Back to the World of Light: On Tactile Subject in Melville and Merleau-Ponty

回返光的世界：論梅爾維爾與梅洛龐蒂之觸覺主體

10.6153/2008.20.04

蘇秋華(Chiu-Hua Su)

觸覺主體 ； 光的波動說 ； 梅洛龐蒂現象學 ； 莫比•迪克 ； 笛卡爾式透視論 ； 暗箱 ； tactile subject ； wave theory of light ； Merleau-Pontian Phenomenology ； Moby-Dick ； Cartesian Perspectivalism ； camera obscura

NTU Studies in Language and Literature

20期（2008 / 12 / 01）

97 - 130

英文

自柏拉圖以來，西方哲學傳統長久爲視覺所宰制；咸以爲視學霸權與笛卡爾主義沆座一氣，堅實了傳統認識論的基礎，在此二元思維模式中，人類心靈、理性以及意識皆大受讚揚，反之，舉几活的存有所依附的身體感官以及物質性則遭到貶抑。當代文化研究者試圖以二十世紀歐陸哲思彌補此鴻溝，如：海德格、梅洛龐蒂、列維納斯、依希佳黑等人之思想，其中梅氏理論在回復身體重要性及重思主／客之非二元關係上極具潛力。本文將試圖說明，梅洛龐蒂及梅爾維爾雖處於完全不同的歷史脈絡中，但兩者均強調視覺與觸覺之跨侵，進而對視覺霸權提出挑戰的策略卻不謀而合。兩者對觀視的重塑相應了十九世紀初在光學上的典範轉移－牛頓的粒子說被波動說所取代。在《莫比•迪克》中，梅爾維爾以新的光學理論顛覆了傳統認識論的內／外二元模式，因而豐富了當代與身體相關的討論。此一真知灼見亦說明了他和梅洛龐蒂現象學可對話之處。

Western philosophical tradition ever since Plato has, as many culture critics show, been dominated by vision. It is widely accepted that this hegemony of vision has conspired with Cartesianism to forge the foundation of dualism for traditional epistemology which celebrates the human mind, reason, and consciousness at the cost of bodily senses and the materiality in which every living being is embedded. Scholars of contemporary cultural studies try to bridge this gap by resorting to twentieth century continental philosophers, such as Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, Irigaray, to name but a few. Among them, Merleau-Ponty has offered a promising model for reviving the body and rethinking a non-dualistic relation between subject and object. In this study, I would like to show that, although situated in historical contexts quite different from each other, Merleau-Ponty and Melville challenge the hegemony of vision in a very similar way-emphasizing the encroachment of touch and vision. Their recasting of seeing corresponds with the paradigm shift in optics at the turn of the nineteenth century, when the traditional Newtonian corpuscular theory was replaced by the new wave theory of light. With the new paradigm in mind, Melville in Moby-Dick has subverted the inside/outside dichotomy posed by traditional epistemology and made a significant contribution to contemporary discussion of the body, a revolutionary insight which marks his affinity with Merleau-Pontian phenomenology.

1. Abram, David.(1997).The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World.New York:Vintage.
2. Beer, Gillian.,Teresa Brennan (Ed.),Martin Jay.(1996).Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Sight.New York:Routledge.
3. Blumenberg, Hans.,David Michael Levin. (Ed.)(1993).Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision.Berkeley:U of California P.
4. Bredahl, A. Carl(1972).Melville's Angles of Vision.Gainesville:U of Florida P.
5. Butler, Judith.,Taylor Carman (Ed.),Mark B. N. Hansen.(2005).The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
6. Cataldi, Sue L.(1993).Emotion, Depth, and Flesh: A Study of Sensitive Space: Reflections on Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy of Embodiment.Albany:State U of New York P.
7. Crary, Jonathan.(1990).Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century.Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MITP.
8. Crary, Jonathan.,Hal Foster. (Ed.)(1988).Vision and Visuality.Seattle:Bay.
9. Dijksterhuis, Fokko Jan.(2004).Lenses and Waves: Christiaan Huygens and the Mathematical Science of Optics in the Seventeenth Century.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
10. Frankel, Eugene.(1976).Corpuscular Optics and the Wave Theory of Light: The Science and Politics of a Revolution in Physics.Social Studies of Science,6,141-184.
11. Grosz, Elizabeth.(1994).Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism.Bloomington:Indiana UP.
12. Harman, Peter Michael.(1982).Energy, Force, and Matter: The Conceptual Development of Nineteenth-Century Physics.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
13. Jay, Martin.(1993).Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought.Berkeley:U of California P.
14. Jay, Martin.,Hal Foster. (Ed.)(1988).Vision and Visuality.Seattle:Bay.
15. Keller, David R.,Frank B. Golley.,David R. Keller (Ed.),Frank B. Golley.(2000).The Philosophy of Ecology: From Science to Synthesis.Athens:U of Georgia P.
16. Langer, Monika M.(1989).Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception: A Guide and Commentary.London:Macmillan.
17. Leder, Drew.(1990).Flesh and Blood: A Proposed Supplement to Merleau-Ponty.Human Studies,13,209-219.
18. Mazis, Glen A.(1987).'Modern Depths,' Painting, and the Novel: Turner, Melville, and the Interstices.Soundings,70(1-2),121-144.
19. Melville, Herman.,Harrison Hayford (Ed.),Hershel Parker.(1967).Moby-Dick: An Authoritative Text Reviews and Letters by Melville Analogues and Sources Criticism.New York:Norton.
20. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice.,Alphonso Lingis. (Trans.),Claude Lefort. (Ed.)(1968).The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes.Evanston:Northwestern UP.
21. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice.,Carleton Dallery. (Trans.),James M. Edie. (Ed.)(1964).The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics.Evanston:Northwestern UP.
22. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice.,Colin Smith. (Trans.)(2002).Phenomenology of Perception.London:Routledge.
23. Neal, Valerie Sue.(1979).U of Minnesota.
24. Smith, Richard Dean.(1993).Melville's Science: "Devilish Tantalization of the Gods!".New York:Garland.
25. Taylor, Charles.,Taylor Carman (Ed.),Mark B. N. Hansen.(2005).The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
26. Vasseleu, Cathryn.(1998).Textures of Light: Vision and Touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty.London:Routledge.
27. Ward, J. A.(1956).The Function of the Cetalogical Chapters in Moby-Dick.American Literature,28(2),164-183.
28. Wilson, Eric.(2000).Romantic Turbulence: Chaos, Ecology, and American Space.London:Macmillan.