题名

社群媒體時代下政策企業家促進政策變遷之策略研析：臺灣的以核養綠公投為例

并列篇名

Strategies Employed by Policy Entrepreneurs to Promote Policy Change in the Era of Social Media: A Case Study of the ＂Go Green With Nuclear＂ Referendum in Taiwan

DOI

10.6166/TJPS.202003_(83).0003

作者

徐幸瑜(Hsin-yu Hsu)

关键词

政策企業家 ； 政策變遷 ； 公民投票 ； 以核養綠 ； 社群媒體 ； Policy Entrepreneurs ； Policy Change ； ＂Go Green with Nuclear＂ ； Referendum ； Social Media

期刊名称

政治科學論叢

卷期/出版年月

83期（2020 / 03 / 01）

页次

101 - 148

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

政策企業家在政策變遷中的角色與重要性已獲得許多研究證實，但對於社群媒體時代的政策企業家如何推動政策變遷，常採取的策略為何？國內在此方面之研究仍有所不足。本文基於過去相關文獻，加以整理及簡化，建構一個簡潔明瞭的分類架構，將政策企業家常使用的策略分為四類，分別是：概念發展、展示與宣傳、建立聯盟及關係管理。本文以2018年臺灣以核養綠公投案作為研究案例，透過次級資料分析及深度訪談法，描繪政策企業家推動公投採取之策略，藉以檢視本架構之適用性。研究結果顯示，缺乏組織性人力與經費資源支持的公民個體政策企業家，在社群媒體發達的時代中，具有更多元的策略工具選擇，以推動政策改變；而政策企業家採取的策略類型，也確實符合本研究提出的策略架構。
英文摘要

The importance of policy entrepreneurs on policy change has been confirmed by many studies. However, domestic research is insufficient regarding what strategies are adopted by policy entrepreneurs to promote policy change. Based upon related literature and references, this article organizes, simplifies, and constructs a clear and concise scheme to classify the strategies employed by policy entrepreneurs into four categories: idea development, demonstration and marketing, coalition building, and relationship management. Using the ＂Go Green with Nuclear Referendum in 2018＂ as a case study, this article analyzes these local policy entrepreneurs' strategies in Taiwan. Via secondary data analysis and in-depth interviews, this article describes strategies employed by local policy entrepreneurs who successfully promoted the referendum, and it examines the applicability of the above-mentioned scheme. The results show that in this peculiar era of social media, individual policy entrepreneurs without political power and resources can still effectively facilitate policy changes by employing diverse strategies, which are also consistent with the classification scheme proposed in this article.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 方凱弘, Kai-hung,梁綰琪, Wan-chi(2009)。政策為何變遷？以桃園縣開徵地方稅為例。臺灣民主季刊，6(3)，125-167。
    連結：
  2. 王光旭, Guang-xu,熊瑞梅, Ray-may(2014)。運用網絡分析探討政策掮客在政策過程中的角色：以解嚴前後臺中市都市發展為分析案例。調查研究—方法與應用，31，31-88。
    連結：
  3. 李衍儒, Yen-ju,趙永茂, Yung-mau(2016)。公共政策棘手問題界定理論之研究：以我國觀光博弈產業政策與個案為例。行政暨政策學報，62，1-58。
    連結：
  4. 林子倫, Tze-luen(2008)。台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析。公共行政學報，28，153-175。
    連結：
  5. 林水波, Shoei-po,王崇斌, Chung-pin(1998)。政策論述與政策變遷的關聯性—批判取向的分析。台灣政治學刊，3，195-273。
    連結：
  6. 林澤民, Tse-min,蘇彥斌, Yen-pin(2015)。台灣快閃政治—新媒體、政黨與社會運動。臺灣民主季刊，12(2)，123-159。
    連結：
  7. 張世賢, Shih-hsien(2014)。政策企業家之探討。中國行政評論，20，1-18。
    連結：
  8. 陶振超, Chen-chao(2017)。社交媒體的動員力量：網絡機會模式之觀點。新聞學研究，131，49-86。
    連結：
  9. 魯炳炎, Bing-yan(2009)。從多元流程觀點談蘇花高興建決策之議程設定與政策選擇。東吳政治學報，27(4)，171-240。
    連結：
  10. GetUp!. 2020. “GetUp!” in https://www.getup.org.au/. Latest update 30 March 2020.
  11. Avaaz. 2020. “Avaaz.” in https://secure.avaaz.org/page/ct/. Latest update 30 March 2020.
  12. Ackrill, R.,Kay, A.(2011).Multiple Streams in EU Policy-making: the Case of the 2005 Sugar Reform.Journal of European Public Policy,18(1),72-89.
  13. Ackrill, R.,Kay, A.,Zahariadis, N.(2013).Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy.Journal of European Public Policy,20(6),871-887.
  14. Baumgartner, F. R.,Jones, B. D.(1994).Attention, Boundary Effects, and Large-Scale Policy Change in Air Transportation Policy.The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda,Lawrence, KA:
  15. Baumgartner, F. R.,Jones, B. D.(1993).Agendas and Instability in American Politics.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  16. Baumgartner, F. R.,Jones, B. D.(2002).Policy Dynamics.Chicago, Ill.:The University of Chicago Press.
  17. Baumgartner, F. R.,Jones, B. D.(1991).Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems.The Journal of Politics,53(4),1044-1074.
  18. Bennett, W. L.,Segerberg, A.(2012).The Logic of Connective Action.Information, Communication & Society,15(5),739-768.
  19. Brouwer, S.(2015).Policy Entrepreneurs in Water Governance-strategies for Change.Switzerland AG:Springer International Publishing.
  20. Brouwer, S.,Biermann, F.(2011).,未出版
  21. Cairney, P.(2018).Three Habits of Successful Policy Entrepreneurs.Policy & Politics,46(2),199-215.
  22. Chadwick, A.,Dennis, J.(2017).Social Media, Professional Media and Mobilisation in Contemporary Britain: Explaining the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Citizens’ Movement 38 Degrees.Political Studies,65(1),42-60.
  23. Cohen, N.(2012).Policy Entrepreneurs and the Design of Public Policy: Conceptual framework and the Case of the National Health Insurance Law in Israel.Journal of Social Research and Policy,3(1),5-26.
  24. Cohen, N.,Naor, M.(2013).Reducing Dependence on Oil? How Policy Entrepreneurs Utilize the National Security Agenda to Recruit Government Support: The Case of Electric Transportation in Israel.Energy Policy,56,582-590.
  25. David, C. P.(2015).How do Entrepreneurs Make National Security Policy? A CaseSstudy of the G. W. Bush Administration.Entrepreneurship in the Polis: Understanding Political Entrepreneurship,Burlington, VT:
  26. De Bruijn, H.,Ten Heuvelhof, E.(2008).Management in Networks: on Multi-actor Decision Making.London:Routledge.
  27. Dunn, W. N.(1994).Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction.Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice Hall.
  28. Dutton, J. E.,Ashford, S. J.(1993).Selling Issues to Top Management.The Academy of Management Review,18(3),397-428.
  29. Ehrlich, S. D.(2008).The Tariff and the Lobbyist: Political Institutions, Interest Group Politics, and U. S. Trade Policy.International Studies Quarterly,52(2),427-445.
  30. Frisch-Aviram, N.,Cohen., N.,Beeri, I.(2019).Wind (ow) of Change: A Systematic Review of Policy Entrepreneurship Characteristics & Strategies.Policy Studies Journal,0,1-33.
  31. Gerring, J.(2004).What is a Case Study and What is It Good for?.American Political Science Review,98(2),341-354.
  32. Gerring, J.(2007).Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?.Comparative Political Studies,40(3),231-253.
  33. Hajer, M. A.(1995).The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  34. Heimans、 J.,Timms, H.,李芳齡（譯）, Fang-ling(Trans.)(2019).動員之戰：在超連結世代建立、說服、引導群眾,達成最佳效益.臺北=Taipei:天下雜誌=Common Wealth Magazine.
  35. Huitema, D.,Meijerink, S.(2010).,未出版
  36. Imperial, M. T.(2005).Using Collaboration as a Governance Strategy: Lessons from Six Watershed Management Programs.Administration & Society,37(3),281-320.
  37. Karpf, D.(2012).The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  38. Kavada, A.(2012).Engagement, Bonding, and Identity across Multiple Platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace.Medie Kultur,28(52),28-48.
  39. Kingdon, J. W.(1995).Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.New York:Harper Collins College Publishers.
  40. Kingdon, J. W.(1984).Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.Boston:Little, Brown.
  41. Kirzner, I.(1973).Competition and Entrepreneurship.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  42. Klijn, E. H.,Koppenjan, J.(2000).Public Management and Policy Networks: Foundations of a Network Approach to Governance.Public Management,2(2),135-158.
  43. Lewis, E.(1980).Public Entrepreneurship: Toward a Theory of Bureaucratic Power.Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press.
  44. Mackenzie, C.(2004).Policy Entrepreneurship in Australia: A Conceptual Review and Application.Australian Journal of Political Science,39(2),367-386.
  45. Mintrom, M.(2013).Policy Entrepreneurs and Controversial Science: Governing Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Journal of European Public Policy,20,442-457.
  46. Mintrom, M.(1997).Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.American Journal of Political Science,41,738-770.
  47. Mintrom, M.(2000).Policy Entrepreneurs and School Choice.Washington:Georgetown University Press.
  48. Mintrom, M.(1994).Stony Brook, NY,Department of Political Science, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook.
  49. Mintrom, M.,Norman, P.(2009).Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change.Policy Studies Journal,37,649-667.
  50. Mintrom, M.,Vergari, S.(1996).Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change.Policy Studies Journal,24,420-434.
  51. Morris, A.,Staggenborg, S.(2007).Leadership in Social Movements.Blackwell Companion to Social Movements,London:
  52. Newman, A. L.(2008).Building Transnational Civil Liberties: Trans Governmental Entrepreneurs and the European Data Privacy Directive.International Organization,62(1),103-130.
  53. Olson, M.(1965).The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  54. Palmer, J. R.(2015).How do Policy Entrepreneurs Influence Policy Change? Framing and Boundary Work in EU Transport Biofuels Policy.Environmental Politics,24(2),270-287.
  55. Petridou, E.(2018).Entrepreneurship in the Swedish Municipal Polis: the Case of Mer [*] Östersund.Policy Studies,39(1),70-89.
  56. Polsby, N.(1984).Political Innovation in America.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
  57. Rabe, B.(2004).Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Stealth Politics of America Climate Change Policy.Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.
  58. Roberts, N. C.,King, P. J.(1991).Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2,147-175.
  59. Roberts, N.C.(1992).Public Entrepreneurship and Innovation.Review of Policy Research,11(1),55-74.
  60. Sabatier, P. A.(1988).An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein.Policy Sciences,21,129-168.
  61. Sabatier, P. A.(ed.),Jenkins-Smith, H. C.(ed.)(1993).Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach.Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
  62. Schneider, M.,Teske, P.,Mintrom, M.(1995).Public Entrepreneurs: Agents of Change in American Government.Princeton. NJ:Princeton University.
  63. Seawright, J.,Gerring, J.(2008).Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.Political Research Quarterly,61(2),294-308.
  64. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1990).Basic of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory Procedures and Techniques.Thousand Oaksk, CA:Sage.
  65. Verduijn, S.(2015).Setting the Policy Agenda: A Policy Entrepreneurial Perspective on Urban Development in the Netherlands.Entrepreneurship in the Polis: Understanding Political Entrepreneurship,Burlington, VT:
  66. Vromen, A.(2015).Campaign Entrepreneurs in Online Collective Action: GetUp! in Australia.Social Movement Studies,14(2),195-213.
  67. Vromen, A.,Coleman, W.(2013).Online Campaigning Organizations & Storytelling Strategies: Getup! In Australia.Policy and Internet,5(1),76-100.
  68. Weissert, C. S.(1991).Policy Entrepreneurs, Policy Opportunists, & Legislative Effectiveness.American Political Quarterly,19,262-274.
  69. Yin, R. K.(2009).Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
  70. Zahariadis, N.(2004).European Markets and National Regulation: Conflict and Cooperation in British Competition Policy.Journal of Public Policy,24(1),49-73.
  71. 中國時報，2015，〈先想清楚廢核後的問題再行動〉，《中國時報》，3/19，A17 China Times. 2015. “Xian xiang qingchu feihe hou de wenti zai xingdong” [Think about the Problem of the Nuclear Phase-out before You Act]. China Times March 19, sec A17.
  72. 中華民國核能學會，2018，〈「能源大小事鳳馨幫你問明白」網路直播節目〉，中華民國核能學會網址，http://www.chns.org/energy-feng-xin-helps-you-understand，2019/08/12。Chung-Hwa Nuclear Society. 2018. “Nengyuan da xiao shi Fengxin bang ni wen mingbai wanglu zhibo jiemu” [Go Green with Nuclear Online Live Streaming]. in http://www.chns.org/energy-feng-xin-helps-you-understand. Latest update 12 August 2019.
  73. 王寓中，2018，〈以核養綠馬英九、江宜樺挺公投〉，《聯合報》，8/1，3A。Wang, Yu-zhong. 2018. “Yihe yanglu ma ying jiu jiang yi hua ting gongtou” [Ma Ying-Jeou and Jiang Yi-Huah support the "Go Green with Nuclear" Referendum]. United Daily News August 1, sec 3A.
  74. 以核養綠—缺電公民自救會，2018a，以核養綠-缺電公民自救會 Facebook 網頁，https://www.facebook.com/GreenNuclear.vote/，2019/08/12。Go Green with Nuclear― Self-help Group of Power Shortage Citizens. 2018a. “Yihe yanglu quedian gongmin zijiuhui Facebook” [Go Green with Nuclear- Self-help Association of Power Shortage Citizens Facebook]. in https://reurl.cc/9jDzY. Latest update 12 August 2019.
  75. 以核養綠—缺電公民自救會，2018b，〈「以核養綠？以核養綠！」懶人包〉，網頁，https://reurl.cc/9jDzY，2019/08/12。Go Green with Nuclear― Self-help Group of Power Shortage Citizens. 2018b. “Yihe yanglu? yihe yanglu! Lanrenbao” [Go Green with Nuclear for Dummies]. in https://reurl.cc/9jDzY. Latest update 12 August 2019.
  76. 朱冠諭，2018，〈台大醫師書寫 13 萬字挺核四盼出書支持「以核養綠」公投〉，風傳媒網頁，https://www.storm.mg/article/486600?srcid=7777772e73746f726d2e6d675f33386336376166636261356139346633_1564562749，2018/09/05。Chu, Kuan-yu. 2018. “Taida yishi shuxie 13wan zi ting hesi pan chushu zhichi yihe yanglu gongtou” [Doctor of National Taiwan University Hospital Writes 130,000 Characters to Express Support for Constructing the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and Looking Forward to Publishing in Support of the “Go Green with Nuclear” Referendum]. in https://www.storm.mg/article/486600?srcid=7777772e73746f726d2e6d675f33386336376166636261356139346633_1564562749. Latest update 12 August 2019.
  77. 江飛宇，2018，〈「以核養綠」影響國際德國出現「核自豪」運動〉，中時電子報，https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20181025004827-260408?chdtv，2018/10/25/。Jiang, Fei-yu. 2018. “Yihe yanglu yingxiang guoji deguo chuxian he zi hao yundong” [The “Go Green with Nuclear” Referendum Affects Germany to Organize the “Nuclear Pride Fest”]. in https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20181025004827-260408?chdtv. Latest update 12 August 2019.
  78. 自由時報，2014，〈全國能源會議反核擁核爆口角〉，自由時報網頁，https://news. ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/840666，2014/12/21。Liberty Times Net. 2014. “Quan guoneng yuanhui yifan heyonghe baokou jiao” [Anti-nuclear Groups Have Words with Pro-nuclear Groups at the National Energy Conferences]. in https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/840666. Latest update 12 August 2019.
  79. 林淑馨, Shu-hsin(2010).質性研究：理論與實務.臺北=Taipei:巨流=Chuliu Publishers.
  80. 邱瓊玉，2018，〈推「以核養綠」公投藍營議員推公車廣告宣傳〉，聯合報網頁，https://udn.com/news/story/6656/3284123，2018/08/01。Chiu, Chiung-yu. 2018. “Tui yihe yanglu gongtou lanying yiyuan tui gongju guanggao xuanchuan” [Promoting the “Go Green with Nuclear” Referendum KMT City Councilors Publicize by Bus Advertisements]. in https://udn.com/news/story/6656/3284123. Latest update 01 August 2019.
  81. 陳恆鈞, Hen-chin,劉邵祥, Shao-shyang(2007)。由政策選擇觀點談政策變遷。T&D 飛訊，55，1-19。
  82. 陳順孝, Shun-hsiao(2015)。網路公民行動的集體演化—從搶救樂生院、野草莓運動到太陽花運動。我是公民也是媒體：太陽花與新媒體實踐，臺北=Taipei:
  83. 魯炳炎, Bing-yan(2016).公共政策與民主治理—苗栗大埔徵地案的多元流分析.臺北=Taipei:五南出版=Wu-Nan Book Inc.
  84. 魯炳炎, Bing-yan(2010)。政策企業家化解政策衝突之研究。文官制度季刊，2(3)，151-181。
  85. 魯炳炎, Bing-yan(2009)。政策企業家於政策行銷過程的角色扮演。文官制度季刊，1(3)，125-158。
  86. 魯炳炎, Bing-yan(2009)。政策企業家在政策中的重要性：蘇花高速公路興建個案探討。地方治理發展策略，臺北=Taipei:
  87. 蘇偉業, Bennis Wai yip(2009)。再論政策行銷：陷阱、民主政治與政府再造工程。公共治理與地方事務III，新竹=Hsinchu:
  88. 蘇偉業, Bennis Wai-yip(2007)。政策行銷：理論重構與實踐。中國行政評論，16(1)，1-34。
被引用次数
  1. (2023)。環境法案如何進入政策議程？如何獲得立法通過？《溫室氣體減量及管理法》的個案分析（2006～2015）。政治學報，76，111-144。
print cancel