans-Jörg(2015).Understanding the Mechanisms of EU Politicization: Lessons from the Eurozone Crisis.Comparative European Politics,13(3),287-306.
69. Tajfel, H.(1970).Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.Scientific American,223(5),96-103.
70. Thomas, Risse(ed.),Richand, Herrmann(ed.),Brewer, Marilynn(ed.)(2004).Identities in Europe and the Institutions of the European Union.Lanham:Rowman and Littlefield.
71. Wolf, P.(1973).International Organization and Attitude Change: A Re-Examination of the Functionalist Approach.International Organization,27(3),347-371.
72. Zürn, M.(2006).Zur Politisierung Der Europäischen Union.Politische Vierteljahresschrift,47(2),242-251.
73. 朱景鵬、Eissel, Dieter(2013)。歐盟治理理論發展與模式特色。公共治理季刊，1(4)，18-33。
74. 蘇宏達編(2011)。歐洲聯盟的歷史發展與理論辯論。臺北=Taipei:國立臺灣大學出版中心=National Taiwan University Press。

1. 卓忠宏(Chung-Hung Cho)(2021)。歐洲治理危機：「利益」與「認同」的落差。歐美研究。51(2)。219-266。