题名

族群政策的歷史起源：20世紀初泰國和菲律賓對南部穆斯林的政策比較

并列篇名

The Historical Origin of Ethnic Policy: A Comparative Study of Thailand's and the Philippines' Policies toward Southern Muslims in the Early 20th Century

DOI

10.6166/TJPS.202012_(86).0003

作者

曹航(Hang Cao)

关键词

族群政策 ； 國族建構 ； 同化 ； 容留 ； 殖民大國 ； Ethnic Policy ； Nation-Building ； Assimilation ； Accommodation ； Colonial Power

期刊名称

政治科學論叢

卷期/出版年月

86期（2020 / 12 / 01）

页次

83 - 149

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

在20世紀初啟動國族建構事業之時，泰國和菲律賓為何會採取不同的政策對待各自南疆的穆斯林少數族群？本文透過考察一個關鍵但未獲重視的外部因素──現代國家形成過程中民族菁英與殖民大國的關係──對上述問題作了回答。作者認為民族菁英與殖民大國的關係是對抗性的還是共謀性的，這會深刻地影響中央政權對少數族群的政策。基於泰國和菲律賓的比較研究，作者揭示了將這一外部因素與國內族群政策聯結起來的兩種機制，即塑造菁英的政治自主性及其戰略取向。具體而言，泰國對其南部馬來穆斯林的同化政策（1910～1944年）起源於該國與英、法兩個殖民大國的長期對抗關係，因為這種關係造成了泰族菁英較高的自主性和安全化的戰略取向。相比之下，菲律賓對其南部摩洛穆斯林的容留政策（1921～1941年）則根植於該國與美國殖民勢力的共謀關係，而這種關係發揮作用正是通過限制菲律賓菁英的自主性和塑造其經濟化的戰略取向。上述案例比較展示了民族菁英與外部殖民大國的互動關係為何及如何影響了國內族群政策的起源，將增進學界對東南亞地區國族建構實踐的理解，同時也有助於我們認清第二次世界大戰後該地區族際關係和族群衝突的動態。
英文摘要

Why did Thailand and the Philippines adopt different policies toward their domestic Muslim minorities in southern border areas during the early 20th century? This paper addresses the above question by focusing on a critical but underappreciated external factor: the national elites' relationship with colonial powers in the process of modern state formation. I argue that whether the national elites develop an antagonistic or a collaborationist relationship with colonial powers has a great effect on government policies toward ethnic minorities. Elites' political autonomy and their strategic orientation, as two mechanisms connecting this external factor to domestic ethnic policy, are identified in this comparative case study of Thailand and the Philippines. Thailand's assimilationist policy toward Malay Muslims (1910-1944) originated in its antagonistic relationship with Britain and France since the 1880s, because it contributed to a high degree of Thai elite autonomy and to the elites' serious security concerns on nation-building. By contrast, the Philippines' accommodationist policy toward Moro Muslims (1921-1941) resulted from its collaborationist relationship with the American colonial power, and such a relationship took effect by limiting the autonomy of Philippine elites and shaping their economic concerns on nation-building. This controlled comparison shows why and how an external factor contributes to the origin of domestic ethnic policy. It deepens our understanding of nation-building practices in Southeast Asia, as well as the dynamics of inter-ethnic relations and ethnic conflict in this region after World War II.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. Abaton Muslim, M.(1990).Manoa, HI.,Department of Political Science, University of Hawai‘i.
  2. Abinales, P. N.(1997).Ithaca, NY,Department of Government, Cornell University.
  3. Abinales, P. N.(2010).Orthodoxy and History in the Muslim-Mindanao Narrative.Quezon City:Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  4. Abinales, P. N.(2000).Making Mindanao: Cotabato and Davao in the Formation of the Philippine Nation-State.Quezon City:Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  5. Abueva, José V.(ed.)(1998).The Making of the Filipino Nation and Republic: From Barangays, Tribes, Sultanates, and Conlony.Quezon City:University of the Philippines Press.
  6. Abuza, Z.(2009).Conspiracy of Silence: The Insurgency in Southern Thailand.Washington:United States Institute of Peace Press.
  7. Adamides, C.(2020).Securitization and Desecuritization Processes in Protracted Conflicts: The Case of Cyprus.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Agoncillo, T. A.(1990).History of the Filipino People.Quezon City:Garotech Publishing.
  9. Ahmad Idris, W. B. A.(1995).Tradition and Cultural Background of the Patani Region.Regions and National Integration in Thailand, 1892-1992,Wiesbaden:
  10. Amoroso, D. J.(2003).Inheriting the ‘Moro Problem’: Muslim Authority and Colonial Rule in British Malaya and the Philippines.The American Colonial State in the Philippines: Global Perspectives,Durham:
  11. Anderson, B. R. O’G.(1983).Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.London:Verso Books.
  12. Anderson, B. R. O’G.(1998).The Spectre of Comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia, and the World.London:Verso Books.
  13. Angeles, V. SM.(1987).Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Political Science, Temple University.
  14. Aslan, S.(2013).Negotiating National Identity: Berber Activism and the Moroccan State.The Everyday Life of the State: A State-in-Society Approach,Seattle, WA:
  15. Aslan, S.(2015).Nation-Building in Turkey and Morocco: Governing Kurdish and Berber Dissent.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  16. Barmé, S.(1993).Luang Wichit Wathakan and the Creation of a Thai Identity.Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  17. Barrington, Lowell W.(ed.)(2006).After Independence: Making and Protecting the Nation in Postcolonial and Postcommunist States.Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
  18. Bateman, D. A.(2018).Disenfranchising Democracy: Constructing the Electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  19. Batson, B. A.(1984).The End of the Absolute Monarchy in Siam.Singapore:Oxford University Press.
  20. Battye, N. A.(1974).Ithaca, NY,Department of History, Cornell University.
  21. Bendix, R.(1964).Nation-Building and Citizenship: Studies of Our Changing Social Order.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Berger, S.(ed.),Fetzer, T.(ed.)(2019).Nationalism and the Economy: Explorations into a Neglected Relationship.Budapest:Central European University Press.
  23. Berry, W. D.,Fording, R. C.(1997).Measuring State Tax Capacity and Effort.Social Science Quarterly,78(1),158-166.
  24. Bizumic, B.,Duckitt, J.(2012).What Is and Is Not Ethnocentrism? A Conceptual Analysis and Political Implications.Political Psychology,33(6),887-909.
  25. Booth, A. E.(2007).Colonial Legacies: Economic and Social Development in East and Southeast Asia.Honolulu:University of Hawai‘i Press.
  26. Bourbeau, P.(2011).The Securitization of Migration: A Study of Movement and Order.New York:Routledge.
  27. Bradley, F. R.(2015).Forging Islamic Power and Place: The Legacy of Shaykh Dā’ūd bin ‘Abd Allāh al-Faṭānī in Mecca and Southeast Asia.Honolulu:University of Hawai‘i Press.
  28. Brand, L. A.(2014).Official Stories: Politics and National Narratives in Egypt and Algeria.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  29. Brands, H. W.(1992).Bound to Empire: The United States and the Philippines.New York:Oxford University Press.
  30. Breuilly, J.(1993).Nationalism and the State.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
  31. Brook, T.(ed.),Schmid, A.(ed.)(2000).Nation Work: Asian Elites and National Identities.Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
  32. Butt, A. I.(2017).Secession and Security: Explaining State Strategy against Separatists.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  33. Buzan, B.,Wæver, O.,de Wilde, J.(1998).Security: A New Framework for Analysis.Boulder:Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  34. Byman, D. L.(2002).Keeping the Peace: Lasting Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  35. Çalışkan, K.,Callon, M.(2009).Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy towards Processes of Economization.Economy and Society,38(3),369-398.
  36. Chaiwat, S.(2012).When Autonomy Is Not an Option? Governing Violence in Southern Thailand.Autonomy and Ethnic Conflict in South and South-East Asia,New York:
  37. Chaiwat, S.(ed.)(2009).Imagined Land? State and Southern Violence in Thailand.Tokyo:Research Institute for Language and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
  38. Che Man, W. K.(1990).Muslim Separatism: The Moros of Southern Philippines and the Malays of Southern Thailand.Singapore:Oxford University Press.
  39. Cheah, B. K.(2004).Malaysia: The Making of a Nation.Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  40. Chong, Ja Ian(2012).External Intervention and the Politics of State Formation: China, Indonesia, and Thailand, 1893-1952.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  41. Choudhry, Sujit(ed.)(2008).Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation?.New York:Oxford University Press.
  42. Coakley, J.(1992).The Resolution of Ethnic Conflict: Towards a Typology.International Political Science Review,13(4),343-358.
  43. Coggins, B.(2014).Power Politics and State Formation in the Twentieth Century: The Dynamics of Recognition.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  44. Collier, R. B.(1999).Paths toward Democracy: Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  45. Cornish, A.(1997).Whose Place Is This? Malay Rubber Producers and Thai Government Officials in Yala.Bangkok:White Lotus Press.
  46. Cullinane, M.(2003).Ilustrado Politics: Filipino Elite Response to American Rule, 1898-1908.Quezon City:Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  47. Day, T.(2002).Fluid Iron: State Formation in Southeast Asia.Honolulu:University of Hawaiʻi Press.
  48. Denk, T.,Lehtinen, S.(2019).State-Formation and Democratization: A New Classifcation.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  49. Dogan, M.(ed.),Higley, J.(ed.)(1998).Elites, Crises, and the Origins of Regimes.Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  50. Dubus, A.,Polkla, S. R.(2011).Policies of the Thai State towards the Malay Muslim South (1978-2010).Bangkok:The Research Institute on Contemporary Southeast Asia.
  51. Duncan, Christopher R.(ed.)(2008).Civilizing the Margins: Southeast Asian Government Policies for the Development of Minorities.Singapore:NUS Press.
  52. Dunham-Scott, D. L.(2012).Santa Monica, CA.,Pardee Rand Graduate School.
  53. Enloe, C. H.(1977).Internal Colonialism, Federalism and Alternative State Development Strategies.Publius,7(4),145-160.
  54. Evans, P. B.(ed.),Rueschemeyer, D.(ed.),Skocpol, T.(ed.)(1985).Bringing the State Back In.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  55. Friend, T.(1965).Between Two Empires: The Ordeal of the Philippines, 1929-1946.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  56. Garfias, F.(2018).Elite Competition and State Capacity Development: Theory and Evidence from Post-Revolutionary Mexico.American Political Science Review,112(2),339-357.
  57. Geertz, Clifford(ed.)(1963).Old Societies and New States: The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa.New York:Free Press of Glencoe.
  58. George, T. J. S.(1980).Revolt in Mindanao: The Rise of Islam in Philippine Politics.Kuala Lumpur:Oxford University Press.
  59. Gibler, D. M.(2012).The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  60. Gibler, D. M.(2010).Outside-In: The Effects of External Threat on State Centralization.Journal of Conflict Resolution,54(4),519-542.
  61. Gibler, D. M.,Tir, J.(2010).Settled Borders and Regime Type: Democratic Transitions as Consequences of Peaceful Territorial Transfers.American Journal of Political Science,54(4),951-968.
  62. Go, J.(1999).Colonial Reception and Cultural Reproduction: Filipino Elites and United States Tutelary Rule.Journal of Historical Sociology,12(4),337-368.
  63. Gonzalez, A. B.(1980).Language and Nationalism: The Philippine Experience Thus Far.Quezon City:Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  64. Gourevitch, P.(1978).The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics.International Organization,32(4),881-912.
  65. Gowing, P. G.(1979).Muslim Filipinos: Heritage and Horizon.Quezon City:New Day Publishers.
  66. Gowing, P. G.(1983).Mandate in Moroland: The American Government of Muslim Filipinos, 1899-1920.Quezon City:New Day Publishers.
  67. Graf, A.(ed.),Kreuzer, P.(ed.) Werning, R.(ed.)(2009).Conflict in Moro Land: Prospects for Peace?.Pulau Pinang:Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
  68. Greene, S. L. W.(1999).Absolute Dreams: Thai Government under Rama VI, 1910-1925.Bangkok:White Lotus Press.
  69. Gripaldo, R. M.(1991).The Quezon-Osmeña Split of 1922.Philippine Studies,39(2),158-175.
  70. Guibernau, M.(2007).The Identity of Nations.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  71. Gunaratna, R.,Acharya, A.(2013).The Terrorist Threat from Thailand: Jihad or Quest for Justice?.Washington:Potomac Books.
  72. Habyarimana, J.,Humphreys, M.,Posner, D. N.,Weinstein, J. M.(2009).Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action.New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
  73. Hamilton, N.(1982).The Limits of State Autonomy: Post-Revolutionary Mexico.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  74. Han, E.,Mylonas, H.(2014).Interstate Relations, Perceptions, and Power Balance: Explaining China’s Policies Toward Ethnic Groups, 1949-1965.Security Studies,23(1),148-181.
  75. Hastings, A.(1997).The Construction of Nationhood: Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  76. Hawkins, M. C.(2013).Making Moros: Imperial Historicism and American Military Rule in the Philippines’ Muslim South.DeKalb, IL:Northern Illinois University Press.
  77. Hayden, J. R. 1942. The Philippines: A Study in National Development. New York: Macmillan.
  78. Hechter, M.(1987).Principles of Group Solidarity.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  79. Hechter, M.(2000).Containing Nationalism.New York:Oxford University Press.
  80. Hechter, M.(1975).Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development, 1536-1966.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  81. Hedman, E. E.,Sidel, J. T.(2000).Philippine Politics and Society in the Twentieth Century: Colonial Legacies, Post-Colonial Trajectories.London:Routledge.
  82. Hendrix, C. S.(2010).Measuring State Capacity: Theoretical and Empirical Implications for the Study of Civil Conflict.Journal of Peace Research,47(3),273-285.
  83. Howe, A. E.(2018).Discourses of Exclusion: The Societal Securitization of Burma’s Rohingya (2012-2018).Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs,5(3),245-266.
  84. Hutchcroft, P. D.(2000).Colonial Masters, National Politicos, and Provincial Lords: Central Authority and Local Autonomy in the American Philippines, 1900-1913.Journal of Asian Studies,59(2),277-306.
  85. Hutchinson, F. E.(2015).Malaysia’s Independence Leaders and the Legacies of State Formation under British Rule.Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society,25(1),123-151.
  86. Jeffrey, Robin(ed.)(1981).Asia: The Winning of Independence.London:Macmillan.
  87. Jocano, F. L.(ed.)(1983).Filipino Muslims: Their Social Institutions and Cultural Achievements.Quezon City:University of the Philippines Asian Center.
  88. Jory, P.(2007).From Melayu Patani to Thai Muslim: The Spectre of Ethnic Identity in Southern Thailand.South East Asia Research,15(2),255-279.
  89. Jory, P.(ed.)(2013).Ghosts of the Past in Southern Thailand: Essays on the History and Historiography of Patani.Singapore:NUS Press.
  90. Kachadpai, B.,Porntipa, A.(1988).Thai Government Policies on Minorities.Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science,16(2),47-60.
  91. Kertzer, J. D.(2016).Resolve in International Politics.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  92. Keyes, C. F.(1987).Thailand: Buddhist Kingdom as Modern Nation-State.Boulder:Westview Press.
  93. Kim, N. K.(2019).External Territorial Threats and Military Regimes.Political Research Quarterly,72(4),863-877.
  94. Kiser, E.,Drass, K. A.,Brustein, W.(1995).Ruler Autonomy and War in Early Modern Western Europe.International Studies Quarterly,39(1),109-138.
  95. Kotlowski, D.(2010).Independence or Not? Paul V. McNutt, Manuel L. Quezon, and the Re-examination of Philippine Independence, 1937-9.International History Review,32(3),501-531.
  96. Kuhonta, E. M.(2011).The Institutional Imperative: The Politics of Equitable Development in Southeast Asia.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
  97. Kuperman, Alan J.(ed.)(2015).Constitutions and Conflict Management in Africa.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
  98. Kurniawan, Y.(2018).The Politics of Securitization in Democratic Indonesia.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  99. Lachmann, R.(2000).Capitalists in Spite of Themselves: Elite Conflict and Economic Transformations in Early Modern Europe.New York:Oxford University Press.
  100. Laitin, D. D.(1992).Language Repertoires and State Construction in Africa.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  101. Lalwani, S. P.(2014).Cambridge, MA.,Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  102. Lee, J.(2018).Princeton, NJ.,Department of Politics, Princeton University.
  103. Lee, M. M.(2020).Crippling Leviathan: How Foreign Subversion Weakens the State.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  104. Lektzian, D.,Prins, B. C.(2008).Taming the Leviathan: Examining the Impact of External Threat on State Capacity.Journal of Peace Research,45(5),613-631.
  105. LeVine, R. A.,Campbell, D. T.(1972).Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes, and Group Behavior.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  106. LGSP in ARMM(2009).Land Tenure Stories in Central Mindanao.Davao City:The Local Governance Support Program in ARMM.
  107. Lidasan, N. P.(2013).Norfolk, VA,Graduate Program in International Studies, Old Dominion University.
  108. Likhit, D.(1974).Siam and Colonialism, 1855-1909: An Analysis of Diplomatic Relations.Bangkok:Thai Watana Panich.
  109. Liow, J. C.(2009).Islam, Education and Reform in Southern Thailand: Tradition and Transformation.Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  110. Loos, T.(2010).Competitive Colonialisms: Siam and the Malay Muslim South.The Ambiguous Allure of the West: Traces of the Colonial in Thailand,Hong Kong:
  111. López-Alves, F.(2000).State Formation and Democracy in Latin America, 1810-1900.Durham:Duke University Press.
  112. MacIsaac, S.(2002).The Struggle for Economic Development in the Philippine Commonwealth, 1935-1940.Philippine Studies,50(2),141-167.
  113. Madmarn, H.(1999).The Pondok and Madrasah in Patani.Bangi:Penerbit University Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  114. Mahajani, U.(1971).Philippine Nationalism: External Challenge and Filipino Response, 1565-1946.Brisbane:University of Queensland Press.
  115. Majul, C. A.(1999).Muslims in the Philippines.Quezon City:University of the Philippines Press.
  116. Malešević, S.(2012).Wars that Make States and Wars that Make Nations: Organised Violence, Nationalism and State Formation in the Balkans.European Journal of Sociology,53(1),31-63.
  117. Malle, B. F.(2004).How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
  118. Mann, M.(1988).States, War and Capitalism: Studies in Political Sociology.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  119. Mann, M.(1984).The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.European Journal of Sociology,25(2),185-213.
  120. Marohomsalic, N. A.(2001).Aristocrats of the Malay Race: A History of the Bangsa Moro in the Philippines.Quezon City:VJ Graphics Arts.
  121. Matsuzaki, R.(2011).Cambridge, MA.,Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  122. Matsuzaki, R.(2019).Statebuilding by Imposition: Resistance and Control in Colonial Taiwan and the Philippines.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  123. Mavelli, L.(2018).Citizenship for Sale and the Neoliberal Political Economy of Belonging.International Studies Quarterly,62(3),482-493.
  124. May, G. A.(1980).Social Engineering in the Philippines: The Aims, Execution, and Impact of American Colonial Policy, 1900-1913.Westport:Greenwood Press.
  125. McCargo, D.(2014).Southern Thailand: From Conflict to Negotiations?.Sydney:Lowy Institute for International Policy.
  126. McCargo, D.(2011).Informal Citizens: Graduated Citizenship in Southern Thailand.Ethnic and Racial Studies,34(5),833-849.
  127. McCargo, D.(2011).Mapping National Anxieties: Thailand’s Southern Conflict.Copenhagen:NIAS Press.
  128. McDonald, M.(2008).Securitization and the Construction of Security.European Journal of International Relations,14(4),563-587.
  129. McGarry, J.,O’Leary, B.(1994).The Political Regulation of National and Ethnic Conflict.Parliamentary Affairs,47(1),94-115.
  130. McKenna, T. M.(1998).Muslim Rulers and Rebels: Everyday Politics and Armed Separatism in the Southern Philippines.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  131. Meyers, D.(1994).Siam under Siege (1893-1902): Modern Thailand’s Decisive Decade, from the ‘Paknam Incident’ to the First Flowering of the ‘Chakri Reformation’.Journal of the Siam Society,82(2),121-133.
  132. Migdal, J. S.(2001).State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  133. Miller, Michelle Ann(ed.)(2012).Autonomy and Armed Separatism in South and Southeast Asia.Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  134. Miller, S. C.(1982)."Benevolent Assimilation": The American Conquest of the Philippines, 1899-1903.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  135. Milligan, J. A.(2005).Faith in School: Educational Policy Responses to Ethno-Religious Conflict in the Southern Philippines, 1935-1985.Journal of Southeast Asian Studies,36(1),67-86.
  136. Mojares, R. B.(2006).The Formation of Filipino Nationality under U. S. Colonial Rule.Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society,34(1),11-32.
  137. Montesano, M. J.(ed.),Jory, P.(ed.)(2008).Thai South and Malay North: Ethnic Interactions on a Plural Peninsula.Singapore:NUS Press.
  138. Moore, J. M.(2014).The Thai Way of Counterinsurgency.Arlington:Muir Analytics.
  139. Murashima, E.(1988).The Origin of Modern Official State Ideology in Thailand.Journal of Southeast Asian Studies,19(1),80-96.
  140. Murti, B. S. N.(1952).London, UK,School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
  141. Mylonas, H.(2012).The Politics of Nation-Building: Making Co-Nationals, Refugees, and Minorities.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  142. Nordlinger, E. A.(1981).On the Autonomy of the Democratic State.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  143. Nuttanee, R.(1990).DeKalb, IL.,Department of History, Northern Illinois University.
  144. Oblas, P. B.(1974).Ann Arbor, MI.,History Department, University of Michigan.
  145. Olesker, R.(2014).National Identity and Securitization in Israel.Ethnicities,14(3),371-391.
  146. Ornanong, N.(2001).DeKalb, IL.,Department of Political Science, Northern Illinois University.
  147. Ortiz, A. T.(1986).Philadelphia, PA.,Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania.
  148. Paik, C.,Vechbanyongratana, J.(2019).Path to Centralization and Development: Evidence from Siam.World Politics,71(2),289-331.
  149. Paine, S. C. M.(ed.)(2010).Nation Building, State Building, and Economic Development: Case Studies and Comparisons.New York:M. E. Sharpe.
  150. Panomporn, A.(1984).Austin, TX.,Department of Government, University of Texas.
  151. Paredes, R. R.(ed.)(1989).Philippine Colonial Democracy.Quezon City:Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  152. Porath, N.(2014).Muslim Schools (Pondok) in the South of Thailand: Balancing Piety on a Tightrope of National Civility, Prejudice and Violence.South East Asia Research,22(3),303-319.
  153. Porter, B. D.(1994).War and the Rise of the State: The Military Foundations of Modern Politics.New York:Free Press.
  154. Quimpo, N. G.(2000).Colonial Name, Colonial Mentality and Ethnocentrism.Public Policy: A University of the Philippine Quarterly,4(1),1-49.
  155. Rasler, K.,Thompson, W. R.(2011).Borders, Rivalry, Democracy, and Conflict in the European Region, 1816-1994.Conflict Management and Peace Science,28(3),280-303.
  156. Richardson, J.(2011).Komunista: The Genesis of the Philippine Communist Party, 1902-1935.Quezon City:Ateneo de Manila University Press.
  157. Roces, Mina(ed.),Edwards, Louise(ed.)(2007).The Politics of Dress in Asia and the Americas.Brighton:Sussex Academic Press.
  158. Saleeby, N. M.(1976).Studies in Moro History, Law and Religion.Manila:Filipiniana Book Guild.
  159. Schneckener, Ulrich(ed.),Wolff, Stefan(ed.)(2004).Managing and Settling Ethnic Conflicts.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
  160. Shils, E.(1957).Primordial, Personal, Sacred and Civil Ties.British Journal of Sociology,8(2),130-145.
  161. Slater, D.(2010).Ordering Power: Contentious Politics and Authoritarian Leviathans in Southeast Asia.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  162. Slater, D,Ziblatt, D.(2013).The Enduring Indispensability of the Controlled Comparison.Comparative Political Studies,46(10),1301-1327.
  163. Smith, A. D.(1986).The Ethnic Origins of Nations.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  164. Smith, A. D.(1995).Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  165. Smooha, S.,Hanf, T.(1992).The Diverse Modes of Conflict-Regulation in Deeply Divided Societies.International Journal of Comparative Sociology,33(1),26-47.
  166. Soifer, H.(2008).State Infrastructural Power: Approaches to Conceptualization and Measurement.Studies in Comparative International Development,43(3-4),231-251.
  167. Spruyt, H.(2020).The World Imagined: Collective Beliefs and Political Order in the Sinocentric, Islamic and Southeast Asian International Societies.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  168. Stanley, P. W.(1974).A Nation in the Making: The Philippines and the United States, 1899-1921.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
  169. Stepan, A.,Linz, J. J.,Yadav, Y.(2011).Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  170. Stetson, R. S.(1969).New York City, NY.,Department of Politics, New York University.
  171. Strate, S.(2015).The Lost Territories: Thailand’s History of National Humiliation.Honolulu:University of Hawai‘i Press.
  172. Streckfuss, D.(2012).An ‘Ethnic’ Reading of ‘Thai’ History in the Twilight of the Century-Old Official ‘Thai’ National Model.South East Asia Research,20(3),305-327.
  173. Streckfuss, D.(1993).The Mixed Colonial Legacy in Siam: Origins of Thai Racialist Thought, 1890-1910.Autonomous Histories, Particular Truths: Essays in Honor of John R. W. Smail,Madison:
  174. Sturtevant, D. R.(1976).Popular Uprisings in the Philippines, 1840-1940.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  175. Sturtevant, D. R.(1962).Sakdalism and Philippine Radicalism.Journal of Asian Studies,21(2),199-213.
  176. Sulak, S.(2002).The Crisis of Siamese Identity.National Identity and Its Defenders: Thailand Today,Chiang Mai:
  177. Surin, P.(1985).Islam and Malay Nationalism: A Case Study of the Malay-Muslims of Southern Thailand.Bangkok:Thai Khadi Research Institute, Thammasat University.
  178. Suryadinata, L.(2015).The Making of Southeast Asian Nations: State, Ethnicity, Indigenism and Citizenship.Singapore:World Scientific.
  179. Suwannathat-Pian, K.(1995).Thailand’s Durable Premier: Phibun through Three Decades, 1932-1957.Kuala Lumpur:Oxford University Press.
  180. Suwannathat-Pian, K.(1988).Thai-Malay Relations: Traditional Intra-regional Relations from the Seventeenth to the Early Twentieth Centuries.Singapore:Oxford University Press.
  181. Suwannathat-Pian, K.(1995).The Provincial Administrative Reform and Islamic Legal Autonomy in South Siam, 1892-1925.Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics and Strategic Studies,23,67-81.
  182. Syukri, I.,Bailey, Conner(Trans.),Miksic, John N.(Trans.)(1985).History of the Malay Kingdom of Patani.Athens:Ohio University Center for International Studies.
  183. Tan, S. K.(1977).The Filipino Muslim Armed Struggle, 1900-1972.Makati City:Filipinas Foundation.
  184. Tang, S.(2011).Reconciliation and the Remaking of Anarchy.World Politics,63(4),711-749.
  185. Tang, S.(2012).Outline of a New Theory of Attribution in IR: Dimensions of Uncertainty and Their Cognitive Challenges.Chinese Journal of International Politics,5(3),299-338.
  186. Tarling, N.(1962).The Mission of Sir John Bowring to Siam.Journal of Siam Society,50(2),91-118.
  187. Tej, B.(1977).The Provincial Administration of Siam, 1892-1915: The Ministry of the Interior under Prince Damrong Rajanubhab.Kuala Lumpur:Oxford University Press.
  188. Terami-Wada, M.(1988).The Sakdal Movement, 1930-34.Philippine Studies,36(2),131-150.
  189. Terwiel, B. J.(2011).Thailand’s Political History: From the 13th Century to Recent Times.Bangkok:River Books Press.
  190. Thamsook, N.(1967).Negotiations Regarding the Cession of the Siamese Malay States 1907-1909.Journal of the Siam Society,55(2),227-235.
  191. Thamsook, N.(1978).Pibulsongkram’s Thai Nation-Building Programmeme during the Japanese Military Presence.Journal of Southeast Asian Studies,9(2),234-247.
  192. Thanet, A.(2007).Rebellion in Southern Thailand: Contending Histories.Washington:East-West Center.
  193. Thies, C. G.(2005).War, Rivalry, and State Building in Latin America.American Journal of Political Science,49(3),451-465.
  194. Thomas, R. B.(1971).Philadelphia, PA.,Department of History, University of Pennsylvania.
  195. Thompson, V. 1941. Thailand: The New Siam. New York: Macmillan.
  196. Thongchai, W.(1994).Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation.Honolulu:University of Hawai‘i Press.
  197. Tilly, C.(1990).Coercion, Capital, and European States, A. D. 990-1990.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
  198. Timberman, D. G.(1991).A Changeless Land: Continuity and Change in Philippine Politics.New York:M.E. Sharpe.
  199. Tips, W. E. J.(1996).Siam’s Struggle for Survival: The 1893 Gunboat Incident at Paknam and the Franco-Siamese Treaty of October 1893.Bangkok:White Lotus Press.
  200. Uthai, D.(1981).Stanford, CA.,Stanford Graduate School of Education, Stanford University.
  201. Van den Berghe, P. L.(1987).The Ethnic Phenomenon.New York:Praeger Publishers.
  202. Vella, W. F.(1978).Chaiyo! King Vajiravudh and the Development of Thai Nationalism.Honolulu:University of Hawai‘i Press.
  203. Vella, W. F.(1955).The Impact of the West on Government in Thailand.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  204. Vickery, M.(1970).Thai Regional Elites and the Reforms of King Chulalongkorn.Journal of Asian Studies,29(4),863-881.
  205. Vu, T.(2010).Studying the State through State Formation.World Politics,62(1),148-175.
  206. Vu, T.(2010).Paths to Development in Asia: South Korea, Vietnam, China, and Indonesia.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  207. Walter, B. F.(2009).Reputation and Civil War: Why Separatist Conflicts Are So Violent.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  208. Wang, Gungwu(ed.)(2005).Nation-Building: Five Southeast Asian Histories.Singapore:Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  209. Wattana, S.(ed.)(2005).Dynamic Diversity in Southern Thailand.Chiang Mai:Silkworm Press.
  210. White, L. T.(2015).Philippine Politics: Progress and Problems in a Localist Democracy.New York:Routledge.
  211. Williamson, O. E.(1991).Strategizing, Economizing, and Economic Organization.Strategic Management Journal,12(S2),75-94.
  212. Wimmer, A.(2018).Nation Building: Why Some Countries Come Together While Others Fall Apart.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  213. Wurfel, D.(1988).Filipino Politics: Development and Decay.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
  214. Wyatt, D. K.(2003).Thailand: A Short History.New Haven:Yale University Press.
  215. Yamamoto, K.(2007).Nation-Building and Integration Policy in the Philippines.Journal of Peace Research,44(2),195-213.
  216. Yarhi-Milo, K.(2014).Knowing the Adversary: Leaders, Intelligence, and Assessment of Intentions in International Relations.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  217. Ybiernas, V. A. S.(2015).Contested National Development: Executive-Legislative Relations in American Colonial Philippines and the Cabinet Crisis of 1923.Asian Studies: Journal of Critical Perspectives on Asia,51(2),102-130.
  218. Yegar, M.(2002).Between Integration and Secession: The Muslim Communities of the Southern Philippines, Southern Thailand, and Western Burma/Myanma.Lanham:Lexington Books.
  219. Yom, S. L.(2016).From Resilience to Revolution: How Foreign Interventions Destabilize the Middle East.New York:Columbia University Press.
  220. Zyck, S. A.(2012).How to Lose Allies and Finance Your Enemies: The Economisation of Conflict Termination in Afghanistan.Conflict, Security & Development,12(3),249-271.
  221. 文學, Xue(2015).英法在東南亞的殖民模式及影響研究 ─ 以馬來地區和印度支那地區為例.北京=Beijing:對外經濟貿易大學出版社=University of International Business and Economics Press.
  222. 王建娥, Jian-e(2010)。國家建構和民族建構：內涵、特徵及聯繫。西北師大學報（社會科學版），47(2)，22-29。
  223. 占薇, Wei(2009)。廈門=Xiamen, Fujian，廈門大學南洋研究院=Research School for Southeast Asia Studies, Xiamen University。
  224. 江炳倫, Joseph Ping-Lan(2003).南菲律賓摩洛反抗運動研究.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:韋伯文化國際=Weber Publication International.
  225. 何平, Ping(1990)。泰國南部的馬來族問題和政府的政策。東南亞，8(2)，56-59。
  226. 吳小安, Xiao-an(1995)。論美國殖民統治對菲律賓現代政治發展的影響。廈門大學學報（哲學社會科學版），44(4)，30-35。
  227. 李道緝, Tao-chi(1999)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，政治大學歷史學系=Department of History, National Chengchi University。
  228. 周方冶, Fangye(2011).王權‧威權‧金權 ─ 泰國政治現代化進程.北京=Beijing:社會科學文獻出版社=Social Sciences Academic Press.
  229. 林合勝, Ho-sheng(2012)。高雄=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，中山大學中國與亞太區域研究所=Institute of China and Asia-Pacific Studies, National Sun Yat-sen University。
  230. 邱士熒, Shih-Ying(2009)。臺北=Taipei, Taiwan，臺灣大學政治學系=Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University。
  231. 金勇, Yong(2013)。泰國鑾披汶時期的文化政策及其意涵。東方論壇，20(5)，39-43。
  232. 金應熙（編）, Yingxi(ed.)(1990).菲律賓史.開封=Kaifeng:河南大學出版社=Henan University Press.
  233. 施雪琴, Xueqin(2002)。戰後菲律賓穆斯林分離主義運動興起的原因。東南亞，20(1)，35-40+45。
  234. 馬天航, Tianhang,熊覺, Jue(2018)。理解「國家自主性」─ 基於概念的考察。學術月刊，50(8)，80-92。
  235. 陳衍德, Yande,彭慧, Hui(2007)。菲律賓現代化進程中摩洛人的處境與反抗（1946-1986）。南洋問題研究，34(1)，17-26。
  236. 陳衍德, Yande,楊宏雲, Hongyun(2008)。美國的新殖民主義與菲律賓民族主義的回應：1898-1935。東南亞研究，30(4)，41-47。
  237. 曾少聰, Shaocong(2008)。東南亞國家的民族問題 ─ 以菲律賓、印尼、泰國和緬甸為例。世界民族，30(5)，35-44。
  238. 賀聖達, Shengda(1989)。暹羅國王瓦棲拉兀評傳。東南亞，7(4)，51-57。
  239. 陽舉偉, Juwei(2015)。泰國整合馬來穆斯林族群的困境與出路─基於影響民族同化因素的分析。印度洋經濟體研究，2(6)，118-140。
  240. 陽舉偉, Juwei,何平, Ping(2015)。泰國民族國家建構模式探究。東南亞南亞研究，33(3)，90-98。
  241. 陽舉偉, Juwei,何平, Ping(2018)。論泰國政治整合馬來穆斯林族群的政策─以「後鑾披汶時代」為中心的考察。世界民族，40(4)，64-78。
  242. 趙海英, Haiying(2016).現代化進程中的東南亞國家建構研究─基於族際整合視角.北京=Beijing:中國政法大學出版社=China University of Political Science and Law Press.
  243. 劉永芳, Yongfang(2010).歸因理論及其應用.上海=Shanghai:上海教育出版社=Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
  244. 蕭文軒, Wen-hsuan(2009)。高雄=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，中山大學中國與亞太區域研究所=Institute of China and Asia-Pacific Studies, National Sun Yat-sen University。
  245. 龐海紅, Haihong(2012).泰國民族國家的形成及其民族整合進程.北京=Beijing:民族出版社=The Ethnic Publishing House.
  246. 顧長永, Samuel C. Y.,蕭文軒, Wen-hsuan(2016).邊緣化或是整合：泰國的少數族群政治.高雄=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:中山大學出版社=National Sun Yat-sen University Press.
  247. 龔浩群, Haoqun(2009).信徒與公民－泰國曲鄉的政治民族志.北京=Beijing:北京大學出版社=Peking University Press.
  248. 龔浩群, Haoqun(2011)。國家與民族整合的困境－20世紀以來泰國南部馬來穆斯林社會的裂變。東南亞研究，33(3)，20-25。
被引用次数
  1. 謝國斌(2021)。泰國的族群政策。臺灣國際研究季刊，17(4)，67-94。
print cancel