题名

檢視容克執委會的規範性權力作為：以環境政策為例

并列篇名

The Practice of Normative Power in Jean-Claude Juncker's Term: From the Case of Environmental Policy

DOI

10.6166/TJPS.202103_(87).0002

作者

賴昀辰(Yun-chen Lai)

关键词

綠色規範性權力 ； 歐盟 ； 環境政策 ； 容克任期 ； 權力角色 ； Green Normative Power ； EU ； Environmental Policy ； Juncker's Term ； Role of Power

期刊名称

政治科學論叢

卷期/出版年月

87期（2021 / 03 / 01）

页次

39 - 91

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

作為一個特殊的國際關係行為者，歐盟的權力角色長期以來在學界備受重視，學者發展出許多不同的概念，來描繪歐盟此不同於傳統國家的國際行為者。然而雖有許多不同的概念描繪歐盟的權力角色，目前卻缺乏一個可普遍適用的分析框架，來觀察國際行為者的權力角色，故本文試圖建立一權力角色分析框架，主張應由「機會」、「工具」及「實踐」三面向，來觀察國際關係行為者的權力角色。在對歐盟不同的描述中，「規範性權力」近期最受關注，因此本文將以權力角色分析框架，來觀察歐盟在國際社會上的規範性權力。在案例選擇上，歐盟在環境議題上引領發展，並以條約將「永續發展」訂為歐盟的重要目標之一，故本文將聚焦在容克執政期間，歐盟在環境議題的作為，觀察歐盟在面臨內外挑戰的時期，其於國際社會上的綠色規範性權力實踐。
英文摘要

As a special international actor, the role of the EU's power is a hot issue in academic debates. Scholars develop several concepts to describe the EU as an actor which is different from that of traditional national states. Despite various concepts being proposed, there so far has been no analytical framework developed to observe the role of international actors' power. As a result, this essay tries to develop an analytical framework of the role of power, which observes international actors from the perspectives of opportunities, instruments and practices. Among the various descriptions of the EU, ＂normative power＂ is a highly-debated one. This essay uses the analytical framework of the role of power to observe the role of the EU's normative power in international society. This research chooses to analyze environmental issues, as the EU takes a lead in this area and sets ＂sustainable development＂ as an important goal in its treaties. The development of environmental issues in the EU during Jean-Claude Juncker's Mandate will be observed in this research to discuss the EU's practice of normative power in international society during this difficult time, in which the EU faced both internal and external challenges.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 甘逸驊, Francis(2007)。歐盟「柔性強權」身份認同的建構與批判。問題與研究，46(4)，1-25。
    連結：
  2. 甘逸驊, Francis(2008)。歐盟與美國的權力關係：「柔性平衡」的適用性。問題與研究，47(2)，1-24。
    連結：
  3. 吳建輝, Chien-huei(2013)。歐盟作為規範性權力：以國際刑事法秩序之建立為例。歐美研究，43(3)，537-593。
    連結：
  4. 賴昀辰, Yu-chen(2019)。歐洲議題政治化現象之分析。臺灣民主季刊，16(4)，39-92。
    連結：
  5. 賴昀辰, Yu-chen(2014)。歐洲聯盟貿易政策的權力分析。問題與研究，53(1)，99-123。
    連結：
  6. 蘇卓馨, Cho-hsin(2019)。歐盟規範性權力與中國關係性權力在中東歐國家的實踐。政治科學論叢，81，69-103。
    連結：
  7. Aggestam, L.(2008).Introduction: Ethical Power Europe?.International Affairs,84(1),1-11.
  8. Bäckstrand, K.,Elgström, O.(2013).The EU’s Role In Climate Change Negotiations: From Leader To ‘Leadiator.Journal of European Public Policy,20(10),1369-1386.
  9. Barbière, C. 2016. “Commission Delays Ecodesign Strategy For Fear of Offending UK Businesses.” in https://www.euractiv.com/section/sustainable-dev/news/ commission-delays-ecodesign-strategy-for-fear-of-offending-uk-businesses/.Latest update 7 January 2021.
  10. Bretherton, C.(1999).The European Union as a Ｇlobal Actor.London:Routledge.
  11. Brexit The Movie. 2016. “Regulated People Living Regulated Lives (11 of 26).” in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGeDX-6DINM. Latest update Latest update 7 January 2021.
  12. Burns, C.,Tobin, P.(2016).The Impact Of The Economic Crisis On European Union Environmental Policy.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,54(6),1485-1494.
  13. Burns, C.,Tobin, P.(2018).The Limits of Ambitious Environmental Policy in Times Of Crisis.European Union External Environmental Policy,Switzerland:
  14. Carbon, B. 2021. “Brexit Deal Threatens UK Labour and Climate Standards, Thinktank Warns.” in https://www.carbonbrief.org/daily-brief/brexit-deal-threatens-uk-labour-and-climate-standards-thinktank-warns. Latest update 11 March 2021.
  15. Čavoški, A.(2015).A Post-austerity European Commission: No Role for Environmental Policy?.Environmental Politics,24(3),501-505.
  16. Crisp, J. 2016. “UN Boss: Brexit would Mean Rewriting Paris Agreement on Climate Change.” in https://www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/ news/un-boss-brexit-would-mean-rewriting-paris-agreement-on-climate-change/.Latest update 10 January 2021.
  17. Crisp, J. 2017. “Britain Threatens to Scupper EU Climate Law Over‘Brexit No Deal’ Clause.” in https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/18/britain-threatens-scupper-eu-climate-law-brexit-no-deal-clause/. Latest update 5 January 2021.
  18. Dawson, M. 2018. “The Right Idea in the Wrong Hands? A look at Juncker’s ‘Political Commission’.” in https://www.hertie-school.org/en/news/detail/content/ the-right-idea-in-the-wrong-hands-evaluating-junckers-political-commission.Latest update 10 January 2021.
  19. Dechezleprêtre, A.,Nachtigall, D.,Venmans, F.(2018).OECD Economics Department Working PapersOECD Economics Department Working Papers,未出版
  20. Defra. 2014. “Defra Better for Business: Strategic Reform Plan for Defra’s Regulations.” in https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/defra-better-for-business-strategic-reform-plan-for-defras-regulations. Latest update 6 January 2021.
  21. Delreux, T.,Happaerts, S.(2016).Environmental Policy and Politics in the European Union.London; New York, NY:Macmillan International Higher Education.
  22. Deutsche, W. 2019. “Are Right-Wing Populists a Threat to European Climate Policy?” in https://www.dw.com/en/are-right-wing-populists-a-threat-to-european-climate- policy/a-48764969. Latest update 14 January 2021.
  23. Deutsche, W. 2018. “How Right-Wing Nationalism Fuels Climate Denial.” in https://www.dw.com/en/how-right-wing-nationalism-fuels-climate-denial/a-46699510. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  24. Duchêne, F.(1972).Europe’s Role in World Peace.Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead,London:
  25. Ekblom, J. 2020. “Factbox: What is von der Leyen’s European Green Deal?” in https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-commission-climate-factbox/factbox-what-is-von-der-leyens-european-green-deal-idUSKBN1Y01OE. Latest update 21 January 2021.
  26. EPRS. 2019. “The Juncker Commission’s Ten Priorities: An End-of-term Assessment.” in https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html? reference=EPRS_IDA(2019)637943. Latest update 2 January 2021. EPRS_IDA(2019)637943
  27. European Commission. 2018b. “Europe on the Move: Commission Completes Its Agenda For Safe, Clean And Connected Mobility.” in https://ec.europa.eu/ commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_18_3708. Latest update 12 January 2021.
  28. European Commission. 2011a. “Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe.” in https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0571&from=EN. Latest update 3 January 2021. CELEX:52011DC0571&from
  29. European Commission. 2021a. “EU Emission Trading System (ETS).” in https:// ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets_en. Latest update 13 January 2021.
  30. European Commission. 2021b. “International Carbon Market.” in https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/markets_en. Latest update 23 January 2021.
  31. European Commission. 2018a. “A European Strategy For Plastic in a Circular Economy.” in https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/plastics-strategy-brochure.pdf. Latest update 12 January 2021.
  32. European Commission. 2012. “Energy Road Map 2050.” in https://ec.europa.eu/ energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2012_energy_roadmap_2050_en_0.pdf. Latest update 24 January 2021.
  33. European Commission. 2011b. “A Roadmap for Moving to A Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050.” in https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0112:FIN:EN:PDF. Latest update 14 January 2021.
  34. European Commission. 2014. “Communication From the Commission To the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions Commission Work Programme 2015 A New Start.” in https://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= CELEX:52014DC0910. Latest update 4 January 2021. EN
  35. European Environmental Bureau. 2016. “Let’s Reinforce Not Reduce Ecodesign and Ecolabel.” In https://ecostandard.org/wp-content/uploads/ECOS-EEB-BEUC-ANEC-Letter-to-Mr-Juncker-on-Ecodesign-and-Ecolabel.pdf. Latest update 24 January 2021.
  36. Falkner, R.(2007).The Political Economy of ‘Normative Power’ Europe: EU Environmental Leadership in International Biotechnology Regulation.Journal of European Public Policy,14(4),507-526.
  37. Falkner, R.(2006).CES Working PaperCES Working Paper,Harvard University: Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies.
  38. French, J. R.,Raven, B.,Cartwright, D.(1959).The Bases of Social Power.Classics of Organization Theory,7,311-320.
  39. Froggatt, A., T. Raines, & S. Tomlinson. 2016. “UK Unplugged? The Impacts of Brexit on Energy and Climate Policy (Chatham House Research Paper, May).” in https://www.chathamhouse.org/2016/05/uk-unplugged-impacts-brexit-energy-and-climate-policy. Latest update 10 March 2021.
  40. Gilberston, T.,Reyes, O.(2009).Carbon Trading: How It Works and Why It Fails.Uppsala:Dag Hammerskjöld Foundation.
  41. Godard, O.(2012).Godard, O. 2012. Ecological Debt and Historical Responsibility Revisited - The Case of Climate Change. Italy: European University Institute..
  42. Green Shipping. 2018. “EEB: Jean Claude Juncker’s Environmental Record is Poor.” in https://safety4sea.com/eeb-jean-claude-junckers-environmentalrecord-is-poor/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=63fefc97a5c0105d3348f0a85a6f2227eb5fcc04-1598717993-0-Aet6_dce5uzWn44yX9DsspIkE7gIp5_5oTi7Vk70fXNw2snhn26Z287Xd2YhjpG4MJDZ032Xcl2bhpWRlEgqqOxBco1YMRSJghF3IORkXM72wHKGy9sP1jolJFbxySOymO_236pvcFJ3VbrYh8lvt5SlGn2CSH64-Gz-EENFdnidrIOnDheH1DFiI1uYubw8pK8ZwysL73pN3HttKgGioSnRmUBL6QxBNJu8EgphXfrtvHzDj2wHoEs0oGxvr-VwbtQDAqwinvtCeUfzZG33ntsmNf5W2geV7z4odsP_6eILmzICR53TkFhiNwpvJ4TKXPUJBwGZxRuqZn9BvbSkXb-G7ReqfY5MtyQkLUxlgl-U. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  43. Greer, L.(2014).The Three Faces of European Union Health Policy: Policy, Markets, and Austerity.Policy and Society,33(1),13-24.
  44. Hepburn, C.,Teytelboym, A.(2017).Climate Change Policy after Brexit.Oxford Review of Economic Policy,33(suppl_1),S144-S154.
  45. Huber, R. A.(2020).The Role of Populist Attitudes in Explaining Climate Change Skepticism and Support for Environmental Protection.Environmental Politics,29(6),959-982.
  46. Hyde-Price, A.(2008).A’tragic Actor’? A Realist Perspective on’ethical Power Europe.International affairs,84(1),29-44.
  47. Juncker, J. C. 2018. “State of the Union Address 2018 [Text].” in https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/Speech_18_5808. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  48. Juncker, J. C.(2016).State of the Union Address 2016.
  49. Juncker, J. C. 2014. “The Right Team to Deliver Change [Text].” in https:// ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_14_585. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  50. Juncker, J. C. 2017. “State of the Union Address 2017 [Text].” in https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_17_3165. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  51. Keating, D. 2018. “EU tells Trump: No Paris Climate Deal, No Free Trade.” In https://www.forbes.com/sites/davekeating/2018/02/08/eu-tells-trump-no-parisclimate-deal-no-free-trade/?sh=7050ad4d37c7. Latest update 14 January 2021.
  52. Kelemen, R.(2010).Globalizing European Union Environmental Policy.Journal of European Public Policy,17(3),335-349.
  53. Keohane, R. O.,Martin, L. L.(1995).The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.International Security,20(1),39-51.
  54. Lai, Y. C.(2019).Human Rights and Sustainability in EU-China Relations: The Limits of Normative Power.European Foreign Affairs Review,24(4),555-576.
  55. Latchoumaya, M.(2018).,未出版
  56. Lightfoot, S.,Burchell, J.(2005).The European Union and the world Summit on Sustainable Development: Normative Power Europe in Action?.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,43(1),75-95.
  57. Lockwood, M. 2019. “Right-Wing Populism and Climate Change Policy.” in https://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/blog/right-wing-populism-and-climate-change-policy. Latest update 3 January 2021.
  58. Manners, I.(2002).Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies,40(2),235-258.
  59. Manners, I.,Whitman, R.(2003).The Difference Engine’: Constructing and Representing the International Identity of the European Union.Journal of European Public Policy,10(3),380-404.
  60. Marcu, A., D. Vangenechten, E. Alberola, J. Olsen, J. Caneill, S. Schleicher, & R.de Rafael. 2020. “2020 State of the EU ETS Report.” in https://z7r.689.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/2020-State-of-the-EU-ETS-Report-Final-2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3VN-BFkVeW0HXB-KCUVYxA0iyE2gu_O-WeGOJED3Q4QWOz_DhxeiXyKGI. Latest update 10 January 2021.
  61. Mathis, M. & E. Krukowska. 2020. “EU Carbon Market Has Chance to Link With U. K. After Brexit Deal.” in https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/ 2020-12-28/eu-carbon-market-has-chance-to-link-with-u-k-after-brexit-deal.Latest update 11 March 2021.
  62. Mizo, R.(2016).India, China and Climate Cooperation.India Quarterly,72(4),375-394.
  63. Mogherini, F. 2017. “Thinking Europe Forward [Text].” in https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-Homepage/33162/federica-mogherinis-speech-conference-thinking-europe-forward-occasion-25th-anniversary-treaty_fr. Latest update 2 January 2021.
  64. Morgenthau, H.(1978).Politics Among Nations.New York:Alfred Knopf.
  65. Mosnier, C.,Ridier, A.,Képhaliacos, C.,Carpy-Goulard, F.(2009).Economic and Environmental Impact of the CAP Mid-term Review on Arable Crop Farming in South-western France.Ecological Economics,68(5),1408-1416.
  66. Nelson, A. 2015. “EU to Launch Diplomatic Offensive ahead of Paris Climate Talks.” in http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/20/eu-to-launch-diplomatic-offensive-ahead-paris-climate-talks. Latest update 3 January 2021.
  67. Neslen, A. 2013. “EU Admits Double-counting Climate Finance and Development aid.” in https://www.euractiv.com/section/development-policy/news/eu-admits-double-counting-climate-finance-and-development-aid/. Latest update 3 January 2021.
  68. Nunes, I. F.(2011).Civilian, Normative, and Ethical Power Europe: Role Claims and EU Discourses.European Foreign Affairs Review,16(1),1-20.
  69. Oberthür, S. 2016. “The European Union in Crisis: What Future for the EU in International Climate Policy.” in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 311747225_The_European_Union_in_Crisis_What_Future_for_the_EU_in_International_Climate_Policy. Latest update 2 January 2021.
  70. Parker, C. F.,Karlsson, C.,Hjerpe, M.,Linnér, B.O.(2012).Fragmented Climate Change Leadership: Making Sense of the Ambiguous Outcome of COP-15.Environmental Politics,21(2),268-286.
  71. Petitjean, T. 2019. “The Political Entrepreneurship of the Juncker Commission on the Energy and Environment Policy—Le Portail de Référence Pour L’Espace de Liberté, Sécurité et Justice. Le Portail de Référence pour L’Espace de Liberté, Sécurité et Justice.” in https://www.eu-logos.org/2019/06/06/eyes-on-europe-the-political-entrepreneurship-of-the-juncker-commission-on-the-energy-and-environment-policy/. Latest update 2 January 2021.
  72. Pollex, J.,Lenschow, A.(2020).Many Faces of Dismantling: Hiding Policy Change in Non-legislative Acts in EU Environmental Policy.Journal of European Public Policy,27(1),20-40.
  73. Possenti, S.(2019).College of Europe EU Diplomacy PaperCollege of Europe EU Diplomacy Paper,未出版
  74. PV Europe. 2020. “Global Carbon Market Grows to Record Highs in 2019.” in https://www.pveurope.eu/markets-money/global-carbon-market-grows-record-highs-2019. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  75. Richards, M. 2019. “Climate Change Skepticism-and Its Weird Connection to Brexit.” in https://towardsdatascience.com/climate-change-and-its-weird-connection-to-brexit-8247a243d815. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  76. Schaller, S. & A. Carius. 2019. “Mapping Climate Agendas of Right-wing Populist Parties in Europe.” in https://www.adelphi.de/de/system/files/mediathek/bilder/ Convenient%20Truths%20-%20Mapping%20climate%20agendas%20of%20right-wing%20populist%20parties%20in%20Europe%20-%20adelphi.pdf. Latest update 7 January 2021.
  77. Smith, K. E.(2001).The EU, Human Rights and Relations with Third Countries: ‘Foreign Policy’ with an Ethical Dimension?.Ethics and Foreign Policy,Cambridge:
  78. Therborn, G.(1997).Europe in the 21st Century: The World’s Scandinavia?.Irish Studies in International Affairs,8,21-34.
  79. Tobin, P. & C. Burns. 2015. “Measuring the Impact of Austerity on European Environmental Policy.” in https://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/confer ence/papers/2015/The%20Impact%20of%20Austerity%20on%20Environmental%20Policy%20Tobin%20and%20Burns%202015%20PSAfin.pdf. Latest update 7 January 2021.
  80. Todts, W. 2019. “Time’s Nearly Up: So, What Has Juncker’s Commission Done to Advance the Green Agenda?” in https://www.tran sportenvironment.org/ newsroom/blog/time%E2%80%99s-nearly-so-what-has-juncker%E2%80%99s-commission-done-advance-green-agenda. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  81. Trauffler, G. 2019. “The EU Carbon Trading System, Focus.” in https://fedil-echo.lu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ECHO-2019_2_digital_3.pdf. Latest update 20 January 2021.
  82. Vaughan, A. 2016. “Brexit Voters Almost Twice as Likely to Disbelieve in Manmade Climate Change.” in https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ 2016/jun/16/brexit-voters-almost-twice-as-likely-to-disbelieve-in-manmade-climate-change. Latest update 20 January 2021.
  83. Veebel, V.,Markus, R.(2018).European Normative Power During Ukrainian-Russian Conflict.Baltic Journal of Law & Politics,11(1),1-20.
  84. Vogler, J.(2005).The European Contribution to Global Environmental Governance.International Affairs,81(4),835-850.
  85. Von Lucke, F. 2019. “Green Principled Pragmatism: How the EU Combines Normative and Consequentialist Motivations in its Climate Policy.” in https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/05/01/green-principled-pragmatism-how-the-eu-combines-normative-and-consequentialist-motivations-in-its-climate-policy/. Latest update 9 January 2021.
  86. Vote Watch Europe. 2020. “Influence and Comparative Level of Support for Accelerating/Prioritising the EU Climate Agenda: Based on Actual Voting Behavior and Activities in the European Parliament EU.” in https://www.votewatch.eu/blog/votewatch-analytical-tool-uncover-which-meps-can-help-you-advance-your-agenda-part-2-climate-policy/. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  87. Waltz, K.(1979).Theories of International Politics.New York:Little Brown.
  88. Wendt, A.(1992).Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics (1992).International Organization,46(2),391-425.
  89. Whitman, R.(1998).From Civilian Power to Superpower?: The International Identity of the European Union.Berlin:Springer.
  90. Wurzel, R. K.,Connelly, J.(2012).The European Union in International Climate Change Politics: Still Taking A Lead.London:Taylor & Francis.
  91. 天下雜誌，2019，〈電動車真的「環保」嗎？生產製程及廢棄物回收受到關注〉，天下雜誌網頁， https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5096661， 2021/01/15。Common Wealth Magazine. 2019. “Diandongche zhende「huan bao」ma? shengchanzhicheng ji feiqiwu huishoushoudao guanzhu” [Are Electric Vehicles Really “Environmentally Friendly?” Production Process And Waste Recycling Attract Attention]. in https:// www.cw.com.tw/article/5096661. Latest update 15 January 2021.
  92. 王曉伯，2014，〈烏克蘭危機恐害歐洲能源短缺〉，中時新聞網，https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20140309000065-260511，2021/01/02。Wang, Xiao-bo. 2014. “Ukraine weiji konghai Europe nengyuan duanque” [Ukraine Crisis Threatening Energy Shortages in Europe]. in https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20140309000065-260511. Latest update 2 January 2021.
  93. 北極星電力網，2016，〈中歐碳交易合作成果呼之欲出協助中國碳交易體系建設〉，北極星電力網，https://www.sohu.com/a/118072660_131990，2021/ 01/14。Bei Ji Xing Dian Li Wang. 2016. “Zhongou tanjiaoyi hezuo chengguo huzhiyuchu xiezhu China tanjiaoyi tixijianshe” [The Results of China-EU Carbon Trading Cooperation Ready to Assist in the Construction of China’s Carbon Trading System]. in https://www.sohu.com/a/118072660_131990. Latest update 14 January 20121.
  94. 艾倫‧萊利，2014，〈烏克蘭危機敲響歐洲能源的警鐘〉，紐約時報中文網，https://cn.nytimes.com/opinion/20140527/c27riley/zh-hant/ ， 2021/01/05 。Riley, Alan. 2014. “Ukraine weiji qiaoxiang Europe nengyuan de jingzhong” [Gazprom on the Ropes]. in https://cn.nytimes.com/opinion/20140527/c27riley/ zh-hant/. Lates update 5 January 2021.
  95. 李淳、顏慧欣，2018，〈研析歐盟近期對外洽簽之貿易協定中與投資、公司治理等議題相關內容及辦理小型讀書會〉，中華經濟研究院 WTO 及 RTA中心，https://www.trade.gov.tw/App_Ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=../Files/Doc/ fa0ad802-a57a-4272-b02e-ef275b83c16e.pdf ， 2021/01/20 。 Li, Chun & Hui-xin Yan. 2018. “Yanxi EU jinqi duiwai qiaqian zhi maoyi xieding Zhongyu touzi, gongsi zhili deng yiti xiangguan neirong ji banli xiaoxing dushuhui” [Analysis of the Issues Related to Investment, Corporate Governance and Other Issues in the Recent Trade Agreements Negotiated and Signed by the European Union and Handling Small Book Clubs]. in https://www.trade.gov.tw/App_Ashx/File.ashx?FilePath=../Files/Doc/fa0ad802-a57a-4272-b02e-ef275b83c16e.pdf. Latest update 20 January 2021.
  96. 周姵妤, Pei-yu(2020)。,臺灣大學社會科學院風險社會與政策研究中心=Risk Society and Policy Research Center。
  97. 姜唯，2019，〈OECD 最新報告：企業加入「歐盟碳交易體系後」，營收最高增加 18%〉，社企流，https://www.seinsights.asia/article/3289/3269/6065，2021/01/20。Jiang Wei. 2020. “OECDzui xin bao gao: qiye jiaru「EU tanjiaoyi tixihou」yingshou zuigao zengjia 18%” [The Latest OECD report: After Joining the “EU carbon trading system”, Revenue Increases up to 18%]. in https://www.seinsights.asia/article/3289/3269/6065. Latest update 20 January 2021.
  98. 徐仁輝, Jen-hui.(2013)。從歐債危機看財政樽節爭議。主計月刊，693，24-29。
  99. 張亞中, Ya-zhong.(2012)。歐盟的全球政治角色：目標與限制。歐洲研究，3，28-38。
  100. 張素美，2017，〈英國脫歐對氣候政策的衝擊－四種情境對英國、歐盟及巴黎協定的衝擊預測及探討〉，能源資料庫，https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Data/ share?KmNWgtYKztmbyhyQu73JAA==，2021/01/24。Zhang, Su-mei. 2017.“UK tuoou dui qihou zhengce de chongji-sizhong qingjing dui UK, EU ji Paris xieding de chongji yuce ji tantao” [The Impact of Brexit on Climate Policy - Discussion and Prediction of Four Scenarios of Impact on UK, EU, and Paris Agreement]. in https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Data/share? KmNWgtYKztmbyhy Qu73JAA==. Latest update 24 January 2021.
  101. 張素美, Su-mei(2015)。,能源資料庫。
  102. 張素美，2018，〈沒有巴黎協定就沒有貿易協定－歐盟委員會呼籲歐盟各國將巴黎協定作為簽署新貿易協定的先決條件〉，能源資料庫，https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Data/share?P2VmUY0Fa10+Zy0pXzkW8g==，2021/01/04。Zhang, Su-mei. 2018. “Meiyou Paris xieding jiu meiyou maoyi xieding-EU weiyuanhui huyu oumeng geguo jiang Paris xieding zuowei qianshu xinmaoyixieding de xianjuetiaojian” [No Paris Agreement, no EU trade agreement” - European Commission Call for the Paris Deal to be a Prerequisite for Making Trade Deal]. in https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Data/share?P2VmUY 0Fa10+Zy0pXzkW8g==. Latest update 4 January 2021.
  103. 郭映庭，2015，〈若未能解決 6 年前「哥本哈根協議」的根本問題，此次巴黎氣候峰會的失敗也不令人意外〉，The News Lens 關鍵評論網，https:// www.thenewslens.com/article/32446，2021/01/03。Guo, Ying-ting. 2015.“Ruo weineng jiejue 6 nianqian「Copenhagen」de genben wenti, cici Paris qihoufenghui de shibai ye bulingrenyiwai” [Paris 2015 UN Climate Change Conference’s Failure will Come as No Surprise if Problems from Copenhagen Accord 6 Years Ago haven’t been Resolved]. in https://www.thenewslens.com/ article/32446. Latest update 3 January. 2021.
  104. 葉國俊, Guo-chun(2019)。,中華經濟研究院。
  105. 賈旭東, Xu-dong(1988)。實踐定義研究簡介。哲學動態，11，37-38。
  106. 廖舜右, Shun-you(2016)。現實主義。國際關係總論，臺北=Taipei:
  107. 蔡元閎, Yuan-hong(2015)。試論碳交易制度下之價格穩定機制－以歐盟「市場穩定儲備」為中心。經貿法訊，179，12-22。
  108. 鄭伊廷, Yi-ting(2020)。簡介歐盟碳邊境調整機制。經貿法訊，268，1-5。
  109. 謝雯凱，2016，〈歐盟推出「全歐洲人共享清潔能源」包裹式提案，旨在盤點法規環境以推進再生能源發展〉，能源資料庫，https://km.twenergy.org.tw/ Data/db_more?id=1350， 2021/01/19。 Xie, Wen-kai. 2016. “EU tuichu「quanouzhouren gongxiang qingjie nengyuan」baoguoshi tian zhizai pandian fagui huanjing yi tuijin zaishengnengyuan fazhan” [The European Union Launched the “All Europeans Share Clean Energy” Package Proposal, Aiming to Take Stock of the Regulatory Environment to Promote the Development of Renewable Energy]. in https://km.twenergy.org.tw/Data/db_more?id=1350. Latest update 19 January 2021.
  110. 蘇卓馨, Cho-hsin.(2019)。歐盟規範性權力在亞洲的試煉－以貿易議程為例。全球政治評論，65，57-79。
print cancel