土地使用開發管制封土地開發決策影響之研究

A Study on the Impact of Land Use Development Control on the Decision-making of Land Development

10.6404/JP.200312.0001

吳彩珠(Tsai-Chu Wu)

土地開發 ； 開發管制 ； 交易成本 ； land development ； development control ； transaction costs

規劃學報

30期（2003 / 12 / 01）

1 - 14

繁體中文

土地開發可視為公私部門合夥事業，在公部門賦予私部門開發權之協議過程中，所衍生或增加之土地開發交易成本，往往影響開發者投資開發之意願與決策，致開發管制有時不僅未能調整土地市場失靈問題，反可能更加扭曲土地市場機能。本研究爰基於交易成本理論，探討土地開發管制交易成本之內涵，並應用分析階層程序法，透過封相關土地開發公司進行問卷調查分析，以瞭解開發管制機制對開發業者決策影響，裨供政府研訂相關政策之參考。

Land development can be viewed as the product of a contract between the private developer and the public sector. It is necessary for developers to bargain with public sectors and citizens over the nature, scope and design of development projects, in order to secure development permission from the public sector. The development approval process incurs transaction costs for developing land, affects the willingness of developers to develop land. Thus, this research, based on the transaction cost theory, attempts to explore the impacts of transaction costs incurred by development control on land development decisions. The empirical analysis attempts to identify and analyze the appropriate dimensions of the analysis, the nature and effects of transaction costs in the development control process.

1. Alexander, Ernest R.(2001).Governance and Transaction Costs in Planning Systems.Environment and Planning B: planning and Design,28,755-776.
2. Alexander, Ernest R.(1992).A Transaction Cost Theory of Planning.Journal of the American Planning Association,58(2),190-200.
3. Alexander, Ernest R.(1992).A Transaction-Cost Theory of Land Use Planning and Development Control.T.P.R.,72(1),45-75.
4. Atash, Farhad(1990).Local Land Use Regulations in the USA: A Study of their Impacts on Housing Cost.Land Use Policy,7(3),231-242.
5. Blair, John P.,Robert Premus(1987).Industrial Location: A Review.Economic Development Quarterly,1(1),1-28.
6. Bramley, Glen(1992).Land-use Planning and the Housing Market in Britain: the Impact on Housing Building and House Prices.Environment and Planning A,25(7),1021-1051.
7. Bryson, John M.(1984).The Policy Process and Organizational form.Policy Studies Journal,12(3),445-463.
8. Bryson, John M.,Peter Smith Ring(1990).A Transaction-based Approach to Policy Intervention.Policy Sciences,23(2),205-229.
9. Cheung, S.N.S.(1983).The Contractual Nature of the Firm.Journal of Law & Economics,26,1-21.
10. Cheung, S.N.S.(1969).Transactions Cost, Risk Aversion, and the Choice of Contractual Arrangements.Journal of Law and Economics,23
11. Coase, Ronald H.(1960).The Problem of Social Cost.Journal of Law and Economics,3(2),1-40.
12. Cooter, Robbert,Ulen, Thomas(2000).Law and Economics.Addison-Wesley.
13. Dawkns, Casey J.(2000).Transaction Costs and the Land Use Planning Process.Journal of Planning Literature,14(4)
14. Demsetz, Harold(1964).The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights.Journal of Law and Economics,11
15. Eggertsson, T.(1990).Economic Behavior and Institution.Cambridge University Press.
16. Ervin, David E.(1977).Land Use Control: Evaluating Economic and Political Effects.Ballinger Publishing Company.
17. Fischel, William A.(1985).The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Gilg, Andrew,Mike Kelley(1996).The Analysis of Development Control Decisions.Town Planning Review,67(2),203-228.
19. Katz, Lawrence,Kenneth Rosen(1987).The Interjurisdictional Effects of Growth Controls on Housing Prices.Journal of Law and Economics,30(1),147-160.
20. Keogh, G.,Evans, A.W.(1992).The Private and Social Costs of Planning Delay.Urban Studies,29(5),687-699.
21. Lai, Lawrence Wai-chung(1996).Zoning and Property Rights: A Hong Kong Case study.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.
22. Landis, John D.(1992).Do Growth Control Work? A New Assessment.Journal of the American Planning Association,58(4),489-508.
23. Masten, Scott E., (ed.)(1996).Case Studies in Contracting and Organization.New York:Oxford University Press.
24. Pogodzinski, J.M.,Tim R. Sass(1991).Measuring the Effects of Municipal Zoning Regulations: A Survey.Urban Studies,28(4),597-621.
25. Pogodzinski, J.M.,Tim R. Sass(1994).The Theory and Estimation of Endogenous Zoning.Regional Science and Urban Economics,23(5),601-630.
26. Preece, Roy(1990).Development Control Studies: Scientific Method and Policy Analysis.Town Planning Review,61(1),59-74.
27. Underwood, J.(1981).Development Control: A Review of Research and Current Issues.Progress in Planning 16
28. Williamson, Oliver E.(1985).The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting.New York:The Free Press.
29. Williamson, Oliver E.(1983).Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange.American Economic Review,73,519-540.
30. Williamson, Oliver E.(1991).Comparative Economic Organization: An Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives.Administrative Science Quarterly,36,269-296.
31. 台北市政府都市發展局(2000)。台北市都市計畫變更回饋制度規劃案。
32. 行政院經濟建設委員會(2000)。改進土地使用變更審議機制方案。
33. 吳彩珠(1995)。由內生性觀點探討土地使用分區管制之市場效應。規劃學報，22，149-169。
34. 吳彩珠(2001)。開發管制對土地開發決策影響之研究。第二屆地政學術研討會
35. 吳彩珠、林森田(1996)。內生性土地使用分區管制與地價關係之探討。土地經濟年刊，7，241-271。
36. 李永展、黃建勛(1995)。土地開發協商模式之探討。政大學報，71，107-141。
37. 林森田(1993)。土地開發許可制度之研究。行政院經建會住都處。
38. 洪維廷(1996)。國立政治大學地政研究所。
39. 徐忠賢(1992)。國立中興大學都市計劃研究所。
40. 國揚實業股份有限公司(1998)。南隆鋼鐵公司松山廠整體開發計畫規劃報告書。
41. 陳志偉(1998)。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
42. 陳佳聰(1994)。淡江大學建築研究所。
43. 陳麗紅(1991)。國科會專題計畫國科會專題計畫,未出版
44. 陳麗紅(1992)。國科會專題計畫國科會專題計畫,未出版
45. 陳麗紅(1992)。國科會專題計畫國科會專題計畫,未出版
46. 彭子浩、吳彩珠(2001)。土地開發交易成本之初探。2001年全國土地管理與開發學術研討會
47. 楊松齡(1998)。土地使用變更利益回饋本質之探討。現代地政，17(6)，11-16。
48. 邊泰明(1994)。國科會專題計畫國科會專題計畫,未出版
49. 邊泰明(1996)。國科會專題計畫國科會專題計畫,未出版
50. 邊泰明(1994)。土地使用變更與財產權配置。土地經濟年刊，5，189-212。

1. 胡海豐(2010)。交易成本分析法的操作性問題：以土地使用變更制度的經濟效率性比較為例。建築與規劃學報，11(2)，89-110。